reel a few more in ruiney
Well the ref didn't favour Chelsea....or else he wouldn't have sent two Chelsea players off and give an offside goal against them, would he Ruiney...
But i get what you're saying. The ref had a decentish game. The Ivanovic sending off was spot on and the offside was completely covered. Couldn't see it.
The only issue is, he got the Torres issue completely messed up, The first yellow should have been a red and the second should never have been a yellow.
You can't even tell the truth nowadays without getting accused of wumming.
Torres should've been sent off 3 times for that vile boot to Cleverley's neck. That is how bad it was.
The F.A need to look at that, carrot.
I agree. I may email them.
The only issue is, he got the Torres issue completely messed up, The first yellow should have been a red and the second should never have been a yellow.
........
So why is football world up in arms about Manchester United being favoured?
Them two decisions even themselves out.
Surely Torres being allowed to play is a worse punishment for Chelsea than sending him off 3 times
So why is football world up in arms about Manchester United being favoured?
-------------------------------
Do you want a serious answer or a special Serial funny one?
You're still crying about the whole thing? You won, stopped bitching!
This article is unbelievable. Thank you for showing absolutely no bias in your assessments of the situations, Ruiney
Don't take any $hit off them either carrot, tell them if they don't act, paperchase will send the heavy boys round.
Ha, I actually said the same thing to my friends today Ruiney who gathered as an army chanting how we get all the referee decisions. The only decision we got was from the linesman for not flagging offside against Hernandez.
Evans definitely touched him but that doesn't warrant him rolling around clutching his knee. If he had just fell like a normal person, Evans might have got sent off. Seriously, I don't understand why players feel if they roll 3-4 times it's actually going to help them. Only makes you look like you're just being theatrical.
you're forgetting the cahill rugby tackle on evans that denied a 100% goal and the blatantly deliberate luiz hand ball in the box to stop a pin point cross from valencia
This article is unbelievable. Thank you for showing absolutely no bias in your assessments of the situations, Ruiney
.....
Please explain...
you're forgetting the cahill rugby tackle on evans that denied a 100% goal and the blatantly deliberate luiz hand ball in the box to stop a pin point cross from valencia
----
You're making this up or you're just totally blind. Either way, this never happened
and the continuous fouls from ramires who was already on a yellow card - mikel too, both should have been red carded. the ref had a shocker, favoured chelsea big time
No, Samir, although exaggerated they definitely happened. Cahill manhandling Evans was a penalty if ever I've seen one and Luiz was very lucky not to concede another. Mikel was also extremely fortunate to stay on the pitch. Clattenberg got the big calls correct and this victimization is scandalous.
I exaggerated indeed, but if the ref was being strict, chelsea would have ended the match with 7 men and rooney could have also been sent off as he made two yellow card challenges
Ruiney
Refs gave most of the 50-50 decisions your way for a start, Young got away with a ludicrous dive. The Torres decision was a difficult one, as I've explained countless times, because although Torres definitely went down easily, Evans, although making little contact, did enough to put him off. The decision could have gone either way, but the fact that Evans openly admitted that he made contact with Torres is telling.
As for Torres not being on the pitch because of the high boot to Cleverley, how was that much worse than Rooney scything Hazard down with no intention of getting the ball?
In your pointless and biased opinion.
Most of the 50-50 decisions, I knew that vague description would make an appearance.
Rooney's wasn't a dangerous tackle, it was a yellow card tackle you see every single game.
A high boot is dangerous, that's the difference.
Cahill manhandling Evans was a penalty if ever I've seen one and Luiz was very lucky not to concede another. Mikel was also extremely fortunate to stay on the pitch.
----
Yes Mikel was lucky to stay on the pitch. I don't seem to recall Cahill on Evans, is there any footage of this incident?
Sign in if you want to comment
Laughing at the outrage aside...
Page 1 of 6
6
posted on 29/10/12
reel a few more in ruiney
posted on 29/10/12
I'm not even joking!
posted on 29/10/12
Well the ref didn't favour Chelsea....or else he wouldn't have sent two Chelsea players off and give an offside goal against them, would he Ruiney...
