"For the record I don't believe British Steel should have been sanctioned any more than I do Evraz. They're both private companies and both in business to make money, why would it be anymore unusual Evraz selling their produce to the Russian Government than BS selling to the UK Government?"
Greed is good no matter how many people it kills
Should those making a fortune off the back of war also own a football team? How do you reconcile a new signing being bought off the back of war money?
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 4 minutes ago
"For the record I don't believe British Steel should have been sanctioned any more than I do Evraz. They're both private companies and both in business to make money, why would it be anymore unusual Evraz selling their produce to the Russian Government than BS selling to the UK Government?"
Greed is good no matter how many people it kills
Should those making a fortune off the back of war also own a football team? How do you reconcile a new signing being bought off the back of war money?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Again you're avoiding the question, what is it that you feel you can condemn Evraz with but not apply the same principle to something a little closer to home?
And all our recent signings have been made with US money. Again not a situation I'm happy with but as a fan what do you propose I can do about it?
comment by BraveheartTyke (U6173)
posted 16 hours, 55 minutes ago
Roman coming back at Summerslam.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Best comment on this thread by a distance
comment by Devil (U6522)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by BraveheartTyke (U6173)
posted 16 hours, 55 minutes ago
Roman coming back at Summerslam.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Best comment on this thread by a distance
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I have no idea what Summerslam is!
comment by BrummieBlue! (U3487)
posted 23 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 4 minutes ago
"For the record I don't believe British Steel should have been sanctioned any more than I do Evraz. They're both private companies and both in business to make money, why would it be anymore unusual Evraz selling their produce to the Russian Government than BS selling to the UK Government?"
Greed is good no matter how many people it kills
Should those making a fortune off the back of war also own a football team? How do you reconcile a new signing being bought off the back of war money?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Again you're avoiding the question, what is it that you feel you can condemn Evraz with but not apply the same principle to something a little closer to home?
And all our recent signings have been made with US money. Again not a situation I'm happy with but as a fan what do you propose I can do about it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not avoided anything
"Mate stop clinging to this. I don't agree with who we (The UK) selectively decide to arm in the world. The British gov obviously disagrees so would never apply sanctions. Who do you think should be sanctioning British Steel? "
comment by BrummieBlue! (U3487)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Devil (U6522)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by BraveheartTyke (U6173)
posted 16 hours, 55 minutes ago
Roman coming back at Summerslam.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Best comment on this thread by a distance
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I have no idea what Summerslam is!
-----------------------------------------------
Congratulations on being an adult, unfortunately something I am not
You're now just repeating yourself, FieldsofAnfieldRd!
In answer to your question, I don't think anyone should be sanctioning BS!
comment by Devil (U6522)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by BrummieBlue! (U3487)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Devil (U6522)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by BraveheartTyke (U6173)
posted 16 hours, 55 minutes ago
Roman coming back at Summerslam.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Best comment on this thread by a distance
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I have no idea what Summerslam is!
-----------------------------------------------
Congratulations on being an adult, unfortunately something I am not
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I see I'm going to have to Google it! .
FieldsofAnfieldRd
Thanks for the debate, we won't agree on anything over this by the look of it but at least you try and present a thought out approach to the subject, unlike some of the other trolls that lurk around the Chelsea board just trying to point score!
Unfortunately I don't have time to continue but I wish you well until the football season starts!
comment by BrummieBlue! (U3487)
posted 58 minutes ago
comment by Lexington 125.2 (U8879)
posted 8 minutes ago
https://www.fourfourtwo.com/features/henry-norris-arsenal-tottenham-woolwich-highbury
There you go, Brummie.
Can't promise it will help with what you know about bee-keeping, but it will certainly expand your football knowledge.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're nothing more than a hypocritical clown to me.
Accept what you don't like if it suits, but demean others for less!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can you explain to the rest of us what you think hypocritical means?
I don’t like warmongers, or their acolytes. Especially those currently committing, and assisting in committing atrocities.
It is true, I’m tend not to be so concerned about dodgy sporting shenanigans that may or may not have happened, to the benefit of many parties, over 100 years ago.
