Im going to bend to relieve the pressure you are under on here Jan.
morning fatjanmolby have you any more deflection techniques once you have lost the debate to teach us?
Suddenly coming out with questioning our intelligence was sheer genius,espescially from someone like you.
Of course they just get on with things Jan, and dont play the vicitim. Just like their players dont dive, play act, wave imaginary cards or hound the referee
Deflection techniques? Thats exactly what this thread is Phil. To deflect from your huge slice of luck at the weekend so you can try and justify that big chip on your shoulders.
Just because you are boring/obsessed/sad/embittered enough to try and nitpick through every decision doesnt somehow turn this into us deflecting from your bizzare theory that somehow Liverpool were the lucky ones with the officials on Sunday. Like I have said if you want to pick through the decisions in that much detail Everton could have had Howard, Fellaini, Osman and Jaglielka all sent off.
Care to explain that one away? Or will you yet again 'deflect' attention onto something else?
Like I have said if you want to pick through the decisions in that much detail Everton could have had Howard, Fellaini, Osman and Jaglielka all sent off
Explain
Howard in the referees face at every chance, at least 3 or 4 times. A yellow card for each = red
Osman persistent fouling AFTER his booking. Second yellow.
Fellaini - deliberate kick out at an opponent (whilst the were on the ground the big coward) - straight red
Jagielka - Denied a goalscoring opportunity to Sterling - straight red.
Howard in the referees face at every chance, at least 3 or 4 times. A yellow card for each = red
Gerrard was at it all game
Osman persistent fouling AFTER his booking. Second yellow
Your getting desperate now
Fellaini - deliberate kick out at an opponent (whilst the were on the ground the big coward) - straight red
Yellow at best,if the Suarez's incidents didn't deserve a red
Jagielka - Denied a goalscoring opportunity to Sterling - straight red.
There was cover,and Sterling should of been off,for his two bookable offenses.
Gerrard is the captain and is allowed to speak with the referee. Howard was just plain hounding the referee.
Osman - no defence for that one then
Fellaini - so you do think it was a straight red then.
Jagielka - there was no cover. They were never going to catch Sterling and I call you a liar for suggesting that there was
comment by TalksRubbish (U3303)
Did you see where the ball landed and how fast it was travelling re the jags booking.Sterling had no chance whatsoever in reaching the ball before Howard,but don't let facts get in the way of your bitterness
Phil - if there is one thing I am not it is bitter. Certainly not towards Everton. I just dont think football is that important. But thats not to say I sont enjoy it.
I've seen the incidient with my own eyes. Sterling could/would have had a goalscoring chance. Jagielka quite deliberately brought. But then even with a yellow Jagielka could/should have seen red for his foul on Sterling in the build up to Liverpools first goal.
Fellaini - so you do think it was a straight red then
No, because I'm not convinced Suarez's tackles deserved a straight red ,but both tackles deserved a yellow. If you claim Fellaini's tackle was a red,then so were both of Suarez's.
Osman - no defence for that one then
Your grasping at straw here,not one paper or sports commentator have mentioned Osman.
agielka - there was no cover. They were never going to catch Sterling and I call you a liar for suggesting that there was
Call me what you want,but Sterling,along with Goofy was lucky to be on the pitch.
If you claim Fellaini's tackle was a red,then so were both of Suarez's.
Thats simply not true at all.
Osman - still no defence of his persistent fouling then. Just because it wasnt mentioned doesnt make it any less correct. He committed at least four fouls following his first yellow card. Suarez committed two and you seem convinced that is worthy of two yellow cards.
Jagielka - irrlevent. Jagielka could well have been given a straight red for fouling Sterling before Sterling was even booked.
Like I've said several times on this thread if you nitpick through every decision you could come up with plenty of scenarios for red cards, goals etc.
The ref got the big one wrong on Sunday and you boys benefited. But you seem to have this embedded insistence on portraying yourselves as the ones that were hard done by by the officials.
Presumably so you can justify another decade of moaning about Clattenburg.
