It’ll be a similar line up to what we play in the europa I suppose.

Personally I’d play

Vicario
Porro Dragusin VDV Davies
Bents Sarr
Johnson Madders Moore
Richarlison

Spence still injured?

Probably lol

Phenom

Man City fans.

What kind of team you think you’ll put out?

Vic
Porro Dragusin VDV Spence
Bents Sarr
BJ Kulu Richy
Solanke


If spence is out why doesn’t the fat Aussie cvnt have tell us

Think Werner will play this one. Be ‘dangerous’ but miss at least 2 one on ones on the counter

comment by Automatic For The People (U21889)
posted 39 minutes ago
Man City fans.

What kind of team you think you’ll put out?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

One that is the product of over a decade of breaking the rules.

comment by WeekendOffender (U22920)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Automatic For The People (U21889)
posted 39 minutes ago
Man City fans.

What kind of team you think you’ll put out?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

One that is the product of over a decade of breaking the rules.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well that aside!

comment by Phenom (U20037)
posted 48 minutes ago
Vic
Porro Dragusin VDV Spence
Bents Sarr
BJ Kulu Richy
Solanke


If spence is out why doesn’t the fat Aussie cvnt have tell us
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Think we might gonwith Werner left, Richy centre for Dom


Law of probability, Werner will score soon.

Wouldn't mind if Gray started over Porro.

Another manager not going all out to win something
What’s the point in rotating like this, getting knocked out of every cup and still finishing 5th-9th anyway?? I don’t get it. We aren’t getting top 4 or winning the title are we. And even if we did get top4 , we aren’t winning that either. We do however have a realistic chance of winning one of the cups !!

comment by Sir Tottenham of Hotspur (U17379)
posted 5 minutes ago
Another manager not going all out to win something
What’s the point in rotating like this, getting knocked out of every cup and still finishing 5th-9th anyway?? I don’t get it. We aren’t getting top 4 or winning the title are we. And even if we did get top4 , we aren’t winning that either. We do however have a realistic chance of winning one of the cups !!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreed.

anything more than 5/6 changes would be daft but with Bentancur and Sarr they didnt start at the weekend but are first team players and shouldnt weaken us in theory

Just put out the strongest team and hope for the best. We should be a strong enough team to be able to beat City in a domestic cup game at home in an earlier round when they will be resting players.

I know it's City but I think the shiiit will really start getting real with fans wanting Ange out if we lose.

comment by Phenom (U20037)
posted 2 hours, 49 minutes ago
Vic
Porro Dragusin VDV Spence
Bents Sarr
BJ Kulu Richy
Solanke


If spence is out why doesn’t the fat Aussie cvnt have tell us
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"the fat Aussie cvnt "

Seriously? Is this the level of disrespect towards our manager already?!

I can't even be bothered to watch is tonight, i know we're gonna lose , Ange ball is suicide .

NEW: #thfc could have signed Conor Gallagher - who Ange Postecoglou wanted - but didn't because of wages.

Spurs also decided against signing Eberechi Eze because of wages. |
@pokeefe1

Instead we got cheaper options like of Odebert and re-signed Werner. But yeah, sack the manager.

Btw, I didn't particularly want Gallagher, but the point is Ange did

comment by Gezza-Spurs (U18952)
posted 18 minutes ago
NEW: #thfc could have signed Conor Gallagher - who Ange Postecoglou wanted - but didn't because of wages.

Spurs also decided against signing Eberechi Eze because of wages. |
@pokeefe1

Instead we got cheaper options like of Odebert and re-signed Werner. But yeah, sack the manager.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Would signing Eze and Gallagher have made our defence any less leaky?

Anyway, a manager is not going to be able to get all of the players he wants. And even without them he's spent a lot and we ought to be doing better. Can you imagine how much he'd have spent altogether if we had signed those 2 as well?

I'm not advocating for him to be sacked but I don't think not signing these players is too much of an excuse for him.

comment by Gezza-Spurs (U18952)
posted 49 minutes ago
comment by Phenom (U20037)
posted 2 hours, 49 minutes ago
Vic
Porro Dragusin VDV Spence
Bents Sarr
BJ Kulu Richy
Solanke


If spence is out why doesn’t the fat Aussie cvnt have tell us
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"the fat Aussie cvnt "

Seriously? Is this the level of disrespect towards our manager already?!


----------------------------------------------------------------------
looks like it

comment by Spurtle (U1608)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Gezza-Spurs (U18952)
posted 18 minutes ago
NEW: #thfc could have signed Conor Gallagher - who Ange Postecoglou wanted - but didn't because of wages.

Spurs also decided against signing Eberechi Eze because of wages. |
@pokeefe1

Instead we got cheaper options like of Odebert and re-signed Werner. But yeah, sack the manager.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Would signing Eze and Gallagher have made our defence any less leaky?

