comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody (U6374)
posted 44 seconds ago
Are Liverpool fans happy with this arrangement?
———————
Nope. You’ll not see some blind defence from me where I dogmatically stick to defending the money men at the cost of my integrity.
What kind of person would do that?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Someone who hasn’t been able to access all the details yet?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah, that kind of person. Hasn’t got a fvcking clue what they’re on about but staunchly sticks to a polarised defensive view point based on little more than being partizan. They’d look a right fvcking idiot.
comment by Fred: Mamba Worships at the Altar of Winston (U3979)
posted 51 minutes ago
Is this the stupid take in the history of JA606?
LFC would have had absolutely zero knowledge of anything of this nature going on. LFC and Standard Chartered are two entirely separate entities connected by a simple sponsorship agreement.
We aren’t like City, faking sponsorship deals where the owners of the sponsor and the club are the fvcking same.
If there’s any truth in the rumours, I’d expect the sponsorship to be removed and replaced with another entirely separate sponsor. It’s how legitimate clubs, unlike Manchester City, do business.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s been going for years, don’t people at your club read the news?
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Fred: Mamba Worships at the Altar of Winston (U3979)
posted 51 minutes ago
Is this the stupid take in the history of JA606?
LFC would have had absolutely zero knowledge of anything of this nature going on. LFC and Standard Chartered are two entirely separate entities connected by a simple sponsorship agreement.
We aren’t like City, faking sponsorship deals where the owners of the sponsor and the club are the fvcking same.
If there’s any truth in the rumours, I’d expect the sponsorship to be removed and replaced with another entirely separate sponsor. It’s how legitimate clubs, unlike Manchester City, do business.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s been going for years, don’t people at your club read the news?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
comment by Michael Edwards FC 2.0 loading…{Proud owner of the 5 000 000th comment} (U2720)
Standard Chartered providing funding for social activists in their fight against western imperialism…sorry democracy
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Love a good underdog narrative, helping the Global South break from Western hegemony
Can’t wait to see Arne and the boys in their ‘CSB are Good People’ t shirts
Boris
Go on then, what should the club be doing about this?
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 3 minutes ago
Boris
Go on then, what should the club be doing about this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If they strongly believe in their innocence then stick with them
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 4 minutes ago
Boris
Go on then, what should the club be doing about this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They should launch a legal attack on the PL, stating that not being able to be funded by sponsors accused of terrorism is unfair.
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 4 minutes ago
Boris
Go on then, what should the club be doing about this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They should launch a legal attack on the PL, stating that not being able to be funded by sponsors accused of terrorism is unfair.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Terrorists are people who need banking services too, Term.
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 4 minutes ago
Boris
Go on then, what should the club be doing about this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They should launch a legal attack on the PL, stating that not being able to be funded by sponsors accused of terrorism is unfair.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Using the Courinho money to pay for top lawyers?
yes klopp has been directing terrorist groups across the world
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 4 minutes ago
Boris
Go on then, what should the club be doing about this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They should launch a legal attack on the PL, stating that not being able to be funded by sponsors accused of terrorism is unfair.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Using the Courinho money to pay for top lawyers?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re having a bit of a bad morning aren’t you, Boris.
Comment deleted by Article Creator
Deleted by accident Fields, post it again 👍
comment by Fred: Mamba Worships at the Altar of Winston (U3979)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 4 minutes ago
Boris
Go on then, what should the club be doing about this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They should launch a legal attack on the PL, stating that not being able to be funded by sponsors accused of terrorism is unfair.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Using the Courinho money to pay for top lawyers?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re having a bit of a bad morning aren’t you, Boris.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, I meant Coutinho
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Fred: Mamba Worships at the Altar of Winston (U3979)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 4 minutes ago
Boris
Go on then, what should the club be doing about this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They should launch a legal attack on the PL, stating that not being able to be funded by sponsors accused of terrorism is unfair.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Using the Courinho money to pay for top lawyers?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re having a bit of a bad morning aren’t you, Boris.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, I meant Coutinho
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh now it makes sense....
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 54 minutes ago
Deleted by accident Fields, post it again 👍
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hmm
It was just asking what's the point of the article except for whataboutery and false equivalence?
Nothing has been proven against SCB. If we tried to break ties or do anything based on these rumours they'd absolutely sue our pants off to kingdom come.
