Interesting trailer. Surprising how quickly development for this film has escalated. I didn't even know they were making one until less than a year ago.
Having said that they wouldn't make one again unless they came up with something they thought would work, it's obviously a good sign that Boyle and Garland have returned. These are guys that won't just sign on to make any sequel, like a Ridley Scott would. They have higher standards than that.
comment by Spurtle (U1608)
posted 2 minutes ago
Interesting trailer. Surprising how quickly development for this film has escalated. I didn't even know they were making one until less than a year ago.
Having said that they wouldn't make one again unless they came up with something they thought would work, it's obviously a good sign that Boyle and Garland have returned. These are guys that won't just sign on to make any sequel, like a Ridley Scott would. They have higher standards than that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
An interesting trailer indeed.
Apparently filmed using the latest iPhones and some additional equipment
And from the trailer the remaining civilization seemingly having gone backwards in time rather than forwards
I think this is supposed to be a 'Part 1' with another coming out in a few years.
Looks like they've taken an interesting direction with this
comment by #1 House - (U17162)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Spurtle (U1608)
posted 2 minutes ago
Interesting trailer. Surprising how quickly development for this film has escalated. I didn't even know they were making one until less than a year ago.
Having said that they wouldn't make one again unless they came up with something they thought would work, it's obviously a good sign that Boyle and Garland have returned. These are guys that won't just sign on to make any sequel, like a Ridley Scott would. They have higher standards than that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
An interesting trailer indeed.
Apparently filmed using the latest iPhones and some additional equipment
And from the trailer the remaining civilization seemingly having gone backwards in time rather than forwards
I think this is supposed to be a 'Part 1' with another coming out in a few years.
Looks like they've taken an interesting direction with this
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah I hope they've gone a slightly different and interesting direction with it, if that's possible, cause zombie film plots have always been rather limited to 'group of survivors out on their own against threat of zombies until infection or other bad group of survivors ruin it all and they get overrun by zombies'. That was pretty much rinsed and repeated throughout the whole of The Walking Dead.
Not expecting much. Boyle is a pretty poor director, apart from Trainspotting (which is nearly 30 years old) his films are poor. While Garland is very hit and miss, Ex-Macina (directing) and Dredd (writing) being his stand outs.
I watched 28 Weeks later a year ago as I hadn't seen it in years, felt like a low budget ITV drama. Surprised it's liked as much as it is, but then I feel that way about all of Boyle's stuff that seem to have a fan base.
comment by manutd1982 (U6633)
posted 7 minutes ago
Not expecting much. Boyle is a pretty poor director, apart from Trainspotting (which is nearly 30 years old) his films are poor. While Garland is very hit and miss, Ex-Macina (directing) and Dredd (writing) being his stand outs.
I watched 28 Weeks later a year ago as I hadn't seen it in years, felt like a low budget ITV drama. Surprised it's liked as much as it is, but then I feel that way about all of Boyle's stuff that seem to have a fan base.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And the Beach, loved that film back in the day.
comment by manutd1982 (U6633)
posted 17 minutes ago
Not expecting much. Boyle is a pretty poor director, apart from Trainspotting (which is nearly 30 years old) his films are poor. While Garland is very hit and miss, Ex-Macina (directing) and Dredd (writing) being his stand outs.
I watched 28 Weeks later a year ago as I hadn't seen it in years, felt like a low budget ITV drama. Surprised it's liked as much as it is, but then I feel that way about all of Boyle's stuff that seem to have a fan base.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Couldn't disagree with this more. Boyle is an outstanding director. He also knows how to soundtrack a film.
Trance and Sunshine are in my top films of all time. I also thought TS2 was better than the first as well.
comment by manutd1982 (U6633)
posted 24 minutes ago
Not expecting much. Boyle is a pretty poor director, apart from Trainspotting (which is nearly 30 years old) his films are poor. While Garland is very hit and miss, Ex-Macina (directing) and Dredd (writing) being his stand outs.
I watched 28 Weeks later a year ago as I hadn't seen it in years, felt like a low budget ITV drama. Surprised it's liked as much as it is, but then I feel that way about all of Boyle's stuff that seem to have a fan base.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nah I got respect for Boyle. That Pandemonium sequence for the 2012 Olympics opening ceremony was phenomenal
comment by Hawkeye78 (U22468)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by manutd1982 (U6633)
posted 17 minutes ago
Not expecting much. Boyle is a pretty poor director, apart from Trainspotting (which is nearly 30 years old) his films are poor. While Garland is very hit and miss, Ex-Macina (directing) and Dredd (writing) being his stand outs.
