OK thanks everyone, hopefully OX doesn't get injured

My boys sheriff still holding out v inter

I've never seen a player sent off for not going over to the ref

comment by Jizz_Hornkamp (U15867)
posted less than a minute ago
A few minutes before the red card, ref wanted to speak to Mane. He ran over to the right wing to speak to Mane. Could he not do the same to the Atletico player?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mane was in the location of the offence so the ref went to that location. The ref was already in the position of the offence for the Felipe incident, so didn’t need to.

comment by Constantinople (U11781)
posted less than a minute ago
I've never seen a player sent off for not going over to the ref
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not surprised you don’t understand the rules.

Apparently there was some kind of gesture

comment by Dr Tobias Fünke (U1217)
posted about a minute ago
Apparently there was some kind of gesture
----------------------------------------------------------------------
flowers ?

comment by Dr Tobias Fünke (U1217)
posted less than a minute ago
Apparently there was some kind of gesture
----------------------------------------------------------------------
would make sense, the ref did look like it was gonna be a yellow but after looking at him calling him over 3 times he just decided fk him whipped out the red and told him to walk lol. then got surrounded by 6 atletico players n suarez got booked.

honestly more refs should do the same, book dissent instantly cut it out the game.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

so if it stays like this, PSG have basically won their group

if Utd win our Group....could get a pretty nice draw in the last 16 at this rate

same for Liverpool

Chelsea or City could be screwed if they finish 2nd though, as Bayern and PSG are on the table

It would be two yellows if it was just for not walking over wouldn’t it? For it to have been a straight red he must have said something.

BBC reckon it was for dissent

comment by Jadon The King Sancho (U10026)
posted less than a minute ago
It would be two yellows if it was just for not walking over wouldn’t it? For it to have been a straight red he must have said something.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

doubt he has said anything....cos from the reverse angle he never even stops to look at the ref

seems like straight red is just for ignoring the ref

The red is for the foul.

there is very clearly no gesture made

he has just ignored the ref

comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted less than a minute ago
The red is for the foul.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

disagree

if it was a red for the tackle, the ref wouldn't be so causally waiting

apparently the english refs are being even worse

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

so we want players ignoring refs? or is the issue that hes the only ref hasn't taken there crap?

comment by Titliv - Ben Shapiro fanboy, and what about those milkers (U11882)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 47 seconds ago
The red is for the foul.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hopefully. Really don't want sending offs for referees hurt feelings becoming a regular thing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair play, you do excel in coming out with shiite 👍

ill rephrase with english

so we want players ignoring refs? or is the issue that hes the only ref that hasn't taken crap?

Two yellows in one basically

What is the utter point of Peter Walton when you know he always backs whatever the ref does?

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator