Thought it was a clear pen and it’s given at the other end ……if kicking the ball away at the height of their head isn’t dangerous I don’t know what is

Still deserved nothing from the game though so even at the time I was indifferent as I am now but doesn’t alter the fact it was a pen

comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 14 minutes ago
Thought it was a clear pen and it’s given at the other end ……if kicking the ball away at the height of their head isn’t dangerous I don’t know what is

Still deserved nothing from the game though so even at the time I was indifferent as I am now but doesn’t alter the fact it was a pen
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And also the fact that Liverpool's pen was more blatant and less debatable.

comment by Hengy (U9129)
posted 3 hours, 6 minutes ago
He cleared the ball. You’re never getting pens for that.

Same way if a striker does a bicycle kick he doesn’t get done for a high foot
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I actually thought it was a pen until I read your comment. Its a very good point!

comment by Thorgen Kloppinson (U1282)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 14 minutes ago
Thought it was a clear pen and it’s given at the other end ……if kicking the ball away at the height of their head isn’t dangerous I don’t know what is

Still deserved nothing from the game though so even at the time I was indifferent as I am now but doesn’t alter the fact it was a pen
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And also the fact that Liverpool's pen was more blatant and less debatable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
More blatant because Gakpo did an inward tuck triple reverse and pike landing.

comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson (U1282)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 14 minutes ago
Thought it was a clear pen and it’s given at the other end ……if kicking the ball away at the height of their head isn’t dangerous I don’t know what is

Still deserved nothing from the game though so even at the time I was indifferent as I am now but doesn’t alter the fact it was a pen
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And also the fact that Liverpool's pen was more blatant and less debatable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
More blatant because Gakpo did an inward tuck triple reverse and pike landing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Still far more of a pen than what Spurs fans are moaning about here. How can anyone moan after that not being given against them? Havertz would have got it for sure.

comment by Thorgen Kloppinson (U1282)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 14 minutes ago
Thought it was a clear pen and it’s given at the other end ……if kicking the ball away at the height of their head isn’t dangerous I don’t know what is

Still deserved nothing from the game though so even at the time I was indifferent as I am now but doesn’t alter the fact it was a pen
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And also the fact that Liverpool's pen was more blatant and less debatable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
😂 was that the dive one ?

You will have your scarf on and I’ll have mine

The spurs penalty was very very blatant …..you boys cried when your man got kicked in the chest

Johnson , if braver , would have had his teeth kicked out

comment by Thorgen Kloppinson (U1282)
posted 1 hour, 47 minutes ago
comment by Bats Uncensored (U18355)
posted 1 hour, 29 minutes ago
It was a clear cut penalty. I think VAR were swayed by Gary Neville’s commentary
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What about Gakpo getting brought down in the area? Neville said he was looking for it and went down easy.

If that was Havertz it would be a 100% nailed on pen.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It wasn’t a pen and neither was that Havertz one. But yea if the Havertz one is given then the Gakpo one should have too

comment by Bats Uncensored (U18355)
posted 56 seconds ago
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson (U1282)
posted 1 hour, 47 minutes ago
comment by Bats Uncensored (U18355)
posted 1 hour, 29 minutes ago
It was a clear cut penalty. I think VAR were swayed by Gary Neville’s commentary
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What about Gakpo getting brought down in the area? Neville said he was looking for it and went down easy.

If that was Havertz it would be a 100% nailed on pen.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It wasn’t a pen and neither was that Havertz one. But yea if the Havertz one is given then the Gakpo one should have too
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course it shouldn't be a pen but in today's game the way it's reffed that's blatant.

If anything, havertz' was slightly more convincing than gakpo' effort.

comment by junction8 (U1074)
posted 16 seconds ago
If anything, havertz' was slightly more convincing than gakpo' effort.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No way.

The Gakpo one was a definte pen.

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 3 minutes ago
The Gakpo one was a definte pen.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Took out his standing leg ffs.

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 3 hours, 9 minutes ago
The Gakpo one was a definite dive.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fixed