I watched 28 Weeks later a year ago as I hadn't seen it in years, felt like a low budget ITV drama. Surprised it's liked as much as it is, but then I feel that way about all of Boyle's stuff that seem to have a fan base.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Couldn't disagree with this more. Boyle is an outstanding director. He also knows how to soundtrack a film.
Trance and Sunshine are in my top films of all time. I also thought TS2 was better than the first as well.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep Sunshine is class
Boyle is actually a very good director
comment by manutd1982 (U6633)
posted 1 hour, 50 minutes ago
Not expecting much. Boyle is a pretty poor director, apart from Trainspotting (which is nearly 30 years old) his films are poor. While Garland is very hit and miss, Ex-Macina (directing) and Dredd (writing) being his stand outs.
I watched 28 Weeks later a year ago as I hadn't seen it in years, felt like a low budget ITV drama. Surprised it's liked as much as it is, but then I feel that way about all of Boyle's stuff that seem to have a fan base.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did you not like Slumdog, 127 Hours or Shallow Grave? He’s made some crackers, IMO.
Why didn't they wait till 28 years later
comment by Ali - ๐ช๐ฆ ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ (U1192)
posted 4 minutes ago
Why didn't they wait till 28 years later
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Was the sequel actually 28 weeks later?
For me the horror film that gave me the most nightmares as a teenager (first watched this in 2003 as a 13 yo)
—
Really? Didn’t think it was scary. Good movie though.
comment by Striketeam7 - staying humble (U18109)
posted 57 minutes ago
comment by Ali - ๐ช๐ฆ ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ (U1192)
posted 4 minutes ago
Why didn't they wait till 28 years later
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Was the sequel actually 28 weeks later?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was 262 - 28 weeks later so yes it was
Even the Guardian is giving Kudos to this trailer
https://www.theguardian.com/film/2024/dec/10/28-years-later-trailer
Rosso
Shallow Grave is ok, dated pretty badly. The rest of his films I can’t stand.
Of course it’s all subjective but not a fan.
comment by RRRU-ben a-moo-REENG (U17054)
posted 16 hours, 2 minutes ago
comment by manutd1982 (U6633)
posted 1 hour, 50 minutes ago
Not expecting much. Boyle is a pretty poor director, apart from Trainspotting (which is nearly 30 years old) his films are poor. While Garland is very hit and miss, Ex-Macina (directing) and Dredd (writing) being his stand outs.
I watched 28 Weeks later a year ago as I hadn't seen it in years, felt like a low budget ITV drama. Surprised it's liked as much as it is, but then I feel that way about all of Boyle's stuff that seem to have a fan base.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did you not like Slumdog, 127 Hours or Shallow Grave? He’s made some crackers, IMO.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I really hated Slumdog.
posted 6 days, 23 hours ago
It’s an awful film. Talking of sh-t Boyle films, I switched on the TV last night and saw Yesterday was on, possibly one of the worst films ever made.
posted 6 days, 22 hours ago
comment by manutd1982 (U6633)
posted 42 minutes ago
It’s an awful film. Talking of sh-t Boyle films, I switched on the TV last night and saw Yesterday was on, possibly one of the worst films ever made.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've made a concerted effort to avoid watching Yesterday.
Slumdog were both a general subjective dislike for mawkish fairy tale type films (also fuัking hate Amélie, for instance) and a strong distaste for the way the severe deprivation of Indian slums is used purely as a backdrop for a fantasy story. As I see it, a rich European guy should generally tread carefully if depicting that world, even if it's a attempt to produce a layered and realistic portrait. But Boyle just used the slum as poverty ัorn in a story that could just as easily been set in Lagos, Jakarta or Sao Paulo.
posted 6 days, 21 hours ago
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 2 hours, 42 minutes ago
comment by RRRU-ben a-moo-REENG (U17054)
posted 16 hours, 2 minutes ago
comment by manutd1982 (U6633)
posted 1 hour, 50 minutes ago
Not expecting much. Boyle is a pretty poor director, apart from Trainspotting (which is nearly 30 years old) his films are poor. While Garland is very hit and miss, Ex-Macina (directing) and Dredd (writing) being his stand outs.
