comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 3 minutes ago
My only issue is not making any effort to be involved with the ball and be there as a blocker so to speak ….people can go on about keepers being stronger or defenders getting in there but that’s not the point ….its not American football …..he is fouling the keeper
He wasn’t offside that’s a definite
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you watched the whole game you would have seen that Sa 'fouled' Bernardo several times during the previous 17 corners.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did he ? Or was he pushing Bernardo away as he was standing as a blocker ?
It was clear Bernardo’s role at every corner …..get in the way of the keeper
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 19 minutes ago
... also 3 Arsenal players 'offside'.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Were they offside... The ball was headed almost inline with the players although I agree 3 players deliberately blocking the keeper is BS
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 39 seconds ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 3 minutes ago
My only issue is not making any effort to be involved with the ball and be there as a blocker so to speak ….people can go on about keepers being stronger or defenders getting in there but that’s not the point ….its not American football …..he is fouling the keeper
He wasn’t offside that’s a definite
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you watched the whole game you would have seen that Sa 'fouled' Bernardo several times during the previous 17 corners.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did he ? Or was he pushing Bernardo away as he was standing as a blocker ?
It was clear Bernardo’s role at every corner …..get in the way of the keeper
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They're obviously mates and most of the pushing was quite light hearted.
The ref obviously looked at it as six of one, half a dozen of another apart from the time Bernardo stood on his foot and was duly penalised.
The header was straight at Sa but he flapped, obviously Sky weren't gong to pick up on that after just giving him MOTM.
comment by Ali - ๐ช๐ฆ ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ (U1192)
posted 43 minutes ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 4 minutes ago
My only issue is not making any effort to be involved with the ball and be there as a blocker so to speak ….people can go on about keepers being stronger or defenders getting in there but that’s not the point ….its not American football …..he is fouling the keeper
He wasn’t offside that’s a definite
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But he was offside when the header came through and the keeper still had to think about the positioning of Bernardo. It's not like he can just forget he exists.
I'm amazed so many people see no issues with it, to be honest.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Should every shot be disallowed if there is a player "offside" nowhere near the keeper? You're focusing too much on what happened before and letting it cloud your judgement on where Silva was and his impact arter the header. It's a difficult one to process due to human nature but everything before the Stones header doesn't exist
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 42 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 3 minutes ago
My only issue is not making any effort to be involved with the ball and be there as a blocker so to speak ….people can go on about keepers being stronger or defenders getting in there but that’s not the point ….its not American football …..he is fouling the keeper
He wasn’t offside that’s a definite
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you watched the whole game you would have seen that Sa 'fouled' Bernardo several times during the previous 17 corners.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did he ? Or was he pushing Bernardo away as he was standing as a blocker ?
It was clear Bernardo’s role at every corner …..get in the way of the keeper
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And if he hadn’t have pushed him away, then he’d have been considered still interfering with play.
It was poor defending by the wolves keeper and defenders. Thats why their initial reaction wasn’t to claim anything, it was despondency at conceding.
comment by Ali - ๐ช๐ฆ ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ (U1192)
posted 1 hour, 24 minutes ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 4 minutes ago
My only issue is not making any effort to be involved with the ball and be there as a blocker so to speak ….people can go on about keepers being stronger or defenders getting in there but that’s not the point ….its not American football …..he is fouling the keeper
He wasn’t offside that’s a definite
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But he was offside when the header came through and the keeper still had to think about the positioning of Bernardo. It's not like he can just forget he exists.
I'm amazed so many people see no issues with it, to be honest.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah. So many people.
It's like that old saying: “If you run into a twunt in the morning, you ran into an twunt. If you run into twunts all day, maybe you're the twunt.”
comment by Ali - ๐ช๐ฆ ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ (U1192)
posted 1 hour, 53 minutes ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 4 minutes ago
My only issue is not making any effort to be involved with the ball and be there as a blocker so to speak ….people can go on about keepers being stronger or defenders getting in there but that’s not the point ….its not American football …..he is fouling the keeper
He wasn’t offside that’s a definite
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But he was offside when the header came through and the keeper still had to think about the positioning of Bernardo. It's not like he can just forget he exists.
