Also you can't just force someone to go to court if they have done nothing wrong. Why would you turn up if you know you've done nothing wrong? Last time I checked it was a free country.
Just because someone is wearing a white wig and has a so called law degree they think they can control what people say and do. This is a free country where people can say and do what they want without the fear of being silenced. We fought two world wars for this. We are not losing our freedom
how’s news of this scvmbug got here in a football forum? ffs op
comment by downtheplughole (U22523)
posted 1 hour, 7 minutes ago
He was actually telling the truth in that video..The syrian lad hit the girl with a bat and she suffers from pain still. he attacked the boy first.. then the Muslim community went up in arms and blamed the lad for it.
And of course just to stop unrest. they have to quieten the truth.
and PS i dont like Tommy Robison. Just being honest. which in modern day society is not permitted.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
...especially when she asks if her bum looks big in this
Honest question for Liverpool fans. Over the past two seasons, would you swap your one Carling Cup and third place PL finish for our one Carling Cup, third place PL finish AND an FA Cup?
Essentially, would you like a free FA Cup for admitting that Ten Hag was more successful than Klopp in his time at United?
comment by Keiran Keane (U1734)
posted 4 seconds ago
Honest question for Liverpool fans. Over the past two seasons, would you swap your one Carling Cup and third place PL finish for our one Carling Cup, third place PL finish AND an FA Cup?
Essentially, would you like a free FA Cup for admitting that Ten Hag was more successful than Klopp in his time at United?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wrong article. Robb please transfer this comment to the one about Liverpool.
Funniest part is he was asking for donations from his supporters in the run up to this trial to defend his innocence, only to immediately submit a guilty plea
comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 2 minutes ago
Funniest part is he was asking for donations from his supporters in the run up to this trial to defend his innocence, only to immediately submit a guilty plea
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He was forced to by the deep state or he would have got a longer sentence. I only gave £100 so doesn't really matter to me. It's a much worthier cause than most.
comment by Keiran Keane (U1734)
posted 42 minutes ago
comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 2 minutes ago
Funniest part is he was asking for donations from his supporters in the run up to this trial to defend his innocence, only to immediately submit a guilty plea
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He was forced to by the deep state or he would have got a longer sentence. I only gave £100 so doesn't really matter to me. It's a much worthier cause than most.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
£100 is the average annual household income for a Dundonian ... well played Baz in defeating the system
ahh, my heart bleeds for poor little Stephen Yaxley-Lennon
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 1 hour, 50 minutes ago
comment by The God Fowler (U2538)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 3 minutes ago
what has he actually been jailed for?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Whatever they can nail him for to shut him up. He has made many mistakes over the years. But.... he does expose a lot of things that the powers in charge do not like.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He exposes fuсk all. He lies and 'exposes' things which are already being put through court, who obviously don't want their case jeopardised by somebody releasing details or false claims which may impact the jury who have to go on actual evidence, rather than conspiracy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You obviously haven't been on a jury if you think they base their decisions solely on evidence. I did jury duty last month. Most of the jury I was with had made their mind up before they heard the evidence.
A bloke from Dartford threatened Britain First leader Paul Golding with a sword, it was caught on camera. They moved the court case from Kent to London where he was acquitted. I wonder why they moved it to London?
comment by clapfreesince2003 (U22207)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 1 hour, 50 minutes ago
comment by The God Fowler (U2538)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 3 minutes ago
what has he actually been jailed for?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Whatever they can nail him for to shut him up. He has made many mistakes over the years. But.... he does expose a lot of things that the powers in charge do not like.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He exposes fuсk all. He lies and 'exposes' things which are already being put through court, who obviously don't want their case jeopardised by somebody releasing details or false claims which may impact the jury who have to go on actual evidence, rather than conspiracy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You obviously haven't been on a jury if you think they base their decisions solely on evidence. I did jury duty last month. Most of the jury I was with had made their mind up before they heard the evidence.
A bloke from Dartford threatened Britain First leader Paul Golding with a sword, it was caught on camera. They moved the court case from Kent to London where he was acquitted. I wonder why they moved it to London?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah your opinion doesn't matter there are actual laws people have to follow, which is obviously also the case for jeopardising court cases.
