4skin needs some new material, it's like listening to Joe Dolce on an endless loop.
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 2 minutes ago
4skin needs some new material, it's like listening to Joe Dolce on an endless loop.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah shud Uppa your face.
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 14 minutes ago
4skin needs some new material, it's like listening to Joe Dolce on an endless loop.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Whutsa matter u?
Now it all makes fecking sense.... or not.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J6dFEtb06nw
comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted 5 hours, 24 minutes ago
comment by FishMCFC (U16301)
posted 45 minutes ago
comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted 2 hours, 26 minutes ago
City don't need to be relegated. Just take every trophy off them between 2011 and 2019 if they can't prove their innocence. Would be the best outcome for the league as they wouldn't have got relegated if they had spent a bit less money.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If they can't prove their innocence?
Surely you mean if the FA can prove they are guilty?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The FA?
It's the PL you plank. 😂
Also we already know you are guilty. We saw those emails. No way a a Portuguese man in his early 20's faked those. The language used in those emails was clearly from English speakers.
Guilty as feck and you know it. That's why you've ran away from the charges as long as you have done. 😂
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Stick to name calling. You know nothing.
MEN Sport understands Guardiola will soon sign a new one-year extension at City with the option for a further 12 months inserted into the deal. The reason for his postponement on a deal is believed to surround a back injury which has been causing him considerable pain and the Catalan coach needed to convince himself that staying in Manchester was a good idea.
It is also possible that Guardiola has an inkling as to the outcome of the Premier League charges hearing. Would he have signed on for a potential two years if he was to be working in the lower reaches of the English football pyramid?
He may have spoken about wanting to stay if City were demoted to non-league but that would be easier said than done. City would have to cut their cloth accordingly and unless Guardiola would work for a fraction of his current salary, retaining the manager in the National League would have been unfeasible.
If City feared they were going to be hit with an unprecedented punishment, neither them nor Guardiola would have agreed to a contract extension. This impending new deal is the clearest sign yet that City could be about to avoid a historically severe collapse.
Even the MUEN are having their doubts now.
comment by mancWoohoo- maximus mardius cob-onius (U10676)
posted 21 hours ago
Arsenal fans: we need to keep Arteta cos when Pep leaves, we're next in line.
:
:
:
Arsenal fans: feck.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Arsenal fans: wait we’ve got arteta
Double fack
comment by Baz tard - Ineos your face (U19119)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by mancWoohoo- maximus mardius cob-onius (U10676)
posted 21 hours ago
Arsenal fans: we need to keep Arteta cos when Pep leaves, we're next in line.
:
:
:
Arsenal fans: feck.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Arsenal fans: wait we’ve got arteta
Double fack
----------------------------------------------------------------------
😂😂
Could be pep had a clause inserted into the contract ? Get demoted and im released
Just think him signing a new deal means nothing new
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 2 hours, 8 minutes ago
Could be pep had a clause inserted into the contract ? Get demoted and im released
Just think him signing a new deal means nothing new
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Absolutely no 'get out' clauses, both the club and Pep have confirmed that.
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 2 hours, 40 minutes ago
Could be pep had a clause inserted into the contract ? Get demoted and im released
Just think him signing a new deal means nothing new
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah he can still quit if he wants.
comment by Peter O'Hanraha-hanrahan (U1217)
posted 1 hour, 12 minutes ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 2 hours, 40 minutes ago
Could be pep had a clause inserted into the contract ? Get demoted and im released
Just think him signing a new deal means nothing new
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah he can still quit if he wants.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Anyone can quit any job, Pep has openly stated that he won't be quitting City no matter what happens with the PL case.
comment by Peter O'Hanraha-hanrahan (U1217)
posted 1 hour, 33 minutes ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 2 hours, 40 minutes ago
Could be pep had a clause inserted into the contract ? Get demoted and im released
Just think him signing a new deal means nothing new
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah he can still quit if he wants.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah. Like Klopp did, even though his contract was to expire on 2026, anyone can quit if they want.
