simple,
England is mediocre.

make it 5. england are not good in tests either in the subcontinent. and they are just very bad. they lost to ireland and bangladesh. it cant be coincidence to lose twice against poor teams

Delhi Belly?

indiasox, you're back

You guys ran off when you're best team in the world lost
4-0 and 8 comps in a row

welcome back

whats the point of England continuing to play ODI cricket anyway?
They always seem to get thrashed.ODI has become an embarrasment to England.
I think they should flood in more and more English cricketer with PIO(person of Indian Origin) in their team.Ravi and samit is not enough.lets start with Monty.

Always, sox?

Are you sure? I thought they didn't loser a single ODI or 20/20 in the last series? Wait, I think they won 5 in a row actually

Keep taking those delusion pills soxie

England have always been poor at ODI's in away conditions.

Another myth, England won the ODI series in Australia on the tour they lost the Ashes 5-0. They struggle in India because the bowlers can't adapt.

4 and a half years ago. They lost 6-1 last time

20/20 Champions

Didnt England win a series in Sri Lanka recently?

So I just came back from work , switched on the news and the anchor was mumbling something about 3 lions getting gored by an elephant somewhere in delhi today.What was that all about ?

Ha.. haa..

some were donkeys too

"Why are England so poor in ODIs in India?"

Because they can not milk the spinners. They get bogged down, realise that they are behind the required run rate, slow, get caught in the deep and the cycle starts all over again with the new batsman.

England need to learn how to get 5 runs an over from a spinners WITHOUT taking risks. If you really think about this, when the spinners are bowling, there are usually only four fielders in the 30 yard circle, so why is it so hard for them to hit the gaps 5 out of 6 times?

I will write an article on this tomorrow.

The above should say "SLOG" not "slow"