‘Contempt of court’ happens when someone risks unfairly influencing a court case. It may stop somebody from getting a fair trial and can affect a trial’s outcome.
Contempt of court includes:
disobeying or ignoring a court order
taking photos or shouting out in court
refusing to answer the court’s questions if you’re called as a witness
publicly commenting on a court case, for example on social media or online news articles
If you’re found to be in contempt of court, you could go to prison for up to 2 years, get a fine, or both.
Publicly commenting on a court case
You might be in contempt of court if you speak publicly or post on social media.
For example, you should not:
say whether you think a person is guilty or innocent
refer to someone’s previous convictions
name someone the judge has allowed to be anonymous, even if you did not know this
name victims, witnesses and offenders under 18
name sеx crime victims
share any evidence or facts about a case that the judge has said cannot be made public
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by clapfreesince2003 (U22207)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 1 hour, 50 minutes ago
comment by The God Fowler (U2538)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 3 minutes ago
what has he actually been jailed for?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Whatever they can nail him for to shut him up. He has made many mistakes over the years. But.... he does expose a lot of things that the powers in charge do not like.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He exposes fuсk all. He lies and 'exposes' things which are already being put through court, who obviously don't want their case jeopardised by somebody releasing details or false claims which may impact the jury who have to go on actual evidence, rather than conspiracy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You obviously haven't been on a jury if you think they base their decisions solely on evidence. I did jury duty last month. Most of the jury I was with had made their mind up before they heard the evidence.
A bloke from Dartford threatened Britain First leader Paul Golding with a sword, it was caught on camera. They moved the court case from Kent to London where he was acquitted. I wonder why they moved it to London?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah your opinion doesn't matter there are actual laws people have to follow, which is obviously also the case for jeopardising court cases.
‘Contempt of court’ happens when someone risks unfairly influencing a court case. It may stop somebody from getting a fair trial and can affect a trial’s outcome.
Contempt of court includes:
disobeying or ignoring a court order
taking photos or shouting out in court
refusing to answer the court’s questions if you’re called as a witness
publicly commenting on a court case, for example on social media or online news articles
If you’re found to be in contempt of court, you could go to prison for up to 2 years, get a fine, or both.
Publicly commenting on a court case
You might be in contempt of court if you speak publicly or post on social media.
For example, you should not:
say whether you think a person is guilty or innocent
refer to someone’s previous convictions
name someone the judge has allowed to be anonymous, even if you did not know this
name victims, witnesses and offenders under 18
name sеx crime victims
share any evidence or facts about a case that the judge has said cannot be made public
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So he was jailed for free speech
Exactly Barry. It's almost like you can't just run around saying whatever you want and believe this free speech means you can't be punished.
I mean if I run around telling people that you inserted yourself into my dog and you were found not guilty of this XL Bully sodomy but I continued to claim it, I'm free to claim it but I'll be punished for it after you get an injunction against me and then I get arrested for failing to adhere to said induction.
It's almost like free speech is only fine when it's not illegal which is crazy I know!
comment by Keiran Keane (U1734)
posted 3 hours, 19 minutes ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by clapfreesince2003 (U22207)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 1 hour, 50 minutes ago
comment by The God Fowler (U2538)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 3 minutes ago
what has he actually been jailed for?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Whatever they can nail him for to shut him up. He has made many mistakes over the years. But.... he does expose a lot of things that the powers in charge do not like.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He exposes fuсk all. He lies and 'exposes' things which are already being put through court, who obviously don't want their case jeopardised by somebody releasing details or false claims which may impact the jury who have to go on actual evidence, rather than conspiracy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You obviously haven't been on a jury if you think they base their decisions solely on evidence. I did jury duty last month. Most of the jury I was with had made their mind up before they heard the evidence.
A bloke from Dartford threatened Britain First leader Paul Golding with a sword, it was caught on camera. They moved the court case from Kent to London where he was acquitted. I wonder why they moved it to London?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah your opinion doesn't matter there are actual laws people have to follow, which is obviously also the case for jeopardising court cases.
‘Contempt of court’ happens when someone risks unfairly influencing a court case. It may stop somebody from getting a fair trial and can affect a trial’s outcome.
