comment by Fellaini's pirouette to perfection (U1308)
posted 1 hour, 13 minutes ago
Can't.build the ground in the park....where will the FQ be moved to!
----------------------------------------
cloud cuckooland
I bet United, Arsenal and Newcasyle now with they had kept yo a smaller ground abduction built a FQ to bring in the cash....just like the FA museum different....
FQ you CE
The benefits of groundshare are all well and good, but there is no way it can be funded fairly unless the council get in on the act and actually put something on the table.
Im pretty sure if they came in and said "this is what we propose now go and find £50m each for the project", it would get both clubs seriously interested.
The fact that they have continually banged the grounshare drum without revealing how they plan to support it speaks volumes.
The biggest issue for me has always been the potential revenue we could get from naming rights etc, that we wouldnt get if we shared, but if the council took that on themselves to sort and funded the majority of the development themselves (possibly all of it if they took the existing grounds of both clubs as contribution), then it would be a much more enticing proposal.
it COULD be the wembley of the north if it was done right!!
I say, he`s drank a full case
It's funny that this topic has both red and blue (mostly) in favour of the idea.
I wonder what the biggest blue of them all ...Dave Kelly Tthinks about this?
It's funny that this topic has both red and blue (mostly) in favour of the idea.
=================================
On here.
I've got a feeling that there's an awful lot of people opposed to the idea who aren't quite as comfortable using a keyboard.
I think it is beginning to dawn on both sets of supporters the only way either of us is going to end up with a new stadium is by sharing
Abduction ?
Will you demand a ransom `ansome ?
That would be a kings ransom `ansome
yes, trying this cryptic thing you do all the time
Your better orf with t` quizword
I see keioc have come out with a pissy knickers response to the manager even mentioning the possibility of a shared stadium & have unilaterally decided that it makes no economic sense & that the board are set of rseholes for not telling Moyes that already.
Their 'response' is exactly why the possibility will never even make it to the serious discussion stage, gobshights they are, always have been.
How many pints did you have last night TB.
Not one..................
I was on red wine
They're still a set of pompous gobshights though
I am sure it will be officially discussed in the next 12 months
I can always tell when you have had a Don Revie.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
One thing that occured to me from your well balanced post re KEIOC.
Have you unilatterally decided that the shared stadium does make economic sense?
Sign in if you want to comment
SHARED STADIUM ?
Page 3 of 4
posted on 22/6/12
FQ Bonnie
posted on 22/6/12
comment by Fellaini's pirouette to perfection (U1308)
posted 1 hour, 13 minutes ago
Can't.build the ground in the park....where will the FQ be moved to!
----------------------------------------
cloud cuckooland
posted on 22/6/12
Does the 92 stop there ?
posted on 22/6/12
I bet United, Arsenal and Newcasyle now with they had kept yo a smaller ground abduction built a FQ to bring in the cash....just like the FA museum different....
FQ you CE
posted on 22/6/12
The benefits of groundshare are all well and good, but there is no way it can be funded fairly unless the council get in on the act and actually put something on the table.
Im pretty sure if they came in and said "this is what we propose now go and find £50m each for the project", it would get both clubs seriously interested.
The fact that they have continually banged the grounshare drum without revealing how they plan to support it speaks volumes.
The biggest issue for me has always been the potential revenue we could get from naming rights etc, that we wouldnt get if we shared, but if the council took that on themselves to sort and funded the majority of the development themselves (possibly all of it if they took the existing grounds of both clubs as contribution), then it would be a much more enticing proposal.
it COULD be the wembley of the north if it was done right!!
posted on 22/6/12
I say, he`s drank a full case
posted on 22/6/12
It's funny that this topic has both red and blue (mostly) in favour of the idea.
posted on 22/6/12
I wonder what the biggest blue of them all ...Dave Kelly Tthinks about this?
posted on 22/6/12
It's funny that this topic has both red and blue (mostly) in favour of the idea.
=================================
On here.
I've got a feeling that there's an awful lot of people opposed to the idea who aren't quite as comfortable using a keyboard.
posted on 22/6/12
I think it is beginning to dawn on both sets of supporters the only way either of us is going to end up with a new stadium is by sharing
posted on 22/6/12
posted on 22/6/12
Abduction ?
Will you demand a ransom `ansome ?
posted on 22/6/12
FQ
posted on 22/6/12
That would be a kings ransom `ansome
posted on 22/6/12
stick a dock in it
posted on 22/6/12
Kings Dock ?
posted on 22/6/12
yes, trying this cryptic thing you do all the time
posted on 22/6/12
Your better orf with t` quizword
posted on 23/6/12
I see keioc have come out with a pissy knickers response to the manager even mentioning the possibility of a shared stadium & have unilaterally decided that it makes no economic sense & that the board are set of rseholes for not telling Moyes that already.
Their 'response' is exactly why the possibility will never even make it to the serious discussion stage, gobshights they are, always have been.
posted on 23/6/12
How many pints did you have last night TB.
posted on 23/6/12
Not one..................
I was on red wine
They're still a set of pompous gobshights though
posted on 23/6/12
I am sure it will be officially discussed in the next 12 months
posted on 23/6/12
I can always tell when you have had a Don Revie.
posted on 24/6/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 25/6/12
One thing that occured to me from your well balanced post re KEIOC.
Have you unilatterally decided that the shared stadium does make economic sense?
Page 3 of 4