8bit's right. It's airtight. You'd never make a workplace case against someone on that basis. He shows up on time, plays where and when he's told to and can't be held responsible for the actions of team mates which directly affect his output.
And there are players besides Arshavin (Walcott for one) who you could have used as a more apt examples, especially as Walcott is angling for a pay review, which management COULD turn down on the basis of performance.
What Perspective?
Page 1 of 1
posted on 17/1/12
Legally I'm sure you couldn't do that, form is subjective so you couldn't prove anything.
posted on 17/1/12
8bit's right. It's airtight. You'd never make a workplace case against someone on that basis. He shows up on time, plays where and when he's told to and can't be held responsible for the actions of team mates which directly affect his output.
And there are players besides Arshavin (Walcott for one) who you could have used as a more apt examples, especially as Walcott is angling for a pay review, which management COULD turn down on the basis of performance.
Page 1 of 1