But i get what you're saying. The ref had a decentish game. The Ivanovic sending off was spot on and the offside was completely covered. Couldn't see it.
The only issue is, he got the Torres issue completely messed up, The first yellow should have been a red and the second should never have been a yellow.
posted on 29/10/12
You can't even tell the truth nowadays without getting accused of wumming.
posted on 29/10/12
Torres should've been sent off 3 times for that vile boot to Cleverley's neck. That is how bad it was.
posted on 29/10/12
The F.A need to look at that, carrot.
posted on 29/10/12
I agree. I may email them.
posted on 29/10/12
The only issue is, he got the Torres issue completely messed up, The first yellow should have been a red and the second should never have been a yellow.
........
So why is football world up in arms about Manchester United being favoured?
Them two decisions even themselves out.
posted on 29/10/12
Surely Torres being allowed to play is a worse punishment for Chelsea than sending him off 3 times
posted on 29/10/12
So why is football world up in arms about Manchester United being favoured?
-------------------------------
Do you want a serious answer or a special Serial funny one?
posted on 29/10/12
You're still crying about the whole thing? You won, stopped bitching!
posted on 29/10/12
This article is unbelievable. Thank you for showing absolutely no bias in your assessments of the situations, Ruiney
posted on 29/10/12
Don't take any $hit off them either carrot, tell them if they don't act, paperchase will send the heavy boys round.
posted on 29/10/12
Ha, I actually said the same thing to my friends today Ruiney who gathered as an army chanting how we get all the referee decisions. The only decision we got was from the linesman for not flagging offside against Hernandez.
Evans definitely touched him but that doesn't warrant him rolling around clutching his knee. If he had just fell like a normal person, Evans might have got sent off. Seriously, I don't understand why players feel if they roll 3-4 times it's actually going to help them. Only makes you look like you're just being theatrical.
posted on 29/10/12
you're forgetting the cahill rugby tackle on evans that denied a 100% goal and the blatantly deliberate luiz hand ball in the box to stop a pin point cross from valencia
posted on 29/10/12
This article is unbelievable. Thank you for showing absolutely no bias in your assessments of the situations, Ruiney
.....
Please explain...
posted on 29/10/12
you're forgetting the cahill rugby tackle on evans that denied a 100% goal and the blatantly deliberate luiz hand ball in the box to stop a pin point cross from valencia
----
You're making this up or you're just totally blind. Either way, this never happened
posted on 29/10/12
and the continuous fouls from ramires who was already on a yellow card - mikel too, both should have been red carded. the ref had a shocker, favoured chelsea big time
posted on 29/10/12
Bad winners
posted on 29/10/12
No, Samir, although exaggerated they definitely happened. Cahill manhandling Evans was a penalty if ever I've seen one and Luiz was very lucky not to concede another. Mikel was also extremely fortunate to stay on the pitch. Clattenberg got the big calls correct and this victimization is scandalous.
posted on 29/10/12
I exaggerated indeed, but if the ref was being strict, chelsea would have ended the match with 7 men and rooney could have also been sent off as he made two yellow card challenges
posted on 29/10/12
Ruiney
Refs gave most of the 50-50 decisions your way for a start, Young got away with a ludicrous dive. The Torres decision was a difficult one, as I've explained countless times, because although Torres definitely went down easily, Evans, although making little contact, did enough to put him off. The decision could have gone either way, but the fact that Evans openly admitted that he made contact with Torres is telling.
As for Torres not being on the pitch because of the high boot to Cleverley, how was that much worse than Rooney scything Hazard down with no intention of getting the ball?
posted on 29/10/12
In your pointless and biased opinion.
posted on 29/10/12
Most of the 50-50 decisions, I knew that vague description would make an appearance.
Rooney's wasn't a dangerous tackle, it was a yellow card tackle you see every single game.
A high boot is dangerous, that's the difference.
posted on 29/10/12
Cahill manhandling Evans was a penalty if ever I've seen one and Luiz was very lucky not to concede another. Mikel was also extremely fortunate to stay on the pitch.
----
Yes Mikel was lucky to stay on the pitch. I don't seem to recall Cahill on Evans, is there any footage of this incident?
Page 1 of 6
6