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 2 hours, 33 minutes ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 2 hours, 8 minutes ago
Could be pep had a clause inserted into the contract ? Get demoted and im released
Just think him signing a new deal means nothing new
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Absolutely no 'get out' clauses, both the club and Pep have confirmed that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
the club alsough clame they r knot cheetin khantz tho
comment by #4zA (U22472)
posted 8 hours, 29 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 2 hours, 33 minutes ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 2 hours, 8 minutes ago
Could be pep had a clause inserted into the contract ? Get demoted and im released
Just think him signing a new deal means nothing new
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Absolutely no 'get out' clauses, both the club and Pep have confirmed that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
the club alsough clame they r knot cheetin khantz tho
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because they haven't.
If you can prove otherwise, plese share the evidence with us.
I had felt that Pep would be off at the end of the season, nothing to do with the charges etc but just that he'd done all that could have been expected with City and maybe fancied a new challenge?
Assuming City fan are over the moon with the additional year?
comment by Insufferable-Piffle (U4388)
posted 5 minutes ago
I had felt that Pep would be off at the end of the season, nothing to do with the charges etc but just that he'd done all that could have been expected with City and maybe fancied a new challenge?
Assuming City fan are over the moon with the additional year?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Too much unfinished business.
He's rebuilding the squad ready for the next guy and that will take a couple of years.
Also he's always proclaimed City's innocence over this PL nonsense, he wouldn't want to leave until the hearing is concluded.
A huge cult figure amongst the fans who absolutely adore him, practically unique in the Prem now Klopp has moved on.
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Insufferable-Piffle (U4388)
posted 5 minutes ago
I had felt that Pep would be off at the end of the season, nothing to do with the charges etc but just that he'd done all that could have been expected with City and maybe fancied a new challenge?
Assuming City fan are over the moon with the additional year?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Too much unfinished business.
He's rebuilding the squad ready for the next guy and that will take a couple of years.
Also he's always proclaimed City's innocence over this PL nonsense, he wouldn't want to leave until the hearing is concluded.
A huge cult figure amongst the fans who absolutely adore him, practically unique in the Prem now Klopp has moved on.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeh I have no comment on the charges, don't know enough about them if honest but from a football perspective he has been superb for your club and if he is able to adjust/upgrade the squad before moving on thats another feather in his cap, losing a top manager can be a painful one but one leaving after setting the club up for the future after years of success will make him a legend for you fellahs
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 36 minutes ago
comment by Insufferable-Piffle (U4388)
posted 5 minutes ago
I had felt that Pep would be off at the end of the season, nothing to do with the charges etc but just that he'd done all that could have been expected with City and maybe fancied a new challenge?
Assuming City fan are over the moon with the additional year?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Too much unfinished business.
He's rebuilding the squad ready for the next guy and that will take a couple of years.
Also he's always proclaimed City's innocence over this PL nonsense, he wouldn't want to leave until the hearing is concluded.
A huge cult figure amongst the fans who absolutely adore him, practically unique in the Prem now Klopp has moved on.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How is it nonsense?
Your growth rate is impossible without fiddling the books and the whole world knows it. Nobody is going to believe you're innocent even if your expensive lawyers find some more loopholes.
Why won't they believe it? 115/130 mistakes? Do me a favour.
City not complying when they maintained their innocence is another iffy area. Why would you make it as difficult as possible for the PL if you had nothing to hide? It makes no sense.
Finally those emails are the proof you were up to no good. Why would a random Portuguese hacker have it in for a club from Manchester? I haven't heard any credible reason for this and the language used in those emails wasn't a Portuguese man in a foreign language let's be straight. It was clearly City execs caught with their pants down.
City are clearly guilty and not even my United goggles is telling me that. It's blatantly obvious they are.
How much revenue do you think Pep's 18 trophies have earned us over the last 9 years, would you say it's more than Uniteds?
Huge sponsorship deals with Puma and Nissan etc, other multi national companies queueing up to back us
Admittedly, we don't have a condom partner in Papua New Guinea as far as I know.
Only an absolute eejit would deny that a large percentage of the charges are there for padding to make it appear more sensational than it really is.
Are you that eejit?
