Been watching stevie g this euros and reminded me how great he is. Top class
--------------------------------------------------
WHAT!
I thought Gerrard has been extremely poor this Euro's! Anyway Scholes in his prime was much better than Gerrard in his
Really? i thought he has been leading the team fantasticly and his crossing/passing is a class above, massive presence and shows how far alot of our 'future' players have to go to be anywhere near good enough imo.
Scholes.
But not taking anything away from gerrard, best all action CM in the world in his prime
Scholes, technically supreme.
As a big admirer of both I have to say Scholes. No opppsotion player frightened me more than Scholes in his prime, he was the ultimate player and always seemed to produce or be heavily influential against us. In contrast Gerrard although a great player also never produced against Chelsea and was found out a lot against our superstar players
Only Liverpool fans will say Gerrard.
One can pass the ball short, keep possession and can control a game. The other used to charge around like a bull in a china shop and now resorts to hopeful long balls that concede possession cheaply.
If Gerrard is a better player than Scholes then I don't think I want to watch football any more.
ovibously we have some people who have been drinking. Scholes was good, But Gerrard is 10 times better. Gerrard leads by example, scholes never did, plus he cant tackle to save his life.
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
Paul scholes or stevie g
Page 1 of 1
posted on 17/6/12
Been watching stevie g this euros and reminded me how great he is. Top class
--------------------------------------------------
WHAT!
I thought Gerrard has been extremely poor this Euro's! Anyway Scholes in his prime was much better than Gerrard in his
posted on 17/6/12
Really? i thought he has been leading the team fantasticly and his crossing/passing is a class above, massive presence and shows how far alot of our 'future' players have to go to be anywhere near good enough imo.
posted on 17/6/12
Gerarrd
posted on 17/6/12
Scholes.
But not taking anything away from gerrard, best all action CM in the world in his prime
posted on 17/6/12
Scholes, technically supreme.
posted on 17/6/12
Gerrard easily.
posted on 17/6/12
As a big admirer of both I have to say Scholes. No opppsotion player frightened me more than Scholes in his prime, he was the ultimate player and always seemed to produce or be heavily influential against us. In contrast Gerrard although a great player also never produced against Chelsea and was found out a lot against our superstar players
posted on 17/6/12
Only Liverpool fans will say Gerrard.
posted on 18/6/12
Gerrard for me
posted on 19/6/12
One can pass the ball short, keep possession and can control a game. The other used to charge around like a bull in a china shop and now resorts to hopeful long balls that concede possession cheaply.
If Gerrard is a better player than Scholes then I don't think I want to watch football any more.
posted on 19/6/12
ovibously we have some people who have been drinking. Scholes was good, But Gerrard is 10 times better. Gerrard leads by example, scholes never did, plus he cant tackle to save his life.
Page 1 of 1