I'm amazed so many people see no issues with it, to be honest.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nothing wrong with the goal as far as I’m concerned, if that had been Utd scoring and it was ruled offside I would’ve been annoyed.
If we conceded it wouldn’t of had any complaints apart from poor defending!
“Without even knowing it, are you more likely to give [the goal] to Manchester City than Wolves? When it’s Man City, is there something in there that influences decision-making?" - Gary O'Neil
Can someone remind him about a certain Hwang who should have been sent off, only to stay on and scored the winner against us last year?
comment by RED666…Doing the Right thing! ๐ฌ๐ง (U6562)
posted 1 hour, 13 minutes ago
comment by Ali - ๐ช๐ฆ ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ (U1192)
posted 1 hour, 53 minutes ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 4 minutes ago
My only issue is not making any effort to be involved with the ball and be there as a blocker so to speak ….people can go on about keepers being stronger or defenders getting in there but that’s not the point ….its not American football …..he is fouling the keeper
He wasn’t offside that’s a definite
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But he was offside when the header came through and the keeper still had to think about the positioning of Bernardo. It's not like he can just forget he exists.
I'm amazed so many people see no issues with it, to be honest.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nothing wrong with the goal as far as I’m concerned, if that had been Utd scoring and it was ruled offside I would’ve been annoyed.
If we conceded it wouldn’t of had any complaints apart from poor defending!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If it was disallowed I wouldn't be annoyed because conceding that type of goal would fack me off
comment by mancWoohoo- maximus mardius cob-onius (U10676)
posted 1 hour, 41 minutes ago
comment by Ali - ๐ช๐ฆ ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ (U1192)
posted 1 hour, 24 minutes ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 4 minutes ago
My only issue is not making any effort to be involved with the ball and be there as a blocker so to speak ….people can go on about keepers being stronger or defenders getting in there but that’s not the point ….its not American football …..he is fouling the keeper
He wasn’t offside that’s a definite
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But he was offside when the header came through and the keeper still had to think about the positioning of Bernardo. It's not like he can just forget he exists.
I'm amazed so many people see no issues with it, to be honest.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah. So many people.
It's like that old saying: “If you run into a twunt in the morning, you ran into an twunt. If you run into twunts all day, maybe you're the twunt.”
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Plenty of people think the goal shouldn't have stood, you twunt.
comment by Ali - ๐ช๐ฆ ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ (U1192)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by RED666…Doing the Right thing! ๐ฌ๐ง (U6562)
posted 1 hour, 13 minutes ago
comment by Ali - ๐ช๐ฆ ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ (U1192)
posted 1 hour, 53 minutes ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 4 minutes ago
My only issue is not making any effort to be involved with the ball and be there as a blocker so to speak ….people can go on about keepers being stronger or defenders getting in there but that’s not the point ….its not American football …..he is fouling the keeper
He wasn’t offside that’s a definite
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But he was offside when the header came through and the keeper still had to think about the positioning of Bernardo. It's not like he can just forget he exists.
I'm amazed so many people see no issues with it, to be honest.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nothing wrong with the goal as far as I’m concerned, if that had been Utd scoring and it was ruled offside I would’ve been annoyed.
If we conceded it wouldn’t of had any complaints apart from poor defending!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If it was disallowed I wouldn't be annoyed because conceding that type of goal would fack me off
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And yet you’re amazed people see no issue with the goal!
comment by Ali - ๐ช๐ฆ ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ (U1192)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by mancWoohoo- maximus mardius cob-onius (U10676)
posted 1 hour, 41 minutes ago
comment by Ali - ๐ช๐ฆ ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ (U1192)
posted 1 hour, 24 minutes ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 4 minutes ago
My only issue is not making any effort to be involved with the ball and be there as a blocker so to speak ….people can go on about keepers being stronger or defenders getting in there but that’s not the point ….its not American football …..he is fouling the keeper
He wasn’t offside that’s a definite
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But he was offside when the header came through and the keeper still had to think about the positioning of Bernardo. It's not like he can just forget he exists.
