comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 23 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 32 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 hour, 33 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 54 minutes ago
Deleted by accident Fields, post it again 👍
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hmm
It was just asking what's the point of the article except for whataboutery and false equivalence?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s a totally different topic that was a major news story yesterday, should no one talk about it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So just whataboutery and false equivalence then, cool
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wouldn't I have to be offsetting one subject against another for it to be false equivalence?
Unless my browser's on the blink, I can only see one topic both in my OP and answers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes this is clearly completely unrelated to the City timing. You say this has been going on for 10 years (“Does the club read the news?&rdquo but choose the day that city sue the PL so they can break the rules even more than they do as the time to bring this up.
Good job.
comment by Fred: Mamba Worships at the Altar of Winston (U3979)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 23 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 32 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 hour, 33 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 54 minutes ago
Deleted by accident Fields, post it again 👍
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hmm
It was just asking what's the point of the article except for whataboutery and false equivalence?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s a totally different topic that was a major news story yesterday, should no one talk about it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So just whataboutery and false equivalence then, cool
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wouldn't I have to be offsetting one subject against another for it to be false equivalence?
Unless my browser's on the blink, I can only see one topic both in my OP and answers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes this is clearly completely unrelated to the City timing. You say this has been going on for 10 years (“Does the club read the news?&rdquobut choose the day that city sue the PL so they can break the rules even more than they do as the time to bring this up.
Good job.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Daily Mail article was published yesterday:
Published: 17:27, 4 June 2024 | Updated: 18:21, 4 June 2024
Do you think I have editorial control over it?
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by Fred: Mamba Worships at the Altar of Winston (U3979)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 23 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 32 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 hour, 33 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 54 minutes ago
Deleted by accident Fields, post it again 👍
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hmm
It was just asking what's the point of the article except for whataboutery and false equivalence?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s a totally different topic that was a major news story yesterday, should no one talk about it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So just whataboutery and false equivalence then, cool
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wouldn't I have to be offsetting one subject against another for it to be false equivalence?
Unless my browser's on the blink, I can only see one topic both in my OP and answers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes this is clearly completely unrelated to the City timing. You say this has been going on for 10 years (“Does the club read the news?&rdquobut choose the day that city sue the PL so they can break the rules even more than they do as the time to bring this up.
Good job.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Daily Mail article was published yesterday:
Published: 17:27, 4 June 2024 | Updated: 18:21, 4 June 2024
Do you think I have editorial control over it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You still knew about it for over 10 years and didn't bother until City got charged.
comment by The greatest thing that ever happened to human... (U1282)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by Fred: Mamba Worships at the Altar of Winston (U3979)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 23 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 32 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 hour, 33 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 54 minutes ago
Deleted by accident Fields, post it again 👍
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hmm
It was just asking what's the point of the article except for whataboutery and false equivalence?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s a totally different topic that was a major news story yesterday, should no one talk about it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So just whataboutery and false equivalence then, cool
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wouldn't I have to be offsetting one subject against another for it to be false equivalence?
Unless my browser's on the blink, I can only see one topic both in my OP and answers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes this is clearly completely unrelated to the City timing. You say this has been going on for 10 years (“Does the club read the news?&rdquobut choose the day that city sue the PL so they can break the rules even more than they do as the time to bring this up.
Good job.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Daily Mail article was published yesterday:
Published: 17:27, 4 June 2024 | Updated: 18:21, 4 June 2024
Do you think I have editorial control over it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You still knew about it for over 10 years and didn't bother until City got charged.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've mentioned the money laundering charges several times over the last few years on here.
The specific accusations about Terror Groups only came to light yesterday.
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by The greatest thing that ever happened to human... (U1282)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by Fred: Mamba Worships at the Altar of Winston (U3979)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 23 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 32 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 hour, 33 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 54 minutes ago
Deleted by accident Fields, post it again 👍
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hmm
It was just asking what's the point of the article except for whataboutery and false equivalence?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s a totally different topic that was a major news story yesterday, should no one talk about it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So just whataboutery and false equivalence then, cool
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wouldn't I have to be offsetting one subject against another for it to be false equivalence?
Unless my browser's on the blink, I can only see one topic both in my OP and answers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes this is clearly completely unrelated to the City timing. You say this has been going on for 10 years (“Does the club read the news?&rdquobut choose the day that city sue the PL so they can break the rules even more than they do as the time to bring this up.
