We all know that OVER 90% of violent crimes are committed by men. We all KNOW this yet we are happy for 99% of the male population to run free? We all KNOW what males are capable of.
I was assessed by a doctor and he said I was 90% more likely to commit a violent crime compared to my female relative. There are millions more out there like me as well. Why are we letting us run the streets freely??
comment by John McGlashan (U1734)
posted 3 minutes ago
We all know that OVER 90% of violent crimes are committed by men. We all KNOW this yet we are happy for 99% of the male population to run free? We all KNOW what males are capable of.
I was assessed by a doctor and he said I was 90% more likely to commit a violent crime compared to my female relative. There are millions more out there like me as well. Why are we letting us run the streets freely??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tbf, everyone knows you should be locked up, Barry.
comment by RED666…Out on the “Right Wing” But not as far as Nige! (U6562)
posted 15 hours, 49 minutes ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted 39 minutes ago
comment by Insufferable-Piffle (U4388)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by Insufferable-Piffle (U4388)
posted 7 minutes ago
Not getting involved in the Barney here but I'd class myself as "Woke"and I would define it as being Socially aware, but Ive never really understood it being used as an insult if that's what's happening often now?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The right wing are really good at getting their stupid followers to parrot buzzwords they put out. This is just a latest in a long, long list.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Seems to be the case, found it confusing like it was an insult? Weird imo
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Godwin’s Second Law describes it perfectly.
https://x.com/sfmnemonic/status/1504687870006620163
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Better get my skies out at this rate!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You have more than one sky?
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 2 hours, 5 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Out on the “Right Wing” But not as far as Nige! (U6562)
posted 13 hours, 46 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 42 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Out on the “Right Wing” But not as far as Nige! (U6562)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Out on the “Right Wing” But not as far as Nige! (U6562)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 11 minutes ago
Red666 is the lad that denied Suella Braverman was a cause of the riots last week with her talk of 'invasion' re refugees and migrants, same with then PM Sunak and Rwanda.
He's one of those daft stick your fingers in your ears and pretemd it didn't happen Tories
----------------------------------------------------------------------
More misinformation!
You claimed that the Tories were to blame for the riots, In the end it seemed they were only a “contibuting factor”!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah the Home Secretary using the word invasion at the dispatch box was in no way to blame
I guess when RW racists posted the addresses online of 'LW solicitors' last week the PM using the phrase 'leftie lawyer' towards Starmer wasn't to blame.
Stick to the simple stuff, you know nothing about politics aside from childish name calling.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But you stated that they were to blame and now you’ve backtracked to that they were “a cause”!
Funny how name calling is only one way! You’re obviously happy dishing it out but not happy when it comes your way!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone loves a semantics bore.
You don't think the divisive language used by the Home Sec and PM in the HOC's is to blame (not solely) for the race riots?
You must be blind.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ve never said that you’re making stuff up again!
If you remember you threw you teddy well and truly out of the cot when I stated that it may have been a contibuting factor and not directly to blame!
And you’ve quite rightly recognised that by saying it was “a cause” which is clearly on part of the reason!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know you didn't say that, it was a question, hence this (?) at the end of the sentence.
No you didn't, that second paragraph is an outright lie
Facts are your Tory chums played as much part as the grifters Farage and Robinson have re the discourse on race and immigration in this country. Are you going to admit to wanting 5 more years of Tory demonization of migrants?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
“Out right lie”!? Ok lets see shall we Pinocchio!
Remember me saying this?
So the Tories were a “contibuting factor”! So therefore they’re are not directly to blame, thank you so much for clarifying that, it took a while coming but you got there in the end.
Yes! That was me saying they were a “contributing factor” after you were blaming them solely for the riots and don’t forget now that you’ve admitted they were “a cause”!
Yet again you’re spreading misinformation!
Will your Teddy go flying again?
comment by rosso says the time has come to unlock the unl... (U17054)
posted 3 hours, 35 minutes ago
comment by Sheriff JW Pepper (U1007)
posted 1 hour, 50 minutes ago
comment by Ras Clar Teta (U22980)
posted 1 minute ago
Stabbings of random people
Pull the Mental Health Card
Get sympathy instead of castration
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Get identified as a potential killer in your notes
Have medical professionals assess you & let you loose anyway
Kill or maim people because they "facked you off" or a voice told you to
Ruin peoples & their families lives
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I read one psychiatrist on sectioning and long-term detention of schizophrenic patients who *might* pose a risk to the safety of the general public.
He made a point worth considering about confirmation bias, which went more or less like this:
Every time a diagnosed schizophrenic who has exhibited risk factors murders or maims a member of the public there will be an outcry in the press and amongst the public. “Why was this guy not living in a secure facility?! He had previously been assessed as a risk!”
*But* for every one of these patients who commits a dangerous, violent act against a member of the public, there are 999 who don’t. And as clinicians, with the best will in the world, we cannot tell the difference between those who will and those who won’t.
So the question is not, “Why was this guy not living in a secure facility?”
Instead it is, “Would we be happy as a society permanently detaining 50,000 patients, 49,950 who will never commit a serious violent offence against a member of the public, depriving those people of their freedom and at astronomical cost to the taxpayer, in order to prevent 50 such occurrences?”
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm pretty sure their parents would say so...as would you if it were your child
comment by rosso says the time has come to unlock the unl... (U17054)
posted 3 hours, 26 minutes ago
comment by John McGlashan (U1734)
posted 3 minutes ago
We all know that OVER 90% of violent crimes are committed by men. We all KNOW this yet we are happy for 99% of the male population to run free? We all KNOW what males are capable of.
I was assessed by a doctor and he said I was 90% more likely to commit a violent crime compared to my female relative. There are millions more out there like me as well. Why are we letting us run the streets freely??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tbf, everyone knows you should be locked up, Barry.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
for your own safety as much as anything
comment by Sheriff JW Pepper (U1007)
posted 1 hour, 8 minutes ago
comment by rosso says the time has come to unlock the unl... (U17054)
posted 3 hours, 35 minutes ago
comment by Sheriff JW Pepper (U1007)
posted 1 hour, 50 minutes ago
comment by Ras Clar Teta (U22980)
posted 1 minute ago
Stabbings of random people
Pull the Mental Health Card
Get sympathy instead of castration
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Get identified as a potential killer in your notes
Have medical professionals assess you & let you loose anyway
Kill or maim people because they "facked you off" or a voice told you to
Ruin peoples & their families lives
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I read one psychiatrist on sectioning and long-term detention of schizophrenic patients who *might* pose a risk to the safety of the general public.