I'm amazed so many people see no issues with it, to be honest.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah. So many people.
It's like that old saying: “If you run into a twunt in the morning, you ran into an twunt. If you run into twunts all day, maybe you're the twunt.”
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Plenty of people think the goal shouldn't have stood, you twunt.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And yet you’re amazed people see no issue with the goal!
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 6 hours, 3 minutes ago
I saw a great picture before on FB of 3 Arsenal players practically assaulting Ederson just as Gabriel scored against City.
Maybe GON should look at that if he thinks City get all the decisions
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's UEFA for you
comment by Ali - ๐ช๐ฆ ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ (U1192)
posted 1 hour, 41 minutes ago
comment by mancWoohoo- maximus mardius cob-onius (U10676)
posted 1 hour, 41 minutes ago
comment by Ali - ๐ช๐ฆ ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ (U1192)
posted 1 hour, 24 minutes ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 4 minutes ago
My only issue is not making any effort to be involved with the ball and be there as a blocker so to speak ….people can go on about keepers being stronger or defenders getting in there but that’s not the point ….its not American football …..he is fouling the keeper
He wasn’t offside that’s a definite
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But he was offside when the header came through and the keeper still had to think about the positioning of Bernardo. It's not like he can just forget he exists.
I'm amazed so many people see no issues with it, to be honest.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah. So many people.
It's like that old saying: “If you run into a twunt in the morning, you ran into an twunt. If you run into twunts all day, maybe you're the twunt.”
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Plenty of people think the goal shouldn't have stood, you twunt.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If they want to change the current rules then fair enough..If anyone thinks it should have been based on the current rules, then they’re just wrong. So.
Ignore the last word there!
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 8 hours, 45 minutes ago
comment by Ali - ๐ช๐ฆ ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ (U1192)
posted 1 hour, 41 minutes ago
comment by mancWoohoo- maximus mardius cob-onius (U10676)
posted 1 hour, 41 minutes ago
comment by Ali - ๐ช๐ฆ ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ (U1192)
posted 1 hour, 24 minutes ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 4 minutes ago
My only issue is not making any effort to be involved with the ball and be there as a blocker so to speak ….people can go on about keepers being stronger or defenders getting in there but that’s not the point ….its not American football …..he is fouling the keeper
He wasn’t offside that’s a definite
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But he was offside when the header came through and the keeper still had to think about the positioning of Bernardo. It's not like he can just forget he exists.
I'm amazed so many people see no issues with it, to be honest.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah. So many people.
It's like that old saying: “If you run into a twunt in the morning, you ran into an twunt. If you run into twunts all day, maybe you're the twunt.”
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Plenty of people think the goal shouldn't have stood, you twunt.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If they want to change the current rules then fair enough..If anyone thinks it should have been based on the current rules, then they’re just wrong. So.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeh, players abuse the current rules. Boris shared a goal that Gabriel scored against city last month.
You can't honestly tell me that those sorts of goals should be allowed?
The Akanji one vs Fulham last year was worse.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=JK-vm-8k1gQ
The handball vs Everton a few years ago is the one though. It’s stuff like that which leads to asterisk chat
https://www.skysports.com/watch/video/sports/football/12552777/huge-controversy-as-var-rules-no-handball-by-rodri-during-everton-vs-man-city
It’s just so blatant
I could list about a dozen if these tbh but tye Wolves one wouldn’t be in it.