Good job.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Daily Mail article was published yesterday:
Published: 17:27, 4 June 2024 | Updated: 18:21, 4 June 2024
Do you think I have editorial control over it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You still knew about it for over 10 years and didn't bother until City got charged.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've mentioned the money laundering charges several times over the last few years on here.
The specific accusations about Terror Groups only came to light yesterday.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was you that said it had been going on a long time. Now you're saying it all started yesterday?
comment by The greatest thing that ever happened to humankind (U1282)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by The greatest thing that ever happened to human... (U1282)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by Fred: Mamba Worships at the Altar of Winston (U3979)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 23 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 32 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 hour, 33 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 54 minutes ago
Deleted by accident Fields, post it again 👍
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hmm
It was just asking what's the point of the article except for whataboutery and false equivalence?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s a totally different topic that was a major news story yesterday, should no one talk about it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So just whataboutery and false equivalence then, cool
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wouldn't I have to be offsetting one subject against another for it to be false equivalence?
Unless my browser's on the blink, I can only see one topic both in my OP and answers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes this is clearly completely unrelated to the City timing. You say this has been going on for 10 years (“Does the club read the news?&rdquobut choose the day that city sue the PL so they can break the rules even more than they do as the time to bring this up.
Good job.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Daily Mail article was published yesterday:
Published: 17:27, 4 June 2024 | Updated: 18:21, 4 June 2024
Do you think I have editorial control over it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You still knew about it for over 10 years and didn't bother until City got charged.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've mentioned the money laundering charges several times over the last few years on here.
The specific accusations about Terror Groups only came to light yesterday.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was you that said it had been going on a long time. Now you're saying it all started yesterday?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Backed right into a corner here!
comment by The greatest thing that ever happened to human... (U1282)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by The greatest thing that ever happened to human... (U1282)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by Fred: Mamba Worships at the Altar of Winston (U3979)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 23 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 32 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 hour, 33 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 54 minutes ago
Deleted by accident Fields, post it again 👍
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hmm
It was just asking what's the point of the article except for whataboutery and false equivalence?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s a totally different topic that was a major news story yesterday, should no one talk about it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So just whataboutery and false equivalence then, cool
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wouldn't I have to be offsetting one subject against another for it to be false equivalence?
Unless my browser's on the blink, I can only see one topic both in my OP and answers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes this is clearly completely unrelated to the City timing. You say this has been going on for 10 years (“Does the club read the news?&rdquobut choose the day that city sue the PL so they can break the rules even more than they do as the time to bring this up.
Good job.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Daily Mail article was published yesterday:
Published: 17:27, 4 June 2024 | Updated: 18:21, 4 June 2024
Do you think I have editorial control over it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You still knew about it for over 10 years and didn't bother until City got charged.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've mentioned the money laundering charges several times over the last few years on here.
The specific accusations about Terror Groups only came to light yesterday.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was you that said it had been going on a long time. Now you're saying it all started yesterday?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, the money laundering accusations have been around for over a decade. The laundering money for terror groups factor appeared yesterday.
Is your concept of time compromised in some way?
Put it on the Standard Chartered Board
https://www.ja606.co.uk/pages/rules/
Nothing here saying it's taboo to be critical of Liverpool's main sponsor.
The tyranny of the majority continues!
comment by Robbing Hoody (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
The tyranny of the majority continues!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The tyranny of the majority (or tyranny of the masses) is an inherent weakness to majority rule in which the majority of an electorate pursues exclusively its own objectives at the expense of those of the minority factions.
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 44 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
The tyranny of the majority continues!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The tyranny of the majority (or tyranny of the masses) is an inherent weakness to majority rule in which the majority of an electorate pursues exclusively its own objectives at the expense of those who want to make up their own rules
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fixed that for ya bud
Still don't know what the club have supposedly donewromg as a result of the allegations against SC.
Nice little distraction for Boris who was firefighting on about 4 other articles about City.
Guilty by association innit.
It’s no different to how City are responsible for an appalling human rights record to be fair.
comment by Robbing Hoody - I want to play by my own rules and if I can’t I’ll sue you (U6374)
posted 27 seconds ago
Guilty by association innit.
It’s no different to how City are responsible for an appalling human rights record to be fair.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I expect Sheikh Mansour to issue personal apologies every time Etihad planes land late.
The previous charges against SCB were about helping Iran, violating sanctions or something like that iirc. They didn't expressly state supporting terrorism but this isn't exactly far removed from the initial charges.