Contempt of court includes:
disobeying or ignoring a court order
taking photos or shouting out in court
refusing to answer the court’s questions if you’re called as a witness
publicly commenting on a court case, for example on social media or online news articles
If you’re found to be in contempt of court, you could go to prison for up to 2 years, get a fine, or both.
Publicly commenting on a court case
You might be in contempt of court if you speak publicly or post on social media.
For example, you should not:
say whether you think a person is guilty or innocent
refer to someone’s previous convictions
name someone the judge has allowed to be anonymous, even if you did not know this
name victims, witnesses and offenders under 18
name sеx crime victims
share any evidence or facts about a case that the judge has said cannot be made public
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So he was jailed for free speech
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope.
Your free speech doesn't extend to limiting the freedom or free speech of others
Which influencing a jury or impacting on a person to get a free and fair trial would do.
comment by Mattyp (U8926)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Keiran Keane (U1734)
posted 3 hours, 19 minutes ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by clapfreesince2003 (U22207)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 1 hour, 50 minutes ago
comment by The God Fowler (U2538)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 3 minutes ago
what has he actually been jailed for?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Whatever they can nail him for to shut him up. He has made many mistakes over the years. But.... he does expose a lot of things that the powers in charge do not like.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He exposes fuсk all. He lies and 'exposes' things which are already being put through court, who obviously don't want their case jeopardised by somebody releasing details or false claims which may impact the jury who have to go on actual evidence, rather than conspiracy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You obviously haven't been on a jury if you think they base their decisions solely on evidence. I did jury duty last month. Most of the jury I was with had made their mind up before they heard the evidence.
A bloke from Dartford threatened Britain First leader Paul Golding with a sword, it was caught on camera. They moved the court case from Kent to London where he was acquitted. I wonder why they moved it to London?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah your opinion doesn't matter there are actual laws people have to follow, which is obviously also the case for jeopardising court cases.
‘Contempt of court’ happens when someone risks unfairly influencing a court case. It may stop somebody from getting a fair trial and can affect a trial’s outcome.
Contempt of court includes:
disobeying or ignoring a court order
taking photos or shouting out in court
refusing to answer the court’s questions if you’re called as a witness
publicly commenting on a court case, for example on social media or online news articles
If you’re found to be in contempt of court, you could go to prison for up to 2 years, get a fine, or both.
Publicly commenting on a court case
You might be in contempt of court if you speak publicly or post on social media.
For example, you should not:
say whether you think a person is guilty or innocent
refer to someone’s previous convictions
name someone the judge has allowed to be anonymous, even if you did not know this
name victims, witnesses and offenders under 18
name sеx crime victims
share any evidence or facts about a case that the judge has said cannot be made public
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So he was jailed for free speech
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope.
Your free speech doesn't extend to limiting the freedom or free speech of others
Which influencing a jury or impacting on a person to get a free and fair trial would do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So he wasn't allowed to express his free speech. He was jailed for it.
comment by Keiran Keane (U1734)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Mattyp (U8926)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Keiran Keane (U1734)
posted 3 hours, 19 minutes ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by clapfreesince2003 (U22207)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 1 hour, 50 minutes ago
comment by The God Fowler (U2538)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 3 minutes ago
what has he actually been jailed for?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Whatever they can nail him for to shut him up. He has made many mistakes over the years. But.... he does expose a lot of things that the powers in charge do not like.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He exposes fuсk all. He lies and 'exposes' things which are already being put through court, who obviously don't want their case jeopardised by somebody releasing details or false claims which may impact the jury who have to go on actual evidence, rather than conspiracy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You obviously haven't been on a jury if you think they base their decisions solely on evidence. I did jury duty last month. Most of the jury I was with had made their mind up before they heard the evidence.
A bloke from Dartford threatened Britain First leader Paul Golding with a sword, it was caught on camera. They moved the court case from Kent to London where he was acquitted. I wonder why they moved it to London?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah your opinion doesn't matter there are actual laws people have to follow, which is obviously also the case for jeopardising court cases.
‘Contempt of court’ happens when someone risks unfairly influencing a court case. It may stop somebody from getting a fair trial and can affect a trial’s outcome.
