City won't get charged with anything for a year or more and probably nothing at all. The thing is, unlike Forest and Everton they've not released honest accounts and they're determined to keep up the charade that the shell company sponsors etc was all legit. Which means actual criminal law proceedings to prove that they're lying before the football people can even get involved. And they'll tie it up with very expensive lawyers for as long as possible.
Dunno where you're getting this idea that Spurs are anywhere close to being in trouble with this though. We're literally one of the most secure clubs on that basis. Look here
https://www.givemesport.com/premier-league-psr-tracker-every-clubs-ffp-status/
The point is....those figures you quote may ALL be wrong.
Nobody really understands the full implications of the FFP rules because they have not been investigated...i.e., the rules have consequences for what costs can be counted, and nobody knows the full extent. Never yet been litigated in court.
THAT is why they are going to change the rules!!!
Don't read too much into the crap these clickbait sites churn out - Especially when it's written by 'Football experts' no one has heard of and you struggle to find on google.
comment by JustCallMeTed (U21528)
posted 2 hours, 39 minutes ago
The point is....those figures you quote may ALL be wrong.
Nobody really understands the full implications of the FFP rules because they have not been investigated...i.e., the rules have consequences for what costs can be counted, and nobody knows the full extent. Never yet been litigated in court.
THAT is why they are going to change the rules!!!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You clearly do not understand the rules so are in no position to demand they change.
Ted, reading your posts gives me the same feeling that reading my dad's posts on Facebook gives me. I wish I could say that was a good thing.
comment by SpursBoy101 (U21819)
posted 3 minutes ago
Ted, reading your posts gives me the same feeling that reading my dad's posts on Facebook gives me. I wish I could say that was a good thing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by SpursBoy101 (U21819)
posted 3 minutes ago
Ted, reading your posts gives me the same feeling that reading my dad's posts on Facebook gives me. I wish I could say that was a good thing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
comment by Phenom (U20037)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by SpursBoy101 (U21819)
posted 3 minutes ago
Ted, reading your posts gives me the same feeling that reading my dad's posts on Facebook gives me. I wish I could say that was a good thing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
comment by Bãleș left boot (U22081)
posted 5 hours, 24 minutes ago
City won't get charged with anything for a year or more and probably nothing at all. The thing is, unlike Forest and Everton they've not released honest accounts and they're determined to keep up the charade that the shell company sponsors etc was all legit. Which means actual criminal law proceedings to prove that they're lying before the football people can even get involved. And they'll tie it up with very expensive lawyers for as long as possible.
Dunno where you're getting this idea that Spurs are anywhere close to being in trouble with this though. We're literally one of the most secure clubs on that basis. Look here
https://www.givemesport.com/premier-league-psr-tracker-every-clubs-ffp-status/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you read the article, it states Etihads accounts would all be open to the public if they go onto the stock market, which includes the City owners.
They’d be fecked.
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Bãleș left boot (U22081)
posted 5 hours, 24 minutes ago
City won't get charged with anything for a year or more and probably nothing at all. The thing is, unlike Forest and Everton they've not released honest accounts and they're determined to keep up the charade that the shell company sponsors etc was all legit. Which means actual criminal law proceedings to prove that they're lying before the football people can even get involved. And they'll tie it up with very expensive lawyers for as long as possible.
Dunno where you're getting this idea that Spurs are anywhere close to being in trouble with this though. We're literally one of the most secure clubs on that basis. Look here
https://www.givemesport.com/premier-league-psr-tracker-every-clubs-ffp-status/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you read the article, it states Etihads accounts would all be open to the public if they go onto the stock market, which includes the City owners.
They’d be fecked.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Unless they've had time to prepare for the IPO and make sure nothing embarrassing will be discovered?
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by Bãleș left boot (U22081)
posted 5 hours, 24 minutes ago
City won't get charged with anything for a year or more and probably nothing at all. The thing is, unlike Forest and Everton they've not released honest accounts and they're determined to keep up the charade that the shell company sponsors etc was all legit. Which means actual criminal law proceedings to prove that they're lying before the football people can even get involved. And they'll tie it up with very expensive lawyers for as long as possible.
Dunno where you're getting this idea that Spurs are anywhere close to being in trouble with this though. We're literally one of the most secure clubs on that basis. Look here
https://www.givemesport.com/premier-league-psr-tracker-every-clubs-ffp-status/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you read the article, it states Etihads accounts would all be open to the public if they go onto the stock market, which includes the City owners.
They’d be fecked.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah but that's like your GF giving you notice that tomorrow she's going to be checking your search history. Delete delete delete!
Etihad had a turnover of £5bn last year, do you honestly think they would cook the books knowing they’ll be forensically analysed by some of the biggest financial companies in the World?
I could never imagine the UAE partaking in fraud and corruption.
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 21 minutes ago
I could never imagine the UAE partaking in fraud and corruption.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Simply inconceivable.
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 35 minutes ago
I could never imagine the UAE partaking in fraud and corruption.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Like Liverpool hacking other clubs databases?
