Comment deleted by Site Moderator
So many lies in one post its difficult to know where to start but let's start at Broughton who was recommended by Purslow
=========================================================
Er....Purslow was appointed by Hicks and Gillett, in an attempt to appease RBS. But he didn't appease them enough, and RBS appointed Broughton. Purslow wasn't happy about it, there is no way he "recommended" Broughton, he was imposed by RBS.
By this point, Hicks was trying to sack Purslow so that he could put his own family in total control and take a more aggressive line, so Purslow was hardly in a position to "recommend" anybody. That's the point at which Purslow switched sides, but what he really wanted was to stay in control himself.
The irony is that Broughton is a Chelsea fan, and Purslow a Liverpool fan, but we prefer Broughton.
By the way, what is this book you're reading about Liverpool?...is it the Brian Reade one?
You just dress it all up in hyperbole
=====================================================
Another happy chappy...
(What's surprising is that you're capable of conversation....I'd never have guessed that from the previous posts I've seen of yours).
Where's the hyperbole? What did I exaggerate?
comment by Wessie Road (U10652)
posted 9 minutes ago
So many lies in one post its difficult to know where to start but let's start at Broughton who was recommended by Purslow
=========================================================
Er....Purslow was appointed by Hicks and Gillett, in an attempt to appease RBS. But he didn't appease them enough, and RBS appointed Broughton. Purslow wasn't happy about it, there is no way he "recommended" Broughton, he was imposed by RBS.
By this point, Hicks was trying to sack Purslow so that he could put his own family in total control and take a more aggressive line, so Purslow was hardly in a position to "recommend" anybody. That's the point at which Purslow switched sides, but what he really wanted was to stay in control himself.
The irony is that Broughton is a Chelsea fan, and Purslow a Liverpool fan, but we prefer Broughton.
By the way, what is this book you're reading about Liverpool?...is it the Brian Reade one?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No the great Paul Tomkins who so many of you revere.
If you're trying to tell me he's got it all wrong then you're more stupid than I gave you credit for.
Wessie Road has owned the real Cha'vs in this thread. I don't need to add to this
comment by (Kash) Coutinho's (lack off) Through Ball - Justice4Gaza (U1108)
posted 1 minute ago
Wessie Road has owned the real Cha'vs in this thread. I don't need to add to this
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Owned?
I've posted quotes showing he's lied.
You scaly.I saw what you tried there.
(Kash) Coutinho's (lack off) Through Ball - Justice4Gaza (U1108)
posted 9 minutes ago
Wessie Road has owned the real Cha'vs in this thread. I don't need to add to this
==============
i agree he,s routed this cyber twit
No the great Paul Tomkins who so many of you revere.
======================================================
Which book is it?
comment by (Kash) Coutinho's (lack off) Through Ball... (U1108)
posted 16 minutes ago
Wessie Road has owned the real Cha'vs in this thread. I don't need to add to this
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well it can only be one of them can't it and I'm going to take a wild stab in the dark and say that he's not actually read it at all.
comment by Wessie Road (U10652)
posted 3 minutes ago
No the great Paul Tomkins who so many of you revere.
======================================================
Which book is it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The one that quotes Broughton as saying administration was a real possibility. Something I posted a link to and you still haven't had the good grace to say you were wrong about.
comment by Robbing_Hoody - Sometimes I choose my words carefully during a debate to suit my argument (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
Well it can only be one of them can't it and I'm going to take a wild stab in the dark and say that he's not actually read it at all.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would I need to read it all to see exact quotes from Broughton and others?
You dippers just can't ever admit you've lied even when everyone can follow the link to the quotes. It's bizarre it really is.
Why would I need to read it all
========================
To add credence to the statement you made about reading the book. Obviously.
comment by Robbing_Hoody - Sometimes I choose my words carefully during a debate to suit my argument (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
Why would I need to read it all
========================
To add credence to the statement you made about reading the book. Obviously.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Go and read what i said.