Still think that if you’re in the six yard box, you’re affecting play and that should be the rule, full stop.
comment by Ali - ๐ช๐ฆ ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ (U1192)
posted 48 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 8 hours, 45 minutes ago
comment by Ali - ๐ช๐ฆ ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ (U1192)
posted 1 hour, 41 minutes ago
comment by mancWoohoo- maximus mardius cob-onius (U10676)
posted 1 hour, 41 minutes ago
comment by Ali - ๐ช๐ฆ ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ (U1192)
posted 1 hour, 24 minutes ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 4 minutes ago
My only issue is not making any effort to be involved with the ball and be there as a blocker so to speak ….people can go on about keepers being stronger or defenders getting in there but that’s not the point ….its not American football …..he is fouling the keeper
He wasn’t offside that’s a definite
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But he was offside when the header came through and the keeper still had to think about the positioning of Bernardo. It's not like he can just forget he exists.
I'm amazed so many people see no issues with it, to be honest.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah. So many people.
It's like that old saying: “If you run into a twunt in the morning, you ran into an twunt. If you run into twunts all day, maybe you're the twunt.”
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Plenty of people think the goal shouldn't have stood, you twunt.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If they want to change the current rules then fair enough..If anyone thinks it should have been based on the current rules, then they’re just wrong. So.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeh, players abuse the current rules. Boris shared a goal that Gabriel scored against city last month.
You can't honestly tell me that those sorts of goals should be allowed?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah, I agree any holding, grabbing, or obstructing in the six yard box shouldn't be allowed.
If there is a decision to be made that can be argued either way, it almost always goes in City's favour. That's why these questions get asked.
comment by Robbing Hoody - keepy up arbiter. Don’t ... (U6374)
posted 3 hours ago
The Akanji one vs Fulham last year was worse.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JK-vm-8k1gQ
The handball vs Everton a few years ago is the one though. It’s stuff like that which leads to asterisk chat
https://www.skysports.com/watch/video/sports/football/12552777/huge-controversy-as-var-rules-no-handball-by-rodri-during-everton-vs-man-city
It’s just so blatant
I could list about a dozen if these tbh but tye Wolves one wouldn’t be in it.
Still think that if you’re in the six yard box, you’re affecting play and that should be the rule, full stop.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do me a favour, you’re called LiVARpool for a reason
Gundogan was doing a scrum on a Wolves player during a set piece. Wolves player gets booked.
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 30 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - keepy up arbiter. Don’t ... (U6374)
posted 3 hours ago
The Akanji one vs Fulham last year was worse.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JK-vm-8k1gQ
The handball vs Everton a few years ago is the one though. It’s stuff like that which leads to asterisk chat
https://www.skysports.com/watch/video/sports/football/12552777/huge-controversy-as-var-rules-no-handball-by-rodri-during-everton-vs-man-city
It’s just so blatant
I could list about a dozen if these tbh but tye Wolves one wouldn’t be in it.
Still think that if you’re in the six yard box, you’re affecting play and that should be the rule, full stop.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do me a favour, you’re called LiVARpool for a reason
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Only by morons. It’s proven every year how that moniker is bollox, it’s just spouted by know nothings. I mean it you want to talk about reputations Boris… yours is that you’ll say absolutely anything in defence of City no matter how silly it makes you look.
The Rodri handball is just pure comedy and probably the worst reffing decision I’ve ever seen.
Anyone who thinks Akanji isn’t interfering with play there is a bit of a tลตat if we’re honest.
I’m used to it, it’s not even shocking anymore.
Come on though, those two decisions are pretty funny. We’ve not even touched on Doku kicking AMA in the chest…. It’s City, no pen.
Sign in if you want to comment
Wolves manager Gary O'Neil
Page 3 of 5
posted on 21/10/24
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 3 minutes ago
My only issue is not making any effort to be involved with the ball and be there as a blocker so to speak ….people can go on about keepers being stronger or defenders getting in there but that’s not the point ….its not American football …..he is fouling the keeper
He wasn’t offside that’s a definite
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you watched the whole game you would have seen that Sa 'fouled' Bernardo several times during the previous 17 corners.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did he ? Or was he pushing Bernardo away as he was standing as a blocker ?