The ONLY reason the Suarez points were highlighted by your manager was because he knew the media would love nothing more than another good Suarez bashing and that he desparately needed to delfect attention from the appalling antics of his side that he had told anyone that would listen only a few days before they didnt do.
TalksRubbish
Jagielka - irrlevent. Jagielka could well have been given a straight red for fouling Sterling before Sterling was even booked
What tackle are you talking about? If Osman deserved a yellow card for his first booking,then Sterling should of gone, as it was the same type of foul as Osman's but it would of been his second.
No Osman deserved a SECOND yellow for PERSISTENT fouling.
honestly I struggle to pin down whether you lot are being deliberately evasive to obsure the point I'm trying to make or you really are daft.
No Osman deserved a SECOND yellow for PERSISTENT fouling
So Sterling didn't deserve a second yellow,even tho his foul was similar to Osman's first card. Sterling was getting ripped to bits by Baines and Marillas,so much so that BR switched him to the other wing as he knew he was lucky to still be on the pitch.
I'll repeat one more time...persistent fouling.
I'll repeat one more time...persistent fouling
Didn't do any more than Allen,and like I said,If Osman's first caution deserved a card,then why wasn't Sterling sent off,as his tackle was the similar,but he was already on a yellow? And bringing up Jags and Howard just shows how desperate your getting.
Again, Osmans first yellow was more likely the result of persistent fouling.
The desparation is from the very subject this thread, brought up by your manager to cover up the appalling conduct of his own players, following his self righteous speech no less than a few days earlier.
Again, Osmans first yellow was more likely the result of persistent fouling
You don't even know your guessing. I see you've skated around why Sterling wasn't sent off. Liverpool should of been down to 9 men.
youre just being stupid now
I see you've skated around why Sterling wasn't sent off.
Sign in if you want to comment
Can anyone explain why he wasn't sent off
Page 6 of 6
6
posted on 30/10/12
Im going to bend to relieve the pressure you are under on here Jan.
posted on 30/10/12
morning fatjanmolby have you any more deflection techniques once you have lost the debate to teach us?
Suddenly coming out with questioning our intelligence was sheer genius,espescially from someone like you.
posted on 30/10/12
What pressure?
posted on 30/10/12
Of course they just get on with things Jan, and dont play the vicitim. Just like their players dont dive, play act, wave imaginary cards or hound the referee
posted on 30/10/12
Deflection techniques? Thats exactly what this thread is Phil. To deflect from your huge slice of luck at the weekend so you can try and justify that big chip on your shoulders.
Just because you are boring/obsessed/sad/embittered enough to try and nitpick through every decision doesnt somehow turn this into us deflecting from your bizzare theory that somehow Liverpool were the lucky ones with the officials on Sunday. Like I have said if you want to pick through the decisions in that much detail Everton could have had Howard, Fellaini, Osman and Jaglielka all sent off.
Care to explain that one away? Or will you yet again 'deflect' attention onto something else?
posted on 30/10/12
Like I have said if you want to pick through the decisions in that much detail Everton could have had Howard, Fellaini, Osman and Jaglielka all sent off
Explain
posted on 30/10/12
Howard in the referees face at every chance, at least 3 or 4 times. A yellow card for each = red
Osman persistent fouling AFTER his booking. Second yellow.
Fellaini - deliberate kick out at an opponent (whilst the were on the ground the big coward) - straight red
Jagielka - Denied a goalscoring opportunity to Sterling - straight red.
posted on 30/10/12
Howard in the referees face at every chance, at least 3 or 4 times. A yellow card for each = red
Gerrard was at it all game
Osman persistent fouling AFTER his booking. Second yellow
Your getting desperate now
Fellaini - deliberate kick out at an opponent (whilst the were on the ground the big coward) - straight red
Yellow at best,if the Suarez's incidents didn't deserve a red
Jagielka - Denied a goalscoring opportunity to Sterling - straight red.
There was cover,and Sterling should of been off,for his two bookable offenses.
posted on 30/10/12
Gerrard is the captain and is allowed to speak with the referee. Howard was just plain hounding the referee.
Osman - no defence for that one then
Fellaini - so you do think it was a straight red then.
