If you call people caants you cant really criticise other people for doing it. - its not my rules mate, im not here to defend anyone, im just pointing out hypocracy.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

On the wrong board

What a caant

Bit of a petty article.

yes there were some unsavoury comments but they are hardly representative of the majority.

Should I generalise Chelsea fans from the actions of those who did not respect the Hillsbrough silence?

No. You should bore off as well

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

There's one of me but there's about 50 of you over on the Spurs board all carbon copies of each other. You're all cut from the same cloth. Dont you get it by now? Caant this caant that. fack this faaack that.

I probably would Sideshow, and im not that would be Hypocrisy, probably just double standards, but when I said im not defending anyone, I meant myself aswell

Bit of a petty article.
--------------------
The same could be said about the one on your board and this one is only reacting to that. It takes brass neck to condone that but condemn this.

Mr C that isn't true.

Its just those you refer to post much more frequently than the rest

faaack of Mr C you caant, faaacking what are you caanting faacking on abaout saaan

I dont know what you mean?

comment by Chelsea_since_summer_1969 ✪ (U1561)
posted 14 seconds ago
Bit of a petty article.
--------------------
The same could be said about the one on your board and this one is only reacting to that. It takes brass neck to condone that but condemn this.
---------------------

are you referring to the 'Dont cry theo' article?

Where have I condoned it?

I think you missed the point with the whole humour police article ...This article is a crtitisism of an article by Spurs fans laughing about an Arsenal player, who went out of his way to be disliked by the Spurs fans, losing the smug smile off his face ...noone wants to see soemone injured, but we are allowed to have a tasteless sense of humour, or laugh at what we think is karmav- Ive seen worse here and on other boards ...its the fake shock, and condemnation thats hypocitical.

Palmers I know you are one of the decent posters normally and I am not saying you have condoned it but even you know that this article is not half as in bad taste as that one so feel free to pop over there and tell Chronic that his also is a petty article. That's all I'm saying. You have some very good posters over there but let's be completely honest mate that article is in very bad taste. Even Ace (and fairplay to him for that) has put up an article saying how gloating about injuries just cheapens the board.

Still teaching on the wrong board

No one is shocked.

1969


Of course mate I wouldn't condone that article. I though Walcott was a kn0b on Saturday but I wouldn't wish that on him.

I don't think its as bad as some people are making out though. I've read A LOT worse on here

Chronic and the like are the real scúmbags after spending their whole life insinuating others are? Who knew

Maybe not Mr C, still a hypocritical article about an article - anyway im bored of it now


Where have you been? I thought you would have dropped by to tell me what a i am once in a while mate?

Are you now saying Palmers that I have personally written worse on here? Be my guest to have a look at my history (as you once invited me to) and I think you'll struggle as like you I don't do comments or articles like that.

Therefore I don't think I am being a hypocrite by criticising that article and I love the humour and banter as much as all of us on here.

I've been here mate.

I told you a long time ago oddiY you was making it boring

I havent seen you for ages Mr C - you seem different, not as much of a anymore