Beyond belief
comment by Mamba the Chief Disinformation Officer on JA60... (U1282)
posted 5 hours, 2 minutes ago
comment by Phenom (U20037)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by SpursBoy101 (U21819)
posted 3 minutes ago
Ted, reading your posts gives me the same feeling that reading my dad's posts on Facebook gives me. I wish I could say that was a good thing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 6 hours, 18 minutes ago
comment by JustCallMeTed (U21528)
posted 2 hours, 39 minutes ago
The point is....those figures you quote may ALL be wrong.
Nobody really understands the full implications of the FFP rules because they have not been investigated...i.e., the rules have consequences for what costs can be counted, and nobody knows the full extent. Never yet been litigated in court.
THAT is why they are going to change the rules!!!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You clearly do not understand the rules so are in no position to demand they change.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I am not demanding they change. FA says they will be changed next year.
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 5 hours, 59 minutes ago
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 35 minutes ago
I could never imagine the UAE partaking in fraud and corruption.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Like Liverpool hacking other clubs databases?
Beyond belief
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Didn't Fergie get left off a speeding ticket once on a technicality. It's disgraceful and comparable with breaking the financial rules of a multi billion pound industry and then covering it up under a mountain of lawyers.
comment by SpursBoy101 (U21819)
posted 11 hours, 19 minutes ago
Ted, reading your posts gives me the same feeling that reading my dad's posts on Facebook gives me. I wish I could say that was a good thing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your Dad was obviously a great guy....too bad you don't take after him!
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 1 day, 5 hours ago
comment by Bãleș left boot (U22081)
posted 5 hours, 24 minutes ago
City won't get charged with anything for a year or more and probably nothing at all. The thing is, unlike Forest and Everton they've not released honest accounts and they're determined to keep up the charade that the shell company sponsors etc was all legit. Which means actual criminal law proceedings to prove that they're lying before the football people can even get involved. And they'll tie it up with very expensive lawyers for as long as possible.
Dunno where you're getting this idea that Spurs are anywhere close to being in trouble with this though. We're literally one of the most secure clubs on that basis. Look here
https://www.givemesport.com/premier-league-psr-tracker-every-clubs-ffp-status/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you read the article, it states Etihads accounts would all be open to the public if they go onto the stock market, which includes the City owners.
They’d be fecked.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eh? Includes the City owners what?
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
This FFP stuff is Ridiculous!
Page 1 of 1
posted on 27/3/24
City won't get charged with anything for a year or more and probably nothing at all. The thing is, unlike Forest and Everton they've not released honest accounts and they're determined to keep up the charade that the shell company sponsors etc was all legit. Which means actual criminal law proceedings to prove that they're lying before the football people can even get involved. And they'll tie it up with very expensive lawyers for as long as possible.
Dunno where you're getting this idea that Spurs are anywhere close to being in trouble with this though. We're literally one of the most secure clubs on that basis. Look here
https://www.givemesport.com/premier-league-psr-tracker-every-clubs-ffp-status/
posted on 27/3/24
The point is....those figures you quote may ALL be wrong.
Nobody really understands the full implications of the FFP rules because they have not been investigated...i.e., the rules have consequences for what costs can be counted, and nobody knows the full extent. Never yet been litigated in court.
THAT is why they are going to change the rules!!!
posted on 27/3/24
Don't read too much into the crap these clickbait sites churn out - Especially when it's written by 'Football experts' no one has heard of and you struggle to find on google.
posted on 27/3/24
comment by JustCallMeTed (U21528)
posted 2 hours, 39 minutes ago
The point is....those figures you quote may ALL be wrong.
Nobody really understands the full implications of the FFP rules because they have not been investigated...i.e., the rules have consequences for what costs can be counted, and nobody knows the full extent. Never yet been litigated in court.
THAT is why they are going to change the rules!!!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You clearly do not understand the rules so are in no position to demand they change.
posted on 27/3/24
Ted, reading your posts gives me the same feeling that reading my dad's posts on Facebook gives me. I wish I could say that was a good thing.
posted on 27/3/24
comment by SpursBoy101 (U21819)
posted 3 minutes ago
Ted, reading your posts gives me the same feeling that reading my dad's posts on Facebook gives me. I wish I could say that was a good thing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 27/3/24
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by SpursBoy101 (U21819)
posted 3 minutes ago
Ted, reading your posts gives me the same feeling that reading my dad's posts on Facebook gives me. I wish I could say that was a good thing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 27/3/24
comment by Phenom (U20037)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by SpursBoy101 (U21819)
posted 3 minutes ago
Ted, reading your posts gives me the same feeling that reading my dad's posts on Facebook gives me. I wish I could say that was a good thing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 27/3/24
Stop wetting the bed Ted
posted on 27/3/24
comment by Bãleș left boot (U22081)
posted 5 hours, 24 minutes ago
City won't get charged with anything for a year or more and probably nothing at all. The thing is, unlike Forest and Everton they've not released honest accounts and they're determined to keep up the charade that the shell company sponsors etc was all legit. Which means actual criminal law proceedings to prove that they're lying before the football people can even get involved. And they'll tie it up with very expensive lawyers for as long as possible.