Jagielka - there was no cover. They were never going to catch Sterling and I call you a liar for suggesting that there was
posted on 30/10/12
comment by TalksRubbish (U3303)
Did you see where the ball landed and how fast it was travelling re the jags booking.Sterling had no chance whatsoever in reaching the ball before Howard,but don't let facts get in the way of your bitterness
posted on 30/10/12
Phil - if there is one thing I am not it is bitter. Certainly not towards Everton. I just dont think football is that important. But thats not to say I sont enjoy it.
I've seen the incidient with my own eyes. Sterling could/would have had a goalscoring chance. Jagielka quite deliberately brought. But then even with a yellow Jagielka could/should have seen red for his foul on Sterling in the build up to Liverpools first goal.
posted on 30/10/12
Fellaini - so you do think it was a straight red then
No, because I'm not convinced Suarez's tackles deserved a straight red ,but both tackles deserved a yellow. If you claim Fellaini's tackle was a red,then so were both of Suarez's.
Osman - no defence for that one then
Your grasping at straw here,not one paper or sports commentator have mentioned Osman.
agielka - there was no cover. They were never going to catch Sterling and I call you a liar for suggesting that there was
Call me what you want,but Sterling,along with Goofy was lucky to be on the pitch.
posted on 30/10/12
If you claim Fellaini's tackle was a red,then so were both of Suarez's.
Thats simply not true at all.
Osman - still no defence of his persistent fouling then. Just because it wasnt mentioned doesnt make it any less correct. He committed at least four fouls following his first yellow card. Suarez committed two and you seem convinced that is worthy of two yellow cards.
Jagielka - irrlevent. Jagielka could well have been given a straight red for fouling Sterling before Sterling was even booked.
Like I've said several times on this thread if you nitpick through every decision you could come up with plenty of scenarios for red cards, goals etc.
The ref got the big one wrong on Sunday and you boys benefited. But you seem to have this embedded insistence on portraying yourselves as the ones that were hard done by by the officials.
Presumably so you can justify another decade of moaning about Clattenburg.
The ONLY reason the Suarez points were highlighted by your manager was because he knew the media would love nothing more than another good Suarez bashing and that he desparately needed to delfect attention from the appalling antics of his side that he had told anyone that would listen only a few days before they didnt do.
posted on 30/10/12
TalksRubbish
Jagielka - irrlevent. Jagielka could well have been given a straight red for fouling Sterling before Sterling was even booked
What tackle are you talking about? If Osman deserved a yellow card for his first booking,then Sterling should of gone, as it was the same type of foul as Osman's but it would of been his second.
posted on 30/10/12
No Osman deserved a SECOND yellow for PERSISTENT fouling.
honestly I struggle to pin down whether you lot are being deliberately evasive to obsure the point I'm trying to make or you really are daft.
posted on 30/10/12
No Osman deserved a SECOND yellow for PERSISTENT fouling
So Sterling didn't deserve a second yellow,even tho his foul was similar to Osman's first card. Sterling was getting ripped to bits by Baines and Marillas,so much so that BR switched him to the other wing as he knew he was lucky to still be on the pitch.
posted on 30/10/12
I'll repeat one more time...persistent fouling.
posted on 30/10/12
I'll repeat one more time...persistent fouling
Didn't do any more than Allen,and like I said,If Osman's first caution deserved a card,then why wasn't Sterling sent off,as his tackle was the similar,but he was already on a yellow? And bringing up Jags and Howard just shows how desperate your getting.
posted on 30/10/12
Again, Osmans first yellow was more likely the result of persistent fouling.
The desparation is from the very subject this thread, brought up by your manager to cover up the appalling conduct of his own players, following his self righteous speech no less than a few days earlier.
posted on 30/10/12
Again, Osmans first yellow was more likely the result of persistent fouling
You don't even know your guessing. I see you've skated around why Sterling wasn't sent off. Liverpool should of been down to 9 men.
posted on 30/10/12
youre just being stupid now
posted on 30/10/12
I see you've skated around why Sterling wasn't sent off.
posted on 30/10/12
Page 6 of 6
6