You’re not the first for that, once again that was my beloved club Spurs 3 seasons ago. We played Brighton at home, Tariq Lamptey hacked Hojbjerg in the build up for a goal. Ref didn’t give it and was sent to the monitor - he was at the monitor for about 2 mins, despite it being as clear as faaacking day.
Came back and upheld the goal. So we beat you to that one.
The handball yesterday was ridiculous though and felt like they wanted to give Arsenal a little consolation.
100% handball if that’s what you’re referring to.
Richard Masters Guest of Honour too.
Good performance from Everton, deserved the draw, we didn't show up.
Clear handball, not sure why Oliver of all people decided to give it, he's normally happy to screw us over
First club to ban Mark Goldbridge
And no reason was even given by the club
comment by 115 reasons why ours is better (U22832)
posted 3 minutes ago
First club to ban Mark Goldbridge
And no reason was even given by the club
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Brent di Ceasre, Prince of Plastics deserves to be universally banned
comment by 115 reasons why ours is better (U22832)
posted 15 minutes ago
First club to ban Mark Goldbridge
And no reason was even given by the club
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tbf the club are unlikely to come out and say that it’s because he’s a massive cuuuuuunt, are they?
I thought it was an excellent decision and refreshing.
That should never have been sent for review by VAR.
comment by 115 reasons why ours is better (U22832)
posted 52 minutes ago
First club to ban Mark Goldbridge
And no reason was even given by the club
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Man is a plank, spews bike… banned
If that goal had been important they would not have let it stand, I’m certain of that.
But as it was, it affected nothing and therefore no one really cares other than Everton.
I thought Everton played well - I’ve been saying on here for a few weeks now that Dyche isn’t getting the credit he deserves, he has performed superbly given everything that has gone on and the squad at his disposal. I get people don’t like the style, but I’m not sure there is another manager out there currently who could have done the job he has done at Everton
It was a clear handball yesterday. His arm was down but he ran towards the ball and controlled it with his arm. It wasn't ball to hand, or arm in this case.
comment by Striketeam7 - Laughing at Arsenals nearly slaaaags (U18109)
posted 4 hours, 48 minutes ago
If that goal had been important they would not have let it stand, I’m certain of that.
But as it was, it affected nothing and therefore no one really cares other than Everton.
I thought Everton played well - I’ve been saying on here for a few weeks now that Dyche isn’t getting the credit he deserves, he has performed superbly given everything that has gone on and the squad at his disposal. I get people don’t like the style, but I’m not sure there is another manager out there currently who could have done the job he has done at Everton
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well the psychological bonus of a higher league finish and more cash…but yeah, let’s just let it slide.
comment by Edbo (U17933)
posted 3 hours, 58 minutes ago
It was a clear handball yesterday. His arm was down but he ran towards the ball and controlled it with his arm. It wasn't ball to hand, or arm in this case.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't agree at all.
He was trying to keep his arm down and evade the challenge - didn't look any deliberate nature to it at all.
Should never have been picked up by VAR.
Deliberate or not, it came off his arm and Arsenal gained an advantage which lead to a goal.
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 14 minutes ago
Deliberate or not, it came off his arm and Arsenal gained an advantage which lead to a goal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So?
That's not the law, is it.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 14 minutes ago
Deliberate or not, it came off his arm and Arsenal gained an advantage which lead to a goal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So?
That's not the law, is it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well it is.
I use the penalty that Grealish conceded at Wembley last season as a benchmark now.
Not facing the ball, was being challenged by an opposing player when it happened, took a lengthy VAR check to decide it brushed his fingertip.
Presumbly you think Soucek's goal against City should have stood yesterday?
No it isn't, Boris.
You can try and bring other examples into it all you like, but what you've said is categorically incorrect.
Do you think Maradonna was unduly criticised in 1986?
You spelt 'I was wrong' incorrectly.
The second change is on accidental handball in the immediate build-up to a goal.
If an attacking player’s accidental handball immediately precedes another player scoring, the goal will now be awarded, when last season it was likely to have been ruled out.
However, a player will still be penalised if he commits an accidental handball immediately before scoring himself.
-------------------------------------------------------
That's the rule.
The question is was the handball by Jesus deliberate?
Most definately
What are you going on about?
You post something from the laws and then ask a question that has nothing to do with it.
There are two questions:
1. Did the ball hitting the hand immediately precede another play scoring?
Answer: No.
