Quite surprised how high Liverpool are, considering no CL.
Just shows though that if we can get into the CL next season, it's really going to give us a much needed financial boost.
Come on 4th...
comment by Luis Suarez has big teeth (U10117) posted 1 minute ago Quite surprised how high Liverpool are, considering no CL.
You shouldn't be mate, we are a huge club with a massive following. Our owners have already secured us some great sponsorship deal, if we qualify for the CL, I can defo see us cracking the top 5 possibly.
Surprised with the difference between Chelsea and Arsenal..it's not much considering they seat nearly 20000 more every home game.
I think it's due to that poor Emirates deal they struck in the beginning
Madrid and Barca wouldn't even be top two if it wasn't for the differences in how clubs sell the TV rights.
Valencia the only other Spanish club on 19th, what a shame?
comment by BusbysBabes (U9083) posted 58 seconds ago Madrid and Barca wouldn't even be top two if it wasn't for the differences in how clubs sell the TV rights.
As much as it pains me to say it, if Real and Barca didn't have that advantage, Man Utd would be top by a mile.
So how does this TV deal work for Barca and Real and when was this established. Do they always get all of their games shown live on TV or something.
I'm with an Arsenal fan and he says Arsenal would be higher with regards to revenue if it wasnt for them having to repay debts???
Is this true????
I was basically pointing out the fact at how close Chelsea and Arsenal are.
Gulits ghost - I think it is wrong because why would you take stadium debts away from revenue, surely it would be profit.
I think Chelsea as so close to us because they have much better sponsers and got into the world tour during pre season way before us.
I think at the end of next season most of our sponships will be up for renewal and that will help up alot. also we have started touring the world during pre season will help raise quite a bit.
that shows revenue- what each team brought in. Chelsea and Arsenal bring in almost the same!
didn't expect that!
I think at the end of next season most of our sponships will be up for renewal and that will help up alot. also we have started touring the world during pre season will help raise quite a bit.
--------------------
how would those figures look without champions league money?
These findings support a question I've always asked for Chelsea: Is a new (bigger) stadium REALLY that neccesary?
that shows revenue- what each team brought in. Chelsea and Arsenal bring in almost the same!
didn't expect that!
--------------------------------------------------
Until Arsenal moved to the MEirates Chelsea for many years (even pre Roman) actually brought in more revenue, it is only in the last 2 or three years that Arsenal got ahead. The gap has closed and that is interesting.
One of the reasons we had higher revenues previously was that we had more corporate allocation than Arsenal in the past. If I recall correctly our game against Liverpool, the last game of the 2002/2003 season that saw us qualify for the CL (just before Roman bought us) was the first Premier league game to produce gate reciepts of 3m.
Today our merchandise sales globally go a long way to adding to our revenues.
The repayments have nothing to o with these numbers GG.
comment by Mr. Tea. (U4302)
posted 19 minutes ago
So how does this TV deal work for Barca and Real and when was this established. Do they always get all of their games shown live on TV or something.
------------------------------------------------
They sell their own rights to the highest bidders.
In England, the Premier League sells the rights to games and each games is sold at an equal price, meaning each team gets an equal share of income. In Spain; Real's and Barca's deals dwarf the rest.
comment by Culty Legends¤ (U2123)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by BusbysBabes (U9083) posted 58 seconds ago Madrid and Barca wouldn't even be top two if it wasn't for the differences in how clubs sell the TV rights.
As much as it pains me to say it, if Real and Barca didn't have that advantage, Man Utd would be top by a mile.
------------------------------------------------------
I had heard somewhere that this would be stopping in the next couple of years and that TV rights would be sold and managed collectively like the premiership. If it happens could be interesting, in more ways than one. e.g. What if La Liga replaces the premiership as the league to follow?
Today our merchandise sales globally go a long way to adding to our revenues.
--
Sadly Arsenal are way behind the likes or chelsea, Liverpool & United in this department.
If we DO improve this then i reckon we could be pretty close to United and certainly ahead of Bayern.
If we dont get into the CL this season i presonally reckon it will force the board to stand up and actually support Wenger in the Transfer Market.
If we dont make it this season im 100% we will make it the season after as with less games our players will be fresher and wont suffer these stupid injuries that always plague us.
Who's that little club in 5th place, I cant quite make it out..Ch.....Che......Chel....No it's no good, you'll have to help me out.
Some small club from Fulham I think
Love the fact Spurs are higher than Man City
comment by Chelsea-Lad-Power-14-Banter (U5996) posted 2 minutes ago
Love the fact Spurs are higher than Man City.
That's thanks to their participation in the CL last season. Man City will go above Spurs in next years rankings.
Comment deleted by Article Creator
Revenue figures do not mean an awful lot unless you show what has gone out by way of expenditure.
comment by SANDSEND 59 fenton, fenton, FENTON, oh jesus christ !!! (U6325)
posted 15 minutes ago
Who's that little club in 5th place, I cant quite make it out..Ch.....Che......Chel....No it's no good, you'll have to help me out.
Some small club from Fulham I think
----------------------
And the pound i dropping out of sight in the world money-value order...
It really means nothing! I am sure united will not go belly up!
Who's that little club in 5th place, I cant quite make it out..Ch.....Che......Chel....No it's no good, you'll have to help me out.
Some small club from Fulham I think
Haha, Chelsea are actually in 6th place
Sign in if you want to comment
Real Madrid Top Football Richlist
Page 1 of 3
posted on 9/2/12
Quite surprised how high Liverpool are, considering no CL.
Just shows though that if we can get into the CL next season, it's really going to give us a much needed financial boost.
Come on 4th...
posted on 9/2/12
comment by Luis Suarez has big teeth (U10117) posted 1 minute ago Quite surprised how high Liverpool are, considering no CL.