Anyway, a manager is not going to be able to get all of the players he wants. And even without them he's spent a lot and we ought to be doing better. Can you imagine how much he'd have spent altogether if we had signed those 2 as well?

I'm not advocating for him to be sacked but I don't think not signing these players is too much of an excuse for him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not gonna keep writing comments in defence of Ange, but the point is that he (as with previous managers) is restricted by the club's lack of ambition. I mean, who in their right mind thought that re-signing Werner was a good idea? Who thought that signing players from the Championship would elevate us to PL contenders? Levy and the bean counters, that's who.

I just think calling the manager a "cvnt" and calling for his head at this stage is pathetic.

comment by Gezza-Spurs (U18952)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Spurtle (U1608)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Gezza-Spurs (U18952)
posted 18 minutes ago
NEW: #thfc could have signed Conor Gallagher - who Ange Postecoglou wanted - but didn't because of wages.

Spurs also decided against signing Eberechi Eze because of wages. |
@pokeefe1

Instead we got cheaper options like of Odebert and re-signed Werner. But yeah, sack the manager.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Would signing Eze and Gallagher have made our defence any less leaky?

Anyway, a manager is not going to be able to get all of the players he wants. And even without them he's spent a lot and we ought to be doing better. Can you imagine how much he'd have spent altogether if we had signed those 2 as well?

I'm not advocating for him to be sacked but I don't think not signing these players is too much of an excuse for him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not gonna keep writing comments in defence of Ange, but the point is that he (as with previous managers) is restricted by the club's lack of ambition. I mean, who in their right mind thought that re-signing Werner was a good idea? Who thought that signing players from the Championship would elevate us to PL contenders? Levy and the bean counters, that's who.

I just think calling the manager a "cvnt" and calling for his head at this stage is pathetic.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would say he's been less restricted than previous managers. Look how much money he has spent already. He's less restricted than Poch was when Poch had to deal with the upheaval of the new stadium.

We've since completed the new stadium and Ange has thrown a lot of money at players, many were ones he wanted. Now whether he wanted players like Odobert and Werner is another matter. But did he think he was just going to spend hundreds of millions each window at Spurs going after his primary targets? Would have been hugely naive if he did and there are other clubs showing it doesn't need to be done either.

Calling for his head at this stage, I'm not quite in agreement with it but if people think he's no longer the man for us I can understand it. The form over a long period now has not been good enough.

We have lost 4 games out of 9 in the league so far this season, 1 against our big rivals (at home) and then Palace, Brighton and Newcastle. We still have alot of tough away games to come where inevitable losses are waiting.

We can argue about player quality all we want, but we have better teams than Palace, Brighton and Newcastle. These losses relate to our coach IMO.

We've won 4 games, let's not forget that. But I'd argue they were against teams we should be beating. But I get results don't always follow quality (on paper).

IMO Ange should be under pressure. He isn't improving the results or any players (maybe Kulu and BJ excluded). He doesn't play attractive football as much as we are lead to believe. There is limited to no improvement since he joined us. Infact, we have got worse.

I want Ange to succeed but I just don't see it. We could win today but lose Sunday. Any win is always followed by a very quick loss down the road. Inconsistency is our philosophy now.

comment by Bake 'em away toys (U7303)
posted 1 hour, 57 minutes ago
We have lost 4 games out of 9 in the league so far this season, 1 against our big rivals (at home) and then Palace, Brighton and Newcastle. We still have alot of tough away games to come where inevitable losses are waiting.

We can argue about player quality all we want, but we have better teams than Palace, Brighton and Newcastle. These losses relate to our coach IMO.

We've won 4 games, let's not forget that. But I'd argue they were against teams we should be beating. But I get results don't always follow quality (on paper).

IMO Ange should be under pressure. He isn't improving the results or any players (maybe Kulu and BJ excluded). He doesn't play attractive football as much as we are lead to believe. There is limited to no improvement since he joined us. Infact, we have got worse.

I want Ange to succeed but I just don't see it. We could win today but lose Sunday. Any win is always followed by a very quick loss down the road. Inconsistency is our philosophy now.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm astonished by this assessment, but it appears that I'm in a minority.

Time will tell whose right or wrong and maybe the improvement I think I'm seeing is an apparition.

Everyone says it's a results business, but then go on to dismiss 7 wins out of the last 9 games as irrelevant!

A couple of the losses we suffered this season so far were unlucky as we were by far the better team (i.e. vs. Newcastle and to a lesser extent vs Arsenal). We were by far the better team against Leicester and we all know how the wheels fell off in the second half against Brighton.

If we had lost 7 out of 9 I would definitely be saying the manager should go