comment by Ji Sung Park's Cousin - hustla service (U2958)
posted 3 minutes ago
as you can see, all of MUDD's "evidence" is based on the Di Maria signing.
Zero evidence exsists that we were in for Gundogan.
He took a shot in the dark and one of the two claims luckily landed.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Out of all the teams in the world, I not only named one, I named the position the player played in.
Any unbiased judge would throw you out of court for your heinous attempts at besmirching my good name
This statement indicates the bet hedges on not one but two transfers, one from each team mentioned to us?
------------------------
Yes, the bet was based on two players signing, one from Real, one From Dortmund.
He backtracked to include the idea of "Pre-Contracts" which could, of course, be terminated.
This is where you, the jury, have to make your call.
Mudd said Khedira and Mkhitaryan originally
The case hinges on the following:
Do you believe we had a pre-contract with Dortmund to sign Gundogan?
I have stated from day 1 that they were pre-contracts. My word, perjury in the court!!
comment by UnitedRedMacca - First with the news!! (U2024)
posted 32 seconds ago
Mudd said Khedira and Mkhitaryan originally
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I clearly stated I was wumming then as none of them are wide players
"I have stated from day 1 that they were pre-contracts. My word, perjury in the court!!"
I still don't get how that is possible Mudd!
You say Gundogan, I say pre-contract
Let's call the whole thing off
comment by M.U.D.D (U9612)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by UnitedRedMacca - First with the news!! (U2024)
posted 32 seconds ago
Mudd said Khedira and Mkhitaryan originally
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I clearly stated I was wumming then as none of them are wide players
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You didn't actually
You said you 'might' me wumming
Had all bases covered
comment by Pride of the North (U6803)
posted 3 minutes ago
"MUDD made a public claim, in June, that we would sign a player from each of Real Madrid and Dortmund. Upon hearing this, JPSC challenged him to put his username on the line, for a full season"
This statement indicates the bet hedges on not one but two transfers, one from each team mentioned to us?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It indicates that they should both be allowed to keep the crux of their user name(MUDD & JSPC) but must add a tagline.
The tagline should be decided by:
1) An article suggesting which names are best suited
2) Following feedback from *1, a vote for each username.
I suggest that they swap names. Simples.
comment by Juan Matador (U17834)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by Dunc - the master of disguises (U11713)
posted 9 minutes ago
Mudds should be
W&R has had more séx with goats in the last 9 months than MUDD has had with his Mrs
that way W&R is confirmed as a lover of molesty farm animals, and MUDD is confirmed as an ugly who's own Mrs wont even touch him
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
On what basis do you come to the conclusion that W&R has fun time with farm animals? Cause he's Indian?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
he admitted it, and there is photographic evidence f him and his "bride" on their wedding night
i hope youre not suggesting I am racist
Can I just put it out there that if this ends up being close, I'm happy to sell my vote.
http://www.ja606.co.uk/articles/viewArticle/276973
comment by M.U.D.D (U9612)
posted 16 minutes ago
Exhibit H: Arab our twitter expert ..,
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Being called a twitter expert, is there anything less cool?
I'll vote, just cause he seems outnumbered here..
I have submitted a pre-contract vote.
comment by Dunc - the master of disguises (U11713)
posted 58 seconds ago
comment by Juan Matador (U17834)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by Dunc - the master of disguises (U11713)
posted 9 minutes ago
Mudds should be
W&R has had more séx with goats in the last 9 months than MUDD has had with his Mrs
that way W&R is confirmed as a lover of molesty farm animals, and MUDD is confirmed as an ugly who's own Mrs wont even touch him
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
On what basis do you come to the conclusion that W&R has fun time with farm animals? Cause he's Indian?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
he admitted it, and there is photographic evidence f him and his "bride" on their wedding night
i hope youre not suggesting I am racist
----------------------------------------------------------------------
JSPC is W&R?
That explains a lot for me
The case also hinges on the following:
Why would di Maria sign a pre-contract before Real had shown any interest in James the main reason why he was allowed to leave? He was at that point still very important to the CL holders.
Mudd's should be
Man Utd Daredevil - i once smuggled a vuvuzela into OT... thats how i got my name
comment by Mon Dieu - Suarez is football cancer. (U16840)
posted 2 minutes ago
http://www.ja606.co.uk/articles/viewArticle/276973
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you read that article and the comments, you can clearly see it was tongue in cheek
comment by manutd1982 (U6633)
posted 1 minute ago
The case also hinges on the following:
Why would di Maria sign a pre-contract before Real had shown any interest in James the main reason why he was allowed to leave? He was at that point still very important to the CL holders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How are we supposed to establish that? I told you to ask Angel when he signed
"Why would di Maria sign a pre-contract before Real had shown any interest in James the main reason why he was allowed to leave? "
More pertinently than that, I ask again how he could have possibly signed a precontract anyway.
comment by Dunc - the master of disguises (U11713)
posted 21 seconds ago
Mudd's should be
Man Utd Daredevil - i once smuggled a vuvuzela into OT... thats how i got my name
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not nearly bad enough for such an accusation.
That is like giving a murderer a tickle on the tummy for a punishment.
I reckon if someone has to change their user name, it should just be the tag line after the main name. I don't think everyone appreciates how confusing these name changes are for older forum members like VC and Macca.
Sign in if you want to comment
Ja606 Court - JSPC v MUDD
Page 2 of 5
posted on 26/8/14
comment by Ji Sung Park's Cousin - hustla service (U2958)
posted 3 minutes ago
as you can see, all of MUDD's "evidence" is based on the Di Maria signing.
Zero evidence exsists that we were in for Gundogan.