2. Was the handball deliberate?
I don't think it was.
You originally claimed that if the player gains an advantage from the ball hitting his hand, then it's an infringement. Which is completely wrong.
So an infield decision says no handball, same level of Ref in VAR room advises a check. Inconsistency here is the issue.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 5 hours, 8 minutes ago
What are you going on about?
You post something from the laws and then ask a question that has nothing to do with it.
There are two questions:
1. Did the ball hitting the hand immediately precede another play scoring?
Answer: No.
2. Was the handball deliberate?
I don't think it was.
You originally claimed that if the player gains an advantage from the ball hitting his hand, then it's an infringement. Which is completely wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've addressed the fact that the rules have changed but the more I look at the replays, the more I think it was deliberate.
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 5 hours, 8 minutes ago
What are you going on about?
You post something from the laws and then ask a question that has nothing to do with it.
There are two questions:
1. Did the ball hitting the hand immediately precede another play scoring?
Answer: No.
2. Was the handball deliberate?
I don't think it was.
You originally claimed that if the player gains an advantage from the ball hitting his hand, then it's an infringement. Which is completely wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've addressed the fact that the rules have changed but the more I look at the replays, the more I think it was deliberate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No you haven’t.
Also, the rules were never as you claimed.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 5 hours, 8 minutes ago
What are you going on about?
You post something from the laws and then ask a question that has nothing to do with it.
There are two questions:
1. Did the ball hitting the hand immediately precede another play scoring?
Answer: No.
2. Was the handball deliberate?
I don't think it was.
You originally claimed that if the player gains an advantage from the ball hitting his hand, then it's an infringement. Which is completely wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've addressed the fact that the rules have changed but the more I look at the replays, the more I think it was deliberate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No you haven’t.
Also, the rules were never as you claimed.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They were changed in 2021.
https://www.premierleague.com/news/2204759
Sign in if you want to comment
PL Firsts.
Page 1 of 2
posted on 20/5/24
You’re not the first for that, once again that was my beloved club Spurs 3 seasons ago. We played Brighton at home, Tariq Lamptey hacked Hojbjerg in the build up for a goal. Ref didn’t give it and was sent to the monitor - he was at the monitor for about 2 mins, despite it being as clear as faaacking day.
Came back and upheld the goal. So we beat you to that one.
The handball yesterday was ridiculous though and felt like they wanted to give Arsenal a little consolation.
posted on 20/5/24
100% handball if that’s what you’re referring to.
Richard Masters Guest of Honour too.
posted on 20/5/24
Good performance from Everton, deserved the draw, we didn't show up.
Clear handball, not sure why Oliver of all people decided to give it, he's normally happy to screw us over
posted on 20/5/24
First club to ban Mark Goldbridge
And no reason was even given by the club
posted on 20/5/24
comment by 115 reasons why ours is better (U22832)
posted 3 minutes ago
First club to ban Mark Goldbridge
And no reason was even given by the club
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Brent di Ceasre, Prince of Plastics deserves to be universally banned
posted on 20/5/24
comment by 115 reasons why ours is better (U22832)
posted 15 minutes ago
First club to ban Mark Goldbridge
And no reason was even given by the club
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tbf the club are unlikely to come out and say that it’s because he’s a massive cuuuuuunt, are they?
posted on 20/5/24
I thought it was an excellent decision and refreshing.
That should never have been sent for review by VAR.
posted on 20/5/24
comment by 115 reasons why ours is better (U22832)
posted 52 minutes ago
First club to ban Mark Goldbridge
And no reason was even given by the club
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Man is a plank, spews bike… banned
posted on 20/5/24
‘Bile’
posted on 20/5/24
If that goal had been important they would not have let it stand, I’m certain of that.
But as it was, it affected nothing and therefore no one really cares other than Everton.
I thought Everton played well - I’ve been saying on here for a few weeks now that Dyche isn’t getting the credit he deserves, he has performed superbly given everything that has gone on and the squad at his disposal. I get people don’t like the style, but I’m not sure there is another manager out there currently who could have done the job he has done at Everton
posted on 20/5/24
It was a clear handball yesterday. His arm was down but he ran towards the ball and controlled it with his arm. It wasn't ball to hand, or arm in this case.
posted on 20/5/24
comment by Striketeam7 - Laughing at Arsenals nearly slaaaags (U18109)
posted 4 hours, 48 minutes ago
If that goal had been important they would not have let it stand, I’m certain of that.