They have to be found liable for something before we can act. There is a chance we can act if their reputation is so tarnished so much so that we can prove it's negatively affecting the club.
None of the above will ever happen, but if it does I'm sure the club will take action.
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 hour, 33 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 54 minutes ago
Deleted by accident Fields, post it again 👍
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hmm
It was just asking what's the point of the article except for whataboutery and false equivalence?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s a totally different topic that was a major news story yesterday, should no one talk about it?
Everybody knows what the point of the article is though. We just wanted to see if you'd admit it.
comment by The greatest thing that ever happened to human... (U1282)
posted 9 minutes ago
Everybody knows what the point of the article is though. We just wanted to see if you'd admit it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The point is mentioned in the OP
It’s hilarious how often City have been mentioned though despite having no involvement in the matter
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 33 minutes ago
comment by The greatest thing that ever happened to human... (U1282)
posted 9 minutes ago
Everybody knows what the point of the article is though. We just wanted to see if you'd admit it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The point is mentioned in the OP
It’s hilarious how often City have been mentioned though despite having no involvement in the matter
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah, that’s because of who wrote the article.
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 32 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 hour, 33 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 54 minutes ago
Deleted by accident Fields, post it again 👍
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hmm
It was just asking what's the point of the article except for whataboutery and false equivalence?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s a totally different topic that was a major news story yesterday, should no one talk about it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So just whataboutery and false equivalence then, cool
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 32 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 hour, 33 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 54 minutes ago
Deleted by accident Fields, post it again 👍
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hmm
It was just asking what's the point of the article except for whataboutery and false equivalence?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s a totally different topic that was a major news story yesterday, should no one talk about it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So just whataboutery and false equivalence then, cool
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wouldn't I have to be offsetting one subject against another for it to be false equivalence?
Unless my browser's on the blink, I can only see one topic both in my OP and answers.
Incredibly desperate article.
Sign in if you want to comment
Standard Chartered Bank - LFC
Page 3 of 6
6
posted on 5/6/24
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody (U6374)
posted 44 seconds ago
Are Liverpool fans happy with this arrangement?
———————
Nope. You’ll not see some blind defence from me where I dogmatically stick to defending the money men at the cost of my integrity.
What kind of person would do that?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Someone who hasn’t been able to access all the details yet?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah, that kind of person. Hasn’t got a fvcking clue what they’re on about but staunchly sticks to a polarised defensive view point based on little more than being partizan. They’d look a right fvcking idiot.
posted on 5/6/24
comment by Fred: Mamba Worships at the Altar of Winston (U3979)
posted 51 minutes ago
Is this the stupid take in the history of JA606?
LFC would have had absolutely zero knowledge of anything of this nature going on. LFC and Standard Chartered are two entirely separate entities connected by a simple sponsorship agreement.
We aren’t like City, faking sponsorship deals where the owners of the sponsor and the club are the fvcking same.
If there’s any truth in the rumours, I’d expect the sponsorship to be removed and replaced with another entirely separate sponsor. It’s how legitimate clubs, unlike Manchester City, do business.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s been going for years, don’t people at your club read the news?
posted on 5/6/24
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Fred: Mamba Worships at the Altar of Winston (U3979)
posted 51 minutes ago
Is this the stupid take in the history of JA606?
LFC would have had absolutely zero knowledge of anything of this nature going on. LFC and Standard Chartered are two entirely separate entities connected by a simple sponsorship agreement.
We aren’t like City, faking sponsorship deals where the owners of the sponsor and the club are the fvcking same.
If there’s any truth in the rumours, I’d expect the sponsorship to be removed and replaced with another entirely separate sponsor. It’s how legitimate clubs, unlike Manchester City, do business.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s been going for years, don’t people at your club read the news?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 5/6/24
comment by Michael Edwards FC 2.0 loading…{Proud owner of the 5 000 000th comment} (U2720)
Standard Chartered providing funding for social activists in their fight against western imperialism…sorry democracy
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Love a good underdog narrative, helping the Global South break from Western hegemony
posted on 5/6/24
Can’t wait to see Arne and the boys in their ‘CSB are Good People’ t shirts
posted on 5/6/24
Boris
Go on then, what should the club be doing about this?
posted on 5/6/24
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 3 minutes ago
Boris
Go on then, what should the club be doing about this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If they strongly believe in their innocence then stick with them
posted on 5/6/24
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 4 minutes ago
Boris
Go on then, what should the club be doing about this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They should launch a legal attack on the PL, stating that not being able to be funded by sponsors accused of terrorism is unfair.
