Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Jus more cases of u being wrong martial. Ir mental
comment by BWFCCLEGG (U7583)
posted 1 minute ago
Finally! Some sense
----------------------------------------------------------------------
come to think of it who was senna
-------------- fluck me thats a tricky one
Yeh the youtube clip, the drawing, the investigstion itself.
But nooooo means diddly squat to the exalted chosen one
comment by BWFCCLEGG (U7583)
posted 3 minutes ago
Yeh the youtube clip, the drawing, the investigstion itself.
But nooooo means diddly squat to the exalted chosen one
----------------------------------------------------------------------
--------- oh that you tube clip , that was about as believable as the buzzy thing that flew into hamiltons eye ball at monaco
http://www.f1technical.net/development/382
I mean no flexing ever, not.even a hint of it
comment by BWFCCLEGG (U7583)
posted 3 minutes ago
http://www.f1technical.net/development/382
I mean no flexing ever, not.even a hint of it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
what am i looking at -- a doctored film clip that keep on repeating itself every half a second -
---------- yeh thats really conclusive
So martial, please provide conclusive evidence to validate the following
Monaco is low downforce
Vettels wing didnt flex
Rosberg is as quick as hamilton
Lewis and ayrton share no similarities
Any conclusive evidence for any of those wud be great
Thanks in advance
comment by BWFCCLEGG (U7583)
posted 8 minutes ago
So martial, please provide conclusive evidence to validate the following
Monaco is low downforce
Vettels wing didnt flex
Rosberg is as quick as hamilton
Lewis and ayrton share no similarities
Any conclusive evidence for any of those wud be great
Thanks in advance
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you seriously expect me to troll the internet to find meaningless links to keep you happy at this time of night -
---------- if you have a problem with my opinion it is up to you to disprove it
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
I see my Nemesis is causing havoc again. He says I'm running away, but reading his posts it just proves the point that there IS no point trying to debate with him.
He is an arrogant fool. How dare he say that he is the only one on here who has seen all Senna's and Hamilton's careers, and therefore the only one qualified to comment. I have watched F1 since the early 70s and know as much or mire than that fool. But he won't accept anybody else's opinions or points of view, even when presented with hard evidence. Instead he reverts to type accusing others of insulting him, whilst it is him who generally starts on the insults. Hence why I can no longer be bothered to interact with him, he is a waste of time.
Go on MA make your usual childish comments about me getting involved in your discussions. Well I'm not. Just stating my opinion about the biggest idiot on this board who just happens to be you. And THIS doesn't constitute 'running away'.
comment by Just Shoot (U10408)
posted 4 hours, 42 minutes ago
Hamilton has lost more championships than he has won. Even the one he won is a bit tarnished due to Piquet gate.
----------
The only f1 driveer who has won more championships than he has lost is Vettel and they are all tarnished because of the BD/EBD and him getting schooled by Ricciardo.
What Piquet incident are you referring to if you do not mind me asking?
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Just Shoot (U10408)
posted 25 seconds ago
Singapore. Massa leading, Piquet crashes, Ferrari panic, championship lost.
Hamilton Vs Loeb?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah! I see, how does that tarnish it for Hamilton? I'm confused.
If we want to play that game, can we go back to 2007 and Spa and talk about that incident?
I can sort of see where JS thinks Singapore affected the outcome of the championship. If Massa had won that one then he probably would have won WDC. However to say it tarnished Hamilton's WDC is a joke.
The incident took place on lap 14. The reason Massa didn't win that race was because as JS said Ferrari messed up. Now if it had been HK who had crashed and not NPj then THAT would have tarnished LH, unless JS is expanding the conspiracy to include him.
That should be 2008. Just had my first cup of coffee
comment by martial artist (U9033)
posted 9 hours, 32 minutes ago
comment by BWFCCLEGG (U7583)
posted 8 minutes ago
So martial, please provide conclusive evidence to validate the following
Monaco is low downforce
Vettels wing didnt flex
Rosberg is as quick as hamilton
Lewis and ayrton share no similarities
Any conclusive evidence for any of those wud be great
Thanks in advance
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you seriously expect me to troll the internet to find meaningless links to keep you happy at this time of night -
---------- if you have a problem with my opinion it is up to you to disprove it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Martial, i have presented my argument, and given reasons and evidence to support. So would u be so kind to do the same re u opinion.
Otherwise it isnt a debate, its people making opinions, n u saying, nope not true. Oh why martial...just isnt, really, why do u think different martial, just do. Well thats stupud martial, stop with the silly insults u wudnt dare debate with me.
In fact martial, its u who wont debate with us
I have created an interesting article if I do say so myself about facts and opinions.
I highly recommend it
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
"as somebody who has seen the full career of senna and lewis ( to date) i am probably the only person on the forum who can make an accurate comparison , and you are right , there are no similarities that i can see ".
WRONG! On both counts. You are not and there are.
Go figure.
Love Irish
comment by go-cellino-go (U6730)
posted 20 hours, 51 minutes ago
I see my Nemesis is causing havoc again. He says I'm running away, but reading his posts it just proves the point that there IS no point trying to debate with him.
