the con of what? to use less smellies??
how dare you
Did she admit she was lying to you then RRP?
There is no proof of it Kent
The Earth has a cycle of weather climate's and the people who go out and do "research" into the Earth warming up have to pay for the work themselves so of course they are going to pick the data which best suits them
Bales she wouldn't back down but she also couldnt prove anything
I've heard that said before RRP, problem is we can't prove it either way - no-one understands global weather in it's entirety. The way I see it if there's a chance we're affecting it why not switch to renewable energy etc? Fossil fuels are so ridiculously inefficient it makes sense anyway
P.S. Attenbrough reckons it's hotting up
Dara O briain said the earth couldn't flood either, he said its like putting a ice cube into a glass of water
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
the ice is melting
the weather even here is changing drastically
it says it on the news
Global warming does exist, there is a direct corollation (sp) between co2 levels and earth temp.
I do agree that it is blown out of proportion though.
Attenbrough is a WUM
Bales - But the process of lowering our reliance on fossil fuels will not make a difference, humans contribute around 10% of the Earth's pollution anyway, blame the Algae
Its all a giant con and your getting swept up in it
PENGUINS
Oh dear, the evidence is mounting RRP!
What's the answer then Edin?
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
U say that humans only contribute 10% however u are completely ignoring the fact that say cows contribute loads, yet its due to the huge dependance humans have on them. If we didn't have control on their breeding the population levels would be less than 1% of what it is currently.
Bales, steady, monitored sustainable energy is the way forward.
We should stop using deodorant and live like cavemen
Anthropogenic warming is hard to prove because it's very difficult to measure it's offset from natural warming but it doesn't mean it's not happening. The science behind is perfectly sound and as we all know it's best not too play with fire if we don't want to get burned. Better safe than sorry.
Although cynics could argumee the government funding that is provided to research and projects if "global warming" is cited.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Nice copy and paste TWAG.
--------------------------
With all those mistakes? Are you serious, that is signature Twag if ever there was one.
Its all a giant con and your getting swept up in it
--------
Chill out fella, this is one of many fences I sit on daily
Who's conning us though, and why?
Sign in if you want to comment
Good News
Page 765 of 43089
766 | 767 | 768 | 769 | 770
posted on 17/2/12
Here we go...
posted on 17/2/12
the con of what? to use less smellies??
how dare you
posted on 17/2/12
Did she admit she was lying to you then RRP?
posted on 17/2/12
There is no proof of it Kent
The Earth has a cycle of weather climate's and the people who go out and do "research" into the Earth warming up have to pay for the work themselves so of course they are going to pick the data which best suits them
Bales she wouldn't back down but she also couldnt prove anything
posted on 17/2/12
I've heard that said before RRP, problem is we can't prove it either way - no-one understands global weather in it's entirety. The way I see it if there's a chance we're affecting it why not switch to renewable energy etc? Fossil fuels are so ridiculously inefficient it makes sense anyway
P.S. Attenbrough reckons it's hotting up
posted on 17/2/12
Dara O briain said the earth couldn't flood either, he said its like putting a ice cube into a glass of water
posted on 17/2/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 17/2/12
the ice is melting
the weather even here is changing drastically
it says it on the news
posted on 17/2/12
It's freezing
posted on 17/2/12
Global warming does exist, there is a direct corollation (sp) between co2 levels and earth temp.
I do agree that it is blown out of proportion though.
posted on 17/2/12
posted on 17/2/12
Attenbrough is a WUM
Bales - But the process of lowering our reliance on fossil fuels will not make a difference, humans contribute around 10% of the Earth's pollution anyway, blame the Algae
Its all a giant con and your getting swept up in it
PENGUINS
posted on 17/2/12
Oh dear, the evidence is mounting RRP!
What's the answer then Edin?
posted on 17/2/12
Fúcking cows
posted on 17/2/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 17/2/12
ITS A CON
posted on 17/2/12
TBOK
posted on 17/2/12
U say that humans only contribute 10% however u are completely ignoring the fact that say cows contribute loads, yet its due to the huge dependance humans have on them. If we didn't have control on their breeding the population levels would be less than 1% of what it is currently.
Bales, steady, monitored sustainable energy is the way forward.
posted on 17/2/12
We should stop using deodorant and live like cavemen
posted on 17/2/12
Anthropogenic warming is hard to prove because it's very difficult to measure it's offset from natural warming but it doesn't mean it's not happening. The science behind is perfectly sound and as we all know it's best not too play with fire if we don't want to get burned. Better safe than sorry.
Although cynics could argumee the government funding that is provided to research and projects if "global warming" is cited.
posted on 17/2/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 17/2/12
RRP = Jeremy Clarkson
posted on 17/2/12
argue*
posted on 17/2/12
Nice copy and paste TWAG.
--------------------------
With all those mistakes? Are you serious, that is signature Twag if ever there was one.
posted on 17/2/12
Its all a giant con and your getting swept up in it
--------
Chill out fella, this is one of many fences I sit on daily
Who's conning us though, and why?
Page 765 of 43089
766 | 767 | 768 | 769 | 770