or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 133 comments are related to an article called:

Will we spend a penny??

Page 4 of 6

posted on 9/7/14

Tít

posted on 9/7/14

comment by Rabid_wolf (U18239)
posted 11 minutes ago
DJ - 'We did not cover a penny of the wages of the players that went out on loan. They took a drop so they could carry on playing. O'Hara was not prepared to take a drop and that's why he went nowhere' - Why pretend you have a clue?? WE PAID 3K per week last year towards Ward's wages. Brighton paid 10K. So shut up know it all bell!!



----------------------------------------------------------------------


Yeah. Must be true. Said it in the E&S. Once.

posted on 9/7/14

What more would you know Twatter?. U r thick enough to believe the bull poo. And Josef Fritzel's no 1 fan can jog on..!

posted on 9/7/14

"U r thick enough to believe the bull poo."


Says the man who believes the E&S!

posted on 9/7/14

Comment deleted by Article Creator

posted on 9/7/14

Who said I believe E&S you special fool??! MORON

posted on 9/7/14

Where else has it been stated that we have subsidised Ward’s wages?

posted on 9/7/14

Propaganda reels the fools in you see...!!

posted on 9/7/14

You think the clubs going to shout publicly what we're were paying towards their wages??! HAHAHAHA so thick..

posted on 9/7/14

Cuckoo

posted on 9/7/14

So you believe what was in the E&S and have no other indication that we subsidised his wages?

posted on 9/7/14

So you believe we didn't contribute anything? Give me a break silly little boy!!

posted on 9/7/14

I have read two accounts one from the club one from the E&S.

The club insist that we didn’t contribute.

The E&S claimed in one article that we did after toeing the line that we didn’t all season.

I don’t know which is correct and haven’t said that I believe either.

So, other than believing the E&S, what makes you think we did subsidise his wages?

posted on 9/7/14

Maybe someone can find the quote Moxey made. I was under the impression we paid part of his wages too.

posted on 9/7/14

Don't worry, it's out there mate. Public knowledge. Look into it a bit more yourself. Lazy..

posted on 9/7/14

As if we wouldn't agree to subsidise a bit with NO ONE else in for him. Yeah,Pay him in full to be in our stands, or pay 3k of 13k per week??! Duhhh.

posted on 9/7/14

So you DO believe the E&S? Make your mind up.

posted on 9/7/14

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 9/7/14

Christ, it's difficult to get through to your petite brain boy. I can't be any clearer! Get over E&S obsession you MORON.

posted on 9/7/14

Tetchy! So.....other than in the E&S where have you seen any suggestion that we subsidised his wages?

posted on 9/7/14

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!! Common sense let me know...

posted on 9/7/14

And common sense made you pick the £10k/£3k split out of thin air?

Pull the other one. You’ve swallowed an E&S headline hook, line and sinker. Gullible, naive, moron.

posted on 9/7/14

If we didnt subsidise Wards wages last season then why is it a stumbling block for the transfer?

posted on 9/7/14

Twatter, everyone can clearly see what I'm saying and what I mean. If you can't, unlucky. I can't help your brain grow PAL!! Idiot.

posted on 9/7/14

For what its worth, and lets be honest none of us have a clue......but..........Brighton fans seem to think we subsidised wages, but i guess the noises out of their club would be along those lines.

Sooooo, who knows, i would think we did subsidise and i would also say we did the same with Foley at Blackpool as they have zero money and he would be on around 10 grand himself, maybe he took a hit but Blackpool would have fallen way short of 10 grand either way, we probably pushed it too 8 grand or something maybe?

Page 4 of 6

Sign in if you want to comment