Looks like SCB were fined for that initial offense and I'm surprised Boris didn't make an article to inform us when it happened.
comment by Robbing Hoody - I want to play by my own rules... (U6374)
posted 40 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 44 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
The tyranny of the majority continues!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The tyranny of the majority (or tyranny of the masses) is an inherent weakness to majority rule in which the majority of an electorate pursues exclusively its own objectives at the expense of those who want to make up their own rules
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fixed that for ya bud
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You confirmed you're an indolent lackwit.
Not for the first time either.
"In 2012, HSBC agreed to pay $1.9 billion and to submit to years of heightened scrutiny after the authorities found that the bank had helped Mexican drug cartels launder money. In 2014, the French bank BNP Paribas paid a record sum of nearly $9 billion and pleaded guilty for violating American sanctions against Sudan and other countries. And two years ago, Deutsche Bank was fined $630 million for helping Russian investors secretly move $10 billion through branches in London, Moscow and New York."
To be fair, these corporates can be disgusting at times.
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 36 minutes ago
Still don't know what the club have supposedly donewromg as a result of the allegations against SC.
Nice little distraction for Boris who was firefighting on about 4 other articles about City.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Filtered off one, about 6/7 comments spread across 2 others, not even read the 4th.
comment by The greatest thing that ever happened to human... (U1282)
posted 3 minutes ago
The previous charges against SCB were about helping Iran, violating sanctions or something like that iirc. They didn't expressly state supporting terrorism but this isn't exactly far removed from the initial charges.
Looks like SCB were fined for that initial offense and I'm surprised Boris didn't make an article to inform us when it happened.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not as surprised as me
comment by The greatest thing that ever happened to humankind (U1282)
posted 7 minutes ago
"In 2012, HSBC agreed to pay $1.9 billion and to submit to years of heightened scrutiny after the authorities found that the bank had helped Mexican drug cartels launder money. In 2014, the French bank BNP Paribas paid a record sum of nearly $9 billion and pleaded guilty for violating American sanctions against Sudan and other countries. And two years ago, Deutsche Bank was fined $630 million for helping Russian investors secretly move $10 billion through branches in London, Moscow and New York."
To be fair, these corporates can be disgusting at times.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKCN1VF0VR/
Abu Dhabi's state owned (Dep' PM Sheikh Mansour) fined $55m for market manipulation.
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 18 seconds ago
comment by The greatest thing that ever happened to humankind (U1282)
posted 7 minutes ago
"In 2012, HSBC agreed to pay $1.9 billion and to submit to years of heightened scrutiny after the authorities found that the bank had helped Mexican drug cartels launder money. In 2014, the French bank BNP Paribas paid a record sum of nearly $9 billion and pleaded guilty for violating American sanctions against Sudan and other countries. And two years ago, Deutsche Bank was fined $630 million for helping Russian investors secretly move $10 billion through branches in London, Moscow and New York."
To be fair, these corporates can be disgusting at times.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKCN1VF0VR/
Abu Dhabi's state owned (Dep' PM Sheikh Mansour) fined $55m for market manipulation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah, those chaps are even worse than the corporates.
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 29 seconds ago
comment by The greatest thing that ever happened to humankind (U1282)
posted 7 minutes ago
"In 2012, HSBC agreed to pay $1.9 billion and to submit to years of heightened scrutiny after the authorities found that the bank had helped Mexican drug cartels launder money. In 2014, the French bank BNP Paribas paid a record sum of nearly $9 billion and pleaded guilty for violating American sanctions against Sudan and other countries. And two years ago, Deutsche Bank was fined $630 million for helping Russian investors secretly move $10 billion through branches in London, Moscow and New York."
To be fair, these corporates can be disgusting at times.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKCN1VF0VR/
Abu Dhabi's state owned (Dep' PM Sheikh Mansour) fined $55m for market manipulation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
'False equivalence' and 'whataboutery' are the terms you used earlier despite me not even mentioning another Club.
I assume you're on the wum now, it's good to have fun though.
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 29 seconds ago
comment by The greatest thing that ever happened to humankind (U1282)
posted 7 minutes ago
"In 2012, HSBC agreed to pay $1.9 billion and to submit to years of heightened scrutiny after the authorities found that the bank had helped Mexican drug cartels launder money. In 2014, the French bank BNP Paribas paid a record sum of nearly $9 billion and pleaded guilty for violating American sanctions against Sudan and other countries. And two years ago, Deutsche Bank was fined $630 million for helping Russian investors secretly move $10 billion through branches in London, Moscow and New York."
