comment by M.U.D.D - Luke Shaw makes me throb with desire (U9612)
posted 33 minutes ago
I would like intelligent debate with fact based opinions
----------------------------------------------------------------------
what you mean to say is you want people to agree with your opinions all the time and anybody that does"nt is the anti christ
Pot kettle black. Hmmm you can't make some if thus up.
No, I have said what I mean. I have debates with most on here who have opposing views and it is fine.
Nothing wrong with that.
Having opposing views is fine, having daft ones and somehow thinking a daft view is correct and beyond reproach is idiotic.
That is why you generally get into arguments with everyone on here.
OK MA, when I am able to remove the filter I have placed on you, lets have an adult discussion. I shan't say debate as the rules of debating, online or otherwise, are too restrictive for here.
So lets just use common sense.
You pick the subject, unfortunately as this is an open forum everyone else can be involved. I promise not insult you, either by name calling or belittling you. You have to promise to do likewise, so no 'schoolgirl', 'drunk' or 'crawling out from under rocks' comments. Nor any 'pal', 'bruvvrs' or other condescending remarks.
You reckon you can manage that?
Not sure when the filter can be removed but it can't be long now. But it will give you plenty of time to think of something we can all get our teeth into.
Deal?
What does filtering actually do?
Filtering just stops you from seeing someones posts when you are signed in. It also means you cannot post on that persons thread. However you can read that persons posts or threads when you are not signed in.
Bit pointless but when signed in it does stop the facile and childish posts getting on your nerves.
Just back ma.
Are you having a laugh? Told you before Wiki is crap.
" you insult my intelligence irish and it makes you look foolish on here mate -
65 ,610 ,jakobi , penske , first car was a little formula ford thing or whatever -
now keep your side of the bargain and dont run away like you did last time ".
Ma, do yourself a favour, shusssshhhh! The pain will go away. Just stop useing wiki.
" you insult my intelligence irish and it makes you look foolish on here mate ".
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Feckin hell......the above cracks me up.....
comment by Irishgreen (U3215)
posted 14 hours, 14 minutes ago
Just back ma.
Are you having a laugh? Told you before Wiki is crap.
" you insult my intelligence irish and it makes you look foolish on here mate -
65 ,610 ,jakobi , penske , first car was a little formula ford thing or whatever -
now keep your side of the bargain and dont run away like you did last time ".
Ma, do yourself a favour, shusssshhhh! The pain will go away. Just stop useing wiki.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
problem is irish you fire infantile quizzes at me which i reply to but dont respond when i invite your similarities between lewis and senna
comment by M.U.D.D - Luke Shaw makes me throb with desire (U9612)
posted 15 hours, 25 minutes ago
No, I have said what I mean. I have debates with most on here who have opposing views and it is fine.
Nothing wrong with that.
Having opposing views is fine, having daft ones and somehow thinking a daft view is correct and beyond reproach is idiotic.
That is why you generally get into arguments with everyone on here.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
99% of the infantile arguments start off with people hurling unprovoked and needless insults in my direction manx hence i respond with my trade mark sarcasm and cutting wit which only exacerbates things -
aside from that my opinions and logic are no less valid than other"s on here
Of course, we all provoke you, poor innocent martial
comment by go-cellino-go (U6730)
posted 15 hours, 47 minutes ago
OK MA, when I am able to remove the filter I have placed on you, lets have an adult discussion. I shan't say debate as the rules of debating, online or otherwise, are too restrictive for here.
So lets just use common sense.
You pick the subject, unfortunately as this is an open forum everyone else can be involved. I promise not insult you, either by name calling or belittling you. You have to promise to do likewise, so no 'schoolgirl', 'drunk' or 'crawling out from under rocks' comments. Nor any 'pal', 'bruvvrs' or other condescending remarks.
You reckon you can manage that?
Not sure when the filter can be removed but it can't be long now. But it will give you plenty of time to think of something we can all get our teeth into.
Deal?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
good morning go cell
hey ---- i am the pure and undiluted mr forgive and forget on here , people treat me with respect and drop the schoolgirl gossiping and insults and they receive respect back from me 100% all the time , if you put my history under the microscope i dont believe i have ever initiated the infantility that abounds on here -
--------- strict code of ethics and all that --
however moving on ----------- i am sure we can have many enjoyable discussions and i dare say disagreements about F1 related topics that may be posted on here , that said dont expect me to change my opinion if i believe i am correct ( something that nobody else here does anyway hence the inevitable usual disrespect that is normally lobbed my way when my logical brain goes into overdrive )
look forward to restarting F1 related deliberations with you again
comment by M.U.D.D - Luke Shaw makes me throb with desire (U9612)
posted 34 minutes ago
Of course, we all provoke you, poor innocent martial
----------------------------------------------------------------------
see manx --- that is exactly the kind of unprovoked needless comment i am talking about and you have just proved my point mate
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Just Shoot (U10408)
posted 10 minutes ago
MA, it seems we are not in favour of Hamilton being comparable to Senna, which led me to think who I would compare Lewis to. Hakkinen.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
to be honest i think mika hakk was probably better than lewis and i certainly would put mika right up there with schumacher at his peak , in fact i personally think mika hakk was better than micheal at his peak -
to be honest lewis for me is a carbon copy of nigel mansell on many levels and that is very high praise indeed --
Sign in if you want to comment
Senna and Hamilton again nooooo!!