posted on 5/6/24
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 4 minutes ago
Boris
Go on then, what should the club be doing about this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They should launch a legal attack on the PL, stating that not being able to be funded by sponsors accused of terrorism is unfair.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Terrorists are people who need banking services too, Term.
posted on 5/6/24
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 4 minutes ago
Boris
Go on then, what should the club be doing about this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They should launch a legal attack on the PL, stating that not being able to be funded by sponsors accused of terrorism is unfair.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Using the Courinho money to pay for top lawyers?
posted on 5/6/24
yes klopp has been directing terrorist groups across the world
posted on 5/6/24
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 4 minutes ago
Boris
Go on then, what should the club be doing about this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They should launch a legal attack on the PL, stating that not being able to be funded by sponsors accused of terrorism is unfair.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Using the Courinho money to pay for top lawyers?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re having a bit of a bad morning aren’t you, Boris.
posted on 5/6/24
Comment deleted by Article Creator
posted on 5/6/24
Deleted by accident Fields, post it again 👍
posted on 5/6/24
comment by Fred: Mamba Worships at the Altar of Winston (U3979)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 4 minutes ago
Boris
Go on then, what should the club be doing about this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They should launch a legal attack on the PL, stating that not being able to be funded by sponsors accused of terrorism is unfair.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Using the Courinho money to pay for top lawyers?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re having a bit of a bad morning aren’t you, Boris.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, I meant Coutinho
posted on 5/6/24
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Fred: Mamba Worships at the Altar of Winston (U3979)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 4 minutes ago
Boris
Go on then, what should the club be doing about this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They should launch a legal attack on the PL, stating that not being able to be funded by sponsors accused of terrorism is unfair.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Using the Courinho money to pay for top lawyers?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re having a bit of a bad morning aren’t you, Boris.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, I meant Coutinho
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh now it makes sense....
posted on 5/6/24
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 54 minutes ago
Deleted by accident Fields, post it again 👍
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hmm
It was just asking what's the point of the article except for whataboutery and false equivalence?
posted on 5/6/24
Nothing has been proven against SCB. If we tried to break ties or do anything based on these rumours they'd absolutely sue our pants off to kingdom come.
They have to be found liable for something before we can act. There is a chance we can act if their reputation is so tarnished so much so that we can prove it's negatively affecting the club.
None of the above will ever happen, but if it does I'm sure the club will take action.
posted on 5/6/24
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 hour, 33 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 54 minutes ago
Deleted by accident Fields, post it again 👍
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hmm
It was just asking what's the point of the article except for whataboutery and false equivalence?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s a totally different topic that was a major news story yesterday, should no one talk about it?
posted on 5/6/24
Everybody knows what the point of the article is though. We just wanted to see if you'd admit it.
posted on 5/6/24
comment by The greatest thing that ever happened to human... (U1282)
posted 9 minutes ago
Everybody knows what the point of the article is though. We just wanted to see if you'd admit it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The point is mentioned in the OP
It’s hilarious how often City have been mentioned though despite having no involvement in the matter
posted on 5/6/24
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 33 minutes ago
comment by The greatest thing that ever happened to human... (U1282)
posted 9 minutes ago
Everybody knows what the point of the article is though. We just wanted to see if you'd admit it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The point is mentioned in the OP
It’s hilarious how often City have been mentioned though despite having no involvement in the matter
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah, that’s because of who wrote the article.
posted on 5/6/24
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 32 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 hour, 33 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 54 minutes ago
Deleted by accident Fields, post it again 👍
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hmm
It was just asking what's the point of the article except for whataboutery and false equivalence?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s a totally different topic that was a major news story yesterday, should no one talk about it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So just whataboutery and false equivalence then, cool
posted on 5/6/24
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 32 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 hour, 33 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 54 minutes ago
Deleted by accident Fields, post it again 👍
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hmm
It was just asking what's the point of the article except for whataboutery and false equivalence?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s a totally different topic that was a major news story yesterday, should no one talk about it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So just whataboutery and false equivalence then, cool
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wouldn't I have to be offsetting one subject against another for it to be false equivalence?
Unless my browser's on the blink, I can only see one topic both in my OP and answers.
posted on 5/6/24
Incredibly desperate article.
Page 3 of 6
6