To be fair, these corporates can be disgusting at times.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKCN1VF0VR/
Abu Dhabi's state owned (Dep' PM Sheikh Mansour) fined $55m for market manipulation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
'False equivalence' and 'whataboutery' are the terms you used earlier despite me not even mentioning another Club.
I assume you're on the wum now, it's good to have fun though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where did I mention another club?
It's of equal equivalence to the HSBC, BNP Paribas etc examples greatest thing.... posted
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 29 seconds ago
comment by The greatest thing that ever happened to humankind (U1282)
posted 7 minutes ago
"In 2012, HSBC agreed to pay $1.9 billion and to submit to years of heightened scrutiny after the authorities found that the bank had helped Mexican drug cartels launder money. In 2014, the French bank BNP Paribas paid a record sum of nearly $9 billion and pleaded guilty for violating American sanctions against Sudan and other countries. And two years ago, Deutsche Bank was fined $630 million for helping Russian investors secretly move $10 billion through branches in London, Moscow and New York."
To be fair, these corporates can be disgusting at times.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKCN1VF0VR/
Abu Dhabi's state owned (Dep' PM Sheikh Mansour) fined $55m for market manipulation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
'False equivalence' and 'whataboutery' are the terms you used earlier despite me not even mentioning another Club.
I assume you're on the wum now, it's good to have fun though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where did I mention another club?
It's of equal equivalence to the HSBC, BNP Paribas etc examples greatest thing.... posted
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You mentioned a person synonymous with owning another club, why did you pick him?
Liverpool's Chief Sponsors are in the dock here, try to stay on topic.
Sign in if you want to comment
Standard Chartered Bank - LFC
Page 4 of 6
6
posted on 5/6/24
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 23 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 32 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 hour, 33 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 54 minutes ago
Deleted by accident Fields, post it again 👍
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hmm
It was just asking what's the point of the article except for whataboutery and false equivalence?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s a totally different topic that was a major news story yesterday, should no one talk about it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So just whataboutery and false equivalence then, cool
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wouldn't I have to be offsetting one subject against another for it to be false equivalence?
Unless my browser's on the blink, I can only see one topic both in my OP and answers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes this is clearly completely unrelated to the City timing. You say this has been going on for 10 years (“Does the club read the news?&rdquo but choose the day that city sue the PL so they can break the rules even more than they do as the time to bring this up.
Good job.
posted on 5/6/24
comment by Fred: Mamba Worships at the Altar of Winston (U3979)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 23 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 32 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 hour, 33 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 54 minutes ago
Deleted by accident Fields, post it again 👍
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hmm
It was just asking what's the point of the article except for whataboutery and false equivalence?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s a totally different topic that was a major news story yesterday, should no one talk about it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So just whataboutery and false equivalence then, cool
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wouldn't I have to be offsetting one subject against another for it to be false equivalence?
Unless my browser's on the blink, I can only see one topic both in my OP and answers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes this is clearly completely unrelated to the City timing. You say this has been going on for 10 years (“Does the club read the news?&rdquobut choose the day that city sue the PL so they can break the rules even more than they do as the time to bring this up.
Good job.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Daily Mail article was published yesterday:
Published: 17:27, 4 June 2024 | Updated: 18:21, 4 June 2024
Do you think I have editorial control over it?
posted on 5/6/24
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by Fred: Mamba Worships at the Altar of Winston (U3979)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 23 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 32 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 hour, 33 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 54 minutes ago
Deleted by accident Fields, post it again 👍
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hmm
It was just asking what's the point of the article except for whataboutery and false equivalence?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s a totally different topic that was a major news story yesterday, should no one talk about it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So just whataboutery and false equivalence then, cool
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wouldn't I have to be offsetting one subject against another for it to be false equivalence?
Unless my browser's on the blink, I can only see one topic both in my OP and answers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes this is clearly completely unrelated to the City timing. You say this has been going on for 10 years (“Does the club read the news?&rdquobut choose the day that city sue the PL so they can break the rules even more than they do as the time to bring this up.