He made a point worth considering about confirmation bias, which went more or less like this:
Every time a diagnosed schizophrenic who has exhibited risk factors murders or maims a member of the public there will be an outcry in the press and amongst the public. “Why was this guy not living in a secure facility?! He had previously been assessed as a risk!”
*But* for every one of these patients who commits a dangerous, violent act against a member of the public, there are 999 who don’t. And as clinicians, with the best will in the world, we cannot tell the difference between those who will and those who won’t.
So the question is not, “Why was this guy not living in a secure facility?”
Instead it is, “Would we be happy as a society permanently detaining 50,000 patients, 49,950 who will never commit a serious violent offence against a member of the public, depriving those people of their freedom and at astronomical cost to the taxpayer, in order to prevent 50 such occurrences?”
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm pretty sure their parents would say so...as would you if it were your child
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep; that’s exactly his point.
comment by RED666…Out on the “Right Wing” But not as far as Nige! (U6562)
posted 4 hours, 3 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 2 hours, 5 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Out on the “Right Wing” But not as far as Nige! (U6562)
posted 13 hours, 46 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 42 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Out on the “Right Wing” But not as far as Nige! (U6562)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Out on the “Right Wing” But not as far as Nige! (U6562)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 11 minutes ago
Red666 is the lad that denied Suella Braverman was a cause of the riots last week with her talk of 'invasion' re refugees and migrants, same with then PM Sunak and Rwanda.
He's one of those daft stick your fingers in your ears and pretemd it didn't happen Tories
----------------------------------------------------------------------
More misinformation!
You claimed that the Tories were to blame for the riots, In the end it seemed they were only a “contibuting factor”!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah the Home Secretary using the word invasion at the dispatch box was in no way to blame
I guess when RW racists posted the addresses online of 'LW solicitors' last week the PM using the phrase 'leftie lawyer' towards Starmer wasn't to blame.
Stick to the simple stuff, you know nothing about politics aside from childish name calling.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But you stated that they were to blame and now you’ve backtracked to that they were “a cause”!
Funny how name calling is only one way! You’re obviously happy dishing it out but not happy when it comes your way!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone loves a semantics bore.
You don't think the divisive language used by the Home Sec and PM in the HOC's is to blame (not solely) for the race riots?
You must be blind.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ve never said that you’re making stuff up again!
If you remember you threw you teddy well and truly out of the cot when I stated that it may have been a contibuting factor and not directly to blame!
And you’ve quite rightly recognised that by saying it was “a cause” which is clearly on part of the reason!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know you didn't say that, it was a question, hence this (?) at the end of the sentence.
No you didn't, that second paragraph is an outright lie
Facts are your Tory chums played as much part as the grifters Farage and Robinson have re the discourse on race and immigration in this country. Are you going to admit to wanting 5 more years of Tory demonization of migrants?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
“Out right lie”!? Ok lets see shall we Pinocchio!
Remember me saying this?
So the Tories were a “contibuting factor”! So therefore they’re are not directly to blame, thank you so much for clarifying that, it took a while coming but you got there in the end.
Yes! That was me saying they were a “contributing factor” after you were blaming them solely for the riots and don’t forget now that you’ve admitted they were “a cause”!
Yet again you’re spreading misinformation!
Will your Teddy go flying again?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Christ you are thick
You asked me if the Tories were to blame for the riots. I replied that comments by Braverman and Sunak in their roles as PM and Home Sec are a conritbuting factor. You took this as proof they aren't to blame.
I called out how you would react before the inevitable. You're a head in the sand rse licking Tory who can't see them for the grifters and racists they are
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 hour, 42 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Out on the “Right Wing” But not as far as Nige! (U6562)
posted 4 hours, 3 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 2 hours, 5 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Out on the “Right Wing” But not as far as Nige! (U6562)
posted 13 hours, 46 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 42 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Out on the “Right Wing” But not as far as Nige! (U6562)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Out on the “Right Wing” But not as far as Nige! (U6562)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 11 minutes ago
Red666 is the lad that denied Suella Braverman was a cause of the riots last week with her talk of 'invasion' re refugees and migrants, same with then PM Sunak and Rwanda.
He's one of those daft stick your fingers in your ears and pretemd it didn't happen Tories
----------------------------------------------------------------------
More misinformation!
You claimed that the Tories were to blame for the riots, In the end it seemed they were only a “contibuting factor”!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah the Home Secretary using the word invasion at the dispatch box was in no way to blame
I guess when RW racists posted the addresses online of 'LW solicitors' last week the PM using the phrase 'leftie lawyer' towards Starmer wasn't to blame.
Stick to the simple stuff, you know nothing about politics aside from childish name calling.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But you stated that they were to blame and now you’ve backtracked to that they were “a cause”!
Funny how name calling is only one way! You’re obviously happy dishing it out but not happy when it comes your way!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone loves a semantics bore.
You don't think the divisive language used by the Home Sec and PM in the HOC's is to blame (not solely) for the race riots?
You must be blind.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ve never said that you’re making stuff up again!
If you remember you threw you teddy well and truly out of the cot when I stated that it may have been a contibuting factor and not directly to blame!
And you’ve quite rightly recognised that by saying it was “a cause” which is clearly on part of the reason!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know you didn't say that, it was a question, hence this (?) at the end of the sentence.
No you didn't, that second paragraph is an outright lie
Facts are your Tory chums played as much part as the grifters Farage and Robinson have re the discourse on race and immigration in this country. Are you going to admit to wanting 5 more years of Tory demonization of migrants?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
“Out right lie”!? Ok lets see shall we Pinocchio!
Remember me saying this?
So the Tories were a “contibuting factor”! So therefore they’re are not directly to blame, thank you so much for clarifying that, it took a while coming but you got there in the end.
Yes! That was me saying they were a “contributing factor” after you were blaming them solely for the riots and don’t forget now that you’ve admitted they were “a cause”!
Yet again you’re spreading misinformation!
Will your Teddy go flying again?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Christ you are thick
You asked me if the Tories were to blame for the riots. I replied that comments by Braverman and Sunak in their roles as PM and Home Sec are a conritbuting factor. You took this as proof they aren't to blame.
I called out how you would react before the inevitable. You're a head in the sand rse licking Tory who can't see them for the grifters and racists they are
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh come on when I first asked if the Tories were to blame for starting or responisble for the riots, you said yes! But then you proceeded to dig a big hole because you couldn’t back it up with facts as it was just opinion based, you bottled it and then switched it to a “contributing factor” and “a cause”!
comment by RED666…Out on the “Right Wing” But not as far as Nige! (U6562)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 hour, 42 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Out on the “Right Wing” But not as far as Nige! (U6562)
posted 4 hours, 3 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 2 hours, 5 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Out on the “Right Wing” But not as far as Nige! (U6562)
posted 13 hours, 46 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 42 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Out on the “Right Wing” But not as far as Nige! (U6562)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Out on the “Right Wing” But not as far as Nige! (U6562)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 11 minutes ago
Red666 is the lad that denied Suella Braverman was a cause of the riots last week with her talk of 'invasion' re refugees and migrants, same with then PM Sunak and Rwanda.