It was clear Bernardo’s role at every corner …..get in the way of the keeper
posted on 21/10/24
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 19 minutes ago
... also 3 Arsenal players 'offside'.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Were they offside... The ball was headed almost inline with the players although I agree 3 players deliberately blocking the keeper is BS
posted on 21/10/24
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 39 seconds ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 3 minutes ago
My only issue is not making any effort to be involved with the ball and be there as a blocker so to speak ….people can go on about keepers being stronger or defenders getting in there but that’s not the point ….its not American football …..he is fouling the keeper
He wasn’t offside that’s a definite
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you watched the whole game you would have seen that Sa 'fouled' Bernardo several times during the previous 17 corners.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did he ? Or was he pushing Bernardo away as he was standing as a blocker ?
It was clear Bernardo’s role at every corner …..get in the way of the keeper
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They're obviously mates and most of the pushing was quite light hearted.
The ref obviously looked at it as six of one, half a dozen of another apart from the time Bernardo stood on his foot and was duly penalised.
posted on 21/10/24
The header was straight at Sa but he flapped, obviously Sky weren't gong to pick up on that after just giving him MOTM.
posted on 21/10/24
comment by Ali - ๐ช๐ฆ ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ (U1192)
posted 43 minutes ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 4 minutes ago
My only issue is not making any effort to be involved with the ball and be there as a blocker so to speak ….people can go on about keepers being stronger or defenders getting in there but that’s not the point ….its not American football …..he is fouling the keeper
He wasn’t offside that’s a definite
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But he was offside when the header came through and the keeper still had to think about the positioning of Bernardo. It's not like he can just forget he exists.
I'm amazed so many people see no issues with it, to be honest.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Should every shot be disallowed if there is a player "offside" nowhere near the keeper? You're focusing too much on what happened before and letting it cloud your judgement on where Silva was and his impact arter the header. It's a difficult one to process due to human nature but everything before the Stones header doesn't exist
posted on 21/10/24
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 42 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 3 minutes ago
My only issue is not making any effort to be involved with the ball and be there as a blocker so to speak ….people can go on about keepers being stronger or defenders getting in there but that’s not the point ….its not American football …..he is fouling the keeper
He wasn’t offside that’s a definite
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you watched the whole game you would have seen that Sa 'fouled' Bernardo several times during the previous 17 corners.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did he ? Or was he pushing Bernardo away as he was standing as a blocker ?
It was clear Bernardo’s role at every corner …..get in the way of the keeper
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And if he hadn’t have pushed him away, then he’d have been considered still interfering with play.
It was poor defending by the wolves keeper and defenders. Thats why their initial reaction wasn’t to claim anything, it was despondency at conceding.
posted on 21/10/24
comment by Ali - ๐ช๐ฆ ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ (U1192)
posted 1 hour, 24 minutes ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 4 minutes ago
My only issue is not making any effort to be involved with the ball and be there as a blocker so to speak ….people can go on about keepers being stronger or defenders getting in there but that’s not the point ….its not American football …..he is fouling the keeper
He wasn’t offside that’s a definite
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But he was offside when the header came through and the keeper still had to think about the positioning of Bernardo. It's not like he can just forget he exists.
I'm amazed so many people see no issues with it, to be honest.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah. So many people.
It's like that old saying: “If you run into a twunt in the morning, you ran into an twunt. If you run into twunts all day, maybe you're the twunt.”
posted on 21/10/24
comment by Ali - ๐ช๐ฆ ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ (U1192)
posted 1 hour, 53 minutes ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 4 minutes ago
My only issue is not making any effort to be involved with the ball and be there as a blocker so to speak ….people can go on about keepers being stronger or defenders getting in there but that’s not the point ….its not American football …..he is fouling the keeper
He wasn’t offside that’s a definite
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But he was offside when the header came through and the keeper still had to think about the positioning of Bernardo. It's not like he can just forget he exists.