Good job.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Daily Mail article was published yesterday:
Published: 17:27, 4 June 2024 | Updated: 18:21, 4 June 2024
Do you think I have editorial control over it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You still knew about it for over 10 years and didn't bother until City got charged.
posted on 5/6/24
comment by The greatest thing that ever happened to human... (U1282)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by Fred: Mamba Worships at the Altar of Winston (U3979)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 23 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 32 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 hour, 33 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 54 minutes ago
Deleted by accident Fields, post it again 👍
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hmm
It was just asking what's the point of the article except for whataboutery and false equivalence?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s a totally different topic that was a major news story yesterday, should no one talk about it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So just whataboutery and false equivalence then, cool
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wouldn't I have to be offsetting one subject against another for it to be false equivalence?
Unless my browser's on the blink, I can only see one topic both in my OP and answers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes this is clearly completely unrelated to the City timing. You say this has been going on for 10 years (“Does the club read the news?&rdquobut choose the day that city sue the PL so they can break the rules even more than they do as the time to bring this up.
Good job.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Daily Mail article was published yesterday:
Published: 17:27, 4 June 2024 | Updated: 18:21, 4 June 2024
Do you think I have editorial control over it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You still knew about it for over 10 years and didn't bother until City got charged.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've mentioned the money laundering charges several times over the last few years on here.
The specific accusations about Terror Groups only came to light yesterday.
posted on 5/6/24
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by The greatest thing that ever happened to human... (U1282)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by Fred: Mamba Worships at the Altar of Winston (U3979)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 23 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 32 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 hour, 33 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 54 minutes ago
Deleted by accident Fields, post it again 👍
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hmm
It was just asking what's the point of the article except for whataboutery and false equivalence?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s a totally different topic that was a major news story yesterday, should no one talk about it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So just whataboutery and false equivalence then, cool
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wouldn't I have to be offsetting one subject against another for it to be false equivalence?
Unless my browser's on the blink, I can only see one topic both in my OP and answers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes this is clearly completely unrelated to the City timing. You say this has been going on for 10 years (“Does the club read the news?&rdquobut choose the day that city sue the PL so they can break the rules even more than they do as the time to bring this up.
Good job.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Daily Mail article was published yesterday:
Published: 17:27, 4 June 2024 | Updated: 18:21, 4 June 2024
Do you think I have editorial control over it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You still knew about it for over 10 years and didn't bother until City got charged.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've mentioned the money laundering charges several times over the last few years on here.
The specific accusations about Terror Groups only came to light yesterday.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was you that said it had been going on a long time. Now you're saying it all started yesterday?
posted on 5/6/24
comment by The greatest thing that ever happened to humankind (U1282)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by The greatest thing that ever happened to human... (U1282)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by Fred: Mamba Worships at the Altar of Winston (U3979)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 23 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 32 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 hour, 33 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 54 minutes ago
Deleted by accident Fields, post it again 👍
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hmm
It was just asking what's the point of the article except for whataboutery and false equivalence?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s a totally different topic that was a major news story yesterday, should no one talk about it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So just whataboutery and false equivalence then, cool
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wouldn't I have to be offsetting one subject against another for it to be false equivalence?
Unless my browser's on the blink, I can only see one topic both in my OP and answers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes this is clearly completely unrelated to the City timing. You say this has been going on for 10 years (“Does the club read the news?&rdquobut choose the day that city sue the PL so they can break the rules even more than they do as the time to bring this up.
Good job.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Daily Mail article was published yesterday:
Published: 17:27, 4 June 2024 | Updated: 18:21, 4 June 2024
Do you think I have editorial control over it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You still knew about it for over 10 years and didn't bother until City got charged.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've mentioned the money laundering charges several times over the last few years on here.
The specific accusations about Terror Groups only came to light yesterday.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was you that said it had been going on a long time. Now you're saying it all started yesterday?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Backed right into a corner here!
posted on 5/6/24
comment by The greatest thing that ever happened to human... (U1282)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by The greatest thing that ever happened to human... (U1282)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by Fred: Mamba Worships at the Altar of Winston (U3979)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 23 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 32 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 hour, 33 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 54 minutes ago
Deleted by accident Fields, post it again 👍
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hmm
It was just asking what's the point of the article except for whataboutery and false equivalence?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s a totally different topic that was a major news story yesterday, should no one talk about it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So just whataboutery and false equivalence then, cool
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wouldn't I have to be offsetting one subject against another for it to be false equivalence?