Oh let me help you
"Funny you should say that as I was just reading extracts from a book"
You know what extracts means right?
ffs you make yourself look dim. You only had to look back at what i posted.
The one that quotes Broughton as saying administration was a real possibility. Something I posted a link to and you still haven't had the good grace to say you were wrong about.
=========================================================
You mean that link to an article on 'ThisisAnfield'? But you said you've been reading excerpts from a book, and what I was asking you was which book it was.
Is that article taken from a book? If so, which book is it? .....that's all I'm asking.
As for the article....you see the bit where it says:
“ the club would not enter administration as it is a profitable and solvent company”?
They were after Kop Holdings, the holding company and H & G vehicle...not the club.
There is speculation in that article that it would have amounted to the same thing, and that Liverpool would have been deducted points (and Broughton understandably played that up when he was arguing his case), but it turned out that wouldn’t have happened, and Broughton later said he was clear about that:
"The aim of the regulations is primarily to capture clubs who have gone into insolvency. This is manifestly not the case with Liverpool Football Club."
http://www.theguardian.com/football/2010/oct/06/liverpool-fc-sale-tom-hicks
Say My Name (U18558)
I don't think you are reading extracts from Tomkins at all. I think you're posting links from a terrible paper like the Mail.
To be honest it's clear to me you don't know what you're talking about but I do find it amusing that Purslow is an LFC fan and his dad is a scouser considering the tone and context of your thread.
Say My Name having his usual shocker!
comment by Robbing_Hoody - Sometimes I choose my words ca... (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
Say My Name (U18558)
I don't think you are reading extracts from Tomkins at all. I think you're posting links from a terrible paper like the Mail.
To be honest it's clear to me you don't know what you're talking about but I do find it amusing that Purslow is an LFC fan and his dad is a scouser considering the tone and context of your thread.
Say My Name having his usual shocker!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Denial
comment by Wessie Road (U10652)
posted 9 minutes ago
The one that quotes Broughton as saying administration was a real possibility. Something I posted a link to and you still haven't had the good grace to say you were wrong about.
=========================================================
You mean that link to an article on 'ThisisAnfield'? But you said you've been reading excerpts from a book, and what I was asking you was which book it was.
Is that article taken from a book? If so, which book is it? .....that's all I'm asking.
As for the article....you see the bit where it says:
“ the club would not enter administration as it is a profitable and solvent company”?
They were after Kop Holdings, the holding company and H & G vehicle...not the club.
There is speculation in that article that it would have amounted to the same thing, and that Liverpool would have been deducted points (and Broughton understandably played that up when he was arguing his case), but it turned out that wouldn’t have happened, and Broughton later said he was clear about that:
"The aim of the regulations is primarily to capture clubs who have gone into insolvency. This is manifestly not the case with Liverpool Football Club."
http://www.theguardian.com/football/2010/oct/06/liverpool-fc-sale-tom-hicks
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Trying hard but see zero relevance to this pile of horse sh.te. You have the quote that shows you lied. Actually you have 2 quotes that show you lied.
"It's a terrific club, it's a fantastic group of people, fantastic fans, the atmosphere will be electric again now and I'll look forward to coming back to Liverpool on a frequent basis and, after Chelsea's result, it will always be the result I look out for"
Martin Broughton
What a fine specimen of a Chelsea fan that man is, hats off to him, he did us proud. I think he'd be horrified by the Beavis & Butthead tone of this article, but he's probably a bit more cheerful than some of the posters on here
comment by Robbing_Hoody - Sometimes I choose my words carefully during a debate to suit my argument (U6374)
posted 7 minutes ago
Say My Name (U18558)
I don't think you are reading extracts from Tomkins at all. I think you're posting links from a terrible paper like the Mail.
To be honest it's clear to me you don't know what you're talking about but I do find it amusing that Purslow is an LFC fan and his dad is a scouser considering the tone and context of your thread.
Say My Name having his usual shocker!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Honest to god you are the most class bunch of liars.