I'm amazed so many people see no issues with it, to be honest.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nothing wrong with the goal as far as I’m concerned, if that had been Utd scoring and it was ruled offside I would’ve been annoyed.
If we conceded it wouldn’t of had any complaints apart from poor defending!
posted on 21/10/24
“Without even knowing it, are you more likely to give [the goal] to Manchester City than Wolves? When it’s Man City, is there something in there that influences decision-making?" - Gary O'Neil
Can someone remind him about a certain Hwang who should have been sent off, only to stay on and scored the winner against us last year?
posted on 21/10/24
comment by RED666…Doing the Right thing! ๐ฌ๐ง (U6562)
posted 1 hour, 13 minutes ago
comment by Ali - ๐ช๐ฆ ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ (U1192)
posted 1 hour, 53 minutes ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 4 minutes ago
My only issue is not making any effort to be involved with the ball and be there as a blocker so to speak ….people can go on about keepers being stronger or defenders getting in there but that’s not the point ….its not American football …..he is fouling the keeper
He wasn’t offside that’s a definite
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But he was offside when the header came through and the keeper still had to think about the positioning of Bernardo. It's not like he can just forget he exists.
I'm amazed so many people see no issues with it, to be honest.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nothing wrong with the goal as far as I’m concerned, if that had been Utd scoring and it was ruled offside I would’ve been annoyed.
If we conceded it wouldn’t of had any complaints apart from poor defending!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If it was disallowed I wouldn't be annoyed because conceding that type of goal would fack me off
posted on 21/10/24
comment by mancWoohoo- maximus mardius cob-onius (U10676)
posted 1 hour, 41 minutes ago
comment by Ali - ๐ช๐ฆ ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ (U1192)
posted 1 hour, 24 minutes ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 4 minutes ago
My only issue is not making any effort to be involved with the ball and be there as a blocker so to speak ….people can go on about keepers being stronger or defenders getting in there but that’s not the point ….its not American football …..he is fouling the keeper
He wasn’t offside that’s a definite
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But he was offside when the header came through and the keeper still had to think about the positioning of Bernardo. It's not like he can just forget he exists.
I'm amazed so many people see no issues with it, to be honest.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah. So many people.
It's like that old saying: “If you run into a twunt in the morning, you ran into an twunt. If you run into twunts all day, maybe you're the twunt.”
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Plenty of people think the goal shouldn't have stood, you twunt.
posted on 21/10/24
comment by Ali - ๐ช๐ฆ ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ (U1192)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by RED666…Doing the Right thing! ๐ฌ๐ง (U6562)
posted 1 hour, 13 minutes ago
comment by Ali - ๐ช๐ฆ ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ (U1192)
posted 1 hour, 53 minutes ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 4 minutes ago
My only issue is not making any effort to be involved with the ball and be there as a blocker so to speak ….people can go on about keepers being stronger or defenders getting in there but that’s not the point ….its not American football …..he is fouling the keeper
He wasn’t offside that’s a definite
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But he was offside when the header came through and the keeper still had to think about the positioning of Bernardo. It's not like he can just forget he exists.
I'm amazed so many people see no issues with it, to be honest.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nothing wrong with the goal as far as I’m concerned, if that had been Utd scoring and it was ruled offside I would’ve been annoyed.
If we conceded it wouldn’t of had any complaints apart from poor defending!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If it was disallowed I wouldn't be annoyed because conceding that type of goal would fack me off
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And yet you’re amazed people see no issue with the goal!
posted on 21/10/24
comment by Ali - ๐ช๐ฆ ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ (U1192)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by mancWoohoo- maximus mardius cob-onius (U10676)
posted 1 hour, 41 minutes ago
comment by Ali - ๐ช๐ฆ ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ (U1192)
posted 1 hour, 24 minutes ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 4 minutes ago
My only issue is not making any effort to be involved with the ball and be there as a blocker so to speak ….people can go on about keepers being stronger or defenders getting in there but that’s not the point ….its not American football …..he is fouling the keeper
He wasn’t offside that’s a definite
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But he was offside when the header came through and the keeper still had to think about the positioning of Bernardo. It's not like he can just forget he exists.