I’m weird like that.
comment by BrummieBlue! (U3487)
posted 2 minutes ago
You're now just repeating yourself, FieldsofAnfieldRd!
In answer to your question, I don't think anyone should be sanctioning BS!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Stop asking me questions I've already answered then
Yeah we know, make as much as you can, doesn't matter how many people die along the way. Free market capitalism no matter what the cost. And if the owner of your football club is arming a war criminal then that's OK too
You cool with Russian dissidents and UK citizens being poisoned on UK soil as well? Romans mate was so blasé about it he put the KGB agents on national telly.
Just be honest, Brummie.
You didn’t realise Chelsea have as much to thank Henry Norris about as anyone.
Better luck with the bee-keeping, eh?
You didn’t realise Chelsea have as much to thank Henry Norris about as anyone.
If after supporting Chelsea for 60 years, you think I don't know about our history, how we came about and that if events and conspired differently, Fulham could have been playing a Stamford Bridge, you're more stupid than I thought.
The difference between you and me, is that, despite loathing your club, I don't hang around your board like a bad smell try to point score and be generally being obnoxious!
I would NEVER come to your board and WUM you!
comment by BrummieBlue! (U3487)
posted 22 minutes ago
FieldsofAnfieldRd
Thanks for the debate, we won't agree on anything over this by the look of it but at least you try and present a thought out approach to the subject, unlike some of the other trolls that lurk around the Chelsea board just trying to point score!
Unfortunately I don't have time to continue but I wish you well until the football season starts!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sorry Brum just read this
Fair enough, agree to disagree. Have a good afternoon fella
comment by BrummieBlue! (U3487)
posted 57 minutes ago
You didn’t realise Chelsea have as much to thank Henry Norris about as anyone.
If after supporting Chelsea for 60 years, you think I don't know about our history, how we came about and that if events and conspired differently, Fulham could have been playing a Stamford Bridge, you're more stupid than I thought.
The difference between you and me, is that, despite loathing your club, I don't hang around your board like a bad smell try to point score and be generally being obnoxious!
I would NEVER come to your board and WUM you!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The first line of your comment barely makes sense (a theme with you?). However, assuming I have correctly deciphered what you’re trying to say, this isn’t my first rodeo having to correct headline readers such as yourself, so you are wrong, my friend.
And I only commented upon this article due to its misplaced praising of one of Putin’s acolytes. Chelsea only come into it due to your fanbase’s continued support of him.
So you are wrong about the amount of time I spend / comments I make on the Chelsea board too.
0/2.
The first line
Isn't the first line of brummie's comment, which 'doesn't make any sense', him copying and pasting part of your own previous comment to reply to?
comment by Lexington 125.2 (U8879)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by BrummieBlue! (U3487)
posted 57 minutes ago
You didn’t realise Chelsea have as much to thank Henry Norris about as anyone.
If after supporting Chelsea for 60 years, you think I don't know about our history, how we came about and that if events and conspired differently, Fulham could have been playing a Stamford Bridge, you're more stupid than I thought.
The difference between you and me, is that, despite loathing your club, I don't hang around your board like a bad smell try to point score and be generally being obnoxious!
I would NEVER come to your board and WUM you!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The first line of your comment barely makes sense (a theme with you?). However, assuming I have correctly deciphered what you’re trying to say, this isn’t my first rodeo having to correct headline readers such as yourself, so you are wrong, my friend.
And I only commented upon this article due to its misplaced praising of one of Putin’s acolytes. Chelsea only come into it due to your fanbase’s continued support of him.
So you are wrong about the amount of time I spend / comments I make on the Chelsea board too.
0/2.
The first line
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The first line was your line - not surprising that it doesn't make sense to you then!
Taken out of the context of my original comment it is misleading. A couple of apostrophes would've helped highlight you'd clipped it from my point, so really, the fault is yours not mine.
Fair enough, I should've realised you might struggle with something as basic as that.
My point still stands.
But as a gentleman, we'll call that last round a draw.
