Had to do a quick read up on the rules there

If Tav scores the penalty, it would have been retaken because of the encroachment

Because Tav missed the penalty, it's an indirect free kick to Hibs

Fck sake Tav....at least he made up for it

comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted less than a minute ago
Had to do a quick read up on the rules there

If Tav scores the penalty, it would have been retaken because of the encroachment

Because Tav missed the penalty, it's an indirect free kick to Hibs

Fck sake Tav....at least he made up for it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What if Hibs player encroaches first

comment by super phoenix rangers - comments on this forum... (U14864)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted less than a minute ago
Had to do a quick read up on the rules there

If Tav scores the penalty, it would have been retaken because of the encroachment

Because Tav missed the penalty, it's an indirect free kick to Hibs

Fck sake Tav....at least he made up for it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What if Hibs player encroaches first
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Retake if Tav misses.....goal stands if he scores

comment by super phoenix rangers - comments on this forum are not mine but a fictionalised version loosely based on someone similar to me (U14864)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted less than a minute ago
Had to do a quick read up on the rules there

If Tav scores the penalty, it would have been retaken because of the encroachment

Because Tav missed the penalty, it's an indirect free kick to Hibs

Fck sake Tav....at least he made up for it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What if Hibs player encroaches first
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Retake if it’s both teams regardless if penalty is scored or missed

If it's both an attacker and a defender encroaching...it should be retaken regardless.....so there's an argument for that

Imagine that happens to them, at their ground...with Dallas on VAR

Oooft

Seen a still of it.

Think the decision is correct. Bushiri not in the box

comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 2 minutes ago
If it's both an attacker and a defender encroaching...it should be retaken regardless.....so there's an argument for that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't think so, defender never touched the ball

comment by I'm not as think as you drunk I am.......... (U2115)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 2 minutes ago
If it's both an attacker and a defender encroaching...it should be retaken regardless.....so there's an argument for that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't think so, defender never touched the ball
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not about touching the ball, it's about players encroaching into the penalty area before the kick is taken

comment by I'm not as think as you drunk I am.......... (U2115)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 2 minutes ago
If it's both an attacker and a defender encroaching...it should be retaken regardless.....so there's an argument for that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't think so, defender never touched the ball
----------------------------------------------------------------------
encroachment isn't about making contact

Unbelievable ref...ffs

Great defending by the ref

Ref is having a bit of a mad one

Just read there that it should have been a retake as Hibs players clearly in the d.

Well we scored shortly after so wasn't costly but, that's embarrassing they got that wrong. Especially after the time they took

Another VAR calamity and the ref himself has lost the plot with some of these decisions

comment by super phoenix rangers - comments on this forum are not mine but a fictionalised version loosely based on someone similar to me (U14864)
posted about a minute ago
Well we scored shortly after so wasn't costly but, that's embarrassing they got that wrong. Especially after the time they took
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can’t tell how costly it is until the end surely

Looks a lot costlier already

Poor poor goal to give away

Lundstram sleeping there

Oops.

Anyway, another pen for Rangers and a red card for Hibs.

Don’t worry so much Bears.

Refs having a mare here ffs

Embarrassing stuff from the officials

Yaaas

Get in!