What?............more info please.
referring to mikel and clattenburg
Clattenberg did nothing wrong and got a longer ban than Mikel.
To be fair the ban has nothing to do with the acquisation. Just how he acted towards the ref after the game
correct Diva. Its the club that should be punished for the accusation , not Mikel.
10 point deduction should stop them doing it again.
Just a wee dig at Chelsea then.
Fair enough.Mikel bad man,after being told he was racially abused,by Ramires,who has got it wrong.
Move on.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
I prefer to think he was misinformed about what was said.
Its simple
The FA aren't fit to govern football
How can the FA prove that Clattenburg said nothing to Mikel but can prove Mikel said something to Clattenburg
comment by Will shave árse when Arshavin starts (U2725)
posted 1 second ago
How can the FA prove that Clattenburg said nothing to Mikel but can prove Mikel said something to Clattenburg
-------------
Mikel admitted the charge. They didn't have to prove anything. Although as I understand it, the other officials were there to witness it.
Would anyone consider suspected racism worse than falsely accusing someone of racism?
The FA don't and the punishment is evidence of that.
"Why has ramires not been punished?"
you can't and shouldn't be punished for thinking you heard a racist comment
the fa said he was right to report it
I think that Mikel has got off lightly. He should have approached Clattenburg, told him what had been claimed and asked for his version. I am sure that the matter would have been cleared up quickly without all of this hassle. Irrespective of what he had been told by a team mate, he should not have steamed in threatening a referee. A three game ban is very lenient in my opinion.
Clattenburg didnt get a ban. He got paid leave.
Mistakenly thought Clattenberg racially abused a player ??
That's some mistake isn't it
How can the FA prove that Clattenburg said nothing to Mikel but can prove Mikel said something to Clattenburg
-------------------------------
The ban and fine is not for the onfield incident but for the incident after the match when mikel entered the officials room !
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Ramires didn't threaten to break clattenburgs legs
Didnt phelen make false claims of racism at Chelsea after Evra attacked a groundsman an rio kicked a female steward?
The real joke is the fine for having ago at the ref is three times more than John Terry's for being racist Anton.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Cityblueloz City are still alive here, balotelli agueroooooooooooooooooooooooo (U6305)
posted 52 minutes ago
Didnt phelen make false claims of racism at Chelsea after Evra attacked a groundsman an rio kicked a female steward?
----------------
Can you please explain what relevance that statement has to the article?
Many thanks
Mikel got of lighlty in my honest opinion. No matter what the ref said, he shouldn't have done what he did.
The matter had been reported and that should have been enough for him. He was very lucky because it could have been a lot worse.
I hope he now appreciates why Anton Ferdinand was upset at his good friend John Terry.
Being consistent with my City friend, can someone explain to me how a City player missed a drugs test and got a slap on the wrist and a man utd player missed a drugs test, offered to take it again but was banned for 6 months?
Fergie should have been banned for 20 games for calling a referee unfit and incompetant.
Sign in if you want to comment
Trying to ruin someone's career
Page 1 of 3
posted on 6/12/12
What?............more info please.
posted on 6/12/12
referring to mikel and clattenburg
posted on 6/12/12
Clattenberg did nothing wrong and got a longer ban than Mikel.
posted on 6/12/12
To be fair the ban has nothing to do with the acquisation. Just how he acted towards the ref after the game
posted on 6/12/12
correct Diva. Its the club that should be punished for the accusation , not Mikel.
10 point deduction should stop them doing it again.
posted on 6/12/12
Just a wee dig at Chelsea then.
Fair enough.Mikel bad man,after being told he was racially abused,by Ramires,who has got it wrong.
Move on.
posted on 6/12/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 6/12/12
I prefer to think he was misinformed about what was said.
posted on 6/12/12
Its simple
The FA aren't fit to govern football
posted on 6/12/12
How can the FA prove that Clattenburg said nothing to Mikel but can prove Mikel said something to Clattenburg
posted on 6/12/12
comment by Will shave árse when Arshavin starts (U2725)
posted 1 second ago
How can the FA prove that Clattenburg said nothing to Mikel but can prove Mikel said something to Clattenburg
-------------
Mikel admitted the charge. They didn't have to prove anything. Although as I understand it, the other officials were there to witness it.
posted on 6/12/12
Would anyone consider suspected racism worse than falsely accusing someone of racism?
The FA don't and the punishment is evidence of that.
posted on 6/12/12
"Why has ramires not been punished?"
you can't and shouldn't be punished for thinking you heard a racist comment
the fa said he was right to report it
posted on 6/12/12
I think that Mikel has got off lightly. He should have approached Clattenburg, told him what had been claimed and asked for his version. I am sure that the matter would have been cleared up quickly without all of this hassle. Irrespective of what he had been told by a team mate, he should not have steamed in threatening a referee. A three game ban is very lenient in my opinion.
posted on 6/12/12
Clattenburg didnt get a ban. He got paid leave.
posted on 7/12/12
Mistakenly thought Clattenberg racially abused a player ??
That's some mistake isn't it
posted on 7/12/12
How can the FA prove that Clattenburg said nothing to Mikel but can prove Mikel said something to Clattenburg
-------------------------------
The ban and fine is not for the onfield incident but for the incident after the match when mikel entered the officials room !
posted on 7/12/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 7/12/12
Ramires didn't threaten to break clattenburgs legs
posted on 7/12/12
Didnt phelen make false claims of racism at Chelsea after Evra attacked a groundsman an rio kicked a female steward?
posted on 7/12/12
The real joke is the fine for having ago at the ref is three times more than John Terry's for being racist Anton.
posted on 7/12/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 7/12/12
comment by Cityblueloz City are still alive here, balotelli agueroooooooooooooooooooooooo (U6305)
posted 52 minutes ago
Didnt phelen make false claims of racism at Chelsea after Evra attacked a groundsman an rio kicked a female steward?
----------------
Can you please explain what relevance that statement has to the article?
Many thanks
posted on 7/12/12
Mikel got of lighlty in my honest opinion. No matter what the ref said, he shouldn't have done what he did.
The matter had been reported and that should have been enough for him. He was very lucky because it could have been a lot worse.
I hope he now appreciates why Anton Ferdinand was upset at his good friend John Terry.
Being consistent with my City friend, can someone explain to me how a City player missed a drugs test and got a slap on the wrist and a man utd player missed a drugs test, offered to take it again but was banned for 6 months?
posted on 7/12/12
Fergie should have been banned for 20 games for calling a referee unfit and incompetant.
Page 1 of 3