Taken out of the context of my original comment it is misleading. A couple of apostrophes would've helped highlight you'd clipped it from my point, so really, the fault is yours not mine.
Fair enough, I should've realised you might struggle with something as basic as that.
-----------------------------------------------------
This is the most Winston comment not made by Winston I've seen on this forum
I guess not allowing you the last comment, only makes it worse?
I’d better not reply then…
comment by Lexington 125.2 (U8879)
posted 1 hour, 43 minutes ago
Taken out of the context of my original comment it is misleading. A couple of apostrophes would've helped highlight you'd clipped it from my point, so really, the fault is yours not mine.
Fair enough, I should've realised you might struggle with something as basic as that.
My point still stands.
But as a gentleman, we'll call that last round a draw.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My how gracious of you!
Next time I copy n paste one of your lines, I'll be sure to put it in bold italic, highlighted in Red, with parentheses, to make sure you can't forget what you've written!
And I thought I was supposed to be the senile old codger!
I’d better not reply then…
--------------------------------------------------
And that's the most un-Winston like one
Well played sir
comment by BrummieBlue! (U3487)
posted 4 hours, 16 minutes ago
You didn’t realise Chelsea have as much to thank Henry Norris about as anyone.
If after supporting Chelsea for 60 years, you think I don't know about our history, how we came about and that if events and conspired differently, Fulham could have been playing a Stamford Bridge, you're more stupid than I thought.
The difference between you and me, is that, despite loathing your club, I don't hang around your board like a bad smell try to point score and be generally being obnoxious!
I would NEVER come to your board and WUM you!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pretty common for people to search by recent and stumble across embarrassing sharticles like this.
Sign in if you want to comment
Roman the peacemaker: again
Page 3 of 3
posted on 3/8/24
"For the record I don't believe British Steel should have been sanctioned any more than I do Evraz. They're both private companies and both in business to make money, why would it be anymore unusual Evraz selling their produce to the Russian Government than BS selling to the UK Government?"
Greed is good no matter how many people it kills
Should those making a fortune off the back of war also own a football team? How do you reconcile a new signing being bought off the back of war money?
posted on 3/8/24
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 4 minutes ago
"For the record I don't believe British Steel should have been sanctioned any more than I do Evraz. They're both private companies and both in business to make money, why would it be anymore unusual Evraz selling their produce to the Russian Government than BS selling to the UK Government?"
Greed is good no matter how many people it kills
Should those making a fortune off the back of war also own a football team? How do you reconcile a new signing being bought off the back of war money?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Again you're avoiding the question, what is it that you feel you can condemn Evraz with but not apply the same principle to something a little closer to home?
And all our recent signings have been made with US money. Again not a situation I'm happy with but as a fan what do you propose I can do about it?
posted on 3/8/24
comment by BraveheartTyke (U6173)
posted 16 hours, 55 minutes ago
Roman coming back at Summerslam.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Best comment on this thread by a distance
posted on 3/8/24
comment by Devil (U6522)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by BraveheartTyke (U6173)
posted 16 hours, 55 minutes ago
Roman coming back at Summerslam.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Best comment on this thread by a distance
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I have no idea what Summerslam is!
posted on 3/8/24
comment by BrummieBlue! (U3487)
posted 23 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 4 minutes ago
"For the record I don't believe British Steel should have been sanctioned any more than I do Evraz. They're both private companies and both in business to make money, why would it be anymore unusual Evraz selling their produce to the Russian Government than BS selling to the UK Government?"
Greed is good no matter how many people it kills
Should those making a fortune off the back of war also own a football team? How do you reconcile a new signing being bought off the back of war money?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Again you're avoiding the question, what is it that you feel you can condemn Evraz with but not apply the same principle to something a little closer to home?