He's one of those daft stick your fingers in your ears and pretemd it didn't happen Tories
----------------------------------------------------------------------
More misinformation!
You claimed that the Tories were to blame for the riots, In the end it seemed they were only a “contibuting factor”!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah the Home Secretary using the word invasion at the dispatch box was in no way to blame
I guess when RW racists posted the addresses online of 'LW solicitors' last week the PM using the phrase 'leftie lawyer' towards Starmer wasn't to blame.
Stick to the simple stuff, you know nothing about politics aside from childish name calling.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But you stated that they were to blame and now you’ve backtracked to that they were “a cause”!
Funny how name calling is only one way! You’re obviously happy dishing it out but not happy when it comes your way!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone loves a semantics bore.
You don't think the divisive language used by the Home Sec and PM in the HOC's is to blame (not solely) for the race riots?
You must be blind.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ve never said that you’re making stuff up again!
If you remember you threw you teddy well and truly out of the cot when I stated that it may have been a contibuting factor and not directly to blame!
And you’ve quite rightly recognised that by saying it was “a cause” which is clearly on part of the reason!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know you didn't say that, it was a question, hence this (?) at the end of the sentence.
No you didn't, that second paragraph is an outright lie
Facts are your Tory chums played as much part as the grifters Farage and Robinson have re the discourse on race and immigration in this country. Are you going to admit to wanting 5 more years of Tory demonization of migrants?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
“Out right lie”!? Ok lets see shall we Pinocchio!
Remember me saying this?
So the Tories were a “contibuting factor”! So therefore they’re are not directly to blame, thank you so much for clarifying that, it took a while coming but you got there in the end.
Yes! That was me saying they were a “contributing factor” after you were blaming them solely for the riots and don’t forget now that you’ve admitted they were “a cause”!
Yet again you’re spreading misinformation!
Will your Teddy go flying again?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Christ you are thick
You asked me if the Tories were to blame for the riots. I replied that comments by Braverman and Sunak in their roles as PM and Home Sec are a conritbuting factor. You took this as proof they aren't to blame.
I called out how you would react before the inevitable. You're a head in the sand rse licking Tory who can't see them for the grifters and racists they are
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh come on when I first asked if the Tories were to blame for starting or responisble for the riots, you said yes! But then you proceeded to dig a big hole because you couldn’t back it up with facts as it was just opinion based, you bottled it and then switched it to a “contributing factor” and “a cause”!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Couldn't back it up with facts like the Home Sec, Braverman talking of invasion in the HOC or the PM's divisive language re Rwanda, refugees and 'leftie lawyers'. Even Priti Patel is still at it trying to claim a perception of two tier policing.
I also told you you'd ignore facts to suit your own argument/blindness to your pet party being the racist grifters they are, just like Farage and Tommy ten names.
Every denial of objective fact is you supporting these RW racists. You asked someone, Rw&W I think, to show where you'd supported the far right, asked and answered. You can bore off again now.
I dunno how anyone can stay engaged in this thread with the excessive use of the reply button
comment by T-BAD (U11806)
posted 7 minutes ago
I dunno how anyone can stay engaged in this thread with the excessive use of the reply button
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know right
comment by Cinciwolf-----JA606 NFL fantasy champ 2023 (U11551)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by T-BAD (U11806)
posted 7 minutes ago
I dunno how anyone can stay engaged in this thread with the excessive use of the reply button
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know right
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Though, it does make things a bit clearer
comment by Cinciwolf-----JA606 NFL fantasy champ 2023 (U11551)
posted 1 second ago
comment by Cinciwolf-----JA606 NFL fantasy champ 2023 (U11551)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by T-BAD (U11806)
posted 7 minutes ago
I dunno how anyone can stay engaged in this thread with the excessive use of the reply button
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know right
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Though, it does make things a bit clearer
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But then again, most just skip by the drivel
comment by Cinciwolf-----JA606 NFL fantasy champ 2023 (U11551)
posted 1 second ago
comment by Cinciwolf-----JA606 NFL fantasy champ 2023 (U11551)
posted 1 second ago
comment by Cinciwolf-----JA606 NFL fantasy champ 2023 (U11551)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by T-BAD (U11806)
posted 7 minutes ago
I dunno how anyone can stay engaged in this thread with the excessive use of the reply button
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know right
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Though, it does make things a bit clearer
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But then again, most just skip by the drivel
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe you should try that?
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Out on the “Right Wing” But not as far as Nige! (U6562)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 hour, 42 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Out on the “Right Wing” But not as far as Nige! (U6562)
posted 4 hours, 3 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 2 hours, 5 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Out on the “Right Wing” But not as far as Nige! (U6562)
posted 13 hours, 46 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 42 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Out on the “Right Wing” But not as far as Nige! (U6562)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Out on the “Right Wing” But not as far as Nige! (U6562)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 11 minutes ago
Red666 is the lad that denied Suella Braverman was a cause of the riots last week with her talk of 'invasion' re refugees and migrants, same with then PM Sunak and Rwanda.
He's one of those daft stick your fingers in your ears and pretemd it didn't happen Tories
----------------------------------------------------------------------
More misinformation!
You claimed that the Tories were to blame for the riots, In the end it seemed they were only a “contibuting factor”!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah the Home Secretary using the word invasion at the dispatch box was in no way to blame
I guess when RW racists posted the addresses online of 'LW solicitors' last week the PM using the phrase 'leftie lawyer' towards Starmer wasn't to blame.
Stick to the simple stuff, you know nothing about politics aside from childish name calling.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But you stated that they were to blame and now you’ve backtracked to that they were “a cause”!
Funny how name calling is only one way! You’re obviously happy dishing it out but not happy when it comes your way!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone loves a semantics bore.
You don't think the divisive language used by the Home Sec and PM in the HOC's is to blame (not solely) for the race riots?
You must be blind.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ve never said that you’re making stuff up again!
If you remember you threw you teddy well and truly out of the cot when I stated that it may have been a contibuting factor and not directly to blame!
And you’ve quite rightly recognised that by saying it was “a cause” which is clearly on part of the reason!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know you didn't say that, it was a question, hence this (?) at the end of the sentence.