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 2 minutes ago
How much revenue do you think Pep's 18 trophies have earned us over the last 9 years, would you say it's more than Uniteds?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your alleged cheating started in 2011 way before Pep arrived.
If City were actually innocent this situation wouldn't have
got as far as it has now. City would have made it go away quite easily without the need for lawyers because simple documentation would have put an end to it all. The PL aren't buying your BS and nobody else is either.
Will you get away with it because of legal loopholes again? Potentially you might but nobody is ever going to believe you're innocent and rightly so. You've acted like a guilty party throughout this whole mess.
The PL should never have allowed foreign states into the league in the first place. That's where they went wrong.
Half the charges are over not 'supplying information'.
Business deals require at least 2 parties and both have to agree to sensative information to be shared.
Also it's not been made clear what the questions were and who was asking them.
PL committees are made up of top figures from rival clubs, I'm sure they were desperate to get their grubby mitts on our business strategy
The PL should never have allowed foreign states into the league in the first place. That's where they went wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
When was the last time United had British owners?
Martin 'Perv' Edwards, son of a black marketeer and tainted meat peddler if I'm not mistaken.
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 53 seconds ago
Half the charges are over not 'supplying information'.
Business deals require at least 2 parties and both have to agree to sensative information to be shared.
Also it's not been made clear what the questions were and who was asking them.
PL committees are made up of top figures from rival clubs, I'm sure they were desperate to get their grubby mitts on our business strategy
----------------------------------------------------------------------
35 of them are surely?
Why did the other 19 clubs have no trouble submitting theirs Boris?
Come on mate I know you'd bleed sky blue if I cut you open but you're not a total idiot. You know exactly why city's accounts haven't been submitted in full.
Sign in if you want to comment
Pep
Page 3 of 5
posted on 20/11/24
4skin needs some new material, it's like listening to Joe Dolce on an endless loop.
posted on 20/11/24
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 2 minutes ago
4skin needs some new material, it's like listening to Joe Dolce on an endless loop.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah shud Uppa your face.
posted on 20/11/24
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 14 minutes ago
4skin needs some new material, it's like listening to Joe Dolce on an endless loop.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Whutsa matter u?
posted on 20/11/24
Now it all makes fecking sense.... or not.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J6dFEtb06nw
posted on 20/11/24
comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted 5 hours, 24 minutes ago
comment by FishMCFC (U16301)
posted 45 minutes ago
comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted 2 hours, 26 minutes ago
City don't need to be relegated. Just take every trophy off them between 2011 and 2019 if they can't prove their innocence. Would be the best outcome for the league as they wouldn't have got relegated if they had spent a bit less money.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If they can't prove their innocence?
Surely you mean if the FA can prove they are guilty?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The FA?
It's the PL you plank. 😂
Also we already know you are guilty. We saw those emails. No way a a Portuguese man in his early 20's faked those. The language used in those emails was clearly from English speakers.
Guilty as feck and you know it. That's why you've ran away from the charges as long as you have done. 😂
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Stick to name calling. You know nothing.
posted on 20/11/24
MEN Sport understands Guardiola will soon sign a new one-year extension at City with the option for a further 12 months inserted into the deal. The reason for his postponement on a deal is believed to surround a back injury which has been causing him considerable pain and the Catalan coach needed to convince himself that staying in Manchester was a good idea.
It is also possible that Guardiola has an inkling as to the outcome of the Premier League charges hearing. Would he have signed on for a potential two years if he was to be working in the lower reaches of the English football pyramid?
He may have spoken about wanting to stay if City were demoted to non-league but that would be easier said than done. City would have to cut their cloth accordingly and unless Guardiola would work for a fraction of his current salary, retaining the manager in the National League would have been unfeasible.
If City feared they were going to be hit with an unprecedented punishment, neither them nor Guardiola would have agreed to a contract extension. This impending new deal is the clearest sign yet that City could be about to avoid a historically severe collapse.
Even the MUEN are having their doubts now.
posted on 20/11/24
comment by mancWoohoo- maximus mardius cob-onius (U10676)
posted 21 hours ago
Arsenal fans: we need to keep Arteta cos when Pep leaves, we're next in line.