And all our recent signings have been made with US money. Again not a situation I'm happy with but as a fan what do you propose I can do about it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not avoided anything
"Mate stop clinging to this. I don't agree with who we (The UK) selectively decide to arm in the world. The British gov obviously disagrees so would never apply sanctions. Who do you think should be sanctioning British Steel? "
posted on 3/8/24
comment by BrummieBlue! (U3487)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Devil (U6522)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by BraveheartTyke (U6173)
posted 16 hours, 55 minutes ago
Roman coming back at Summerslam.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Best comment on this thread by a distance
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I have no idea what Summerslam is!
-----------------------------------------------
Congratulations on being an adult, unfortunately something I am not
posted on 3/8/24
You're now just repeating yourself, FieldsofAnfieldRd!
In answer to your question, I don't think anyone should be sanctioning BS!
posted on 3/8/24
comment by Devil (U6522)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by BrummieBlue! (U3487)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Devil (U6522)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by BraveheartTyke (U6173)
posted 16 hours, 55 minutes ago
Roman coming back at Summerslam.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Best comment on this thread by a distance
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I have no idea what Summerslam is!
-----------------------------------------------
Congratulations on being an adult, unfortunately something I am not
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I see I'm going to have to Google it! .
posted on 3/8/24
FieldsofAnfieldRd
Thanks for the debate, we won't agree on anything over this by the look of it but at least you try and present a thought out approach to the subject, unlike some of the other trolls that lurk around the Chelsea board just trying to point score!
Unfortunately I don't have time to continue but I wish you well until the football season starts!
posted on 3/8/24
comment by BrummieBlue! (U3487)
posted 58 minutes ago
comment by Lexington 125.2 (U8879)
posted 8 minutes ago
https://www.fourfourtwo.com/features/henry-norris-arsenal-tottenham-woolwich-highbury
There you go, Brummie.
Can't promise it will help with what you know about bee-keeping, but it will certainly expand your football knowledge.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're nothing more than a hypocritical clown to me.
Accept what you don't like if it suits, but demean others for less!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can you explain to the rest of us what you think hypocritical means?
I don’t like warmongers, or their acolytes. Especially those currently committing, and assisting in committing atrocities.
It is true, I’m tend not to be so concerned about dodgy sporting shenanigans that may or may not have happened, to the benefit of many parties, over 100 years ago.
I’m weird like that.
posted on 3/8/24
comment by BrummieBlue! (U3487)
posted 2 minutes ago
You're now just repeating yourself, FieldsofAnfieldRd!
In answer to your question, I don't think anyone should be sanctioning BS!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Stop asking me questions I've already answered then
Yeah we know, make as much as you can, doesn't matter how many people die along the way. Free market capitalism no matter what the cost. And if the owner of your football club is arming a war criminal then that's OK too
You cool with Russian dissidents and UK citizens being poisoned on UK soil as well? Romans mate was so blasé about it he put the KGB agents on national telly.
posted on 3/8/24
Just be honest, Brummie.
You didn’t realise Chelsea have as much to thank Henry Norris about as anyone.
Better luck with the bee-keeping, eh?
posted on 3/8/24
You didn’t realise Chelsea have as much to thank Henry Norris about as anyone.
If after supporting Chelsea for 60 years, you think I don't know about our history, how we came about and that if events and conspired differently, Fulham could have been playing a Stamford Bridge, you're more stupid than I thought.
The difference between you and me, is that, despite loathing your club, I don't hang around your board like a bad smell try to point score and be generally being obnoxious!
I would NEVER come to your board and WUM you!
posted on 3/8/24
comment by BrummieBlue! (U3487)
posted 22 minutes ago
FieldsofAnfieldRd
Thanks for the debate, we won't agree on anything over this by the look of it but at least you try and present a thought out approach to the subject, unlike some of the other trolls that lurk around the Chelsea board just trying to point score!
Unfortunately I don't have time to continue but I wish you well until the football season starts!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sorry Brum just read this
Fair enough, agree to disagree. Have a good afternoon fella
posted on 3/8/24
comment by BrummieBlue! (U3487)
posted 57 minutes ago
You didn’t realise Chelsea have as much to thank Henry Norris about as anyone.