No you didn't, that second paragraph is an outright lie
Facts are your Tory chums played as much part as the grifters Farage and Robinson have re the discourse on race and immigration in this country. Are you going to admit to wanting 5 more years of Tory demonization of migrants?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
“Out right lie”!? Ok lets see shall we Pinocchio!
Remember me saying this?
So the Tories were a “contibuting factor”! So therefore they’re are not directly to blame, thank you so much for clarifying that, it took a while coming but you got there in the end.
Yes! That was me saying they were a “contributing factor” after you were blaming them solely for the riots and don’t forget now that you’ve admitted they were “a cause”!
Yet again you’re spreading misinformation!
Will your Teddy go flying again?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Christ you are thick
You asked me if the Tories were to blame for the riots. I replied that comments by Braverman and Sunak in their roles as PM and Home Sec are a conritbuting factor. You took this as proof they aren't to blame.
I called out how you would react before the inevitable. You're a head in the sand rse licking Tory who can't see them for the grifters and racists they are
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh come on when I first asked if the Tories were to blame for starting or responisble for the riots, you said yes! But then you proceeded to dig a big hole because you couldn’t back it up with facts as it was just opinion based, you bottled it and then switched it to a “contributing factor” and “a cause”!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Couldn't back it up with facts like the Home Sec, Braverman talking of invasion in the HOC or the PM's divisive language re Rwanda, refugees and 'leftie lawyers'. Even Priti Patel is still at it trying to claim a perception of two tier policing.
I also told you you'd ignore facts to suit your own argument/blindness to your pet party being the racist grifters they are, just like Farage and Tommy ten names.
Every denial of objective fact is you supporting these RW racists. You asked someone, Rw&W I think, to show where you'd supported the far right, asked and answered. You can bore off again now.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
All based on your opinions for the riots not fact!
“You can bore off again now.”
There we have watch out guys for the low flying teddies!
"All based on your opinions for the riots not fact!"
Yep, no correlation between Braverman using the word invasion and rioters citing it as a reason for trying to burn down hotels with asylum seekers in.
No correlation between Sunak using the tern 'leftie lawyers' and RW racists posting addresses of 'leftie lawyers' online.
Your thoughts on Tory leadership candidate Patel's latest shiite stirring comments on two tier policing?
Stick to daft little names like calling people woke & wokie and talk of teddy bears little boy. Adult talk about politics is beyond you.
comment by T-BAD (U11806)
posted 1 hour, 17 minutes ago
I dunno how anyone can stay engaged in this thread with the excessive use of the reply button
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don’t know how anyone can stayed engaged in this thread with the excessive posting from REteeardeD666.
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 29 minutes ago
"All based on your opinions for the riots not fact!"
Yep, no correlation between Braverman using the word invasion and rioters citing it as a reason for trying to burn down hotels with asylum seekers in.
No correlation between Sunak using the tern 'leftie lawyers' and RW racists posting addresses of 'leftie lawyers' online.
Your thoughts on Tory leadership candidate Patel's latest shiite stirring comments on two tier policing?
Stick to daft little names like calling people woke & wokie and talk of teddy bears little boy. Adult talk about politics is beyond you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wow! Look at you go because I’ve questioned your opinion!
You cry about name calling yet you do the same!
Listen you can have your opinion and you may have be right on that the Tories of a “contibuting factor” in the riots but all I did was say you can’t totally blame them which Darren The String Fletcher was doing, you chose to stick your head up DTSF backside and start justifying his opinion with yours all because it was “lil ole me”! Once you clear his shiite out your eyes you may see that!
"Listen you can have your opinion and you may have be right on that the Tories of a “contibuting factor” in the riots but all I did was say you can’t totally blame them"
Well if they only cop for some of the blame that's okay. The rest of the blame goes to Farage, Robinson and Elon Musk. Your Tory pals are in good company.
What a joke, they aren't totally to blame
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 6 minutes ago
"Listen you can have your opinion and you may have be right on that the Tories of a “contibuting factor” in the riots but all I did was say you can’t totally blame them"
Well if they only cop for some of the blame that's okay. The rest of the blame goes to Farage, Robinson and Elon Musk. Your Tory pals are in good company.
What a joke, they aren't totally to blame
----------------------------------------------------------------------
In your opinion obviously!
Listen next time im in Liverpool lets have a pint and we can laugh about all this, what da ya say?
comment by RED666…Out on the “Right Wing” But not as far as Nige! (U6562)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 6 minutes ago
"Listen you can have your opinion and you may have be right on that the Tories of a “contibuting factor” in the riots but all I did was say you can’t totally blame them"
Well if they only cop for some of the blame that's okay. The rest of the blame goes to Farage, Robinson and Elon Musk. Your Tory pals are in good company.
What a joke, they aren't totally to blame
----------------------------------------------------------------------
In your opinion obviously!
Listen next time im in Liverpool lets have a pint and we can laugh about all this, what da ya say?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No objective fact.
Do I want to meet up with a weird, cockney, Tory voting plastic United fan who can't admit objective facts, I'll give it a swerve ta.
Try Cleverson, Culer or RDD if you're that desperate for a pint
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Out on the “Right Wing” But not as far as Nige! (U6562)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 6 minutes ago
"Listen you can have your opinion and you may have be right on that the Tories of a “contibuting factor” in the riots but all I did was say you can’t totally blame them"
Well if they only cop for some of the blame that's okay. The rest of the blame goes to Farage, Robinson and Elon Musk. Your Tory pals are in good company.
What a joke, they aren't totally to blame
----------------------------------------------------------------------
In your opinion obviously!
Listen next time im in Liverpool lets have a pint and we can laugh about all this, what da ya say?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No objective fact.
Do I want to meet up with a weird, cockney, Tory voting plastic United fan who can't admit objective facts, I'll give it a swerve ta.
Try Cleverson, Culer or RDD if you're that desperate for a pint
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What were you saying about name calling? 🤣
So that’s a “NO” then, I only asked because you have become so needy, let’s face it you have an obsession with lil ole me, following me round JA606 jumping on my comments!
It’s like “hey Red look it’s me again” you’re even resorting to making stuff up to catch my attention, maybe you should take a step back son!
But I dare say you don’t live in Liverpool anyway!
Red666
You're a strange lad, asks a stranger on the internet out for a pint then calls them needy when turned down
As if you, a plastic United Tory voter from London, would have the balls to walk into a pub in Liverpool, you wouldn't get past hello
Sign in if you want to comment
Far Right thugs or patriots
Page 37 of 66
38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42
posted on 13/8/24
We all know that OVER 90% of violent crimes are committed by men. We all KNOW this yet we are happy for 99% of the male population to run free? We all KNOW what males are capable of.