:
:
:
Arsenal fans: feck.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Arsenal fans: wait we’ve got arteta
Double fack
posted on 20/11/24
comment by Baz tard - Ineos your face (U19119)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by mancWoohoo- maximus mardius cob-onius (U10676)
posted 21 hours ago
Arsenal fans: we need to keep Arteta cos when Pep leaves, we're next in line.
:
:
:
Arsenal fans: feck.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Arsenal fans: wait we’ve got arteta
Double fack
----------------------------------------------------------------------
😂😂
posted on 20/11/24
Could be pep had a clause inserted into the contract ? Get demoted and im released
Just think him signing a new deal means nothing new
posted on 20/11/24
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 2 hours, 8 minutes ago
Could be pep had a clause inserted into the contract ? Get demoted and im released
Just think him signing a new deal means nothing new
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Absolutely no 'get out' clauses, both the club and Pep have confirmed that.
posted on 20/11/24
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 2 hours, 40 minutes ago
Could be pep had a clause inserted into the contract ? Get demoted and im released
Just think him signing a new deal means nothing new
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah he can still quit if he wants.
posted on 20/11/24
comment by Peter O'Hanraha-hanrahan (U1217)
posted 1 hour, 12 minutes ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 2 hours, 40 minutes ago
Could be pep had a clause inserted into the contract ? Get demoted and im released
Just think him signing a new deal means nothing new
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah he can still quit if he wants.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Anyone can quit any job, Pep has openly stated that he won't be quitting City no matter what happens with the PL case.
posted on 20/11/24
comment by Peter O'Hanraha-hanrahan (U1217)
posted 1 hour, 33 minutes ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 2 hours, 40 minutes ago
Could be pep had a clause inserted into the contract ? Get demoted and im released
Just think him signing a new deal means nothing new
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah he can still quit if he wants.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah. Like Klopp did, even though his contract was to expire on 2026, anyone can quit if they want.
posted on 21/11/24
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 2 hours, 33 minutes ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 2 hours, 8 minutes ago
Could be pep had a clause inserted into the contract ? Get demoted and im released
Just think him signing a new deal means nothing new
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Absolutely no 'get out' clauses, both the club and Pep have confirmed that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
the club alsough clame they r knot cheetin khantz tho
posted on 21/11/24
comment by #4zA (U22472)
posted 8 hours, 29 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 2 hours, 33 minutes ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 2 hours, 8 minutes ago
Could be pep had a clause inserted into the contract ? Get demoted and im released
Just think him signing a new deal means nothing new
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Absolutely no 'get out' clauses, both the club and Pep have confirmed that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
the club alsough clame they r knot cheetin khantz tho
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because they haven't.
If you can prove otherwise, plese share the evidence with us.
posted on 21/11/24
I had felt that Pep would be off at the end of the season, nothing to do with the charges etc but just that he'd done all that could have been expected with City and maybe fancied a new challenge?
Assuming City fan are over the moon with the additional year?
posted on 21/11/24
comment by Insufferable-Piffle (U4388)
posted 5 minutes ago
I had felt that Pep would be off at the end of the season, nothing to do with the charges etc but just that he'd done all that could have been expected with City and maybe fancied a new challenge?
Assuming City fan are over the moon with the additional year?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Too much unfinished business.
He's rebuilding the squad ready for the next guy and that will take a couple of years.
Also he's always proclaimed City's innocence over this PL nonsense, he wouldn't want to leave until the hearing is concluded.
A huge cult figure amongst the fans who absolutely adore him, practically unique in the Prem now Klopp has moved on.
posted on 21/11/24
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Insufferable-Piffle (U4388)
posted 5 minutes ago
I had felt that Pep would be off at the end of the season, nothing to do with the charges etc but just that he'd done all that could have been expected with City and maybe fancied a new challenge?
Assuming City fan are over the moon with the additional year?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Too much unfinished business.
He's rebuilding the squad ready for the next guy and that will take a couple of years.