Unless my browser's on the blink, I can only see one topic both in my OP and answers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes this is clearly completely unrelated to the City timing. You say this has been going on for 10 years (“Does the club read the news?&rdquobut choose the day that city sue the PL so they can break the rules even more than they do as the time to bring this up.
Good job.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Daily Mail article was published yesterday:
Published: 17:27, 4 June 2024 | Updated: 18:21, 4 June 2024
Do you think I have editorial control over it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You still knew about it for over 10 years and didn't bother until City got charged.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've mentioned the money laundering charges several times over the last few years on here.
The specific accusations about Terror Groups only came to light yesterday.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was you that said it had been going on a long time. Now you're saying it all started yesterday?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, the money laundering accusations have been around for over a decade. The laundering money for terror groups factor appeared yesterday.
Is your concept of time compromised in some way?
posted on 5/6/24
Put it on the Standard Chartered Board
posted on 5/6/24
https://www.ja606.co.uk/pages/rules/
Nothing here saying it's taboo to be critical of Liverpool's main sponsor.
posted on 5/6/24
The tyranny of the majority continues!
posted on 5/6/24
comment by Robbing Hoody (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
The tyranny of the majority continues!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The tyranny of the majority (or tyranny of the masses) is an inherent weakness to majority rule in which the majority of an electorate pursues exclusively its own objectives at the expense of those of the minority factions.
posted on 5/6/24
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 44 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
The tyranny of the majority continues!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The tyranny of the majority (or tyranny of the masses) is an inherent weakness to majority rule in which the majority of an electorate pursues exclusively its own objectives at the expense of those who want to make up their own rules
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fixed that for ya bud
posted on 5/6/24
Still don't know what the club have supposedly donewromg as a result of the allegations against SC.
Nice little distraction for Boris who was firefighting on about 4 other articles about City.
posted on 5/6/24
Guilty by association innit.
It’s no different to how City are responsible for an appalling human rights record to be fair.
posted on 5/6/24
comment by Robbing Hoody - I want to play by my own rules and if I can’t I’ll sue you (U6374)
posted 27 seconds ago
Guilty by association innit.
It’s no different to how City are responsible for an appalling human rights record to be fair.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I expect Sheikh Mansour to issue personal apologies every time Etihad planes land late.
posted on 5/6/24
The previous charges against SCB were about helping Iran, violating sanctions or something like that iirc. They didn't expressly state supporting terrorism but this isn't exactly far removed from the initial charges.
Looks like SCB were fined for that initial offense and I'm surprised Boris didn't make an article to inform us when it happened.
posted on 5/6/24
comment by Robbing Hoody - I want to play by my own rules... (U6374)
posted 40 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 44 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
The tyranny of the majority continues!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The tyranny of the majority (or tyranny of the masses) is an inherent weakness to majority rule in which the majority of an electorate pursues exclusively its own objectives at the expense of those who want to make up their own rules
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fixed that for ya bud
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You confirmed you're an indolent lackwit.
Not for the first time either.
posted on 5/6/24
"In 2012, HSBC agreed to pay $1.9 billion and to submit to years of heightened scrutiny after the authorities found that the bank had helped Mexican drug cartels launder money. In 2014, the French bank BNP Paribas paid a record sum of nearly $9 billion and pleaded guilty for violating American sanctions against Sudan and other countries. And two years ago, Deutsche Bank was fined $630 million for helping Russian investors secretly move $10 billion through branches in London, Moscow and New York."
To be fair, these corporates can be disgusting at times.
posted on 5/6/24
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 36 minutes ago
Still don't know what the club have supposedly donewromg as a result of the allegations against SC.
Nice little distraction for Boris who was firefighting on about 4 other articles about City.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Filtered off one, about 6/7 comments spread across 2 others, not even read the 4th.
posted on 5/6/24
comment by The greatest thing that ever happened to human... (U1282)
posted 3 minutes ago
The previous charges against SCB were about helping Iran, violating sanctions or something like that iirc. They didn't expressly state supporting terrorism but this isn't exactly far removed from the initial charges.
Looks like SCB were fined for that initial offense and I'm surprised Boris didn't make an article to inform us when it happened.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not as surprised as me
posted on 5/6/24
comment by The greatest thing that ever happened to humankind (U1282)
posted 7 minutes ago
"In 2012, HSBC agreed to pay $1.9 billion and to submit to years of heightened scrutiny after the authorities found that the bank had helped Mexican drug cartels launder money. In 2014, the French bank BNP Paribas paid a record sum of nearly $9 billion and pleaded guilty for violating American sanctions against Sudan and other countries. And two years ago, Deutsche Bank was fined $630 million for helping Russian investors secretly move $10 billion through branches in London, Moscow and New York."