I watched 28 Weeks later a year ago as I hadn't seen it in years, felt like a low budget ITV drama. Surprised it's liked as much as it is, but then I feel that way about all of Boyle's stuff that seem to have a fan base.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did you not like Slumdog, 127 Hours or Shallow Grave? He’s made some crackers, IMO.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I really hated Slumdog.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why? It’s not a terrible movie.
I mean it’s better than anything Tarantino has done imo
posted 6 days, 21 hours ago
comment by Baz tard - ineos your face (U19119)
posted 4 minutes ago
Why? It’s not a terrible movie.
I mean it’s better than anything Tarantino has done imo
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I answered your 'why' question in the following post.
I'm not much of a Tarantino fan, and I don't think he has grown up as a director since his breakout films, but for me nothing he has made is as bad as Slumdog.
posted 6 days, 20 hours ago
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by Baz tard - ineos your face (U19119)
posted 4 minutes ago
Why? It’s not a terrible movie.
I mean it’s better than anything Tarantino has done imo
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I answered your 'why' question in the following post.
I'm not much of a Tarantino fan, and I don't think he has grown up as a director since his breakout films, but for me nothing he has made is as bad as Slumdog.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair enough. You raise some decent points.
I like tarantino’s production values, but I hate his pointless go nowhere dialogue, pulp fiction is one of the most overrated movies ever and the hateful 8 is very hateful.
posted 6 days, 20 hours ago
Slumdog Millionaire is overrated and I don't care for many of Boyle's films but I would concede that he is at least a solid film maker. This would be the most I've been up for a Boyle film in a long while.
posted 6 days, 19 hours ago
Tarantino hasn’t really done anything of note since Jackie Brown, definitely lost whatever made him so interesting after his first few films. His more recent movies while watchable are very bloated and the dialogue can be hard to watch at times.
Plenty of far more interesting directors around these days than either of those 2.
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
28 Years Later Trailer
Page 1 of 1
posted 1 week, 1 day ago
Interesting trailer. Surprising how quickly development for this film has escalated. I didn't even know they were making one until less than a year ago.
Having said that they wouldn't make one again unless they came up with something they thought would work, it's obviously a good sign that Boyle and Garland have returned. These are guys that won't just sign on to make any sequel, like a Ridley Scott would. They have higher standards than that.
posted 1 week, 1 day ago
comment by Spurtle (U1608)
posted 2 minutes ago
Interesting trailer. Surprising how quickly development for this film has escalated. I didn't even know they were making one until less than a year ago.
Having said that they wouldn't make one again unless they came up with something they thought would work, it's obviously a good sign that Boyle and Garland have returned. These are guys that won't just sign on to make any sequel, like a Ridley Scott would. They have higher standards than that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
An interesting trailer indeed.
Apparently filmed using the latest iPhones and some additional equipment
And from the trailer the remaining civilization seemingly having gone backwards in time rather than forwards
I think this is supposed to be a 'Part 1' with another coming out in a few years.
Looks like they've taken an interesting direction with this
posted 1 week, 1 day ago
comment by #1 House - (U17162)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Spurtle (U1608)
posted 2 minutes ago
Interesting trailer. Surprising how quickly development for this film has escalated. I didn't even know they were making one until less than a year ago.
Having said that they wouldn't make one again unless they came up with something they thought would work, it's obviously a good sign that Boyle and Garland have returned. These are guys that won't just sign on to make any sequel, like a Ridley Scott would. They have higher standards than that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
An interesting trailer indeed.
Apparently filmed using the latest iPhones and some additional equipment
And from the trailer the remaining civilization seemingly having gone backwards in time rather than forwards
I think this is supposed to be a 'Part 1' with another coming out in a few years.
Looks like they've taken an interesting direction with this
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah I hope they've gone a slightly different and interesting direction with it, if that's possible, cause zombie film plots have always been rather limited to 'group of survivors out on their own against threat of zombies until infection or other bad group of survivors ruin it all and they get overrun by zombies'. That was pretty much rinsed and repeated throughout the whole of The Walking Dead.
posted 1 week, 1 day ago
Not expecting much. Boyle is a pretty poor director, apart from Trainspotting (which is nearly 30 years old) his films are poor. While Garland is very hit and miss, Ex-Macina (directing) and Dredd (writing) being his stand outs.
