Nah it's on default. No idea why it'd do this. Don't think it'd be my res' as I've always had it 16:9 with this monitor.

"If he was streets ahead of the others on form then I'd agree."

He is.

Seen him parking up before in his schaguar.

Maybe just different resolutions then. I've mine on 1366*768

It's even worse on my phone.

Do we care this much about how a line up looks>?

Yeah I get some crazy formations on my phone when I look at others.

Sakho 90% tackle success.

Yeah I think it effects it directly when you're typing it on your screen. It'll look fine to people with the same res'. But crazy when it's different. Problem solved.

And yes Tippy. We do.

Should go with the player in form - Skrtel and the player who is used to him - Agger, as a partnership. Then look to get Sakho into the side.

comment by RespectedThere'sOnlyOneRedsWillian (U1721)
posted 6 seconds ago
"If he was streets ahead of the others on form then I'd agree."

He is.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

That's your opinion TOOR and it's not one I'd agree with.

Aside from his first 60 mins for us, Sakho has been as good in my eyes. I certainly can't see Skrtel having been notably better.

Toure has been excellent also with a few lapses. It's a great problem to have. I wish we had that problem in midfield.

SkrTel 77% agger 57% kolo 86%

Yes that's my opinion. Are you another who needs me to write a disclaimer on the bottom of my comments? I'd really rather not as it takes up a lot of time.

Statistics Ilori - we tried that, remember? We ended up spending over £100m and going backwards.

I prefer to judge on performances with the help on statistics.

I'd say they are different types of CB's. Skrtel can read the game better and sweeps play up pretty well. Whereas Sakho is a great stopper, stepping up and winning the ball back. They would be a good partnership actually.

Though I'd say Agger can do both roles and suits our system more so than Sakho. Seeing that he can pass and dribble well. And that he can just switch roles on the fly.

comment by RespectedThere'sOnlyOneRedsWillian (U1721)
posted 46 seconds ago
Yes that's my opinion. Are you another who needs me to write a disclaimer on the bottom of my comments? I'd really rather not as it takes up a lot of time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

No, of course not. However "he is" is quite a definite and closed response. Doesn't leave a lot of room for debate and that's what this forum is generally about.

Maybe you're not up for chatting about the merits of the other and that's cool if not. Maybe you see it as cut and dry. I wouldn't know from that answer.

Or we could make up a team of the best statistics. Put the best tacklers in defence. The best passers on percentages in midfield and the best shots to goal rate in attack. We may lineup something like this:-

-------------Jones(hasn't played so has 100% record)------Kelly-------------------Toure---------Sakho----------Flanagan
------------------------Lucas----------Allen----------------------
------------------------------Alberto---------------------------
---------Sterling-------------------------------------Ibe
-----------------------------Aspas---------------------------------

That would show 'em.

If anyone needs it

http://www.viplivesports.eu/football/185916/1/liverpool-fc-vs-fulham-fc-live-stream-online.html

Alright.

He is.

*Disclaimer - the above comment is my opinion, it is in no way a definitive fact or a closure of conversation.*

Jones(hasn't played so has 100% record)

----

Wouldn't that technically be 0% or n/a?

Agger suits the central CB role best of all our players, he has the ball playing ability to compete in the midfield

Ta Tippy

Well that statistic could be twisted. Goals conceeded to shots? 0.

Statistics are great.