or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 173 comments are related to an article called:

Chronic

Page 5 of 7

comment by Chronic (U3423)

posted on 14/4/13

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 14/4/13

Yeh worked. It out now tommy

posted on 14/4/13

In regards to judges comment about rose being first choice due to AVB/levy prioritising other areas, might have a good point. Surely they'll see sense and get us a striker, but if Townsend comes back into the picture, sandro fit again and holtby settled I doubt we'll strengthen midfield so I'd imagine LB would be our 2nd area to think about

comment by Analog (U17200)

posted on 14/4/13

Our 2nd priority is a creative midfielder surely?

posted on 14/4/13

he's absoloutely nothing like grandspur.

this article is ridiculous.

comment by Chronic (U3423)

posted on 14/4/13

JPB - let it go.. passionate spurs fans got a bit heated. thats all

posted on 14/4/13

posted 7 seconds ago
Our 2nd priority is a creative midfielder surely?
------------------

Would be MINE to be honest. I'd like to see us really go in for eriksen who's said he's up for leaving Ajax in the summer. My idea would be to play him as the number 10, holtby (says he prefers CM role) to fight dembele for the role alongside sandro....

With the number of players we've got who can play in the roles behind the striker (Lennon, holtby, bale, siggy, Dempsey, Townsend maybe) AVB might want to use that money elsewhere

comment by Analog (U17200)

posted on 14/4/13

Do you think there's a chance we might switch up to a 433 next season? In which case a 'moutinho/modric' type is needed?

comment by Chronic (U3423)

posted on 14/4/13

analog... i assumed that this is a given... am surprised that everytime i say it its been met with resistance...

thats why avb wanted a willian type wing forward, for a pure 4-3-3


posted on 14/4/13

Chronic is a good guy.

Just like RRP he graced the Villarreal board.

posted on 14/4/13

If we play 433 mountinho won't be needed due to bales new role.

comment by Chronic (U3423)

posted on 14/4/13

henrik i even own a villarreal shirt with Riquelme on the back

comment by Analog (U17200)

posted on 14/4/13

Bale wouldn't be able to play in a midfield 3

posted on 14/4/13

Chronic.

Anyway good luck for the top four, been filtered for the first time today by a bitter Chelsea mug so I'm wanting Spurs to finish above them now!

comment by Chronic (U3423)

posted on 14/4/13

analog.. i was thinking more like...


-------Lloris-----


walker kaboul verts new lb

--------------sandro-----------


-------dembele----- moutinho type-


wing forward----------------------------------bale

------------------------new striker--------------

comment by Chronic (U3423)

posted on 14/4/13

henrik celtic are my scottish team too

i am catholic

posted on 14/4/13

But he wants to occupy that more central roll, I don't see him moving out to the wing in a 433

posted on 14/4/13

There is no way we should drop Lennon, chronic!

comment by Analog (U17200)

posted on 14/4/13

I think Lennon could probably adapt to the on the right of the forward three. I wouldn't even be surprised if bale was played upfront on his own next year, and bring in a left winger.

posted on 14/4/13

Very possible as we'd have the players to play it.

3 from sandro, Parker, holtby, dembele, siggy and either hudd/Livermore in CM positions

Bale, Lennon, Dempsey and Townsend/new signing as the wide men

I'm a 4231 man myself but I recall AVB going 433 at Porto and think he might revert to that

posted on 14/4/13

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 14/4/13

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 14/4/13

Chronic, go on my member profile and go on the 'Millwall' article. I don't know because i filtered the pr ick but i think i have made Mafia mug fuming with my comments on it .....

posted on 14/4/13

Chronic.

Good luck, Spurs.

posted on 14/4/13

Ha, I found Chronic to be unnecessarily argumentative at first too judge, but if no one ever disagrees then there's no chat.

And I actually thought this was a good post:

"dont think rose has a long term future at spurs. he has been good for sunderland, but naughton was good for norwich, and we have countless posters on here saying he is not good enough for spurs.

furthermore, i really dont think he would be happy being on the bench"

Page 5 of 7

Sign in if you want to comment