I watched 28 Weeks later a year ago as I hadn't seen it in years, felt like a low budget ITV drama. Surprised it's liked as much as it is, but then I feel that way about all of Boyle's stuff that seem to have a fan base.
posted 1 week, 1 day ago
comment by manutd1982 (U6633)
posted 7 minutes ago
Not expecting much. Boyle is a pretty poor director, apart from Trainspotting (which is nearly 30 years old) his films are poor. While Garland is very hit and miss, Ex-Macina (directing) and Dredd (writing) being his stand outs.
I watched 28 Weeks later a year ago as I hadn't seen it in years, felt like a low budget ITV drama. Surprised it's liked as much as it is, but then I feel that way about all of Boyle's stuff that seem to have a fan base.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And the Beach, loved that film back in the day.
posted 1 week, 1 day ago
comment by manutd1982 (U6633)
posted 17 minutes ago
Not expecting much. Boyle is a pretty poor director, apart from Trainspotting (which is nearly 30 years old) his films are poor. While Garland is very hit and miss, Ex-Macina (directing) and Dredd (writing) being his stand outs.
I watched 28 Weeks later a year ago as I hadn't seen it in years, felt like a low budget ITV drama. Surprised it's liked as much as it is, but then I feel that way about all of Boyle's stuff that seem to have a fan base.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Couldn't disagree with this more. Boyle is an outstanding director. He also knows how to soundtrack a film.
Trance and Sunshine are in my top films of all time. I also thought TS2 was better than the first as well.
posted 1 week, 1 day ago
comment by manutd1982 (U6633)
posted 24 minutes ago
Not expecting much. Boyle is a pretty poor director, apart from Trainspotting (which is nearly 30 years old) his films are poor. While Garland is very hit and miss, Ex-Macina (directing) and Dredd (writing) being his stand outs.
I watched 28 Weeks later a year ago as I hadn't seen it in years, felt like a low budget ITV drama. Surprised it's liked as much as it is, but then I feel that way about all of Boyle's stuff that seem to have a fan base.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nah I got respect for Boyle. That Pandemonium sequence for the 2012 Olympics opening ceremony was phenomenal
posted 1 week, 1 day ago
comment by Hawkeye78 (U22468)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by manutd1982 (U6633)
posted 17 minutes ago
Not expecting much. Boyle is a pretty poor director, apart from Trainspotting (which is nearly 30 years old) his films are poor. While Garland is very hit and miss, Ex-Macina (directing) and Dredd (writing) being his stand outs.
I watched 28 Weeks later a year ago as I hadn't seen it in years, felt like a low budget ITV drama. Surprised it's liked as much as it is, but then I feel that way about all of Boyle's stuff that seem to have a fan base.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Couldn't disagree with this more. Boyle is an outstanding director. He also knows how to soundtrack a film.
Trance and Sunshine are in my top films of all time. I also thought TS2 was better than the first as well.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep Sunshine is class
Boyle is actually a very good director
posted 1 week, 1 day ago
comment by manutd1982 (U6633)
posted 1 hour, 50 minutes ago
Not expecting much. Boyle is a pretty poor director, apart from Trainspotting (which is nearly 30 years old) his films are poor. While Garland is very hit and miss, Ex-Macina (directing) and Dredd (writing) being his stand outs.
I watched 28 Weeks later a year ago as I hadn't seen it in years, felt like a low budget ITV drama. Surprised it's liked as much as it is, but then I feel that way about all of Boyle's stuff that seem to have a fan base.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did you not like Slumdog, 127 Hours or Shallow Grave? He’s made some crackers, IMO.
posted 1 week, 1 day ago
Why didn't they wait till 28 years later
posted 1 week, 1 day ago
comment by Ali - ๐ช๐ฆ ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ (U1192)
posted 4 minutes ago
Why didn't they wait till 28 years later
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Was the sequel actually 28 weeks later?
posted 1 week, 1 day ago
For me the horror film that gave me the most nightmares as a teenager (first watched this in 2003 as a 13 yo)
—
Really? Didn’t think it was scary. Good movie though.
posted 1 week, 1 day ago
comment by Striketeam7 - staying humble (U18109)
posted 57 minutes ago
comment by Ali - ๐ช๐ฆ ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ (U1192)
posted 4 minutes ago
Why didn't they wait till 28 years later
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Was the sequel actually 28 weeks later?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was 262 - 28 weeks later so yes it was
posted 1 week, 1 day ago
Even the Guardian is giving Kudos to this trailer
https://www.theguardian.com/film/2024/dec/10/28-years-later-trailer
posted 1 week, 1 day ago
Rosso
Shallow Grave is ok, dated pretty badly. The rest of his films I can’t stand.
