Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by THE ACE FACE (U18814)
posted 5 minutes ago
Let's be frank about this; women are generally less intelligent, physically weaker and less skilled than men. Women's sports are token events to keep the feminists happy, but only a small % would give a toss if any woman's sport was disbanded. The mens games are infinitely more popular because the men are better at them, thus they command much more sponsorship & TV money, thus the participants earn more. Men built the world while women were having babies - we deserve a bigger slice of the pie. I have nothing against women in their proper place, but I can't accept them demanding equal pay just because they've got a pair of títs, they've got to earn it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
<roflr>
Seriously these feminists are p!ssing me off.
Women are pretty much equal in all walks of life now, give up, the world is good, now you're just pushing for women to get an advantage over men.
Please, for the love of god, fack off.
comment by THE ACE FACE (U18814)
posted 27 minutes ago
Let's be frank about this; women are generally less intelligent, physically weaker and less skilled than men. Women's sports are token events to keep the feminists happy, but only a small % would give a toss if any woman's sport was disbanded. The mens games are infinitely more popular because the men are better at them, thus they command much more sponsorship & TV money, thus the participants earn more. Men built the world while women were having babies - we deserve a bigger slice of the pie. I have nothing against women in their proper place, but I can't accept them demanding equal pay just because they've got a pair of títs, they've got to earn it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Someone print Ace's comment and pin it on the door of the women's institute
2 Chambz you are funny!Women deserve equal pay as they are superb athletes in the entire world like men are on Earth.
I don't think women's sports should be subsidised by men's.
However I do think any woman good enough to compete in the men's league should be allowed to do so.
Football is a prime candidate for this, because while women are generally less muscular than men, football isn't always about the strongest or the fastest.
And don't give me that tosh about men would be too gallant to risk injuring a female opponent.
I played mixed ice-hockey at university, and exactly no f4cks were given by any player about hurting or being hurt by the opposite gender.
And a lot of you are incredibly stupidly ignorantly wrong about this issue:
it's NOT about comparing the best women football players with the best men football players.
It is that the best female football players are BETTER than many of the male players but still GET PAID LESS!
Besides wouldn't it be better for us, the fans, if our teams were represented by the best footballers available, instead of just the best male ones x
I agree with X THOUGH ONLY FEW WOMEN WOULD BE GOOD ENOUGH TO EVEN PLAY FOR LEAGUE 2 TEAMS!
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
If none would be good enough than there is no reason to bar them from playing.
Even if they were only good enough to play in League Two, those are still professional players earning an average of around £50k p.a.
And of course logically opening the men's game up to women would produce better female footballers; greater financial rewards means less players would be lost to other professions x
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
One thing Sepp Blatter got right:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/3402519.stm
comment by Ji Sung Park's Cousin - twice the posts in half the time (U2958)
posted 4 minutes ago
One thing Sepp Blatter got right:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/3402519.stm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
the audacity. We have become so much more pc than when that was written 10 years ago. Now he would be torn to shreds with comments like that
Sign in if you want to comment
Lets get all chauvinistic.....oink, oink!
Page 5 of 7
6 | 7
posted on 28/10/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 28/10/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 28/10/14
comment by THE ACE FACE (U18814)
posted 5 minutes ago
Let's be frank about this; women are generally less intelligent, physically weaker and less skilled than men. Women's sports are token events to keep the feminists happy, but only a small % would give a toss if any woman's sport was disbanded. The mens games are infinitely more popular because the men are better at them, thus they command much more sponsorship & TV money, thus the participants earn more. Men built the world while women were having babies - we deserve a bigger slice of the pie. I have nothing against women in their proper place, but I can't accept them demanding equal pay just because they've got a pair of títs, they've got to earn it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
<roflr>
posted on 28/10/14
FFS
*
posted on 28/10/14
Seriously these feminists are p!ssing me off.
Women are pretty much equal in all walks of life now, give up, the world is good, now you're just pushing for women to get an advantage over men.
Please, for the love of god, fack off.
posted on 28/10/14
comment by THE ACE FACE (U18814)
posted 27 minutes ago
Let's be frank about this; women are generally less intelligent, physically weaker and less skilled than men. Women's sports are token events to keep the feminists happy, but only a small % would give a toss if any woman's sport was disbanded. The mens games are infinitely more popular because the men are better at them, thus they command much more sponsorship & TV money, thus the participants earn more. Men built the world while women were having babies - we deserve a bigger slice of the pie. I have nothing against women in their proper place, but I can't accept them demanding equal pay just because they've got a pair of títs, they've got to earn it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 28/10/14
Someone print Ace's comment and pin it on the door of the women's institute
posted on 28/10/14
2 Chambz you are funny!Women deserve equal pay as they are superb athletes in the entire world like men are on Earth.
posted on 28/10/14
I don't think women's sports should be subsidised by men's.
However I do think any woman good enough to compete in the men's league should be allowed to do so.
Football is a prime candidate for this, because while women are generally less muscular than men, football isn't always about the strongest or the fastest.
And don't give me that tosh about men would be too gallant to risk injuring a female opponent.
I played mixed ice-hockey at university, and exactly no f4cks were given by any player about hurting or being hurt by the opposite gender.
And a lot of you are incredibly stupidly ignorantly wrong about this issue:
it's NOT about comparing the best women football players with the best men football players.
It is that the best female football players are BETTER than many of the male players but still GET PAID LESS!
Besides wouldn't it be better for us, the fans, if our teams were represented by the best footballers available, instead of just the best male ones x
posted on 28/10/14
I agree with X THOUGH ONLY FEW WOMEN WOULD BE GOOD ENOUGH TO EVEN PLAY FOR LEAGUE 2 TEAMS!
posted on 28/10/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 28/10/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 28/10/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 28/10/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 28/10/14
Lol C Cup!
posted on 28/10/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 28/10/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 28/10/14
If none would be good enough than there is no reason to bar them from playing.
Even if they were only good enough to play in League Two, those are still professional players earning an average of around £50k p.a.
And of course logically opening the men's game up to women would produce better female footballers; greater financial rewards means less players would be lost to other professions x
posted on 28/10/14
gay
posted on 28/10/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 28/10/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 28/10/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 28/10/14
Fack 'em.
posted on 28/10/14
One thing Sepp Blatter got right:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/3402519.stm
posted on 28/10/14
comment by Ji Sung Park's Cousin - twice the posts in half the time (U2958)
posted 4 minutes ago
One thing Sepp Blatter got right:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/3402519.stm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
the audacity. We have become so much more pc than when that was written 10 years ago. Now he would be torn to shreds with comments like that
Page 5 of 7
6 | 7