He himself admitted to bringing race into it, his excuse was its acceptable in his country. It's legal to defend your property with lethal force in some states in America, would you do it here? No, because you'd be punished.
Redconn
That's another point I put to VC, that he shied away from answering.
Just imagine if it had gone to court. What would have happened when it came out Evra claimed he was called a n****r?
Should we now expect a Suarez appeal lodged with the FA to clear his name?
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 4 hours, 26 minutes ago
No deep down inside we know that one of your players is a cheating lying
.............................
Hardly lying when Suarez admitted to using the word Negro.
I think you are a bit foolish here son. Totaly unable to read and understand facts.
Keep your head in the sand kid, we will keep laughing at how simple minded you are.
==============
The only simple minded reetard around here is you 'son'
When I need advice from the village idiot i'll let you know 'son'
You keep your head up your rrrs 'kid'
We'll just keep pitying you.....
Rob's getting himself all worked up tonight isn't he, why all the insults? Bit petty.
Vidicschin was stating facts, (I know how you lot like your facts) there's no need to start insulting people who you don't agree with.
>>Vidicschin was stating facts,
I wouldn't disagree
He loves omitting the ones he doesn't like a bit too conveniently is all
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
The Suarez case to me is a simple matter of cross cultural misunderstanding.
In the UK you can not use the word negro.
In South America it is an everyday term that has no derogatory connotations. It is just an adjective to describe someone.
----
This just isn't an excuse. And I'm dubious as to whether it's true, as in the video, Suarez clearly points at Evra's skin.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lbtk8etxf1Q&feature=related
35 seconds.
You're right it isn't an excuse because there isn't anything that needs excusing.
Were the FA wrong to take the captains arm band off him?
>>In the UK you can not use the word negro.
of course you can. People do all the time.
Will we see a share appeal over this terrible injustice
I don't know what's more of an injustice... Terry walking free or Fellaini's pirouette to perfection still able to post on JA606 after a years worth of comments that can only be considered to be absolute tripe.
And I'll throw in a zen because it winds you up
Felliani's
Do you want to try that again, but in some form of coherent English?
A suarez appeal.....sorry spilling police......
I doubt it as he is guilty.....Terry on the other hand, innocent. And he didn't even have a tshirt printed
As the Law in this country states that you are innocent until proven guilty and Suarez has never even been tried in a court of law and so cannot have been found guilty of anything then I think you'll find that he is innocent...
No need to thank me for correcting your obvious error.
So the bitter thinks that anyone can be guilty regardless of who gives the verdict.
Ok then - Fellaini's pirouette to perfection is guilty of being a simpleton
Felliani's
No not being the spelling police. Your comment made no sense.
How many times do you have to hear, or read, this for it to sink in. The club, and player, decided not to appeal to put an end to the whole fiasco. The statement made at the time stated that the club did not agree with the decision. But cited the above reason for not appealing.
You're not too bright, are you lad.
You're not too bright, are you lad.
....
You can say that again (although I still don't think he'd get it)
he'll try and worm his way out and finish off with a wink - yeah, like that's gonna save you
Suarez is guilty.....he was found guilty and banned. A punishment fit for the crime
Felliani's simple world, or is it Felliani's world of a simpleton?
That's it lad, keep looking at the tabloid headline, and not at the wider factors of the story.
Well as far as the FA were concerned Terry was guilty, that's why he was stripped of the captaincy and now he has been found not guilty in a court of law what will the FA do with their ivestigation?
Red666
The FA were too quick to judge Terry, when they stripped him of the captaincy. They, and the media, made a big thing of racism, and how it's been tackled in this country (in football). They then couldn't send out the national team to the Euro's with a captain that's got a racism trial hanging over his head.
You've got to bear in mind that Terry hasn't been acquitted because his innocence has been proven. He's been acquitted because there was a lack of evidence. For me, after the Suarez debacle, The FA have to act. It would stink of hypocrisy and xenophobia if they were the brush this under the carpet.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Sign in if you want to comment
Suarez Case vs Terry Case
Page 10 of 29
11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15
posted on 13/7/12
He himself admitted to bringing race into it, his excuse was its acceptable in his country. It's legal to defend your property with lethal force in some states in America, would you do it here? No, because you'd be punished.
posted on 13/7/12
Redconn
That's another point I put to VC, that he shied away from answering.