I was assessed by a doctor and he said I was 90% more likely to commit a violent crime compared to my female relative. There are millions more out there like me as well. Why are we letting us run the streets freely??
posted on 13/8/24
comment by John McGlashan (U1734)
posted 3 minutes ago
We all know that OVER 90% of violent crimes are committed by men. We all KNOW this yet we are happy for 99% of the male population to run free? We all KNOW what males are capable of.
I was assessed by a doctor and he said I was 90% more likely to commit a violent crime compared to my female relative. There are millions more out there like me as well. Why are we letting us run the streets freely??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tbf, everyone knows you should be locked up, Barry.
posted on 13/8/24
comment by RED666…Out on the “Right Wing” But not as far as Nige! (U6562)
posted 15 hours, 49 minutes ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted 39 minutes ago
comment by Insufferable-Piffle (U4388)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by Insufferable-Piffle (U4388)
posted 7 minutes ago
Not getting involved in the Barney here but I'd class myself as "Woke"and I would define it as being Socially aware, but Ive never really understood it being used as an insult if that's what's happening often now?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The right wing are really good at getting their stupid followers to parrot buzzwords they put out. This is just a latest in a long, long list.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Seems to be the case, found it confusing like it was an insult? Weird imo
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Godwin’s Second Law describes it perfectly.
https://x.com/sfmnemonic/status/1504687870006620163
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Better get my skies out at this rate!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You have more than one sky?
posted on 13/8/24
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 2 hours, 5 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Out on the “Right Wing” But not as far as Nige! (U6562)
posted 13 hours, 46 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 42 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Out on the “Right Wing” But not as far as Nige! (U6562)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Out on the “Right Wing” But not as far as Nige! (U6562)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 11 minutes ago
Red666 is the lad that denied Suella Braverman was a cause of the riots last week with her talk of 'invasion' re refugees and migrants, same with then PM Sunak and Rwanda.
He's one of those daft stick your fingers in your ears and pretemd it didn't happen Tories
----------------------------------------------------------------------
More misinformation!
You claimed that the Tories were to blame for the riots, In the end it seemed they were only a “contibuting factor”!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah the Home Secretary using the word invasion at the dispatch box was in no way to blame
I guess when RW racists posted the addresses online of 'LW solicitors' last week the PM using the phrase 'leftie lawyer' towards Starmer wasn't to blame.
Stick to the simple stuff, you know nothing about politics aside from childish name calling.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But you stated that they were to blame and now you’ve backtracked to that they were “a cause”!
Funny how name calling is only one way! You’re obviously happy dishing it out but not happy when it comes your way!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone loves a semantics bore.
You don't think the divisive language used by the Home Sec and PM in the HOC's is to blame (not solely) for the race riots?
You must be blind.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ve never said that you’re making stuff up again!
If you remember you threw you teddy well and truly out of the cot when I stated that it may have been a contibuting factor and not directly to blame!
And you’ve quite rightly recognised that by saying it was “a cause” which is clearly on part of the reason!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know you didn't say that, it was a question, hence this (?) at the end of the sentence.
No you didn't, that second paragraph is an outright lie
Facts are your Tory chums played as much part as the grifters Farage and Robinson have re the discourse on race and immigration in this country. Are you going to admit to wanting 5 more years of Tory demonization of migrants?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
“Out right lie”!? Ok lets see shall we Pinocchio!
Remember me saying this?
So the Tories were a “contibuting factor”! So therefore they’re are not directly to blame, thank you so much for clarifying that, it took a while coming but you got there in the end.
Yes! That was me saying they were a “contributing factor” after you were blaming them solely for the riots and don’t forget now that you’ve admitted they were “a cause”!
Yet again you’re spreading misinformation!
Will your Teddy go flying again?
posted on 13/8/24
comment by rosso says the time has come to unlock the unl... (U17054)
posted 3 hours, 35 minutes ago
comment by Sheriff JW Pepper (U1007)
posted 1 hour, 50 minutes ago
comment by Ras Clar Teta (U22980)
posted 1 minute ago
Stabbings of random people
Pull the Mental Health Card
Get sympathy instead of castration
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Get identified as a potential killer in your notes
Have medical professionals assess you & let you loose anyway
Kill or maim people because they "facked you off" or a voice told you to
Ruin peoples & their families lives
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I read one psychiatrist on sectioning and long-term detention of schizophrenic patients who *might* pose a risk to the safety of the general public.
He made a point worth considering about confirmation bias, which went more or less like this:
Every time a diagnosed schizophrenic who has exhibited risk factors murders or maims a member of the public there will be an outcry in the press and amongst the public. “Why was this guy not living in a secure facility?! He had previously been assessed as a risk!”
*But* for every one of these patients who commits a dangerous, violent act against a member of the public, there are 999 who don’t. And as clinicians, with the best will in the world, we cannot tell the difference between those who will and those who won’t.
So the question is not, “Why was this guy not living in a secure facility?”
Instead it is, “Would we be happy as a society permanently detaining 50,000 patients, 49,950 who will never commit a serious violent offence against a member of the public, depriving those people of their freedom and at astronomical cost to the taxpayer, in order to prevent 50 such occurrences?”
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm pretty sure their parents would say so...as would you if it were your child
posted on 13/8/24
comment by rosso says the time has come to unlock the unl... (U17054)
posted 3 hours, 26 minutes ago
comment by John McGlashan (U1734)
posted 3 minutes ago
We all know that OVER 90% of violent crimes are committed by men. We all KNOW this yet we are happy for 99% of the male population to run free? We all KNOW what males are capable of.
I was assessed by a doctor and he said I was 90% more likely to commit a violent crime compared to my female relative. There are millions more out there like me as well. Why are we letting us run the streets freely??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tbf, everyone knows you should be locked up, Barry.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
for your own safety as much as anything
posted on 13/8/24
comment by Sheriff JW Pepper (U1007)
posted 1 hour, 8 minutes ago
comment by rosso says the time has come to unlock the unl... (U17054)
posted 3 hours, 35 minutes ago
comment by Sheriff JW Pepper (U1007)
posted 1 hour, 50 minutes ago
comment by Ras Clar Teta (U22980)
posted 1 minute ago
Stabbings of random people
Pull the Mental Health Card
Get sympathy instead of castration
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Get identified as a potential killer in your notes
Have medical professionals assess you & let you loose anyway
Kill or maim people because they "facked you off" or a voice told you to
Ruin peoples & their families lives
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I read one psychiatrist on sectioning and long-term detention of schizophrenic patients who *might* pose a risk to the safety of the general public.
He made a point worth considering about confirmation bias, which went more or less like this:
Every time a diagnosed schizophrenic who has exhibited risk factors murders or maims a member of the public there will be an outcry in the press and amongst the public. “Why was this guy not living in a secure facility?! He had previously been assessed as a risk!”
