or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 41 comments are related to an article called:

The England Shirt Controversy.

Page 2 of 2

posted on 22/3/24

comment by The God Fowler (U2538)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by fridgeboy (U1053)
posted 2 hours, 14 minutes ago
I quite like the fact that it's annoying the meathead brigade. It's just a tiny flag on the back of the neckline. It's not a new thing. There have been loads of kits that have subtle nods to inclusion and frankly, who is dumb enough to oppose that?

It's such a non-issue that you just knew the army of porkheads were going to bring the burning torches to the debate.

It's not for me but I imagine if I were someone that might have been ostracised from my community in any way, a tiny symbol from the football world that suggested I would be welcome is nothing but a good thing. Shame on those that say otherwise.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Perhaps it is because people are just sick of all this absolute forced inclusion crap. If the people, and by people I mean deranged fascists who just shout rather than have a conversation, that have taken over the LGB movement (and set it back decades for what they rightly fought for) don't like a countries flag, or need it to be changed so their delusions, they should seek help. Flags should not be desecrated in any way.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"a countries flag"

Why are you desecrating our language?

Why do you despise the Saxon Genitive, which has been a part of English grammar for centuries?

posted on 22/3/24

comment by Jalisco Red - And It Was All Diallo (U4195)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by The God Fowler (U2538)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by fridgeboy (U1053)
posted 2 hours, 14 minutes ago
I quite like the fact that it's annoying the meathead brigade. It's just a tiny flag on the back of the neckline. It's not a new thing. There have been loads of kits that have subtle nods to inclusion and frankly, who is dumb enough to oppose that?

It's such a non-issue that you just knew the army of porkheads were going to bring the burning torches to the debate.

It's not for me but I imagine if I were someone that might have been ostracised from my community in any way, a tiny symbol from the football world that suggested I would be welcome is nothing but a good thing. Shame on those that say otherwise.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Perhaps it is because people are just sick of all this absolute forced inclusion crap. If the people, and by people I mean deranged fascists who just shout rather than have a conversation, that have taken over the LGB movement (and set it back decades for what they rightly fought for) don't like a countries flag, or need it to be changed so their delusions, they should seek help. Flags should not be desecrated in any way.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"a countries flag"

Why are you desecrating our language?

Why do you despise the Saxon Genitive, which has been a part of English grammar for centuries?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘

posted on 22/3/24

Hang on. Is the flag not about diversity and inclusion? I assumed it was but it seems it’s connected to 66.

posted on 22/3/24

comment by fridgeboy (U1053)
posted 6 minutes ago
Hang on. Is the flag not about diversity and inclusion? I assumed it was but it seems it’s connected to 66.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, it’d to do with the training colours of the 1966 squad, so basically a homage.

posted on 22/3/24

comment by Automatic For The People (U21889)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by fridgeboy (U1053)
posted 6 minutes ago
Hang on. Is the flag not about diversity and inclusion? I assumed it was but it seems it’s connected to 66.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, it’d to do with the training colours of the 1966 squad, so basically a homage.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Clearly a lot of homagephobics around

posted on 22/3/24

comment by Jalisco Red - And It Was All Diallo (U4195)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Automatic For The People (U21889)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by fridgeboy (U1053)
posted 6 minutes ago
Hang on. Is the flag not about diversity and inclusion? I assumed it was but it seems it’s connected to 66.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, it’d to do with the training colours of the 1966 squad, so basically a homage.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Clearly a lot of homagephobics around
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not in a homageneous population

posted on 22/3/24

comment by Automatic For The People (U21889)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by fridgeboy (U1053)
posted 6 minutes ago
Hang on. Is the flag not about diversity and inclusion? I assumed it was but it seems it’s connected to 66.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, it’d to do with the training colours of the 1966 squad, so basically a homage.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Holy shiiiit! Then disregard my defence of diversity and inclusion.

So many people online have said it is an inclusion flag, I just believed it. Even if it was I'd defend it to the hilt but it just goes to show how disinformation spreads on Twitter.

posted on 22/3/24

comment by fridgeboy (U1053)
posted 27 minutes ago
comment by Automatic For The People (U21889)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by fridgeboy (U1053)
posted 6 minutes ago
Hang on. Is the flag not about diversity and inclusion? I assumed it was but it seems it’s connected to 66.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, it’d to do with the training colours of the 1966 squad, so basically a homage.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Holy shiiiit! Then disregard my defence of diversity and inclusion.

So many people online have said it is an inclusion flag, I just believed it. Even if it was I'd defend it to the hilt but it just goes to show how disinformation spreads on Twitter.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

posted on 22/3/24

comment by Pun Atreides (U21588)
posted 1 hour, 22 minutes ago
comment by Jalisco Red - And It Was All Diallo (U4195)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Automatic For The People (U21889)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by fridgeboy (U1053)
posted 6 minutes ago
Hang on. Is the flag not about diversity and inclusion? I assumed it was but it seems it’s connected to 66.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, it’d to do with the training colours of the 1966 squad, so basically a homage.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Clearly a lot of homagephobics around
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not in a homageneous population
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think they're just triggered by homagerotic content

posted on 22/3/24

comment by Bãleศ™ left boot (U22081)
posted 1 hour, 20 minutes ago
comment by Pun Atreides (U21588)
posted 1 hour, 22 minutes ago
comment by Jalisco Red - And It Was All Diallo (U4195)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Automatic For The People (U21889)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by fridgeboy (U1053)
posted 6 minutes ago
Hang on. Is the flag not about diversity and inclusion? I assumed it was but it seems it’s connected to 66.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, it’d to do with the training colours of the 1966 squad, so basically a homage.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Clearly a lot of homagephobics around
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not in a homageneous population
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think they're just triggered by homagerotic content
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What, homo sapiens?

comment by T-BAD (U11806)

posted on 22/3/24

Snowflakes getting offended by things like football kits. Bet Nike are just laughing that no-one is talking about the price of them thanks to the gammon brigade.

comment by Bumble (U6465)

posted on 23/3/24

Don't buy it. Hit the embarrassing virtue signaling woke useless FA where it hurts most. Even the meaning behind it is laughable but they expect gullible brainwashed punters to just accept it.

Hit them in the wallet.

posted on 23/3/24

You'd have to be a bit special to pay £125 for an England shirt anyway. AliExpress it and get the best of both worlds

posted on 23/3/24

Well yes, if you’re gonna be mad at anything, it should be the price!

posted on 24/3/24

comment by Bumble (U6465)
posted 14 hours, 17 minutes ago
Don't buy it. Hit the embarrassing virtue signaling woke useless FA where it hurts most. Even the meaning behind it is laughable but they expect gullible brainwashed punters to just accept it.

Hit them in the wallet.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

posted on 25/3/24

comment by Bumble (U6465)
posted 2 days, 5 hours ago
Don't buy it. Hit the embarrassing virtue signaling woke useless FA where it hurts most. Even the meaning behind it is laughable but they expect gullible brainwashed punters to just accept it.

Hit them in the wallet.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

If your intention was to help anyone struggling with the definition of irony, well done

Page 2 of 2

Sign in if you want to comment