I'm amazed so many people see no issues with it, to be honest.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah. So many people.
It's like that old saying: “If you run into a twunt in the morning, you ran into an twunt. If you run into twunts all day, maybe you're the twunt.”
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Plenty of people think the goal shouldn't have stood, you twunt.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And yet you’re amazed people see no issue with the goal!
posted on 21/10/24
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 6 hours, 3 minutes ago
I saw a great picture before on FB of 3 Arsenal players practically assaulting Ederson just as Gabriel scored against City.
Maybe GON should look at that if he thinks City get all the decisions
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's UEFA for you
posted on 22/10/24
comment by Ali - ๐ช๐ฆ ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ (U1192)
posted 1 hour, 41 minutes ago
comment by mancWoohoo- maximus mardius cob-onius (U10676)
posted 1 hour, 41 minutes ago
comment by Ali - ๐ช๐ฆ ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ (U1192)
posted 1 hour, 24 minutes ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 4 minutes ago
My only issue is not making any effort to be involved with the ball and be there as a blocker so to speak ….people can go on about keepers being stronger or defenders getting in there but that’s not the point ….its not American football …..he is fouling the keeper
He wasn’t offside that’s a definite
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But he was offside when the header came through and the keeper still had to think about the positioning of Bernardo. It's not like he can just forget he exists.
I'm amazed so many people see no issues with it, to be honest.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah. So many people.
It's like that old saying: “If you run into a twunt in the morning, you ran into an twunt. If you run into twunts all day, maybe you're the twunt.”
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Plenty of people think the goal shouldn't have stood, you twunt.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If they want to change the current rules then fair enough..If anyone thinks it should have been based on the current rules, then they’re just wrong. So.
posted on 22/10/24
Ignore the last word there!
posted on 22/10/24
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 8 hours, 45 minutes ago
comment by Ali - ๐ช๐ฆ ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ (U1192)
posted 1 hour, 41 minutes ago
comment by mancWoohoo- maximus mardius cob-onius (U10676)
posted 1 hour, 41 minutes ago
comment by Ali - ๐ช๐ฆ ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ (U1192)
posted 1 hour, 24 minutes ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 4 minutes ago
My only issue is not making any effort to be involved with the ball and be there as a blocker so to speak ….people can go on about keepers being stronger or defenders getting in there but that’s not the point ….its not American football …..he is fouling the keeper
He wasn’t offside that’s a definite
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But he was offside when the header came through and the keeper still had to think about the positioning of Bernardo. It's not like he can just forget he exists.
I'm amazed so many people see no issues with it, to be honest.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah. So many people.
It's like that old saying: “If you run into a twunt in the morning, you ran into an twunt. If you run into twunts all day, maybe you're the twunt.”
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Plenty of people think the goal shouldn't have stood, you twunt.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If they want to change the current rules then fair enough..If anyone thinks it should have been based on the current rules, then they’re just wrong. So.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeh, players abuse the current rules. Boris shared a goal that Gabriel scored against city last month.
You can't honestly tell me that those sorts of goals should be allowed?
posted on 22/10/24
The Akanji one vs Fulham last year was worse.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=JK-vm-8k1gQ
The handball vs Everton a few years ago is the one though. It’s stuff like that which leads to asterisk chat
https://www.skysports.com/watch/video/sports/football/12552777/huge-controversy-as-var-rules-no-handball-by-rodri-during-everton-vs-man-city
It’s just so blatant
I could list about a dozen if these tbh but tye Wolves one wouldn’t be in it.