Contempt of court includes:
disobeying or ignoring a court order
taking photos or shouting out in court
refusing to answer the court’s questions if you’re called as a witness
publicly commenting on a court case, for example on social media or online news articles
If you’re found to be in contempt of court, you could go to prison for up to 2 years, get a fine, or both.
Publicly commenting on a court case
You might be in contempt of court if you speak publicly or post on social media.
For example, you should not:
say whether you think a person is guilty or innocent
refer to someone’s previous convictions
name someone the judge has allowed to be anonymous, even if you did not know this
name victims, witnesses and offenders under 18
name sеx crime victims
share any evidence or facts about a case that the judge has said cannot be made public
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So he was jailed for free speech
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope.
Your free speech doesn't extend to limiting the freedom or free speech of others
Which influencing a jury or impacting on a person to get a free and fair trial would do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So he wasn't allowed to express his free speech. He was jailed for it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope.
Your free speech doesn't extend to limiting the freedom or free speech of others
Which influencing a jury or impacting on a person to get a free and fair trial would do.
Why has his free speech been silenced? It's meant to be free. He has been cancelled. We can't just be locking people up for saying or doing things we disagree with. World's gone mad.
comment by Keiran Keane (U1734)
posted 54 seconds ago
Why has his free speech been silenced? It's meant to be free. He has been cancelled. We can't just be locking people up for saying or doing things we disagree with. World's gone mad.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope.
Your free speech doesn't extend to limiting the freedom or free speech of others
Which influencing a jury or impacting on a person to get a free and fair trial would do.
What about Tommy's fair trial? He was just thrown in jail without being able to show the jury his online documentary tape which would have cleared his name.
comment by Keiran Keane (U1734)
posted 1 minute ago
What about Tommy's fair trial? He was just thrown in jail without being able to show the jury his online documentary tape which would have cleared his name.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He pleaded guilty.
They don't let you show stuff when you do that.
His documentary would also not have done anything to tackle the contempt of court charges as nothing in that documentary would have proven he didn't commit contempt of court as that's not how contempt of court works.
If he hadn't been silenced then he would have been able to stand up and show his video to the jury on the big screen in court and it would win them over. The jury would see it's actually the judge and the system that is corrupt and there would be riots. The deep state can't allow this so they silenced Tommy and sent him to jail without trial
comment by Robb - Team Nagelsmann (U22716)
posted 7 hours, 19 minutes ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 21 seconds ago
comment by Robb Raygun (U22716)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Mattyp (U8926)
posted 1 minute ago
Maybe not exploding but the self immolation of having a campaign event where your warm up speaker calls Porto Rico an island of garbage when you are trying to win swing states with Porto Rican populations larger than the swing is pretty close...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think he just lost 80,000 votes right there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bad Bunny who in the Latino world is even bigger than Taylor Swift came out and supported Kamala after that so hopefully it’s the thing that tips Penn over the edge next week.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
yeah the way it should be done, y'know rather than vote for actual policies and what would help the country
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kamala actually has polices. Trump has none.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not true, his policy is revenge on anyone who has pointed out his numerous crimes.
comment by Keiran Keane (U1734)
posted 1 hour, 29 minutes ago
If he hadn't been silenced then he would have been able to stand up and show his video to the jury on the big screen in court and it would win them over. The jury would see it's actually the judge and the system that is corrupt and there would be riots. The deep state can't allow this so they silenced Tommy and sent him to jail without trial
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He pleaded guilty.
They don't let you show stuff when you do that.
His documentary would also not have done anything to tackle the contempt of court charges as nothing in that documentary would have proven he didn't commit contempt of court as that's not how contempt of court works.
He's well within his rights to show contempt towards court. It's called an opinion. We are jailing people for having opinions now?
