or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 94 comments are related to an article called:

Should Sir David Murray be next....

Page 1 of 4

posted on 1/2/12

THAT WOULD DEPEND ON WHY HE GOT IT IN THE FIRST PLACE..

For me they should never have taken it off Goodwin (is that his name) though

posted on 1/2/12

He got it for services to Business in scotland Duke

comment by Hector (U3606)

posted on 1/2/12

Morally he should hand it back.

He, single-handedly, has destroyed a massive symbol of this country's culture.
He reaped the benefit of milking the 'quintessential British club' palaver, yet as has been pointed out, did all he could to avoid contributing to the British exchequer to fuel his maniacal ego.

Whats the chances though?

posted on 1/2/12

at the point he was given it he must have deserved it\

\as did Goodwinn

posted on 1/2/12

if he hands it back, take it,


if he dont, take it


put him behind bars

posted on 1/2/12

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Hector (U3606)

posted on 1/2/12

Goodwin saved NatWest = Knighthood
Flopped buying ABN = Reamed

Scapegoated by a Govt. that's even more populist than Blair.

posted on 1/2/12

David Murray is the man who has put Rangers in this position. Where's the deserved witchhunt for him?
Why is Murray being let off by the Media?

comment by (U5278)

posted on 1/2/12

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Hector (U3606)

posted on 1/2/12

What are you suggesting Dos?

Does GCC have a specific policy?

Or are you just a stereotype?

posted on 1/2/12

"the first of course being glasgow city council allthough some find it more difficult to get jobs there than others."

Scotland - some people find it more difficult to get jobs there than others.

posted on 1/2/12

Scotland - some people find it more difficult to get jobs there than others.

--------


no they dont

comment by (U5278)

posted on 1/2/12

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Hector (U3606)

posted on 1/2/12



No, can you back it up?

posted on 1/2/12

He should have it stripped solely for the fact that a company that he run found a way to not pay tax to the very person that gave him it

posted on 1/2/12

Should Sir David Murray be next....


No danger.....

...give him another one...

comment by (U5278)

posted on 1/2/12

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Hector (U3606)

posted on 1/2/12

According to your own source...
"The allegations of sectarianism were found to be untrue"

"of course the sectarian apsect was swept under the carpet by heavy weights like liddle and reid and renamed "nepotism" "

Another one of they big papal conspiracy's eh!

Now, about your GCC insinuation....Proof?

posted on 1/2/12

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by (U5278)

posted on 1/2/12

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Hector (U3606)

posted on 1/2/12

Enlighten me.

comment by Hector (U3606)

posted on 1/2/12

Paisley

Proof?

comment by (U5278)

posted on 1/2/12

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 1/2/12

Dos

That canny be correct

7 out of every 8 children attend non dom schooling
An even higher ratio back in 1972

so that simply couldnt happen

comment by (U5278)

posted on 1/2/12

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Page 1 of 4

Sign in if you want to comment