if its the agent that is trying to get the money then the player as paid the price for hiring him.
Agree with you there Guiseley
No point getting worked up over something we dont know enough about.
Agreed with fortress too!
trouble is agents tend to be taking a cut of whatever they make for their player as far as i know, so they want to look after themselves now rather than the players interests.
Fortress that is exactly right. If we'd had Bates negotiating instead of PP would we have ended in the mire?
Koppie
Wasn't Chelsea in the mire ????
Wakey...I've no idea and I try not to comment on matters which I have no knowledge or insufficient facts.
You should try it sometime
Just the answer i expected from you
Wakey...Bates is a top businessman. He bought Chelsea for a quid and sold it for several hundred millions. Because of that I'm content that we have a top operator running our club and I'm confident we will get back to the top.
Before Bates came in I wasn't sure we fans would have a club to support...or in your case criticise!
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Koppie
He bought Chelsea for a quid because it was worthless.
You think he didn't have to put any money in too keep it running
And he got 16m for shares in Chelsea not hundreds
He didn't make hundreds off a pound, he had to invest alot to keep it running
I heard it was Cesc Fabregas!
Liw I know the public figure is 17 mill that bates apparently made.
However, I was speaking with a bates connection at the weekend, the figure is actually 100 mill.
It's a very interesting story, abramovich actually wanted to buy spurs on the Wednesday, levy didn't believe he was for real and crossed London to Chelsea.
Bates had till the Friday to make a payment to creditors that he was unable to make and was bricking it.
Chelsea were well and truly in the mire, all down to Chelsea village project.
There is no way bates is woth 100 mill.
Jonty.."Bates had till the Friday to make a payment to creditors that he was unable to make and was bricking it.
Chelsea were well and truly in the mire, all down to Chelsea village project".
Pure supposition on either yours or your informants part. If the payment part is correct who can say Bates didn't have a strategy to raise the the payment elsewhere and what evidence is there to blame any presumed cashflow problem on Chelsea Village which, without evidence to the contrary, we have to assume contributed to the cashflow of the company and if it doesn't contribute why hasn't the Russian wound it up ?
bluememe, you can believe what you want, I choose to believe the people I was speaking to on Sunday.
Jonty..Why wouldn't you believe the people slandering our chairman. It's your raison d'etre!
Sign in if you want to comment
Who was Papa Smurf talking about
Page 3 of 3
posted on 14/7/11
if its the agent that is trying to get the money then the player as paid the price for hiring him.
posted on 14/7/11
Agree with you there Guiseley
No point getting worked up over something we dont know enough about.
posted on 14/7/11
Agreed with fortress too!
trouble is agents tend to be taking a cut of whatever they make for their player as far as i know, so they want to look after themselves now rather than the players interests.
posted on 14/7/11
Fortress that is exactly right. If we'd had Bates negotiating instead of PP would we have ended in the mire?
posted on 14/7/11
Koppie
Wasn't Chelsea in the mire ????
posted on 14/7/11
Wakey...I've no idea and I try not to comment on matters which I have no knowledge or insufficient facts.
You should try it sometime
posted on 14/7/11
Just the answer i expected from you
posted on 14/7/11
Wakey...Bates is a top businessman. He bought Chelsea for a quid and sold it for several hundred millions. Because of that I'm content that we have a top operator running our club and I'm confident we will get back to the top.
Before Bates came in I wasn't sure we fans would have a club to support...or in your case criticise!
posted on 14/7/11
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 14/7/11
Koppie
He bought Chelsea for a quid because it was worthless.
You think he didn't have to put any money in too keep it running
And he got 16m for shares in Chelsea not hundreds
He didn't make hundreds off a pound, he had to invest alot to keep it running
posted on 14/7/11
I heard it was Cesc Fabregas!
posted on 14/7/11
Liw I know the public figure is 17 mill that bates apparently made.
However, I was speaking with a bates connection at the weekend, the figure is actually 100 mill.
It's a very interesting story, abramovich actually wanted to buy spurs on the Wednesday, levy didn't believe he was for real and crossed London to Chelsea.
Bates had till the Friday to make a payment to creditors that he was unable to make and was bricking it.
Chelsea were well and truly in the mire, all down to Chelsea village project.
posted on 14/7/11
There is no way bates is woth 100 mill.
posted on 14/7/11
Jonty.."Bates had till the Friday to make a payment to creditors that he was unable to make and was bricking it.
Chelsea were well and truly in the mire, all down to Chelsea village project".
Pure supposition on either yours or your informants part. If the payment part is correct who can say Bates didn't have a strategy to raise the the payment elsewhere and what evidence is there to blame any presumed cashflow problem on Chelsea Village which, without evidence to the contrary, we have to assume contributed to the cashflow of the company and if it doesn't contribute why hasn't the Russian wound it up ?
posted on 14/7/11
bluememe, you can believe what you want, I choose to believe the people I was speaking to on Sunday.
posted on 14/7/11
Jonty..Why wouldn't you believe the people slandering our chairman. It's your raison d'etre!
Page 3 of 3