He is an arrogant fool. How dare he say that he is the only one on here who has seen all Senna's and Hamilton's careers, and therefore the only one qualified to comment. I have watched F1 since the early 70s and know as much or mire than that fool. But he won't accept anybody else's opinions or points of view, even when presented with hard evidence. Instead he reverts to type accusing others of insulting him, whilst it is him who generally starts on the insults. Hence why I can no longer be bothered to interact with him, he is a waste of time.
Go on MA make your usual childish comments about me getting involved in your discussions. Well I'm not. Just stating my opinion about the biggest idiot on this board who just happens to be you. And THIS doesn't constitute 'running away'.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
oh dear --- another one who ran away from me a few weeks ago because he was to gutless to debate rosberg with me , so now just hides behind his computer screen calling me idiotic names -
----------- pitiful
comment by BWFCCLEGG (U7583)
posted 11 hours, 45 minutes ago
comment by martial artist (U9033)
posted 9 hours, 32 minutes ago
comment by BWFCCLEGG (U7583)
posted 8 minutes ago
So martial, please provide conclusive evidence to validate the following
Monaco is low downforce
Vettels wing didnt flex
Rosberg is as quick as hamilton
Lewis and ayrton share no similarities
Any conclusive evidence for any of those wud be great
Thanks in advance
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you seriously expect me to troll the internet to find meaningless links to keep you happy at this time of night -
---------- if you have a problem with my opinion it is up to you to disprove it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Martial, i have presented my argument, and given reasons and evidence to support. So would u be so kind to do the same re u opinion.
Otherwise it isnt a debate, its people making opinions, n u saying, nope not true. Oh why martial...just isnt, really, why do u think different martial, just do. Well thats stupud martial, stop with the silly insults u wudnt dare debate with me.
In fact martial, its u who wont debate with us
----------------------------------------------------------------------
come on then bw -- here i am my old son if you want a debate ,
lets take one point at a time , repeat one point at a time,
------------------- over to you
Let's debate Senna martial, eh?
Poles?
Career points?
First car?
Manager?
Indy car team he tested for?
To be continued....................Tick tock..........
Lewis and ayrton share similiarities
Sign in if you want to comment
Senna and Hamilton again nooooo!!
Page 3 of 7
6 | 7
posted on 25/9/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 25/9/14
Jus more cases of u being wrong martial. Ir mental
posted on 25/9/14
comment by BWFCCLEGG (U7583)
posted 1 minute ago
Finally! Some sense
----------------------------------------------------------------------
come to think of it who was senna
-------------- fluck me thats a tricky one
posted on 25/9/14
Yeh the youtube clip, the drawing, the investigstion itself.
But nooooo means diddly squat to the exalted chosen one
posted on 25/9/14
comment by BWFCCLEGG (U7583)
posted 3 minutes ago
Yeh the youtube clip, the drawing, the investigstion itself.
But nooooo means diddly squat to the exalted chosen one
----------------------------------------------------------------------
--------- oh that you tube clip , that was about as believable as the buzzy thing that flew into hamiltons eye ball at monaco
posted on 25/9/14
http://www.f1technical.net/development/382
I mean no flexing ever, not.even a hint of it
posted on 25/9/14
comment by BWFCCLEGG (U7583)
posted 3 minutes ago
http://www.f1technical.net/development/382
I mean no flexing ever, not.even a hint of it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
what am i looking at -- a doctored film clip that keep on repeating itself every half a second -
---------- yeh thats really conclusive
posted on 25/9/14
So martial, please provide conclusive evidence to validate the following
Monaco is low downforce
Vettels wing didnt flex
Rosberg is as quick as hamilton
Lewis and ayrton share no similarities
Any conclusive evidence for any of those wud be great
Thanks in advance
posted on 25/9/14
...............?
posted on 25/9/14
comment by BWFCCLEGG (U7583)
posted 8 minutes ago
So martial, please provide conclusive evidence to validate the following
Monaco is low downforce
Vettels wing didnt flex
Rosberg is as quick as hamilton
Lewis and ayrton share no similarities
Any conclusive evidence for any of those wud be great
Thanks in advance
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you seriously expect me to troll the internet to find meaningless links to keep you happy at this time of night -
---------- if you have a problem with my opinion it is up to you to disprove it
posted on 25/9/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 26/9/14
I see my Nemesis is causing havoc again. He says I'm running away, but reading his posts it just proves the point that there IS no point trying to debate with him.
He is an arrogant fool. How dare he say that he is the only one on here who has seen all Senna's and Hamilton's careers, and therefore the only one qualified to comment. I have watched F1 since the early 70s and know as much or mire than that fool. But he won't accept anybody else's opinions or points of view, even when presented with hard evidence. Instead he reverts to type accusing others of insulting him, whilst it is him who generally starts on the insults. Hence why I can no longer be bothered to interact with him, he is a waste of time.