Still think that if you’re in the six yard box, you’re affecting play and that should be the rule, full stop.
posted on 22/10/24
comment by Ali - ๐ช๐ฆ ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ (U1192)
posted 48 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 8 hours, 45 minutes ago
comment by Ali - ๐ช๐ฆ ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ (U1192)
posted 1 hour, 41 minutes ago
comment by mancWoohoo- maximus mardius cob-onius (U10676)
posted 1 hour, 41 minutes ago
comment by Ali - ๐ช๐ฆ ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ (U1192)
posted 1 hour, 24 minutes ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 4 minutes ago
My only issue is not making any effort to be involved with the ball and be there as a blocker so to speak ….people can go on about keepers being stronger or defenders getting in there but that’s not the point ….its not American football …..he is fouling the keeper
He wasn’t offside that’s a definite
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But he was offside when the header came through and the keeper still had to think about the positioning of Bernardo. It's not like he can just forget he exists.
I'm amazed so many people see no issues with it, to be honest.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah. So many people.
It's like that old saying: “If you run into a twunt in the morning, you ran into an twunt. If you run into twunts all day, maybe you're the twunt.”
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Plenty of people think the goal shouldn't have stood, you twunt.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If they want to change the current rules then fair enough..If anyone thinks it should have been based on the current rules, then they’re just wrong. So.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeh, players abuse the current rules. Boris shared a goal that Gabriel scored against city last month.
You can't honestly tell me that those sorts of goals should be allowed?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah, I agree any holding, grabbing, or obstructing in the six yard box shouldn't be allowed.
posted on 22/10/24
If there is a decision to be made that can be argued either way, it almost always goes in City's favour. That's why these questions get asked.
posted on 22/10/24
comment by Robbing Hoody - keepy up arbiter. Don’t ... (U6374)
posted 3 hours ago
The Akanji one vs Fulham last year was worse.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JK-vm-8k1gQ
The handball vs Everton a few years ago is the one though. It’s stuff like that which leads to asterisk chat
https://www.skysports.com/watch/video/sports/football/12552777/huge-controversy-as-var-rules-no-handball-by-rodri-during-everton-vs-man-city
It’s just so blatant
I could list about a dozen if these tbh but tye Wolves one wouldn’t be in it.
Still think that if you’re in the six yard box, you’re affecting play and that should be the rule, full stop.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do me a favour, you’re called LiVARpool for a reason
posted on 22/10/24
Gundogan was doing a scrum on a Wolves player during a set piece. Wolves player gets booked.
posted on 22/10/24
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 30 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - keepy up arbiter. Don’t ... (U6374)
posted 3 hours ago
The Akanji one vs Fulham last year was worse.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JK-vm-8k1gQ
The handball vs Everton a few years ago is the one though. It’s stuff like that which leads to asterisk chat
https://www.skysports.com/watch/video/sports/football/12552777/huge-controversy-as-var-rules-no-handball-by-rodri-during-everton-vs-man-city
It’s just so blatant
I could list about a dozen if these tbh but tye Wolves one wouldn’t be in it.
Still think that if you’re in the six yard box, you’re affecting play and that should be the rule, full stop.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do me a favour, you’re called LiVARpool for a reason
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Only by morons. It’s proven every year how that moniker is bollox, it’s just spouted by know nothings. I mean it you want to talk about reputations Boris… yours is that you’ll say absolutely anything in defence of City no matter how silly it makes you look.
The Rodri handball is just pure comedy and probably the worst reffing decision I’ve ever seen.
Anyone who thinks Akanji isn’t interfering with play there is a bit of a tลตat if we’re honest.
posted on 22/10/24
The injustice ๐
posted on 22/10/24
I’m used to it, it’s not even shocking anymore.
Come on though, those two decisions are pretty funny. We’ve not even touched on Doku kicking AMA in the chest…. It’s City, no pen.
Page 3 of 5