To be fair, these corporates can be disgusting at times.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKCN1VF0VR/
Abu Dhabi's state owned (Dep' PM Sheikh Mansour) fined $55m for market manipulation.
posted on 5/6/24
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 18 seconds ago
comment by The greatest thing that ever happened to humankind (U1282)
posted 7 minutes ago
"In 2012, HSBC agreed to pay $1.9 billion and to submit to years of heightened scrutiny after the authorities found that the bank had helped Mexican drug cartels launder money. In 2014, the French bank BNP Paribas paid a record sum of nearly $9 billion and pleaded guilty for violating American sanctions against Sudan and other countries. And two years ago, Deutsche Bank was fined $630 million for helping Russian investors secretly move $10 billion through branches in London, Moscow and New York."
To be fair, these corporates can be disgusting at times.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKCN1VF0VR/
Abu Dhabi's state owned (Dep' PM Sheikh Mansour) fined $55m for market manipulation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah, those chaps are even worse than the corporates.
posted on 5/6/24
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 29 seconds ago
comment by The greatest thing that ever happened to humankind (U1282)
posted 7 minutes ago
"In 2012, HSBC agreed to pay $1.9 billion and to submit to years of heightened scrutiny after the authorities found that the bank had helped Mexican drug cartels launder money. In 2014, the French bank BNP Paribas paid a record sum of nearly $9 billion and pleaded guilty for violating American sanctions against Sudan and other countries. And two years ago, Deutsche Bank was fined $630 million for helping Russian investors secretly move $10 billion through branches in London, Moscow and New York."
To be fair, these corporates can be disgusting at times.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKCN1VF0VR/
Abu Dhabi's state owned (Dep' PM Sheikh Mansour) fined $55m for market manipulation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
'False equivalence' and 'whataboutery' are the terms you used earlier despite me not even mentioning another Club.
I assume you're on the wum now, it's good to have fun though.
posted on 5/6/24
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 29 seconds ago
comment by The greatest thing that ever happened to humankind (U1282)
posted 7 minutes ago
"In 2012, HSBC agreed to pay $1.9 billion and to submit to years of heightened scrutiny after the authorities found that the bank had helped Mexican drug cartels launder money. In 2014, the French bank BNP Paribas paid a record sum of nearly $9 billion and pleaded guilty for violating American sanctions against Sudan and other countries. And two years ago, Deutsche Bank was fined $630 million for helping Russian investors secretly move $10 billion through branches in London, Moscow and New York."
To be fair, these corporates can be disgusting at times.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKCN1VF0VR/
Abu Dhabi's state owned (Dep' PM Sheikh Mansour) fined $55m for market manipulation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
'False equivalence' and 'whataboutery' are the terms you used earlier despite me not even mentioning another Club.
I assume you're on the wum now, it's good to have fun though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where did I mention another club?
It's of equal equivalence to the HSBC, BNP Paribas etc examples greatest thing.... posted
posted on 5/6/24
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 29 seconds ago
comment by The greatest thing that ever happened to humankind (U1282)
posted 7 minutes ago
"In 2012, HSBC agreed to pay $1.9 billion and to submit to years of heightened scrutiny after the authorities found that the bank had helped Mexican drug cartels launder money. In 2014, the French bank BNP Paribas paid a record sum of nearly $9 billion and pleaded guilty for violating American sanctions against Sudan and other countries. And two years ago, Deutsche Bank was fined $630 million for helping Russian investors secretly move $10 billion through branches in London, Moscow and New York."
To be fair, these corporates can be disgusting at times.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKCN1VF0VR/
Abu Dhabi's state owned (Dep' PM Sheikh Mansour) fined $55m for market manipulation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
'False equivalence' and 'whataboutery' are the terms you used earlier despite me not even mentioning another Club.
I assume you're on the wum now, it's good to have fun though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where did I mention another club?
It's of equal equivalence to the HSBC, BNP Paribas etc examples greatest thing.... posted
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You mentioned a person synonymous with owning another club, why did you pick him?
Liverpool's Chief Sponsors are in the dock here, try to stay on topic.
Page 4 of 6
6