Just imagine if it had gone to court. What would have happened when it came out Evra claimed he was called a n****r?
posted on 13/7/12
Should we now expect a Suarez appeal lodged with the FA to clear his name?
posted on 13/7/12
Garth Crooks
posted on 13/7/12
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 4 hours, 26 minutes ago
No deep down inside we know that one of your players is a cheating lying
.............................
Hardly lying when Suarez admitted to using the word Negro.
I think you are a bit foolish here son. Totaly unable to read and understand facts.
Keep your head in the sand kid, we will keep laughing at how simple minded you are.
==============
The only simple minded reetard around here is you 'son'
When I need advice from the village idiot i'll let you know 'son'
You keep your head up your rrrs 'kid'
We'll just keep pitying you.....
posted on 13/7/12
Rob's getting himself all worked up tonight isn't he, why all the insults? Bit petty.
Vidicschin was stating facts, (I know how you lot like your facts) there's no need to start insulting people who you don't agree with.
posted on 13/7/12
>>Vidicschin was stating facts,
I wouldn't disagree
He loves omitting the ones he doesn't like a bit too conveniently is all
posted on 14/7/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 14/7/12
The Suarez case to me is a simple matter of cross cultural misunderstanding.
In the UK you can not use the word negro.
In South America it is an everyday term that has no derogatory connotations. It is just an adjective to describe someone.
----
This just isn't an excuse. And I'm dubious as to whether it's true, as in the video, Suarez clearly points at Evra's skin.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lbtk8etxf1Q&feature=related
35 seconds.
posted on 14/7/12
You're right it isn't an excuse because there isn't anything that needs excusing.
posted on 14/7/12
Were the FA wrong to take the captains arm band off him?
posted on 14/7/12
>>In the UK you can not use the word negro.
of course you can. People do all the time.
posted on 14/7/12
Will we see a share appeal over this terrible injustice
posted on 14/7/12
I don't know what's more of an injustice... Terry walking free or Fellaini's pirouette to perfection still able to post on JA606 after a years worth of comments that can only be considered to be absolute tripe.
And I'll throw in a zen because it winds you up
posted on 14/7/12
Felliani's
Do you want to try that again, but in some form of coherent English?
posted on 14/7/12
A suarez appeal.....sorry spilling police......
I doubt it as he is guilty.....Terry on the other hand, innocent. And he didn't even have a tshirt printed
posted on 14/7/12
As the Law in this country states that you are innocent until proven guilty and Suarez has never even been tried in a court of law and so cannot have been found guilty of anything then I think you'll find that he is innocent...
No need to thank me for correcting your obvious error.
posted on 14/7/12
So the bitter thinks that anyone can be guilty regardless of who gives the verdict.
Ok then - Fellaini's pirouette to perfection is guilty of being a simpleton
posted on 14/7/12
Felliani's
No not being the spelling police. Your comment made no sense.
How many times do you have to hear, or read, this for it to sink in. The club, and player, decided not to appeal to put an end to the whole fiasco. The statement made at the time stated that the club did not agree with the decision. But cited the above reason for not appealing.
You're not too bright, are you lad.
posted on 14/7/12
You're not too bright, are you lad.
....
You can say that again (although I still don't think he'd get it)
he'll try and worm his way out and finish off with a wink - yeah, like that's gonna save you
posted on 14/7/12
Suarez is guilty.....he was found guilty and banned. A punishment fit for the crime
posted on 14/7/12
Felliani's simple world, or is it Felliani's world of a simpleton?
That's it lad, keep looking at the tabloid headline, and not at the wider factors of the story.
posted on 14/7/12
Well as far as the FA were concerned Terry was guilty, that's why he was stripped of the captaincy and now he has been found not guilty in a court of law what will the FA do with their ivestigation?
posted on 14/7/12
Red666
The FA were too quick to judge Terry, when they stripped him of the captaincy. They, and the media, made a big thing of racism, and how it's been tackled in this country (in football). They then couldn't send out the national team to the Euro's with a captain that's got a racism trial hanging over his head.
You've got to bear in mind that Terry hasn't been acquitted because his innocence has been proven. He's been acquitted because there was a lack of evidence. For me, after the Suarez debacle, The FA have to act. It would stink of hypocrisy and xenophobia if they were the brush this under the carpet.
posted on 14/7/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Page 10 of 29
11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15