Also he's always proclaimed City's innocence over this PL nonsense, he wouldn't want to leave until the hearing is concluded.
A huge cult figure amongst the fans who absolutely adore him, practically unique in the Prem now Klopp has moved on.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeh I have no comment on the charges, don't know enough about them if honest but from a football perspective he has been superb for your club and if he is able to adjust/upgrade the squad before moving on thats another feather in his cap, losing a top manager can be a painful one but one leaving after setting the club up for the future after years of success will make him a legend for you fellahs
posted on 21/11/24
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 36 minutes ago
comment by Insufferable-Piffle (U4388)
posted 5 minutes ago
I had felt that Pep would be off at the end of the season, nothing to do with the charges etc but just that he'd done all that could have been expected with City and maybe fancied a new challenge?
Assuming City fan are over the moon with the additional year?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Too much unfinished business.
He's rebuilding the squad ready for the next guy and that will take a couple of years.
Also he's always proclaimed City's innocence over this PL nonsense, he wouldn't want to leave until the hearing is concluded.
A huge cult figure amongst the fans who absolutely adore him, practically unique in the Prem now Klopp has moved on.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How is it nonsense?
Your growth rate is impossible without fiddling the books and the whole world knows it. Nobody is going to believe you're innocent even if your expensive lawyers find some more loopholes.
Why won't they believe it? 115/130 mistakes? Do me a favour.
City not complying when they maintained their innocence is another iffy area. Why would you make it as difficult as possible for the PL if you had nothing to hide? It makes no sense.
Finally those emails are the proof you were up to no good. Why would a random Portuguese hacker have it in for a club from Manchester? I haven't heard any credible reason for this and the language used in those emails wasn't a Portuguese man in a foreign language let's be straight. It was clearly City execs caught with their pants down.
City are clearly guilty and not even my United goggles is telling me that. It's blatantly obvious they are.
posted on 21/11/24
How much revenue do you think Pep's 18 trophies have earned us over the last 9 years, would you say it's more than Uniteds?
posted on 21/11/24
Huge sponsorship deals with Puma and Nissan etc, other multi national companies queueing up to back us
Admittedly, we don't have a condom partner in Papua New Guinea as far as I know.
Only an absolute eejit would deny that a large percentage of the charges are there for padding to make it appear more sensational than it really is.
Are you that eejit?
posted on 21/11/24
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 2 minutes ago
How much revenue do you think Pep's 18 trophies have earned us over the last 9 years, would you say it's more than Uniteds?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your alleged cheating started in 2011 way before Pep arrived.
If City were actually innocent this situation wouldn't have
got as far as it has now. City would have made it go away quite easily without the need for lawyers because simple documentation would have put an end to it all. The PL aren't buying your BS and nobody else is either.
Will you get away with it because of legal loopholes again? Potentially you might but nobody is ever going to believe you're innocent and rightly so. You've acted like a guilty party throughout this whole mess.
The PL should never have allowed foreign states into the league in the first place. That's where they went wrong.
posted on 21/11/24
Half the charges are over not 'supplying information'.
Business deals require at least 2 parties and both have to agree to sensative information to be shared.
Also it's not been made clear what the questions were and who was asking them.
PL committees are made up of top figures from rival clubs, I'm sure they were desperate to get their grubby mitts on our business strategy
posted on 21/11/24
The PL should never have allowed foreign states into the league in the first place. That's where they went wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
When was the last time United had British owners?
Martin 'Perv' Edwards, son of a black marketeer and tainted meat peddler if I'm not mistaken.
posted on 21/11/24
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 53 seconds ago
Half the charges are over not 'supplying information'.
Business deals require at least 2 parties and both have to agree to sensative information to be shared.
Also it's not been made clear what the questions were and who was asking them.
PL committees are made up of top figures from rival clubs, I'm sure they were desperate to get their grubby mitts on our business strategy
----------------------------------------------------------------------
35 of them are surely?
Why did the other 19 clubs have no trouble submitting theirs Boris?
Come on mate I know you'd bleed sky blue if I cut you open but you're not a total idiot. You know exactly why city's accounts haven't been submitted in full.
Page 3 of 5