He took a shot in the dark and one of the two claims luckily landed.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Out of all the teams in the world, I not only named one, I named the position the player played in.
Any unbiased judge would throw you out of court for your heinous attempts at besmirching my good name
posted on 26/8/14
This statement indicates the bet hedges on not one but two transfers, one from each team mentioned to us?
------------------------
Yes, the bet was based on two players signing, one from Real, one From Dortmund.
He backtracked to include the idea of "Pre-Contracts" which could, of course, be terminated.
This is where you, the jury, have to make your call.
posted on 26/8/14
Mudd said Khedira and Mkhitaryan originally
posted on 26/8/14
The case hinges on the following:
Do you believe we had a pre-contract with Dortmund to sign Gundogan?
posted on 26/8/14
I have stated from day 1 that they were pre-contracts. My word, perjury in the court!!
posted on 26/8/14
comment by UnitedRedMacca - First with the news!! (U2024)
posted 32 seconds ago
Mudd said Khedira and Mkhitaryan originally
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I clearly stated I was wumming then as none of them are wide players
posted on 26/8/14
"I have stated from day 1 that they were pre-contracts. My word, perjury in the court!!"
I still don't get how that is possible Mudd!
posted on 26/8/14
You say Gundogan, I say pre-contract
Let's call the whole thing off
posted on 26/8/14
comment by M.U.D.D (U9612)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by UnitedRedMacca - First with the news!! (U2024)
posted 32 seconds ago
Mudd said Khedira and Mkhitaryan originally
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I clearly stated I was wumming then as none of them are wide players
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You didn't actually
You said you 'might' me wumming
Had all bases covered
posted on 26/8/14
comment by Pride of the North (U6803)
posted 3 minutes ago
"MUDD made a public claim, in June, that we would sign a player from each of Real Madrid and Dortmund. Upon hearing this, JPSC challenged him to put his username on the line, for a full season"
This statement indicates the bet hedges on not one but two transfers, one from each team mentioned to us?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It indicates that they should both be allowed to keep the crux of their user name(MUDD & JSPC) but must add a tagline.
The tagline should be decided by:
1) An article suggesting which names are best suited
2) Following feedback from *1, a vote for each username.
posted on 26/8/14
I suggest that they swap names. Simples.
posted on 26/8/14
comment by Juan Matador (U17834)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by Dunc - the master of disguises (U11713)
posted 9 minutes ago
Mudds should be
W&R has had more séx with goats in the last 9 months than MUDD has had with his Mrs
that way W&R is confirmed as a lover of molesty farm animals, and MUDD is confirmed as an ugly who's own Mrs wont even touch him
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
On what basis do you come to the conclusion that W&R has fun time with farm animals? Cause he's Indian?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
he admitted it, and there is photographic evidence f him and his "bride" on their wedding night
i hope youre not suggesting I am racist
posted on 26/8/14
Can I just put it out there that if this ends up being close, I'm happy to sell my vote.
posted on 26/8/14
http://www.ja606.co.uk/articles/viewArticle/276973
posted on 26/8/14
comment by M.U.D.D (U9612)
posted 16 minutes ago
Exhibit H: Arab our twitter expert ..,
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Being called a twitter expert, is there anything less cool?
I'll vote, just cause he seems outnumbered here..
posted on 26/8/14
I have submitted a pre-contract vote.
posted on 26/8/14
comment by Dunc - the master of disguises (U11713)
posted 58 seconds ago
comment by Juan Matador (U17834)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by Dunc - the master of disguises (U11713)
posted 9 minutes ago
Mudds should be
W&R has had more séx with goats in the last 9 months than MUDD has had with his Mrs
that way W&R is confirmed as a lover of molesty farm animals, and MUDD is confirmed as an ugly who's own Mrs wont even touch him
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
On what basis do you come to the conclusion that W&R has fun time with farm animals? Cause he's Indian?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
he admitted it, and there is photographic evidence f him and his "bride" on their wedding night
i hope youre not suggesting I am racist
----------------------------------------------------------------------
JSPC is W&R?
That explains a lot for me
posted on 26/8/14
Mudd.
posted on 26/8/14
The case also hinges on the following:
Why would di Maria sign a pre-contract before Real had shown any interest in James the main reason why he was allowed to leave? He was at that point still very important to the CL holders.
posted on 26/8/14
Mudd's should be
Man Utd Daredevil - i once smuggled a vuvuzela into OT... thats how i got my name
posted on 26/8/14
comment by Mon Dieu - Suarez is football cancer. (U16840)
posted 2 minutes ago
http://www.ja606.co.uk/articles/viewArticle/276973
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you read that article and the comments, you can clearly see it was tongue in cheek
posted on 26/8/14
comment by manutd1982 (U6633)
posted 1 minute ago
The case also hinges on the following:
Why would di Maria sign a pre-contract before Real had shown any interest in James the main reason why he was allowed to leave? He was at that point still very important to the CL holders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How are we supposed to establish that? I told you to ask Angel when he signed
posted on 26/8/14
"Why would di Maria sign a pre-contract before Real had shown any interest in James the main reason why he was allowed to leave? "
More pertinently than that, I ask again how he could have possibly signed a precontract anyway.
posted on 26/8/14
comment by Dunc - the master of disguises (U11713)
posted 21 seconds ago
Mudd's should be
Man Utd Daredevil - i once smuggled a vuvuzela into OT... thats how i got my name
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not nearly bad enough for such an accusation.
That is like giving a murderer a tickle on the tummy for a punishment.
posted on 26/8/14
I reckon if someone has to change their user name, it should just be the tag line after the main name. I don't think everyone appreciates how confusing these name changes are for older forum members like VC and Macca.
Page 2 of 5