Boss,

As captain and as the player closest to the ball, I'm adamant cook would have reviewed it

3-1 against England

The bottom line is that if DRS was used, the number of bad decisions would probably be 0-0.

I can bring so many wrong decisions against India it toured last time but no point in dragging as we played really bad. No ifs/buts n England was the better team.

From this match, we all can see that England team is not the same n it needs to change its captain asap.. Will they do it? I don't think so after they got rid of their best batsmen.

I have repeated many times here that many Indian fans support DRS so no need to beat the dead horse. Go use your energy in complaining to ECB as they are not as weak as they may show to you. If it was BCB or PCB then I can understand but not them.

Fair to say India prefer their own DRS .....DRS = Dharmasena Review System!

comment by Afridi14 (U2805)
posted 8 seconds ago
Fair to say India prefer their own DRS .....DRS = Dharmasena Review System!
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Afridi

Serious question: Has the use of DRS over the past few years led to a fall in the standards of test match umpires, or have poor decisions just been less obvious in times with less technology, replays etc.?

England should tell India to stuff it if they don't want the drs.. We'll have Bangladesh over for a 4 test series and one test against Zimbabwe.

yeah he can joke about India but if someone gives him back, he runs to admin like a kid here.

englandwhoelse, do you think we'd win that series?

Hey Englundwhoelse, why don't you run for ECB pal n may Afridi type gals may support you too. Then you can plan as much cricket series with Zimbabwe or Bangladesh.

caught, right now? we wouldn't beat hong-kong.. losing to the dutch is a current accurance too.

factaker. stop making fun of the word England its not Englund. I don't do Indyia do I?

I don't think DRS has had an impact on umpires.. Umpires have always made poor decisions - which is the kind of point of DRS

Back to game, I still think India has a long way to go as I am not confident enough with our lousy bowlers. England may well play in the second innings and getting 20 wickets is quite tough with our trundlers..

What should England be (realistically) targeting here? Avoiding the follow on? 100 run deficit? Drawing parity probably a bit too much to ask.

just waiting for the next excuse.

Root is so lucky. Edge after edge falling short

'soft hands', BOSS

comment by englandwhoelse (U16825)
posted 3 minutes ago
factaker. stop making fun of the word England its not Englund. I don't do Indyia do I?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's a very cheeky way of writing England I tell ya

@Mrwhoelse.. I apologize if I did hurt your feelings with your touchy attitude. You always talk about India or BCCI but I will never get upset pal. I am thick skinned unlike some gurls here.

Regards,
Big Daddy

England's aim should be to occupy the crease until 6.30pm... Runs don't matter

24 runs until Cook can stop $hitting himself at the prospect of batting again right away.

Facttaker.. I have issues with the bcci. they are bullies. They intimidate everyone because of the money they have.

Kashy.. I do agree with your cheeky analysis