You get shown up to be a complete bell because you couldn't even remember what i said and then babble some sh.te about Purslows dad which has zero to do with Purslow saving your sorry as.s club from administration.
I was completely right.
Classless club Classless fans and you have reinforced that 10 fold.
comment by Wessie Road (U10652)
posted 38 seconds ago
"It's a terrific club, it's a fantastic group of people, fantastic fans, the atmosphere will be electric again now and I'll look forward to coming back to Liverpool on a frequent basis and, after Chelsea's result, it will always be the result I look out for"
Martin Broughton
What a fine specimen of a Chelsea fan that man is, hats off to him, he did us proud. I think he'd be horrified by the Beavis & Butthead tone of this article, but he's probably a bit more cheerful than some of the posters on here
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly, class from him horseshte from you.
Exactly, class from him horseshte from you
========================================================
More cheerful class from the man who quotes as his evidence an article in which it says:
“the club would not enter administration as it is a profitable and solvent company"
A Chelsea season ticket holder and Chelsea employee saved Liverpool from administration so we could have moments like StevieMe's slip,"We go again" and those embarrassing flag waving victory parades.
You can trash them all you like,we thank them for these great times.
“It [administration] could happen, yes,”
comment by Wessie Road (U10652)
posted 3 minutes ago
Exactly, class from him horseshte from you
========================================================
More cheerful class from the man who quotes as his evidence an article in which it says:
“the club would not enter administration as it is a profitable and solvent company"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thats not even a quote from Broughton just text from the writer
Here's a tip for future reference quotes are highlighted with "quote" these.
You idiot.
Sign in if you want to comment
Worlds most classless club at it again.
Page 2 of 5
posted on 29/10/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 29/10/14
So many lies in one post its difficult to know where to start but let's start at Broughton who was recommended by Purslow
=========================================================
Er....Purslow was appointed by Hicks and Gillett, in an attempt to appease RBS. But he didn't appease them enough, and RBS appointed Broughton. Purslow wasn't happy about it, there is no way he "recommended" Broughton, he was imposed by RBS.
By this point, Hicks was trying to sack Purslow so that he could put his own family in total control and take a more aggressive line, so Purslow was hardly in a position to "recommend" anybody. That's the point at which Purslow switched sides, but what he really wanted was to stay in control himself.
The irony is that Broughton is a Chelsea fan, and Purslow a Liverpool fan, but we prefer Broughton.
By the way, what is this book you're reading about Liverpool?...is it the Brian Reade one?
posted on 29/10/14
You just dress it all up in hyperbole
=====================================================
Another happy chappy...
(What's surprising is that you're capable of conversation....I'd never have guessed that from the previous posts I've seen of yours).
Where's the hyperbole? What did I exaggerate?
posted on 29/10/14
comment by Wessie Road (U10652)
posted 9 minutes ago
So many lies in one post its difficult to know where to start but let's start at Broughton who was recommended by Purslow
=========================================================
Er....Purslow was appointed by Hicks and Gillett, in an attempt to appease RBS. But he didn't appease them enough, and RBS appointed Broughton. Purslow wasn't happy about it, there is no way he "recommended" Broughton, he was imposed by RBS.
By this point, Hicks was trying to sack Purslow so that he could put his own family in total control and take a more aggressive line, so Purslow was hardly in a position to "recommend" anybody. That's the point at which Purslow switched sides, but what he really wanted was to stay in control himself.
The irony is that Broughton is a Chelsea fan, and Purslow a Liverpool fan, but we prefer Broughton.
By the way, what is this book you're reading about Liverpool?...is it the Brian Reade one?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No the great Paul Tomkins who so many of you revere.
If you're trying to tell me he's got it all wrong then you're more stupid than I gave you credit for.
posted on 29/10/14
Wessie Road has owned the real Cha'vs in this thread. I don't need to add to this
posted on 29/10/14
comment by (Kash) Coutinho's (lack off) Through Ball - Justice4Gaza (U1108)
posted 1 minute ago
Wessie Road has owned the real Cha'vs in this thread. I don't need to add to this
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Owned?