Sign in if you want to comment
Tommy Robinson jailed
Page 2 of 3
posted on 28/10/24
Also you can't just force someone to go to court if they have done nothing wrong. Why would you turn up if you know you've done nothing wrong? Last time I checked it was a free country.
posted on 28/10/24
Just because someone is wearing a white wig and has a so called law degree they think they can control what people say and do. This is a free country where people can say and do what they want without the fear of being silenced. We fought two world wars for this. We are not losing our freedom
posted on 28/10/24
how’s news of this scvmbug got here in a football forum? ffs op
posted on 28/10/24
comment by downtheplughole (U22523)
posted 1 hour, 7 minutes ago
He was actually telling the truth in that video..The syrian lad hit the girl with a bat and she suffers from pain still. he attacked the boy first.. then the Muslim community went up in arms and blamed the lad for it.
And of course just to stop unrest. they have to quieten the truth.
and PS i dont like Tommy Robison. Just being honest. which in modern day society is not permitted.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
...especially when she asks if her bum looks big in this
posted on 28/10/24
Honest question for Liverpool fans. Over the past two seasons, would you swap your one Carling Cup and third place PL finish for our one Carling Cup, third place PL finish AND an FA Cup?
Essentially, would you like a free FA Cup for admitting that Ten Hag was more successful than Klopp in his time at United?
posted on 28/10/24
comment by Keiran Keane (U1734)
posted 4 seconds ago
Honest question for Liverpool fans. Over the past two seasons, would you swap your one Carling Cup and third place PL finish for our one Carling Cup, third place PL finish AND an FA Cup?
Essentially, would you like a free FA Cup for admitting that Ten Hag was more successful than Klopp in his time at United?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wrong article. Robb please transfer this comment to the one about Liverpool.
posted on 28/10/24
Funniest part is he was asking for donations from his supporters in the run up to this trial to defend his innocence, only to immediately submit a guilty plea
posted on 28/10/24
comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 2 minutes ago
Funniest part is he was asking for donations from his supporters in the run up to this trial to defend his innocence, only to immediately submit a guilty plea
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He was forced to by the deep state or he would have got a longer sentence. I only gave £100 so doesn't really matter to me. It's a much worthier cause than most.
posted on 28/10/24
comment by Keiran Keane (U1734)
posted 42 minutes ago
comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 2 minutes ago
Funniest part is he was asking for donations from his supporters in the run up to this trial to defend his innocence, only to immediately submit a guilty plea
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He was forced to by the deep state or he would have got a longer sentence. I only gave £100 so doesn't really matter to me. It's a much worthier cause than most.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
£100 is the average annual household income for a Dundonian ... well played Baz in defeating the system
posted on 28/10/24
ahh, my heart bleeds for poor little Stephen Yaxley-Lennon
posted on 28/10/24
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 1 hour, 50 minutes ago
comment by The God Fowler (U2538)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 3 minutes ago
what has he actually been jailed for?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Whatever they can nail him for to shut him up. He has made many mistakes over the years. But.... he does expose a lot of things that the powers in charge do not like.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He exposes fuсk all. He lies and 'exposes' things which are already being put through court, who obviously don't want their case jeopardised by somebody releasing details or false claims which may impact the jury who have to go on actual evidence, rather than conspiracy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You obviously haven't been on a jury if you think they base their decisions solely on evidence. I did jury duty last month. Most of the jury I was with had made their mind up before they heard the evidence.
A bloke from Dartford threatened Britain First leader Paul Golding with a sword, it was caught on camera. They moved the court case from Kent to London where he was acquitted. I wonder why they moved it to London?
posted on 28/10/24
comment by clapfreesince2003 (U22207)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 1 hour, 50 minutes ago
comment by The God Fowler (U2538)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 3 minutes ago
what has he actually been jailed for?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Whatever they can nail him for to shut him up. He has made many mistakes over the years. But.... he does expose a lot of things that the powers in charge do not like.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He exposes fuсk all. He lies and 'exposes' things which are already being put through court, who obviously don't want their case jeopardised by somebody releasing details or false claims which may impact the jury who have to go on actual evidence, rather than conspiracy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You obviously haven't been on a jury if you think they base their decisions solely on evidence. I did jury duty last month. Most of the jury I was with had made their mind up before they heard the evidence.
A bloke from Dartford threatened Britain First leader Paul Golding with a sword, it was caught on camera. They moved the court case from Kent to London where he was acquitted. I wonder why they moved it to London?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah your opinion doesn't matter there are actual laws people have to follow, which is obviously also the case for jeopardising court cases.