You shouldn't be mate, we are a huge club with a massive following. Our owners have already secured us some great sponsorship deal, if we qualify for the CL, I can defo see us cracking the top 5 possibly.
posted on 9/2/12
Surprised with the difference between Chelsea and Arsenal..it's not much considering they seat nearly 20000 more every home game.
I think it's due to that poor Emirates deal they struck in the beginning
posted on 9/2/12
Madrid and Barca wouldn't even be top two if it wasn't for the differences in how clubs sell the TV rights.
posted on 9/2/12
Valencia the only other Spanish club on 19th, what a shame?
posted on 9/2/12
comment by BusbysBabes (U9083) posted 58 seconds ago Madrid and Barca wouldn't even be top two if it wasn't for the differences in how clubs sell the TV rights.
As much as it pains me to say it, if Real and Barca didn't have that advantage, Man Utd would be top by a mile.
posted on 9/2/12
So how does this TV deal work for Barca and Real and when was this established. Do they always get all of their games shown live on TV or something.
posted on 9/2/12
I'm with an Arsenal fan and he says Arsenal would be higher with regards to revenue if it wasnt for them having to repay debts???
Is this true????
I was basically pointing out the fact at how close Chelsea and Arsenal are.
posted on 9/2/12
Gulits ghost - I think it is wrong because why would you take stadium debts away from revenue, surely it would be profit.
posted on 9/2/12
I think Chelsea as so close to us because they have much better sponsers and got into the world tour during pre season way before us.
I think at the end of next season most of our sponships will be up for renewal and that will help up alot. also we have started touring the world during pre season will help raise quite a bit.
posted on 9/2/12
that shows revenue- what each team brought in. Chelsea and Arsenal bring in almost the same!
didn't expect that!
posted on 9/2/12
I think at the end of next season most of our sponships will be up for renewal and that will help up alot. also we have started touring the world during pre season will help raise quite a bit.
--------------------
how would those figures look without champions league money?
posted on 9/2/12
These findings support a question I've always asked for Chelsea: Is a new (bigger) stadium REALLY that neccesary?
posted on 9/2/12
that shows revenue- what each team brought in. Chelsea and Arsenal bring in almost the same!
didn't expect that!
--------------------------------------------------
Until Arsenal moved to the MEirates Chelsea for many years (even pre Roman) actually brought in more revenue, it is only in the last 2 or three years that Arsenal got ahead. The gap has closed and that is interesting.
One of the reasons we had higher revenues previously was that we had more corporate allocation than Arsenal in the past. If I recall correctly our game against Liverpool, the last game of the 2002/2003 season that saw us qualify for the CL (just before Roman bought us) was the first Premier league game to produce gate reciepts of 3m.
Today our merchandise sales globally go a long way to adding to our revenues.
The repayments have nothing to o with these numbers GG.
posted on 9/2/12
comment by Mr. Tea. (U4302)
posted 19 minutes ago
So how does this TV deal work for Barca and Real and when was this established. Do they always get all of their games shown live on TV or something.
------------------------------------------------
They sell their own rights to the highest bidders.
In England, the Premier League sells the rights to games and each games is sold at an equal price, meaning each team gets an equal share of income. In Spain; Real's and Barca's deals dwarf the rest.
posted on 9/2/12
comment by Culty Legends¤ (U2123)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by BusbysBabes (U9083) posted 58 seconds ago Madrid and Barca wouldn't even be top two if it wasn't for the differences in how clubs sell the TV rights.
As much as it pains me to say it, if Real and Barca didn't have that advantage, Man Utd would be top by a mile.
------------------------------------------------------
I had heard somewhere that this would be stopping in the next couple of years and that TV rights would be sold and managed collectively like the premiership. If it happens could be interesting, in more ways than one. e.g. What if La Liga replaces the premiership as the league to follow?
posted on 9/2/12
Today our merchandise sales globally go a long way to adding to our revenues.
--
Sadly Arsenal are way behind the likes or chelsea, Liverpool & United in this department.
If we DO improve this then i reckon we could be pretty close to United and certainly ahead of Bayern.
If we dont get into the CL this season i presonally reckon it will force the board to stand up and actually support Wenger in the Transfer Market.
If we dont make it this season im 100% we will make it the season after as with less games our players will be fresher and wont suffer these stupid injuries that always plague us.
posted on 9/2/12
Who's that little club in 5th place, I cant quite make it out..Ch.....Che......Chel....No it's no good, you'll have to help me out.
Some small club from Fulham I think
posted on 9/2/12
Love the fact Spurs are higher than Man City
posted on 9/2/12
comment by Chelsea-Lad-Power-14-Banter (U5996) posted 2 minutes ago
Love the fact Spurs are higher than Man City.
That's thanks to their participation in the CL last season. Man City will go above Spurs in next years rankings.
posted on 9/2/12
Comment deleted by Article Creator
posted on 9/2/12
Revenue figures do not mean an awful lot unless you show what has gone out by way of expenditure.
posted on 9/2/12
comment by SANDSEND 59 fenton, fenton, FENTON, oh jesus christ !!! (U6325)
posted 15 minutes ago
Who's that little club in 5th place, I cant quite make it out..Ch.....Che......Chel....No it's no good, you'll have to help me out.
Some small club from Fulham I think
----------------------
posted on 9/2/12
And the pound i dropping out of sight in the world money-value order...
It really means nothing! I am sure united will not go belly up!
posted on 9/2/12
Who's that little club in 5th place, I cant quite make it out..Ch.....Che......Chel....No it's no good, you'll have to help me out.
Some small club from Fulham I think
Haha, Chelsea are actually in 6th place
Page 1 of 3