You take nothing in just repeating the same old cr@p.

When the PL hit us with 115 charges why the feck would we comply and just hand over our details. When in a battle you don’t hand over details until the appropriate time. It’s not difficult to understand.

comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted 45 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 53 seconds ago
Half the charges are over not 'supplying information'.

Business deals require at least 2 parties and both have to agree to sensative information to be shared.

Also it's not been made clear what the questions were and who was asking them.

PL committees are made up of top figures from rival clubs, I'm sure they were desperate to get their grubby mitts on our business strategy
----------------------------------------------------------------------

35 of them are surely?

Why did the other 19 clubs have no trouble submitting theirs Boris?

Come on mate I know you'd bleed sky blue if I cut you open but you're not a total idiot. You know exactly why city's accounts haven't been submitted in full.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What were the questions and who was asking them?

That's what it boils down to unitil further evidence is released.

U do if that info wud show u as innerscent

The question wuz “r u cheetin khantz?”

n u wud knot anser

A simpull “nope” n hear r docs too proove it wudda surfice

Nope

Their u go

It aint trifficult

So y Man Cs* aint do it?

***DROPS MIC***

Martyn Ziegler @martynzeigler
NEW: Growing confidence among some clubs that Man City will fall short in bid to block vote on sponsorship rules. Understand Wolves and Everton likely to back PL position (unlike a year ago)

https://www.thetimes.com/sport/football/article/manchester-city-v-premier-league-sponsorship-vote-on-a-knife-edge-8fmgx97hf

Excellent.

Wolves to save football 👍