Go on MA make your usual childish comments about me getting involved in your discussions. Well I'm not. Just stating my opinion about the biggest idiot on this board who just happens to be you. And THIS doesn't constitute 'running away'.
posted on 26/9/14
comment by Just Shoot (U10408)
posted 4 hours, 42 minutes ago
Hamilton has lost more championships than he has won. Even the one he won is a bit tarnished due to Piquet gate.
----------
The only f1 driveer who has won more championships than he has lost is Vettel and they are all tarnished because of the BD/EBD and him getting schooled by Ricciardo.
What Piquet incident are you referring to if you do not mind me asking?
posted on 26/9/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 26/9/14
comment by Just Shoot (U10408)
posted 25 seconds ago
Singapore. Massa leading, Piquet crashes, Ferrari panic, championship lost.
Hamilton Vs Loeb?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah! I see, how does that tarnish it for Hamilton? I'm confused.
If we want to play that game, can we go back to 2007 and Spa and talk about that incident?
posted on 26/9/14
I can sort of see where JS thinks Singapore affected the outcome of the championship. If Massa had won that one then he probably would have won WDC. However to say it tarnished Hamilton's WDC is a joke.
The incident took place on lap 14. The reason Massa didn't win that race was because as JS said Ferrari messed up. Now if it had been HK who had crashed and not NPj then THAT would have tarnished LH, unless JS is expanding the conspiracy to include him.
posted on 26/9/14
That should be 2008. Just had my first cup of coffee
posted on 26/9/14
comment by martial artist (U9033)
posted 9 hours, 32 minutes ago
comment by BWFCCLEGG (U7583)
posted 8 minutes ago
So martial, please provide conclusive evidence to validate the following
Monaco is low downforce
Vettels wing didnt flex
Rosberg is as quick as hamilton
Lewis and ayrton share no similarities
Any conclusive evidence for any of those wud be great
Thanks in advance
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you seriously expect me to troll the internet to find meaningless links to keep you happy at this time of night -
---------- if you have a problem with my opinion it is up to you to disprove it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Martial, i have presented my argument, and given reasons and evidence to support. So would u be so kind to do the same re u opinion.
Otherwise it isnt a debate, its people making opinions, n u saying, nope not true. Oh why martial...just isnt, really, why do u think different martial, just do. Well thats stupud martial, stop with the silly insults u wudnt dare debate with me.
In fact martial, its u who wont debate with us
posted on 26/9/14
I have created an interesting article if I do say so myself about facts and opinions.
I highly recommend it
posted on 26/9/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 26/9/14
"as somebody who has seen the full career of senna and lewis ( to date) i am probably the only person on the forum who can make an accurate comparison , and you are right , there are no similarities that i can see ".
WRONG! On both counts. You are not and there are.
Go figure.
Love Irish
posted on 26/9/14
comment by go-cellino-go (U6730)
posted 20 hours, 51 minutes ago
I see my Nemesis is causing havoc again. He says I'm running away, but reading his posts it just proves the point that there IS no point trying to debate with him.
He is an arrogant fool. How dare he say that he is the only one on here who has seen all Senna's and Hamilton's careers, and therefore the only one qualified to comment. I have watched F1 since the early 70s and know as much or mire than that fool. But he won't accept anybody else's opinions or points of view, even when presented with hard evidence. Instead he reverts to type accusing others of insulting him, whilst it is him who generally starts on the insults. Hence why I can no longer be bothered to interact with him, he is a waste of time.
Go on MA make your usual childish comments about me getting involved in your discussions. Well I'm not. Just stating my opinion about the biggest idiot on this board who just happens to be you. And THIS doesn't constitute 'running away'.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
oh dear --- another one who ran away from me a few weeks ago because he was to gutless to debate rosberg with me , so now just hides behind his computer screen calling me idiotic names -
----------- pitiful
posted on 26/9/14
comment by BWFCCLEGG (U7583)
posted 11 hours, 45 minutes ago
comment by martial artist (U9033)
posted 9 hours, 32 minutes ago
comment by BWFCCLEGG (U7583)
posted 8 minutes ago
So martial, please provide conclusive evidence to validate the following
Monaco is low downforce
Vettels wing didnt flex
Rosberg is as quick as hamilton
Lewis and ayrton share no similarities
Any conclusive evidence for any of those wud be great
Thanks in advance
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you seriously expect me to troll the internet to find meaningless links to keep you happy at this time of night -
---------- if you have a problem with my opinion it is up to you to disprove it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Martial, i have presented my argument, and given reasons and evidence to support. So would u be so kind to do the same re u opinion.
Otherwise it isnt a debate, its people making opinions, n u saying, nope not true. Oh why martial...just isnt, really, why do u think different martial, just do. Well thats stupud martial, stop with the silly insults u wudnt dare debate with me.
In fact martial, its u who wont debate with us
----------------------------------------------------------------------
come on then bw -- here i am my old son if you want a debate ,
lets take one point at a time , repeat one point at a time,
------------------- over to you
posted on 26/9/14
Let's debate Senna martial, eh?
Poles?
Career points?
First car?
Manager?
Indy car team he tested for?
To be continued....................Tick tock..........
posted on 26/9/14
Lewis and ayrton share similiarities
Page 3 of 7
6 | 7