So why are you mentioning Talksport in your argument as if it makes any difference?
I like Everton. Always have. Don't come on here spouting irrelevant drivel about an argument we had ages ago. Stick to the subject at hand.
10 shots each over 90 minutes and yet only 1 team wanted to win...you couldn't make it up...well you could if you support Arsenal.
We matched your efforts over 90 minutes but only 1 team wanted to win (arsenal)
We made 1 more foul than you but only 1 team was dirty (us)
Ohh BTW Arsenal fans you were the home team,the onus is normally on the home team to attack
And sorry. How were you proved right exactly? You're a massive b3llend
You know I was right. Some of the Arsenal claim he was the motm
Sammers, Anichebe was poor yes and Moyes' other striker Jelavic was possibly worse when he came on.
I agree that Everton shaded it for the first 65 minutes or so, but the thing is that we were able to bring on genuine game-changers in Ox and Podolski but Everton had nobody like that on the bench, hence why we came out on top in those last twenty minutes.
rubbish answers, fellain was fouled and i'm assuming we made the same amount of subs as you,
---
Fellaini was fouled? Really? If that's the case, then for a big guy, he goes down very easily.
And you call our players wusses...
doesn't change the fact that you were talking carp, there was no time wasting and no taking the ball into the corner just admit that.
Stats now? That's what they're falling back on? So desperate.
One could take a shot from the half way line and it goes wide off goal. It would be counted as a shot. Means f all.
A lot of idiotic Everton fans on here. Did you catch the Liverpool virus?
No wonder those peasants laugh at you guys.
I agree that Everton shaded it for the first 65 minutes or so, but the thing is that we were able to bring on genuine game-changers in Ox and Podolski but Everton had nobody like that on the bench, hence why we came out on top in those last twenty minutes.
ahb do you agree with samir we were time wasting or do you think Arsenal just penned Everton back for the last 20 ?
The most important stat was the game ended in a draw.
Dubbed I was using stats to show how one eyed and biased you lot come across.All these claims of being bullied and being the only team wanting to win doesn't actually stack up does it
doesn't change the fact that you were talking carp, there was no time wasting and no taking the ball into the corner just admit that.
---
Whingegum, I didn't say there was ball taking in the corner, I said Pienaar was a whining little bítch, constantly complaining to the referee about every decision which delayed our free kicks and ran the clock down. If that's all it takes for Fellaini to fall down, you may as well put someone else in midfield.
Just admit it. Your team were unambitious and uninspiring for the final 20 minutes of the match and you 'settled' for a point rather than trying to go for the win.
winegum, we had you penned back and you naturally slowed the game down when you could.
So why are you mentioning Talksport in your argument as if it makes any difference?
Because on the way home from work, the guy who does the fishing (Arsenal fan),claimed it was a cracking game. You can't have a cracking game if there's only one side playing.
ahb do you agree with samir we were time wasting or do you think Arsenal just penned Everton back for the last 20 ?
---
Chamberlain injected a bit more pace and Podolski did okay-ish on the left (won us a few corners but didn't do much), but the reason why we pegged you back was because all your players dropped deeper and did not intend to come out and attack us. If you had harried us and pressed high up the pitch like you did in the first half, you could have got more from the game.
Instead you thought a point would suffice. Not exactly the mindset of a 'big team', is it?
FFS this is what it has come to? Us being criticised by Everton fans? .Horrible club. A glorified Stoke who play rubbish and thuggish football.
You know you are struggling when you use Talksport as a reference point
Did you lads watch your game the other week against WBA by the way.Did you play out the 90 minutes without time wasting or did you shield the ball in the corners at every opportunity?
Did you lads watch your game the other week against WBA by the way.Did you play out the 90 minutes without time wasting or did you shield the ball in the corners at every opportunity?
===============
We were winning.
comment by HenryKamp - Messi White Gervinho (U8418)
posted 47 seconds ago
FFS this is what it has come to? Us being criticised by Everton fans? .Horrible club. A glorified Stoke who play rubbish and thuggish football.
-----------------------------------------------
1 foul less shall we rename Arsenal Stokelite?