‘Contempt of court’ happens when someone risks unfairly influencing a court case. It may stop somebody from getting a fair trial and can affect a trial’s outcome.
Contempt of court includes:
disobeying or ignoring a court order
taking photos or shouting out in court
refusing to answer the court’s questions if you’re called as a witness
publicly commenting on a court case, for example on social media or online news articles
If you’re found to be in contempt of court, you could go to prison for up to 2 years, get a fine, or both.
Publicly commenting on a court case
You might be in contempt of court if you speak publicly or post on social media.
For example, you should not:
say whether you think a person is guilty or innocent
refer to someone’s previous convictions
name someone the judge has allowed to be anonymous, even if you did not know this
name victims, witnesses and offenders under 18
name sеx crime victims
share any evidence or facts about a case that the judge has said cannot be made public
posted on 28/10/24
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by clapfreesince2003 (U22207)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 1 hour, 50 minutes ago
comment by The God Fowler (U2538)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 3 minutes ago
what has he actually been jailed for?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Whatever they can nail him for to shut him up. He has made many mistakes over the years. But.... he does expose a lot of things that the powers in charge do not like.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He exposes fuсk all. He lies and 'exposes' things which are already being put through court, who obviously don't want their case jeopardised by somebody releasing details or false claims which may impact the jury who have to go on actual evidence, rather than conspiracy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You obviously haven't been on a jury if you think they base their decisions solely on evidence. I did jury duty last month. Most of the jury I was with had made their mind up before they heard the evidence.
A bloke from Dartford threatened Britain First leader Paul Golding with a sword, it was caught on camera. They moved the court case from Kent to London where he was acquitted. I wonder why they moved it to London?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah your opinion doesn't matter there are actual laws people have to follow, which is obviously also the case for jeopardising court cases.
‘Contempt of court’ happens when someone risks unfairly influencing a court case. It may stop somebody from getting a fair trial and can affect a trial’s outcome.
Contempt of court includes:
disobeying or ignoring a court order
taking photos or shouting out in court
refusing to answer the court’s questions if you’re called as a witness
publicly commenting on a court case, for example on social media or online news articles
If you’re found to be in contempt of court, you could go to prison for up to 2 years, get a fine, or both.
Publicly commenting on a court case
You might be in contempt of court if you speak publicly or post on social media.
For example, you should not:
say whether you think a person is guilty or innocent
refer to someone’s previous convictions
name someone the judge has allowed to be anonymous, even if you did not know this
name victims, witnesses and offenders under 18
name sеx crime victims
share any evidence or facts about a case that the judge has said cannot be made public
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So he was jailed for free speech
posted on 28/10/24
Exactly Barry. It's almost like you can't just run around saying whatever you want and believe this free speech means you can't be punished.
I mean if I run around telling people that you inserted yourself into my dog and you were found not guilty of this XL Bully sodomy but I continued to claim it, I'm free to claim it but I'll be punished for it after you get an injunction against me and then I get arrested for failing to adhere to said induction.
It's almost like free speech is only fine when it's not illegal which is crazy I know!
posted on 28/10/24
comment by Keiran Keane (U1734)
posted 3 hours, 19 minutes ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by clapfreesince2003 (U22207)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 1 hour, 50 minutes ago
comment by The God Fowler (U2538)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 3 minutes ago
what has he actually been jailed for?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Whatever they can nail him for to shut him up. He has made many mistakes over the years. But.... he does expose a lot of things that the powers in charge do not like.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He exposes fuсk all. He lies and 'exposes' things which are already being put through court, who obviously don't want their case jeopardised by somebody releasing details or false claims which may impact the jury who have to go on actual evidence, rather than conspiracy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You obviously haven't been on a jury if you think they base their decisions solely on evidence. I did jury duty last month. Most of the jury I was with had made their mind up before they heard the evidence.
A bloke from Dartford threatened Britain First leader Paul Golding with a sword, it was caught on camera. They moved the court case from Kent to London where he was acquitted. I wonder why they moved it to London?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah your opinion doesn't matter there are actual laws people have to follow, which is obviously also the case for jeopardising court cases.