*But* for every one of these patients who commits a dangerous, violent act against a member of the public, there are 999 who don’t. And as clinicians, with the best will in the world, we cannot tell the difference between those who will and those who won’t.
So the question is not, “Why was this guy not living in a secure facility?”
Instead it is, “Would we be happy as a society permanently detaining 50,000 patients, 49,950 who will never commit a serious violent offence against a member of the public, depriving those people of their freedom and at astronomical cost to the taxpayer, in order to prevent 50 such occurrences?”
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm pretty sure their parents would say so...as would you if it were your child
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep; that’s exactly his point.
posted on 13/8/24
comment by RED666…Out on the “Right Wing” But not as far as Nige! (U6562)
posted 4 hours, 3 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 2 hours, 5 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Out on the “Right Wing” But not as far as Nige! (U6562)
posted 13 hours, 46 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 42 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Out on the “Right Wing” But not as far as Nige! (U6562)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Out on the “Right Wing” But not as far as Nige! (U6562)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 11 minutes ago
Red666 is the lad that denied Suella Braverman was a cause of the riots last week with her talk of 'invasion' re refugees and migrants, same with then PM Sunak and Rwanda.
He's one of those daft stick your fingers in your ears and pretemd it didn't happen Tories
----------------------------------------------------------------------
More misinformation!
You claimed that the Tories were to blame for the riots, In the end it seemed they were only a “contibuting factor”!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah the Home Secretary using the word invasion at the dispatch box was in no way to blame
I guess when RW racists posted the addresses online of 'LW solicitors' last week the PM using the phrase 'leftie lawyer' towards Starmer wasn't to blame.
Stick to the simple stuff, you know nothing about politics aside from childish name calling.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But you stated that they were to blame and now you’ve backtracked to that they were “a cause”!
Funny how name calling is only one way! You’re obviously happy dishing it out but not happy when it comes your way!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone loves a semantics bore.
You don't think the divisive language used by the Home Sec and PM in the HOC's is to blame (not solely) for the race riots?
You must be blind.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ve never said that you’re making stuff up again!
If you remember you threw you teddy well and truly out of the cot when I stated that it may have been a contibuting factor and not directly to blame!
And you’ve quite rightly recognised that by saying it was “a cause” which is clearly on part of the reason!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know you didn't say that, it was a question, hence this (?) at the end of the sentence.
No you didn't, that second paragraph is an outright lie
Facts are your Tory chums played as much part as the grifters Farage and Robinson have re the discourse on race and immigration in this country. Are you going to admit to wanting 5 more years of Tory demonization of migrants?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
“Out right lie”!? Ok lets see shall we Pinocchio!
Remember me saying this?
So the Tories were a “contibuting factor”! So therefore they’re are not directly to blame, thank you so much for clarifying that, it took a while coming but you got there in the end.
Yes! That was me saying they were a “contributing factor” after you were blaming them solely for the riots and don’t forget now that you’ve admitted they were “a cause”!
Yet again you’re spreading misinformation!
Will your Teddy go flying again?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Christ you are thick
You asked me if the Tories were to blame for the riots. I replied that comments by Braverman and Sunak in their roles as PM and Home Sec are a conritbuting factor. You took this as proof they aren't to blame.
I called out how you would react before the inevitable. You're a head in the sand rse licking Tory who can't see them for the grifters and racists they are
posted on 13/8/24
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 hour, 42 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Out on the “Right Wing” But not as far as Nige! (U6562)
posted 4 hours, 3 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 2 hours, 5 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Out on the “Right Wing” But not as far as Nige! (U6562)
posted 13 hours, 46 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 42 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Out on the “Right Wing” But not as far as Nige! (U6562)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Out on the “Right Wing” But not as far as Nige! (U6562)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 11 minutes ago
Red666 is the lad that denied Suella Braverman was a cause of the riots last week with her talk of 'invasion' re refugees and migrants, same with then PM Sunak and Rwanda.
He's one of those daft stick your fingers in your ears and pretemd it didn't happen Tories
----------------------------------------------------------------------
More misinformation!
You claimed that the Tories were to blame for the riots, In the end it seemed they were only a “contibuting factor”!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah the Home Secretary using the word invasion at the dispatch box was in no way to blame
I guess when RW racists posted the addresses online of 'LW solicitors' last week the PM using the phrase 'leftie lawyer' towards Starmer wasn't to blame.
Stick to the simple stuff, you know nothing about politics aside from childish name calling.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But you stated that they were to blame and now you’ve backtracked to that they were “a cause”!
Funny how name calling is only one way! You’re obviously happy dishing it out but not happy when it comes your way!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone loves a semantics bore.
You don't think the divisive language used by the Home Sec and PM in the HOC's is to blame (not solely) for the race riots?
You must be blind.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ve never said that you’re making stuff up again!
If you remember you threw you teddy well and truly out of the cot when I stated that it may have been a contibuting factor and not directly to blame!
And you’ve quite rightly recognised that by saying it was “a cause” which is clearly on part of the reason!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know you didn't say that, it was a question, hence this (?) at the end of the sentence.
No you didn't, that second paragraph is an outright lie
Facts are your Tory chums played as much part as the grifters Farage and Robinson have re the discourse on race and immigration in this country. Are you going to admit to wanting 5 more years of Tory demonization of migrants?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
“Out right lie”!? Ok lets see shall we Pinocchio!
Remember me saying this?
So the Tories were a “contibuting factor”! So therefore they’re are not directly to blame, thank you so much for clarifying that, it took a while coming but you got there in the end.
Yes! That was me saying they were a “contributing factor” after you were blaming them solely for the riots and don’t forget now that you’ve admitted they were “a cause”!
Yet again you’re spreading misinformation!
Will your Teddy go flying again?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Christ you are thick
You asked me if the Tories were to blame for the riots. I replied that comments by Braverman and Sunak in their roles as PM and Home Sec are a conritbuting factor. You took this as proof they aren't to blame.
I called out how you would react before the inevitable. You're a head in the sand rse licking Tory who can't see them for the grifters and racists they are
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh come on when I first asked if the Tories were to blame for starting or responisble for the riots, you said yes! But then you proceeded to dig a big hole because you couldn’t back it up with facts as it was just opinion based, you bottled it and then switched it to a “contributing factor” and “a cause”!
posted on 13/8/24
comment by RED666…Out on the “Right Wing” But not as far as Nige! (U6562)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 hour, 42 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Out on the “Right Wing” But not as far as Nige! (U6562)
posted 4 hours, 3 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 2 hours, 5 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Out on the “Right Wing” But not as far as Nige! (U6562)
posted 13 hours, 46 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 42 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Out on the “Right Wing” But not as far as Nige! (U6562)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Out on the “Right Wing” But not as far as Nige! (U6562)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 11 minutes ago
Red666 is the lad that denied Suella Braverman was a cause of the riots last week with her talk of 'invasion' re refugees and migrants, same with then PM Sunak and Rwanda.