You know you are struggling when you use Talksport as a reference point
What reference point have you lot used apart from your own? The papers I've read, also claimed it was a good game. You lot are bitter as Spurs might pip you to the CL spot.
y.Did you play out the 90 minutes without time wasting or did you shield the ball in the corners at every opportunity?
---
Are you an idiot or something?
We were down to 10 men and we had a lead to protect.
That's totally different from the scores being level, 11 men on either side and your lot being satisfied with a draw with 20 minutes of the match to go, which is exactly what happened.
D'Jeezus Mackaroni -
Did you time waste though.
I didn't see us play for time by playing the ball into corners and shield it did you?
Pienaar delaying a freekick is a tactic used by all clubs to give defenders time to marshall the defence and pick up opponents.Do you understand this,please say yes
1 foul less shall we rename Arsenal Stokelite?
fannylites would be more apt
fannylites would be more apt
---
Did you think of that yourself you clever little boy?
comment by renoog (U4449)
posted 32 minutes ago
They weren't negative at all, for the first 65 mins or so they pressed the life out of Arsenal and had just as many chances on goal. It was only because they tired out that Arsenal were able to get a foothold on the game and drive Everton back towards their own goal.
I thought it was one of the more adventurous displays by an opposing side at the Emirates this season. Moyes was unlucky that his gamble didn't pay off
the only decent Arsenal fan amongst them all
Everton were even lucky to have 11 men on the pitch. Gibson should've been off. Thought tbf it was akin to playing with 10 men either way.
Everyone, including Mancs used to laugh their as off at this oaf.
What do Everton do? Go out and buy.
Sign in if you want to comment
a point
Page 6 of 9
6 | 7 | 8 | 9
posted on 17/4/13
So why are you mentioning Talksport in your argument as if it makes any difference?
I like Everton. Always have. Don't come on here spouting irrelevant drivel about an argument we had ages ago. Stick to the subject at hand.
posted on 17/4/13
10 shots each over 90 minutes and yet only 1 team wanted to win...you couldn't make it up...well you could if you support Arsenal.
We matched your efforts over 90 minutes but only 1 team wanted to win (arsenal)
We made 1 more foul than you but only 1 team was dirty (us)
Ohh BTW Arsenal fans you were the home team,the onus is normally on the home team to attack
posted on 17/4/13
And sorry. How were you proved right exactly? You're a massive b3llend
You know I was right. Some of the Arsenal claim he was the motm
posted on 17/4/13
Sammers, Anichebe was poor yes and Moyes' other striker Jelavic was possibly worse when he came on.
I agree that Everton shaded it for the first 65 minutes or so, but the thing is that we were able to bring on genuine game-changers in Ox and Podolski but Everton had nobody like that on the bench, hence why we came out on top in those last twenty minutes.
posted on 17/4/13
rubbish answers, fellain was fouled and i'm assuming we made the same amount of subs as you,
---
Fellaini was fouled? Really? If that's the case, then for a big guy, he goes down very easily.
And you call our players wusses...
doesn't change the fact that you were talking carp, there was no time wasting and no taking the ball into the corner just admit that.
posted on 17/4/13
Arsenal fans
posted on 17/4/13
Stats now? That's what they're falling back on? So desperate.
One could take a shot from the half way line and it goes wide off goal. It would be counted as a shot. Means f all.
A lot of idiotic Everton fans on here. Did you catch the Liverpool virus?
No wonder those peasants laugh at you guys.
posted on 17/4/13
I agree that Everton shaded it for the first 65 minutes or so, but the thing is that we were able to bring on genuine game-changers in Ox and Podolski but Everton had nobody like that on the bench, hence why we came out on top in those last twenty minutes.
ahb do you agree with samir we were time wasting or do you think Arsenal just penned Everton back for the last 20 ?
posted on 17/4/13
The most important stat was the game ended in a draw.
Dubbed I was using stats to show how one eyed and biased you lot come across.All these claims of being bullied and being the only team wanting to win doesn't actually stack up does it
posted on 17/4/13
doesn't change the fact that you were talking carp, there was no time wasting and no taking the ball into the corner just admit that.