But as it was, it affected nothing and therefore no one really cares other than Everton.
I thought Everton played well - I’ve been saying on here for a few weeks now that Dyche isn’t getting the credit he deserves, he has performed superbly given everything that has gone on and the squad at his disposal. I get people don’t like the style, but I’m not sure there is another manager out there currently who could have done the job he has done at Everton
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well the psychological bonus of a higher league finish and more cash…but yeah, let’s just let it slide.
posted on 20/5/24
comment by Edbo (U17933)
posted 3 hours, 58 minutes ago
It was a clear handball yesterday. His arm was down but he ran towards the ball and controlled it with his arm. It wasn't ball to hand, or arm in this case.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't agree at all.
He was trying to keep his arm down and evade the challenge - didn't look any deliberate nature to it at all.
Should never have been picked up by VAR.
posted on 20/5/24
Deliberate or not, it came off his arm and Arsenal gained an advantage which lead to a goal.
posted on 20/5/24
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 14 minutes ago
Deliberate or not, it came off his arm and Arsenal gained an advantage which lead to a goal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So?
That's not the law, is it.
posted on 20/5/24
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 14 minutes ago
Deliberate or not, it came off his arm and Arsenal gained an advantage which lead to a goal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So?
That's not the law, is it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well it is.
I use the penalty that Grealish conceded at Wembley last season as a benchmark now.
Not facing the ball, was being challenged by an opposing player when it happened, took a lengthy VAR check to decide it brushed his fingertip.
Presumbly you think Soucek's goal against City should have stood yesterday?
posted on 20/5/24
No it isn't, Boris.
You can try and bring other examples into it all you like, but what you've said is categorically incorrect.
posted on 20/5/24
Do you think Maradonna was unduly criticised in 1986?
posted on 20/5/24
You spelt 'I was wrong' incorrectly.
posted on 20/5/24
The second change is on accidental handball in the immediate build-up to a goal.
If an attacking player’s accidental handball immediately precedes another player scoring, the goal will now be awarded, when last season it was likely to have been ruled out.
However, a player will still be penalised if he commits an accidental handball immediately before scoring himself.
-------------------------------------------------------
That's the rule.
The question is was the handball by Jesus deliberate?
Most definately
posted on 20/5/24
What are you going on about?
You post something from the laws and then ask a question that has nothing to do with it.
There are two questions:
1. Did the ball hitting the hand immediately precede another play scoring?
Answer: No.
2. Was the handball deliberate?
I don't think it was.
You originally claimed that if the player gains an advantage from the ball hitting his hand, then it's an infringement. Which is completely wrong.
posted on 20/5/24
So an infield decision says no handball, same level of Ref in VAR room advises a check. Inconsistency here is the issue.
posted on 20/5/24
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 5 hours, 8 minutes ago
What are you going on about?
You post something from the laws and then ask a question that has nothing to do with it.
There are two questions:
1. Did the ball hitting the hand immediately precede another play scoring?
Answer: No.
2. Was the handball deliberate?
I don't think it was.
You originally claimed that if the player gains an advantage from the ball hitting his hand, then it's an infringement. Which is completely wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've addressed the fact that the rules have changed but the more I look at the replays, the more I think it was deliberate.
posted on 20/5/24
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 5 hours, 8 minutes ago
What are you going on about?
You post something from the laws and then ask a question that has nothing to do with it.
There are two questions:
1. Did the ball hitting the hand immediately precede another play scoring?
Answer: No.
2. Was the handball deliberate?
I don't think it was.
You originally claimed that if the player gains an advantage from the ball hitting his hand, then it's an infringement. Which is completely wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've addressed the fact that the rules have changed but the more I look at the replays, the more I think it was deliberate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No you haven’t.
Also, the rules were never as you claimed.
posted on 20/5/24
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 5 hours, 8 minutes ago
What are you going on about?
You post something from the laws and then ask a question that has nothing to do with it.
There are two questions:
1. Did the ball hitting the hand immediately precede another play scoring?
Answer: No.
2. Was the handball deliberate?
I don't think it was.
You originally claimed that if the player gains an advantage from the ball hitting his hand, then it's an infringement. Which is completely wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've addressed the fact that the rules have changed but the more I look at the replays, the more I think it was deliberate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No you haven’t.
Also, the rules were never as you claimed.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They were changed in 2021.
https://www.premierleague.com/news/2204759
Page 1 of 2