Just when the story was going away up steps glen Johnson and his words of wisdom. What an idiot
Didn't we do this yesterday?
What a foolish man he is.
I hope someone has a word in his ear in order to stop any further nonsense.
Wild_ Rover (U5211) - Because he booked an appointment with the tabloids to specifically talk about this didn't he....
Christ, some people.
He was asked a question and he answered it.
Paisley. Trouble is he didnt think before he answered it, hence the reference to no brains.
Didn't we do this yesterday?
------------------
Sorry, i don't keep track of all the threads
I can't see any logic in reigniting the dispute, but that's what Johnson has done. If he was asked the question specifically he didn't have to answer it.
And how would they have twisted it if he hadn't answered anything?
deepspace,
I can't see any logic in reigniting the dispute
---
And yet that's exactly what you've done on this site by creating another article on this after it was done to death yesterday. Thanks for that, and welcome to my watch list.
So a fellow teammate sticks up for Suarez in a case that didn't require the burden of proof and yet he is criticised
hmmmm
Don't see anything wrong with Johnsons view - he's right, Evra played it out and the nation have been fooled
When has Dalglish ever answered a question he wanted to avoid?
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
How important is Johnsons opinion?
Page 1 of 1
posted on 9/3/12
Just when the story was going away up steps glen Johnson and his words of wisdom. What an idiot
posted on 9/3/12
Didn't we do this yesterday?
posted on 9/3/12
What a foolish man he is.
I hope someone has a word in his ear in order to stop any further nonsense.
posted on 9/3/12
Wild_ Rover (U5211) - Because he booked an appointment with the tabloids to specifically talk about this didn't he....
Christ, some people.
posted on 9/3/12
He was asked a question and he answered it.
posted on 9/3/12
Paisley. Trouble is he didnt think before he answered it, hence the reference to no brains.
posted on 9/3/12
Didn't we do this yesterday?
------------------
Sorry, i don't keep track of all the threads
I can't see any logic in reigniting the dispute, but that's what Johnson has done. If he was asked the question specifically he didn't have to answer it.
posted on 9/3/12
And how would they have twisted it if he hadn't answered anything?
posted on 9/3/12
deepspace,
I can't see any logic in reigniting the dispute
---
And yet that's exactly what you've done on this site by creating another article on this after it was done to death yesterday. Thanks for that, and welcome to my watch list.
posted on 9/3/12
So a fellow teammate sticks up for Suarez in a case that didn't require the burden of proof and yet he is criticised
hmmmm
Don't see anything wrong with Johnsons view - he's right, Evra played it out and the nation have been fooled
posted on 9/3/12
When has Dalglish ever answered a question he wanted to avoid?
posted on 9/3/12
comment by Admin2 (U2)
posted on 9/3/12
Please lock this thread.
Page 1 of 1