Of course it’s all subjective but not a fan.
posted 1 week ago
comment by RRRU-ben a-moo-REENG (U17054)
posted 16 hours, 2 minutes ago
comment by manutd1982 (U6633)
posted 1 hour, 50 minutes ago
Not expecting much. Boyle is a pretty poor director, apart from Trainspotting (which is nearly 30 years old) his films are poor. While Garland is very hit and miss, Ex-Macina (directing) and Dredd (writing) being his stand outs.
I watched 28 Weeks later a year ago as I hadn't seen it in years, felt like a low budget ITV drama. Surprised it's liked as much as it is, but then I feel that way about all of Boyle's stuff that seem to have a fan base.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did you not like Slumdog, 127 Hours or Shallow Grave? He’s made some crackers, IMO.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I really hated Slumdog.
posted 6 days, 23 hours ago
It’s an awful film. Talking of sh-t Boyle films, I switched on the TV last night and saw Yesterday was on, possibly one of the worst films ever made.
posted 6 days, 22 hours ago
comment by manutd1982 (U6633)
posted 42 minutes ago
It’s an awful film. Talking of sh-t Boyle films, I switched on the TV last night and saw Yesterday was on, possibly one of the worst films ever made.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've made a concerted effort to avoid watching Yesterday.
Slumdog were both a general subjective dislike for mawkish fairy tale type films (also fuัking hate Amélie, for instance) and a strong distaste for the way the severe deprivation of Indian slums is used purely as a backdrop for a fantasy story. As I see it, a rich European guy should generally tread carefully if depicting that world, even if it's a attempt to produce a layered and realistic portrait. But Boyle just used the slum as poverty ัorn in a story that could just as easily been set in Lagos, Jakarta or Sao Paulo.
posted 6 days, 21 hours ago
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 2 hours, 42 minutes ago
comment by RRRU-ben a-moo-REENG (U17054)
posted 16 hours, 2 minutes ago
comment by manutd1982 (U6633)
posted 1 hour, 50 minutes ago
Not expecting much. Boyle is a pretty poor director, apart from Trainspotting (which is nearly 30 years old) his films are poor. While Garland is very hit and miss, Ex-Macina (directing) and Dredd (writing) being his stand outs.
I watched 28 Weeks later a year ago as I hadn't seen it in years, felt like a low budget ITV drama. Surprised it's liked as much as it is, but then I feel that way about all of Boyle's stuff that seem to have a fan base.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did you not like Slumdog, 127 Hours or Shallow Grave? He’s made some crackers, IMO.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I really hated Slumdog.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why? It’s not a terrible movie.
I mean it’s better than anything Tarantino has done imo
posted 6 days, 21 hours ago
comment by Baz tard - ineos your face (U19119)
posted 4 minutes ago
Why? It’s not a terrible movie.
I mean it’s better than anything Tarantino has done imo
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I answered your 'why' question in the following post.
I'm not much of a Tarantino fan, and I don't think he has grown up as a director since his breakout films, but for me nothing he has made is as bad as Slumdog.
posted 6 days, 20 hours ago
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by Baz tard - ineos your face (U19119)
posted 4 minutes ago
Why? It’s not a terrible movie.
I mean it’s better than anything Tarantino has done imo
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I answered your 'why' question in the following post.
I'm not much of a Tarantino fan, and I don't think he has grown up as a director since his breakout films, but for me nothing he has made is as bad as Slumdog.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair enough. You raise some decent points.
I like tarantino’s production values, but I hate his pointless go nowhere dialogue, pulp fiction is one of the most overrated movies ever and the hateful 8 is very hateful.
posted 6 days, 20 hours ago
Slumdog Millionaire is overrated and I don't care for many of Boyle's films but I would concede that he is at least a solid film maker. This would be the most I've been up for a Boyle film in a long while.
posted 6 days, 19 hours ago
Tarantino hasn’t really done anything of note since Jackie Brown, definitely lost whatever made him so interesting after his first few films. His more recent movies while watchable are very bloated and the dialogue can be hard to watch at times.
Plenty of far more interesting directors around these days than either of those 2.
Page 1 of 1