You did so well as you raise some good and valid points until u said brown men.

Nothing to do with the 'brown men'

comment by Clever - son son son - It's Amorinnnnnnn of the year Runner Up 2021 (U18599)
posted 3 minutes ago
You did so well as you raise some good and valid points until u said brown men.


Nothing to do with the 'brown men'
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why concentrate on just that one bit then.

How about you respond with some sense concentrating on the points you deem "valid."

comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Clever - son son son - It's Amorinnnnnnnof the year Runner Up 2021 (U18599)
posted 3 minutes ago
You did so well as you raise some good and valid points until u said brown men.


Nothing to do with the 'brown men'
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why concentrate on just that one bit then.

How about you respond with some sense concentrating on the points you deem "valid."
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because you've devalued your whole article by trying to play the race card you div

comment by Clever - son son son - It's Amorinnnnnnn of the year Runner Up 2021 (U18599)
posted 38 seconds ago
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Clever - son son son - It's Amorinnnnnnnof the year Runner Up 2021 (U18599)
posted 3 minutes ago
You did so well as you raise some good and valid points until u said brown men.


Nothing to do with the 'brown men'
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why concentrate on just that one bit then.

How about you respond with some sense concentrating on the points you deem "valid."
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because you've devalued your whole article by trying to play the race card you div
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Stupidson strikes again. No surprises.

comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Clever - son son son - It's Amorinnnnnnnof the year Runner Up 2021 (U18599)
posted 38 seconds ago
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Clever - son son son - It's Amorinnnnnnnof the year Runner Up 2021 (U18599)
posted 3 minutes ago
You did so well as you raise some good and valid points until u said brown men.


Nothing to do with the 'brown men'
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why concentrate on just that one bit then.

How about you respond with some sense concentrating on the points you deem "valid."
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because you've devalued your whole article by trying to play the race card you div
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Stupidson strikes again. No surprises.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Could've said qatari, etc. No goes in with the colour card. And I'm the stupid one

Enjoy your evening angry bird.x

What the hell does point 5 mean?

comment by manutd1982 (U6633)
posted 2 minutes ago
What the hell does point 5 mean?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You don’t want to know for obvious reasons. What have they done for the women side of Manchester United since their takeover?

Scholay

Please explain point 5. Many thanks in advance.

Who are the 'brown men' and who are the idiots who made accusations abiut them and what were these accusation?

Is this some reference to the Boney M classic?

This is a grate thread.

comment by Clever - son son son - It's Amorinnnnnnn of the year Runner Up 2021 (U18599)
posted 6 minutes ago
This is a grate thread.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
It really is. It is the reaction I expected.

Whilst writing it, I told a mate of mine let me throw this one point and they would all run to it. Such a predictable place it is laughable.

comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 33 minutes ago
Scholay

Please explain point 5. Many thanks in advance.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ineos and Sir Jim do not care one iota about women and equality. Like the brown men I am told.

I hope the above answer is satisfactory. Thanks.

Ineos and Sir Jim do not care one iota about women and equality. Like the brown men I am told.

................

So, you are saying INEOS are racist? Who told you this?

comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Clever - son son son - It's Amorinnnnnnnof the year Runner Up 2021 (U18599)
posted 6 minutes ago
This is a grate thread.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
It really is. It is the reaction I expected.

Whilst writing it, I told a mate of mine let me throw this one point and they would all run to it. Such a predictable place it is laughable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You tell your 'mates' you try looking for wind ups on an anonymous forum on a Sunday evening?

You must lead a really chit life

comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 52 seconds ago
Ineos and Sir Jim do not care one iota about women and equality. Like the brown men I am told.

................

So, you are saying INEOS are racist? Who told you this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 1 minute ago
Ineos and Sir Jim do not care one iota about women and equality. Like the brown men I am told.

................

So, you are saying INEOS are racist? Who told you this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dan Ashworth.

FFS

when did you last speak to Dan Ashworth Scholay?

“It is the reaction I expected.”

What, that no one understands what you’re talking about and you won’t explain it so any kind of debate can’t be made?

What the sweet baby jesus and the orphans is going on here guys?

Clicked on the article to see some nice healthy debate (or worse) going on and instead greeted with 'brown men'

Jesus Christ. 😂

comment by RB&W - Our representative on the pitch (U21434)
posted 40 seconds ago
when did you last speak to Dan Ashworth Scholay?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Last night at the cross-burning ceremony on Carrington.

comment by manutd1982 (U6633)
posted 5 minutes ago
“It is the reaction I expected.”

What, that no one understands what you’re talking about and you won’t explain it so any kind of debate can’t be made?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You picked one point out of 5 you imbecile.

I did answer VC. But seeing as you deliberately just want to debate point 5! Why does it matter??

The question is, how is it going all of you fools that supported the Ineos bid??

“Sir Jim Ratcliffe and INEOS have over the past few months come under criticism for their treatment of the women’s team. They were moved out of their training facility to accommodate the men’s side as the Carrington building undergoes renovations.

Ratcliffe himself acknowledged that the women’s team would become a priority for them only after the problems facing the men’s set-up have been fully addressed.“

I wonder the reaction had the Brown men come in and done/ said this.