‘Contempt of court’ happens when someone risks unfairly influencing a court case. It may stop somebody from getting a fair trial and can affect a trial’s outcome.
Contempt of court includes:
disobeying or ignoring a court order
taking photos or shouting out in court
refusing to answer the court’s questions if you’re called as a witness
publicly commenting on a court case, for example on social media or online news articles
If you’re found to be in contempt of court, you could go to prison for up to 2 years, get a fine, or both.
Publicly commenting on a court case
You might be in contempt of court if you speak publicly or post on social media.
For example, you should not:
say whether you think a person is guilty or innocent
refer to someone’s previous convictions
name someone the judge has allowed to be anonymous, even if you did not know this
name victims, witnesses and offenders under 18
name sеx crime victims
share any evidence or facts about a case that the judge has said cannot be made public
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So he was jailed for free speech
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope.
Your free speech doesn't extend to limiting the freedom or free speech of others
Which influencing a jury or impacting on a person to get a free and fair trial would do.
posted on 28/10/24
comment by Mattyp (U8926)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Keiran Keane (U1734)
posted 3 hours, 19 minutes ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by clapfreesince2003 (U22207)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 1 hour, 50 minutes ago
comment by The God Fowler (U2538)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 3 minutes ago
what has he actually been jailed for?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Whatever they can nail him for to shut him up. He has made many mistakes over the years. But.... he does expose a lot of things that the powers in charge do not like.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He exposes fuсk all. He lies and 'exposes' things which are already being put through court, who obviously don't want their case jeopardised by somebody releasing details or false claims which may impact the jury who have to go on actual evidence, rather than conspiracy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You obviously haven't been on a jury if you think they base their decisions solely on evidence. I did jury duty last month. Most of the jury I was with had made their mind up before they heard the evidence.
A bloke from Dartford threatened Britain First leader Paul Golding with a sword, it was caught on camera. They moved the court case from Kent to London where he was acquitted. I wonder why they moved it to London?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah your opinion doesn't matter there are actual laws people have to follow, which is obviously also the case for jeopardising court cases.
‘Contempt of court’ happens when someone risks unfairly influencing a court case. It may stop somebody from getting a fair trial and can affect a trial’s outcome.
Contempt of court includes:
disobeying or ignoring a court order
taking photos or shouting out in court
refusing to answer the court’s questions if you’re called as a witness
publicly commenting on a court case, for example on social media or online news articles
If you’re found to be in contempt of court, you could go to prison for up to 2 years, get a fine, or both.
Publicly commenting on a court case
You might be in contempt of court if you speak publicly or post on social media.
For example, you should not:
say whether you think a person is guilty or innocent
refer to someone’s previous convictions
name someone the judge has allowed to be anonymous, even if you did not know this
name victims, witnesses and offenders under 18
name sеx crime victims
share any evidence or facts about a case that the judge has said cannot be made public
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So he was jailed for free speech
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope.
Your free speech doesn't extend to limiting the freedom or free speech of others
Which influencing a jury or impacting on a person to get a free and fair trial would do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So he wasn't allowed to express his free speech. He was jailed for it.
posted on 28/10/24
comment by Keiran Keane (U1734)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Mattyp (U8926)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Keiran Keane (U1734)
posted 3 hours, 19 minutes ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by clapfreesince2003 (U22207)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 1 hour, 50 minutes ago
comment by The God Fowler (U2538)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 3 minutes ago
what has he actually been jailed for?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Whatever they can nail him for to shut him up. He has made many mistakes over the years. But.... he does expose a lot of things that the powers in charge do not like.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He exposes fuсk all. He lies and 'exposes' things which are already being put through court, who obviously don't want their case jeopardised by somebody releasing details or false claims which may impact the jury who have to go on actual evidence, rather than conspiracy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You obviously haven't been on a jury if you think they base their decisions solely on evidence. I did jury duty last month. Most of the jury I was with had made their mind up before they heard the evidence.
A bloke from Dartford threatened Britain First leader Paul Golding with a sword, it was caught on camera. They moved the court case from Kent to London where he was acquitted. I wonder why they moved it to London?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah your opinion doesn't matter there are actual laws people have to follow, which is obviously also the case for jeopardising court cases.