If after supporting Chelsea for 60 years, you think I don't know about our history, how we came about and that if events and conspired differently, Fulham could have been playing a Stamford Bridge, you're more stupid than I thought.
The difference between you and me, is that, despite loathing your club, I don't hang around your board like a bad smell try to point score and be generally being obnoxious!
I would NEVER come to your board and WUM you!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The first line of your comment barely makes sense (a theme with you?). However, assuming I have correctly deciphered what you’re trying to say, this isn’t my first rodeo having to correct headline readers such as yourself, so you are wrong, my friend.
And I only commented upon this article due to its misplaced praising of one of Putin’s acolytes. Chelsea only come into it due to your fanbase’s continued support of him.
So you are wrong about the amount of time I spend / comments I make on the Chelsea board too.
0/2.
The first line
posted on 3/8/24
Isn't the first line of brummie's comment, which 'doesn't make any sense', him copying and pasting part of your own previous comment to reply to?
posted on 3/8/24
comment by Lexington 125.2 (U8879)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by BrummieBlue! (U3487)
posted 57 minutes ago
You didn’t realise Chelsea have as much to thank Henry Norris about as anyone.
If after supporting Chelsea for 60 years, you think I don't know about our history, how we came about and that if events and conspired differently, Fulham could have been playing a Stamford Bridge, you're more stupid than I thought.
The difference between you and me, is that, despite loathing your club, I don't hang around your board like a bad smell try to point score and be generally being obnoxious!
I would NEVER come to your board and WUM you!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The first line of your comment barely makes sense (a theme with you?). However, assuming I have correctly deciphered what you’re trying to say, this isn’t my first rodeo having to correct headline readers such as yourself, so you are wrong, my friend.
And I only commented upon this article due to its misplaced praising of one of Putin’s acolytes. Chelsea only come into it due to your fanbase’s continued support of him.
So you are wrong about the amount of time I spend / comments I make on the Chelsea board too.
0/2.
The first line
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The first line was your line - not surprising that it doesn't make sense to you then!
posted on 3/8/24
Taken out of the context of my original comment it is misleading. A couple of apostrophes would've helped highlight you'd clipped it from my point, so really, the fault is yours not mine.
Fair enough, I should've realised you might struggle with something as basic as that.
My point still stands.
But as a gentleman, we'll call that last round a draw.
posted on 3/8/24
Taken out of the context of my original comment it is misleading. A couple of apostrophes would've helped highlight you'd clipped it from my point, so really, the fault is yours not mine.
Fair enough, I should've realised you might struggle with something as basic as that.
-----------------------------------------------------
This is the most Winston comment not made by Winston I've seen on this forum
posted on 3/8/24
I guess not allowing you the last comment, only makes it worse?
I’d better not reply then…
posted on 3/8/24
comment by Lexington 125.2 (U8879)
posted 1 hour, 43 minutes ago
Taken out of the context of my original comment it is misleading. A couple of apostrophes would've helped highlight you'd clipped it from my point, so really, the fault is yours not mine.
Fair enough, I should've realised you might struggle with something as basic as that.
My point still stands.
But as a gentleman, we'll call that last round a draw.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My how gracious of you!
Next time I copy n paste one of your lines, I'll be sure to put it in bold italic, highlighted in Red, with parentheses, to make sure you can't forget what you've written!
And I thought I was supposed to be the senile old codger!
posted on 3/8/24
I’d better not reply then…
--------------------------------------------------
And that's the most un-Winston like one
Well played sir
posted on 3/8/24
comment by BrummieBlue! (U3487)
posted 4 hours, 16 minutes ago
You didn’t realise Chelsea have as much to thank Henry Norris about as anyone.
If after supporting Chelsea for 60 years, you think I don't know about our history, how we came about and that if events and conspired differently, Fulham could have been playing a Stamford Bridge, you're more stupid than I thought.
The difference between you and me, is that, despite loathing your club, I don't hang around your board like a bad smell try to point score and be generally being obnoxious!
I would NEVER come to your board and WUM you!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pretty common for people to search by recent and stumble across embarrassing sharticles like this.
Page 3 of 3