What's with Jack?

I would suggest pace has been the mainstay of our earlier performances this season.......

No steve

We’ve played the ball quickly, that different to having pace.

Two completely different things

You need pace to get on to the ball. Roofe showed pace against Rotherham did he not or was I watching another game?

No you saw him run past a really big slow defender

You think Roofe got pace ???

Really

I'll agree to disagree. He wasn't slouching. Credit where credit's due methinks.

comment by LIW - RAD = BATES WITH A SMILE (U8453)
posted 7 minutes ago
No you saw him run past a really big slow defender

You think Roofe got pace ???

Really
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Unless you get Usain, from time to time other players are going to be faster.

I prefer the player with control that is slower, some have mention RS, than the speedy player without (Sacko?).

I prefer the player who can do both

And sacko wasn’t even that quick to be honest

Just think we lack that pacey player at times, who scares defenders and Creates space for other player a

Roofe is quick but certainly would not consider him pacy Will beat the odd defender now and again.

comment by LIW - RAD = BATES WITH A SMILE (U8453)
posted 39 minutes ago
I prefer the player who can do both

And sacko wasn’t even that quick to be honest

Just think we lack that pacey player at times, who scares defenders and Creates space for other player a
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Of course, both is more better, but how many are there like that in this division?

Roofe has pace over short distances which is fine in a striker. I think Harrison has it in him but Alioski is too slow and never seems to attack the byline. Shackleton showed them both how to do that.

We don’t need 100m sprinters just players who can do it over 10/15 yds. Also the first yard is in the head anyway - as Bamford proved last night.