---
Whingegum, I didn't say there was ball taking in the corner, I said Pienaar was a whining little bítch, constantly complaining to the referee about every decision which delayed our free kicks and ran the clock down. If that's all it takes for Fellaini to fall down, you may as well put someone else in midfield.
Just admit it. Your team were unambitious and uninspiring for the final 20 minutes of the match and you 'settled' for a point rather than trying to go for the win.
posted on 17/4/13
winegum, we had you penned back and you naturally slowed the game down when you could.
posted on 17/4/13
So why are you mentioning Talksport in your argument as if it makes any difference?
Because on the way home from work, the guy who does the fishing (Arsenal fan),claimed it was a cracking game. You can't have a cracking game if there's only one side playing.
posted on 17/4/13
ahb do you agree with samir we were time wasting or do you think Arsenal just penned Everton back for the last 20 ?
---
Chamberlain injected a bit more pace and Podolski did okay-ish on the left (won us a few corners but didn't do much), but the reason why we pegged you back was because all your players dropped deeper and did not intend to come out and attack us. If you had harried us and pressed high up the pitch like you did in the first half, you could have got more from the game.
Instead you thought a point would suffice. Not exactly the mindset of a 'big team', is it?
posted on 17/4/13
FFS this is what it has come to? Us being criticised by Everton fans? .Horrible club. A glorified Stoke who play rubbish and thuggish football.
posted on 17/4/13
You know you are struggling when you use Talksport as a reference point
posted on 17/4/13
Did you lads watch your game the other week against WBA by the way.Did you play out the 90 minutes without time wasting or did you shield the ball in the corners at every opportunity?
posted on 17/4/13
Did you lads watch your game the other week against WBA by the way.Did you play out the 90 minutes without time wasting or did you shield the ball in the corners at every opportunity?
===============
We were winning.
posted on 17/4/13
comment by HenryKamp - Messi White Gervinho (U8418)
posted 47 seconds ago
FFS this is what it has come to? Us being criticised by Everton fans? .Horrible club. A glorified Stoke who play rubbish and thuggish football.
-----------------------------------------------
1 foul less shall we rename Arsenal Stokelite?
posted on 17/4/13
You know you are struggling when you use Talksport as a reference point
What reference point have you lot used apart from your own? The papers I've read, also claimed it was a good game. You lot are bitter as Spurs might pip you to the CL spot.
posted on 17/4/13
y.Did you play out the 90 minutes without time wasting or did you shield the ball in the corners at every opportunity?
---
Are you an idiot or something?
We were down to 10 men and we had a lead to protect.
That's totally different from the scores being level, 11 men on either side and your lot being satisfied with a draw with 20 minutes of the match to go, which is exactly what happened.
posted on 17/4/13
D'Jeezus Mackaroni -
Did you time waste though.
I didn't see us play for time by playing the ball into corners and shield it did you?
Pienaar delaying a freekick is a tactic used by all clubs to give defenders time to marshall the defence and pick up opponents.Do you understand this,please say yes
posted on 17/4/13
1 foul less shall we rename Arsenal Stokelite?
fannylites would be more apt
posted on 17/4/13
fannylites would be more apt
---
Did you think of that yourself you clever little boy?
posted on 17/4/13
comment by renoog (U4449)
posted 32 minutes ago
They weren't negative at all, for the first 65 mins or so they pressed the life out of Arsenal and had just as many chances on goal. It was only because they tired out that Arsenal were able to get a foothold on the game and drive Everton back towards their own goal.
I thought it was one of the more adventurous displays by an opposing side at the Emirates this season. Moyes was unlucky that his gamble didn't pay off
the only decent Arsenal fan amongst them all
posted on 17/4/13
Everton were even lucky to have 11 men on the pitch. Gibson should've been off. Thought tbf it was akin to playing with 10 men either way.
Everyone, including Mancs used to laugh their as off at this oaf.
What do Everton do? Go out and buy.
Page 6 of 9
6 | 7 | 8 | 9