Dunno where you're getting this idea that Spurs are anywhere close to being in trouble with this though. We're literally one of the most secure clubs on that basis. Look here
https://www.givemesport.com/premier-league-psr-tracker-every-clubs-ffp-status/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you read the article, it states Etihads accounts would all be open to the public if they go onto the stock market, which includes the City owners.
They’d be fecked.
posted on 27/3/24
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Bãleș left boot (U22081)
posted 5 hours, 24 minutes ago
City won't get charged with anything for a year or more and probably nothing at all. The thing is, unlike Forest and Everton they've not released honest accounts and they're determined to keep up the charade that the shell company sponsors etc was all legit. Which means actual criminal law proceedings to prove that they're lying before the football people can even get involved. And they'll tie it up with very expensive lawyers for as long as possible.
Dunno where you're getting this idea that Spurs are anywhere close to being in trouble with this though. We're literally one of the most secure clubs on that basis. Look here
https://www.givemesport.com/premier-league-psr-tracker-every-clubs-ffp-status/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you read the article, it states Etihads accounts would all be open to the public if they go onto the stock market, which includes the City owners.
They’d be fecked.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Unless they've had time to prepare for the IPO and make sure nothing embarrassing will be discovered?
posted on 27/3/24
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by Bãleș left boot (U22081)
posted 5 hours, 24 minutes ago
City won't get charged with anything for a year or more and probably nothing at all. The thing is, unlike Forest and Everton they've not released honest accounts and they're determined to keep up the charade that the shell company sponsors etc was all legit. Which means actual criminal law proceedings to prove that they're lying before the football people can even get involved. And they'll tie it up with very expensive lawyers for as long as possible.
Dunno where you're getting this idea that Spurs are anywhere close to being in trouble with this though. We're literally one of the most secure clubs on that basis. Look here
https://www.givemesport.com/premier-league-psr-tracker-every-clubs-ffp-status/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you read the article, it states Etihads accounts would all be open to the public if they go onto the stock market, which includes the City owners.
They’d be fecked.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah but that's like your GF giving you notice that tomorrow she's going to be checking your search history. Delete delete delete!
posted on 27/3/24
Etihad had a turnover of £5bn last year, do you honestly think they would cook the books knowing they’ll be forensically analysed by some of the biggest financial companies in the World?
posted on 27/3/24
I could never imagine the UAE partaking in fraud and corruption.
posted on 27/3/24
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 21 minutes ago
I could never imagine the UAE partaking in fraud and corruption.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Simply inconceivable.
posted on 27/3/24
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 35 minutes ago
I could never imagine the UAE partaking in fraud and corruption.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Like Liverpool hacking other clubs databases?
Beyond belief
posted on 27/3/24
comment by Mamba the Chief Disinformation Officer on JA60... (U1282)
posted 5 hours, 2 minutes ago
comment by Phenom (U20037)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by SpursBoy101 (U21819)
posted 3 minutes ago
Ted, reading your posts gives me the same feeling that reading my dad's posts on Facebook gives me. I wish I could say that was a good thing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 27/3/24
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 6 hours, 18 minutes ago
comment by JustCallMeTed (U21528)
posted 2 hours, 39 minutes ago
The point is....those figures you quote may ALL be wrong.
Nobody really understands the full implications of the FFP rules because they have not been investigated...i.e., the rules have consequences for what costs can be counted, and nobody knows the full extent. Never yet been litigated in court.
THAT is why they are going to change the rules!!!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You clearly do not understand the rules so are in no position to demand they change.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I am not demanding they change. FA says they will be changed next year.
posted on 27/3/24
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 5 hours, 59 minutes ago
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 35 minutes ago
I could never imagine the UAE partaking in fraud and corruption.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Like Liverpool hacking other clubs databases?
Beyond belief
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Didn't Fergie get left off a speeding ticket once on a technicality. It's disgraceful and comparable with breaking the financial rules of a multi billion pound industry and then covering it up under a mountain of lawyers.
posted on 27/3/24
comment by SpursBoy101 (U21819)
posted 11 hours, 19 minutes ago
Ted, reading your posts gives me the same feeling that reading my dad's posts on Facebook gives me. I wish I could say that was a good thing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your Dad was obviously a great guy....too bad you don't take after him!
posted on 28/3/24
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 1 day, 5 hours ago
comment by Bãleș left boot (U22081)
posted 5 hours, 24 minutes ago
City won't get charged with anything for a year or more and probably nothing at all. The thing is, unlike Forest and Everton they've not released honest accounts and they're determined to keep up the charade that the shell company sponsors etc was all legit. Which means actual criminal law proceedings to prove that they're lying before the football people can even get involved. And they'll tie it up with very expensive lawyers for as long as possible.
Dunno where you're getting this idea that Spurs are anywhere close to being in trouble with this though. We're literally one of the most secure clubs on that basis. Look here
https://www.givemesport.com/premier-league-psr-tracker-every-clubs-ffp-status/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you read the article, it states Etihads accounts would all be open to the public if they go onto the stock market, which includes the City owners.
They’d be fecked.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eh? Includes the City owners what?
Page 1 of 1