Page 7 of 7
6 | 7
posted on 27/9/14
comment by M.U.D.D - Luke Shaw makes me throb with desire (U9612)
posted 33 minutes ago
I would like intelligent debate with fact based opinions
----------------------------------------------------------------------
what you mean to say is you want people to agree with your opinions all the time and anybody that does"nt is the anti christ
posted on 27/9/14
Pot kettle black. Hmmm you can't make some if thus up.
posted on 27/9/14
No, I have said what I mean. I have debates with most on here who have opposing views and it is fine.
Nothing wrong with that.
Having opposing views is fine, having daft ones and somehow thinking a daft view is correct and beyond reproach is idiotic.
That is why you generally get into arguments with everyone on here.
posted on 27/9/14
Spot on mudd
posted on 27/9/14
OK MA, when I am able to remove the filter I have placed on you, lets have an adult discussion. I shan't say debate as the rules of debating, online or otherwise, are too restrictive for here.
So lets just use common sense.
You pick the subject, unfortunately as this is an open forum everyone else can be involved. I promise not insult you, either by name calling or belittling you. You have to promise to do likewise, so no 'schoolgirl', 'drunk' or 'crawling out from under rocks' comments. Nor any 'pal', 'bruvvrs' or other condescending remarks.
You reckon you can manage that?
Not sure when the filter can be removed but it can't be long now. But it will give you plenty of time to think of something we can all get our teeth into.
Deal?
posted on 27/9/14
What does filtering actually do?
posted on 27/9/14
Filtering just stops you from seeing someones posts when you are signed in. It also means you cannot post on that persons thread. However you can read that persons posts or threads when you are not signed in.
posted on 27/9/14
Bit pointless but when signed in it does stop the facile and childish posts getting on your nerves.
posted on 27/9/14
Just back ma.
Are you having a laugh? Told you before Wiki is crap.
" you insult my intelligence irish and it makes you look foolish on here mate -
65 ,610 ,jakobi , penske , first car was a little formula ford thing or whatever -
now keep your side of the bargain and dont run away like you did last time ".
Ma, do yourself a favour, shusssshhhh! The pain will go away. Just stop useing wiki.
posted on 27/9/14
" you insult my intelligence irish and it makes you look foolish on here mate ".
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Feckin hell......the above cracks me up.....
posted on 28/9/14
comment by Irishgreen (U3215)
posted 14 hours, 14 minutes ago
Just back ma.
Are you having a laugh? Told you before Wiki is crap.
" you insult my intelligence irish and it makes you look foolish on here mate -
65 ,610 ,jakobi , penske , first car was a little formula ford thing or whatever -
now keep your side of the bargain and dont run away like you did last time ".
Ma, do yourself a favour, shusssshhhh! The pain will go away. Just stop useing wiki.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
problem is irish you fire infantile quizzes at me which i reply to but dont respond when i invite your similarities between lewis and senna
posted on 28/9/14
comment by M.U.D.D - Luke Shaw makes me throb with desire (U9612)
posted 15 hours, 25 minutes ago
No, I have said what I mean. I have debates with most on here who have opposing views and it is fine.
Nothing wrong with that.
Having opposing views is fine, having daft ones and somehow thinking a daft view is correct and beyond reproach is idiotic.
That is why you generally get into arguments with everyone on here.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
99% of the infantile arguments start off with people hurling unprovoked and needless insults in my direction manx hence i respond with my trade mark sarcasm and cutting wit which only exacerbates things -
aside from that my opinions and logic are no less valid than other"s on here
posted on 28/9/14
Of course, we all provoke you, poor innocent martial
posted on 28/9/14
comment by go-cellino-go (U6730)
posted 15 hours, 47 minutes ago
OK MA, when I am able to remove the filter I have placed on you, lets have an adult discussion. I shan't say debate as the rules of debating, online or otherwise, are too restrictive for here.
So lets just use common sense.
You pick the subject, unfortunately as this is an open forum everyone else can be involved. I promise not insult you, either by name calling or belittling you. You have to promise to do likewise, so no 'schoolgirl', 'drunk' or 'crawling out from under rocks' comments. Nor any 'pal', 'bruvvrs' or other condescending remarks.
You reckon you can manage that?
Not sure when the filter can be removed but it can't be long now. But it will give you plenty of time to think of something we can all get our teeth into.
Deal?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
good morning go cell
hey ---- i am the pure and undiluted mr forgive and forget on here , people treat me with respect and drop the schoolgirl gossiping and insults and they receive respect back from me 100% all the time , if you put my history under the microscope i dont believe i have ever initiated the infantility that abounds on here -
--------- strict code of ethics and all that --
however moving on ----------- i am sure we can have many enjoyable discussions and i dare say disagreements about F1 related topics that may be posted on here , that said dont expect me to change my opinion if i believe i am correct ( something that nobody else here does anyway hence the inevitable usual disrespect that is normally lobbed my way when my logical brain goes into overdrive )
look forward to restarting F1 related deliberations with you again
posted on 28/9/14
comment by M.U.D.D - Luke Shaw makes me throb with desire (U9612)
posted 34 minutes ago
Of course, we all provoke you, poor innocent martial
----------------------------------------------------------------------
see manx --- that is exactly the kind of unprovoked needless comment i am talking about and you have just proved my point mate
posted on 28/9/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 28/9/14
comment by Just Shoot (U10408)
posted 10 minutes ago
MA, it seems we are not in favour of Hamilton being comparable to Senna, which led me to think who I would compare Lewis to. Hakkinen.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
to be honest i think mika hakk was probably better than lewis and i certainly would put mika right up there with schumacher at his peak , in fact i personally think mika hakk was better than micheal at his peak -
to be honest lewis for me is a carbon copy of nigel mansell on many levels and that is very high praise indeed --
Page 7 of 7
6 | 7