He's one of those daft stick your fingers in your ears and pretemd it didn't happen Tories
----------------------------------------------------------------------
More misinformation!
You claimed that the Tories were to blame for the riots, In the end it seemed they were only a “contibuting factor”!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah the Home Secretary using the word invasion at the dispatch box was in no way to blame
I guess when RW racists posted the addresses online of 'LW solicitors' last week the PM using the phrase 'leftie lawyer' towards Starmer wasn't to blame.
Stick to the simple stuff, you know nothing about politics aside from childish name calling.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But you stated that they were to blame and now you’ve backtracked to that they were “a cause”!
Funny how name calling is only one way! You’re obviously happy dishing it out but not happy when it comes your way!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone loves a semantics bore.
You don't think the divisive language used by the Home Sec and PM in the HOC's is to blame (not solely) for the race riots?
You must be blind.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ve never said that you’re making stuff up again!
If you remember you threw you teddy well and truly out of the cot when I stated that it may have been a contibuting factor and not directly to blame!
And you’ve quite rightly recognised that by saying it was “a cause” which is clearly on part of the reason!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know you didn't say that, it was a question, hence this (?) at the end of the sentence.
No you didn't, that second paragraph is an outright lie
Facts are your Tory chums played as much part as the grifters Farage and Robinson have re the discourse on race and immigration in this country. Are you going to admit to wanting 5 more years of Tory demonization of migrants?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
“Out right lie”!? Ok lets see shall we Pinocchio!
Remember me saying this?
So the Tories were a “contibuting factor”! So therefore they’re are not directly to blame, thank you so much for clarifying that, it took a while coming but you got there in the end.
Yes! That was me saying they were a “contributing factor” after you were blaming them solely for the riots and don’t forget now that you’ve admitted they were “a cause”!
Yet again you’re spreading misinformation!
Will your Teddy go flying again?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Christ you are thick
You asked me if the Tories were to blame for the riots. I replied that comments by Braverman and Sunak in their roles as PM and Home Sec are a conritbuting factor. You took this as proof they aren't to blame.
I called out how you would react before the inevitable. You're a head in the sand rse licking Tory who can't see them for the grifters and racists they are
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh come on when I first asked if the Tories were to blame for starting or responisble for the riots, you said yes! But then you proceeded to dig a big hole because you couldn’t back it up with facts as it was just opinion based, you bottled it and then switched it to a “contributing factor” and “a cause”!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Couldn't back it up with facts like the Home Sec, Braverman talking of invasion in the HOC or the PM's divisive language re Rwanda, refugees and 'leftie lawyers'. Even Priti Patel is still at it trying to claim a perception of two tier policing.
I also told you you'd ignore facts to suit your own argument/blindness to your pet party being the racist grifters they are, just like Farage and Tommy ten names.
Every denial of objective fact is you supporting these RW racists. You asked someone, Rw&W I think, to show where you'd supported the far right, asked and answered. You can bore off again now.
posted on 13/8/24
I dunno how anyone can stay engaged in this thread with the excessive use of the reply button
posted on 13/8/24
comment by T-BAD (U11806)
posted 7 minutes ago
I dunno how anyone can stay engaged in this thread with the excessive use of the reply button
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know right
posted on 13/8/24
comment by Cinciwolf-----JA606 NFL fantasy champ 2023 (U11551)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by T-BAD (U11806)
posted 7 minutes ago
I dunno how anyone can stay engaged in this thread with the excessive use of the reply button
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know right
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Though, it does make things a bit clearer
posted on 13/8/24
comment by Cinciwolf-----JA606 NFL fantasy champ 2023 (U11551)
posted 1 second ago
comment by Cinciwolf-----JA606 NFL fantasy champ 2023 (U11551)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by T-BAD (U11806)
posted 7 minutes ago
I dunno how anyone can stay engaged in this thread with the excessive use of the reply button
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know right
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Though, it does make things a bit clearer
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But then again, most just skip by the drivel
posted on 13/8/24
comment by Cinciwolf-----JA606 NFL fantasy champ 2023 (U11551)
posted 1 second ago
comment by Cinciwolf-----JA606 NFL fantasy champ 2023 (U11551)
posted 1 second ago
comment by Cinciwolf-----JA606 NFL fantasy champ 2023 (U11551)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by T-BAD (U11806)
posted 7 minutes ago
I dunno how anyone can stay engaged in this thread with the excessive use of the reply button
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know right
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Though, it does make things a bit clearer
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But then again, most just skip by the drivel
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe you should try that?
posted on 13/8/24
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Out on the “Right Wing” But not as far as Nige! (U6562)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 hour, 42 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Out on the “Right Wing” But not as far as Nige! (U6562)
posted 4 hours, 3 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 2 hours, 5 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Out on the “Right Wing” But not as far as Nige! (U6562)
posted 13 hours, 46 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 42 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Out on the “Right Wing” But not as far as Nige! (U6562)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Out on the “Right Wing” But not as far as Nige! (U6562)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 11 minutes ago
Red666 is the lad that denied Suella Braverman was a cause of the riots last week with her talk of 'invasion' re refugees and migrants, same with then PM Sunak and Rwanda.
He's one of those daft stick your fingers in your ears and pretemd it didn't happen Tories
----------------------------------------------------------------------
More misinformation!
You claimed that the Tories were to blame for the riots, In the end it seemed they were only a “contibuting factor”!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah the Home Secretary using the word invasion at the dispatch box was in no way to blame
I guess when RW racists posted the addresses online of 'LW solicitors' last week the PM using the phrase 'leftie lawyer' towards Starmer wasn't to blame.
Stick to the simple stuff, you know nothing about politics aside from childish name calling.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But you stated that they were to blame and now you’ve backtracked to that they were “a cause”!
Funny how name calling is only one way! You’re obviously happy dishing it out but not happy when it comes your way!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone loves a semantics bore.
You don't think the divisive language used by the Home Sec and PM in the HOC's is to blame (not solely) for the race riots?
You must be blind.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ve never said that you’re making stuff up again!
If you remember you threw you teddy well and truly out of the cot when I stated that it may have been a contibuting factor and not directly to blame!
And you’ve quite rightly recognised that by saying it was “a cause” which is clearly on part of the reason!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know you didn't say that, it was a question, hence this (?) at the end of the sentence.