‘Contempt of court’ happens when someone risks unfairly influencing a court case. It may stop somebody from getting a fair trial and can affect a trial’s outcome.
Contempt of court includes:
disobeying or ignoring a court order
taking photos or shouting out in court
refusing to answer the court’s questions if you’re called as a witness
publicly commenting on a court case, for example on social media or online news articles
If you’re found to be in contempt of court, you could go to prison for up to 2 years, get a fine, or both.
Publicly commenting on a court case
You might be in contempt of court if you speak publicly or post on social media.
For example, you should not:
say whether you think a person is guilty or innocent
refer to someone’s previous convictions
name someone the judge has allowed to be anonymous, even if you did not know this
name victims, witnesses and offenders under 18
name sеx crime victims
share any evidence or facts about a case that the judge has said cannot be made public
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So he was jailed for free speech
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope.
Your free speech doesn't extend to limiting the freedom or free speech of others
Which influencing a jury or impacting on a person to get a free and fair trial would do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So he wasn't allowed to express his free speech. He was jailed for it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope.
Your free speech doesn't extend to limiting the freedom or free speech of others
Which influencing a jury or impacting on a person to get a free and fair trial would do.
posted on 28/10/24
Why has his free speech been silenced? It's meant to be free. He has been cancelled. We can't just be locking people up for saying or doing things we disagree with. World's gone mad.
posted on 28/10/24
comment by Keiran Keane (U1734)
posted 54 seconds ago
Why has his free speech been silenced? It's meant to be free. He has been cancelled. We can't just be locking people up for saying or doing things we disagree with. World's gone mad.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope.
Your free speech doesn't extend to limiting the freedom or free speech of others
Which influencing a jury or impacting on a person to get a free and fair trial would do.
posted on 28/10/24
What about Tommy's fair trial? He was just thrown in jail without being able to show the jury his online documentary tape which would have cleared his name.
posted on 28/10/24
comment by Keiran Keane (U1734)
posted 1 minute ago
What about Tommy's fair trial? He was just thrown in jail without being able to show the jury his online documentary tape which would have cleared his name.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He pleaded guilty.
They don't let you show stuff when you do that.
His documentary would also not have done anything to tackle the contempt of court charges as nothing in that documentary would have proven he didn't commit contempt of court as that's not how contempt of court works.
posted on 28/10/24
If he hadn't been silenced then he would have been able to stand up and show his video to the jury on the big screen in court and it would win them over. The jury would see it's actually the judge and the system that is corrupt and there would be riots. The deep state can't allow this so they silenced Tommy and sent him to jail without trial
posted on 28/10/24
comment by Robb - Team Nagelsmann (U22716)
posted 7 hours, 19 minutes ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 21 seconds ago
comment by Robb Raygun (U22716)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Mattyp (U8926)
posted 1 minute ago
Maybe not exploding but the self immolation of having a campaign event where your warm up speaker calls Porto Rico an island of garbage when you are trying to win swing states with Porto Rican populations larger than the swing is pretty close...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think he just lost 80,000 votes right there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bad Bunny who in the Latino world is even bigger than Taylor Swift came out and supported Kamala after that so hopefully it’s the thing that tips Penn over the edge next week.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
yeah the way it should be done, y'know rather than vote for actual policies and what would help the country
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kamala actually has polices. Trump has none.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not true, his policy is revenge on anyone who has pointed out his numerous crimes.
posted on 28/10/24
comment by Keiran Keane (U1734)
posted 1 hour, 29 minutes ago
If he hadn't been silenced then he would have been able to stand up and show his video to the jury on the big screen in court and it would win them over. The jury would see it's actually the judge and the system that is corrupt and there would be riots. The deep state can't allow this so they silenced Tommy and sent him to jail without trial
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He pleaded guilty.
They don't let you show stuff when you do that.
His documentary would also not have done anything to tackle the contempt of court charges as nothing in that documentary would have proven he didn't commit contempt of court as that's not how contempt of court works.
posted on 28/10/24
He's well within his rights to show contempt towards court. It's called an opinion. We are jailing people for having opinions now?
Page 2 of 3