Good call..
But Young is not an impact player like Johnson.
Young and then Walcott as an impact player.
Walcott's goal scoring recording is phenomenal for England... But he sometimes run out of ideas.
I might be wrong but I'm guessing Walcott's stats might be better than Johnson's this season?
If you consider the number of games played then 'no'.
A winger's primary stats should be for assists since their job is crossing the ball into the box. So what are they for Walcott and Johnson?
I might be wrong but i am guessing all these crosses depends on the formation you'll play...
And Capello often plays 4-4-2 so it matters.
Both have good records over Lennon. But Capello still picks Lennon.. it would be worse if Harry takes his seat.
Don't know if you're genuinely being ignorant or being your normal wum self but Lennon is hardly ever considered for England. It's always the out of form Milner, who almost every other winger would be a better option than.
Don't know if you're genuinely being ignorant or being your normal wum self but Lennon is hardly ever considered for England.
2010 World Cup squad.
If England want to continue as they are focusing on power and pace then Walcott.If they want to try and change the style of play using technical players that are more skilful then Johnson
Not sure how much weight you can put on those stats; they don't tell you who the goals were against, for example, or whether they were match winners. Furthermore, a winger should be more concerned about assists. So those stats don't really say that Johnson is better than Lennon.
Instead, if you want to fight Johnson's corner than go on observations instead. You only need to watch either player for half and hour to see that Johnson is a far better player. Lennon is all legs and no brain. If he can't beat a man with pace then he can't beat him at all. Johnson has far more in his locker.
As for Walcott; well, the less said about him as a winger, the better. I think he'd make an effective striker, as he'd be in positions where he'd have less time to think about what he has to do. Play him on the shoulder of the last defender, give him two touches max to tuck the ball away and he'll be great. Put him on the wing where he has to think about how he's going to beat a man, how he's going to control a ball and where he's going to play it, and he'll disappoint.
Didn't lennon win some award?He is better than RVP?
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
Johnson vs Lennon
Page 1 of 1
posted on 21/6/11
Ashley Young
posted on 21/6/11
Both.
posted on 21/6/11
Good call..
But Young is not an impact player like Johnson.
posted on 21/6/11
Young and then Walcott as an impact player.
posted on 21/6/11
Walcott's goal scoring recording is phenomenal for England... But he sometimes run out of ideas.
posted on 21/6/11
I might be wrong but I'm guessing Walcott's stats might be better than Johnson's this season?
posted on 21/6/11
If you consider the number of games played then 'no'.
posted on 21/6/11
A winger's primary stats should be for assists since their job is crossing the ball into the box. So what are they for Walcott and Johnson?
posted on 21/6/11
I might be wrong but i am guessing all these crosses depends on the formation you'll play...
posted on 21/6/11
And Capello often plays 4-4-2 so it matters.
posted on 21/6/11
Both have good records over Lennon. But Capello still picks Lennon.. it would be worse if Harry takes his seat.
posted on 21/6/11
Don't know if you're genuinely being ignorant or being your normal wum self but Lennon is hardly ever considered for England. It's always the out of form Milner, who almost every other winger would be a better option than.
posted on 21/6/11
Don't know if you're genuinely being ignorant or being your normal wum self but Lennon is hardly ever considered for England.
2010 World Cup squad.
posted on 21/6/11
If England want to continue as they are focusing on power and pace then Walcott.If they want to try and change the style of play using technical players that are more skilful then Johnson
posted on 22/6/11
Not sure how much weight you can put on those stats; they don't tell you who the goals were against, for example, or whether they were match winners. Furthermore, a winger should be more concerned about assists. So those stats don't really say that Johnson is better than Lennon.
Instead, if you want to fight Johnson's corner than go on observations instead. You only need to watch either player for half and hour to see that Johnson is a far better player. Lennon is all legs and no brain. If he can't beat a man with pace then he can't beat him at all. Johnson has far more in his locker.
As for Walcott; well, the less said about him as a winger, the better. I think he'd make an effective striker, as he'd be in positions where he'd have less time to think about what he has to do. Play him on the shoulder of the last defender, give him two touches max to tuck the ball away and he'll be great. Put him on the wing where he has to think about how he's going to beat a man, how he's going to control a ball and where he's going to play it, and he'll disappoint.
posted on 23/6/11
Didn't lennon win some award?He is better than RVP?
Page 1 of 1