No you didn't, that second paragraph is an outright lie
Facts are your Tory chums played as much part as the grifters Farage and Robinson have re the discourse on race and immigration in this country. Are you going to admit to wanting 5 more years of Tory demonization of migrants?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
“Out right lie”!? Ok lets see shall we Pinocchio!
Remember me saying this?
So the Tories were a “contibuting factor”! So therefore they’re are not directly to blame, thank you so much for clarifying that, it took a while coming but you got there in the end.
Yes! That was me saying they were a “contributing factor” after you were blaming them solely for the riots and don’t forget now that you’ve admitted they were “a cause”!
Yet again you’re spreading misinformation!
Will your Teddy go flying again?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Christ you are thick
You asked me if the Tories were to blame for the riots. I replied that comments by Braverman and Sunak in their roles as PM and Home Sec are a conritbuting factor. You took this as proof they aren't to blame.
I called out how you would react before the inevitable. You're a head in the sand rse licking Tory who can't see them for the grifters and racists they are
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh come on when I first asked if the Tories were to blame for starting or responisble for the riots, you said yes! But then you proceeded to dig a big hole because you couldn’t back it up with facts as it was just opinion based, you bottled it and then switched it to a “contributing factor” and “a cause”!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Couldn't back it up with facts like the Home Sec, Braverman talking of invasion in the HOC or the PM's divisive language re Rwanda, refugees and 'leftie lawyers'. Even Priti Patel is still at it trying to claim a perception of two tier policing.
I also told you you'd ignore facts to suit your own argument/blindness to your pet party being the racist grifters they are, just like Farage and Tommy ten names.
Every denial of objective fact is you supporting these RW racists. You asked someone, Rw&W I think, to show where you'd supported the far right, asked and answered. You can bore off again now.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
All based on your opinions for the riots not fact!
“You can bore off again now.”
There we have watch out guys for the low flying teddies!
posted on 13/8/24
"All based on your opinions for the riots not fact!"
Yep, no correlation between Braverman using the word invasion and rioters citing it as a reason for trying to burn down hotels with asylum seekers in.
No correlation between Sunak using the tern 'leftie lawyers' and RW racists posting addresses of 'leftie lawyers' online.
Your thoughts on Tory leadership candidate Patel's latest shiite stirring comments on two tier policing?
Stick to daft little names like calling people woke & wokie and talk of teddy bears little boy. Adult talk about politics is beyond you.
posted on 13/8/24
comment by T-BAD (U11806)
posted 1 hour, 17 minutes ago
I dunno how anyone can stay engaged in this thread with the excessive use of the reply button
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don’t know how anyone can stayed engaged in this thread with the excessive posting from REteeardeD666.
posted on 13/8/24
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 29 minutes ago
"All based on your opinions for the riots not fact!"
Yep, no correlation between Braverman using the word invasion and rioters citing it as a reason for trying to burn down hotels with asylum seekers in.
No correlation between Sunak using the tern 'leftie lawyers' and RW racists posting addresses of 'leftie lawyers' online.
Your thoughts on Tory leadership candidate Patel's latest shiite stirring comments on two tier policing?
Stick to daft little names like calling people woke & wokie and talk of teddy bears little boy. Adult talk about politics is beyond you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wow! Look at you go because I’ve questioned your opinion!
You cry about name calling yet you do the same!
Listen you can have your opinion and you may have be right on that the Tories of a “contibuting factor” in the riots but all I did was say you can’t totally blame them which Darren The String Fletcher was doing, you chose to stick your head up DTSF backside and start justifying his opinion with yours all because it was “lil ole me”! Once you clear his shiite out your eyes you may see that!
posted on 13/8/24
"Listen you can have your opinion and you may have be right on that the Tories of a “contibuting factor” in the riots but all I did was say you can’t totally blame them"
Well if they only cop for some of the blame that's okay. The rest of the blame goes to Farage, Robinson and Elon Musk. Your Tory pals are in good company.
What a joke, they aren't totally to blame
posted on 13/8/24
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 6 minutes ago
"Listen you can have your opinion and you may have be right on that the Tories of a “contibuting factor” in the riots but all I did was say you can’t totally blame them"
Well if they only cop for some of the blame that's okay. The rest of the blame goes to Farage, Robinson and Elon Musk. Your Tory pals are in good company.
What a joke, they aren't totally to blame
----------------------------------------------------------------------
In your opinion obviously!
Listen next time im in Liverpool lets have a pint and we can laugh about all this, what da ya say?
posted on 13/8/24
comment by RED666…Out on the “Right Wing” But not as far as Nige! (U6562)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 6 minutes ago
"Listen you can have your opinion and you may have be right on that the Tories of a “contibuting factor” in the riots but all I did was say you can’t totally blame them"
Well if they only cop for some of the blame that's okay. The rest of the blame goes to Farage, Robinson and Elon Musk. Your Tory pals are in good company.
What a joke, they aren't totally to blame
----------------------------------------------------------------------
In your opinion obviously!
Listen next time im in Liverpool lets have a pint and we can laugh about all this, what da ya say?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No objective fact.
Do I want to meet up with a weird, cockney, Tory voting plastic United fan who can't admit objective facts, I'll give it a swerve ta.
Try Cleverson, Culer or RDD if you're that desperate for a pint
posted on 13/8/24
Culer isn't real
posted on 13/8/24
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Out on the “Right Wing” But not as far as Nige! (U6562)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 6 minutes ago
"Listen you can have your opinion and you may have be right on that the Tories of a “contibuting factor” in the riots but all I did was say you can’t totally blame them"
Well if they only cop for some of the blame that's okay. The rest of the blame goes to Farage, Robinson and Elon Musk. Your Tory pals are in good company.
What a joke, they aren't totally to blame
----------------------------------------------------------------------
In your opinion obviously!
Listen next time im in Liverpool lets have a pint and we can laugh about all this, what da ya say?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No objective fact.
Do I want to meet up with a weird, cockney, Tory voting plastic United fan who can't admit objective facts, I'll give it a swerve ta.
Try Cleverson, Culer or RDD if you're that desperate for a pint
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What were you saying about name calling? 🤣
So that’s a “NO” then, I only asked because you have become so needy, let’s face it you have an obsession with lil ole me, following me round JA606 jumping on my comments!
It’s like “hey Red look it’s me again” you’re even resorting to making stuff up to catch my attention, maybe you should take a step back son!
But I dare say you don’t live in Liverpool anyway!
posted on 13/8/24
Red666
You're a strange lad, asks a stranger on the internet out for a pint then calls them needy when turned down
As if you, a plastic United Tory voter from London, would have the balls to walk into a pub in Liverpool, you wouldn't get past hello
Page 37 of 66
38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42