posted 2 weeks, 5 days ago
1. I dont think Grealish a shadow of the player he was at Villa. He just hasn't improved since being at City.
2. If he Grealish had gone to United instead, he would have been a United legend. Like Gazza and Shearer would have been.
posted 2 weeks, 5 days ago
2. If he Grealish had gone to United instead, he would have been a United legend. Like Gazza and Shearer would have been.
----------------------------------
Would have ended up like Antony or Alexis Sanchez.
posted 2 weeks, 5 days ago
Price tag is the problem. He has never been a goalscorer, so when people talk about his lack of goals, yeah he's on a bit of a drought but he's never been prolific. For 100m though understandably you expect someone to be chipping in around 20 league goals as an attacking midfielder, but that's just not part of his game. Great in the treble season, not a 100m midfielder though.
posted 2 weeks, 5 days ago
It's not his fault he cost 100 million. We've utterly rinsed City and they've ended up with a player we never saw at Villa. He was overhyped like all English players tbf but he definitely had the quality to excel in a top 6 side and be the player he was touted as. The robotic City machine has just swallowed him and he's also surrounded by better players that have just over shadowed him.
Best bit of business we've ever done really and we've moved on without him. He wouldn't get in our strongest 11 now either.
Got all the baubles and lots and lots of money but the smile and free roaming maverick style went long ago.
Sign in if you want to comment
Jack Grealish
Page 2 of 2
posted 2 weeks, 5 days ago
1. I dont think Grealish a shadow of the player he was at Villa. He just hasn't improved since being at City.
2. If he Grealish had gone to United instead, he would have been a United legend. Like Gazza and Shearer would have been.
posted 2 weeks, 5 days ago
2. If he Grealish had gone to United instead, he would have been a United legend. Like Gazza and Shearer would have been.
----------------------------------
Would have ended up like Antony or Alexis Sanchez.
posted 2 weeks, 5 days ago
Price tag is the problem. He has never been a goalscorer, so when people talk about his lack of goals, yeah he's on a bit of a drought but he's never been prolific. For 100m though understandably you expect someone to be chipping in around 20 league goals as an attacking midfielder, but that's just not part of his game. Great in the treble season, not a 100m midfielder though.
posted 2 weeks, 5 days ago
It's not his fault he cost 100 million. We've utterly rinsed City and they've ended up with a player we never saw at Villa. He was overhyped like all English players tbf but he definitely had the quality to excel in a top 6 side and be the player he was touted as. The robotic City machine has just swallowed him and he's also surrounded by better players that have just over shadowed him.
Best bit of business we've ever done really and we've moved on without him. He wouldn't get in our strongest 11 now either.
Got all the baubles and lots and lots of money but the smile and free roaming maverick style went long ago.
Page 2 of 2