I've posted quotes showing he's lied.
You scaly.I saw what you tried there.
posted on 29/10/14
(Kash) Coutinho's (lack off) Through Ball - Justice4Gaza (U1108)
posted 9 minutes ago
Wessie Road has owned the real Cha'vs in this thread. I don't need to add to this
==============
i agree he,s routed this cyber twit
posted on 29/10/14
No the great Paul Tomkins who so many of you revere.
======================================================
Which book is it?
posted on 29/10/14
comment by (Kash) Coutinho's (lack off) Through Ball... (U1108)
posted 16 minutes ago
Wessie Road has owned the real Cha'vs in this thread. I don't need to add to this
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 29/10/14
Well it can only be one of them can't it and I'm going to take a wild stab in the dark and say that he's not actually read it at all.
posted on 29/10/14
comment by Wessie Road (U10652)
posted 3 minutes ago
No the great Paul Tomkins who so many of you revere.
======================================================
Which book is it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The one that quotes Broughton as saying administration was a real possibility. Something I posted a link to and you still haven't had the good grace to say you were wrong about.
posted on 29/10/14
comment by Robbing_Hoody - Sometimes I choose my words carefully during a debate to suit my argument (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
Well it can only be one of them can't it and I'm going to take a wild stab in the dark and say that he's not actually read it at all.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would I need to read it all to see exact quotes from Broughton and others?
You dippers just can't ever admit you've lied even when everyone can follow the link to the quotes. It's bizarre it really is.
posted on 29/10/14
Why would I need to read it all
========================
To add credence to the statement you made about reading the book. Obviously.
posted on 29/10/14
comment by Robbing_Hoody - Sometimes I choose my words carefully during a debate to suit my argument (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
Why would I need to read it all
========================
To add credence to the statement you made about reading the book. Obviously.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Go and read what i said.
Oh let me help you
"Funny you should say that as I was just reading extracts from a book"
You know what extracts means right?
ffs you make yourself look dim. You only had to look back at what i posted.
posted on 29/10/14
The one that quotes Broughton as saying administration was a real possibility. Something I posted a link to and you still haven't had the good grace to say you were wrong about.
=========================================================
You mean that link to an article on 'ThisisAnfield'? But you said you've been reading excerpts from a book, and what I was asking you was which book it was.
Is that article taken from a book? If so, which book is it? .....that's all I'm asking.
As for the article....you see the bit where it says:
“ the club would not enter administration as it is a profitable and solvent company”?
They were after Kop Holdings, the holding company and H & G vehicle...not the club.
There is speculation in that article that it would have amounted to the same thing, and that Liverpool would have been deducted points (and Broughton understandably played that up when he was arguing his case), but it turned out that wouldn’t have happened, and Broughton later said he was clear about that:
"The aim of the regulations is primarily to capture clubs who have gone into insolvency. This is manifestly not the case with Liverpool Football Club."
http://www.theguardian.com/football/2010/oct/06/liverpool-fc-sale-tom-hicks
posted on 29/10/14
Say My Name (U18558)
I don't think you are reading extracts from Tomkins at all. I think you're posting links from a terrible paper like the Mail.
To be honest it's clear to me you don't know what you're talking about but I do find it amusing that Purslow is an LFC fan and his dad is a scouser considering the tone and context of your thread.
Say My Name having his usual shocker!
posted on 29/10/14
comment by Robbing_Hoody - Sometimes I choose my words ca... (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
Say My Name (U18558)
I don't think you are reading extracts from Tomkins at all. I think you're posting links from a terrible paper like the Mail.
To be honest it's clear to me you don't know what you're talking about but I do find it amusing that Purslow is an LFC fan and his dad is a scouser considering the tone and context of your thread.
Say My Name having his usual shocker!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Denial
posted on 29/10/14
comment by Wessie Road (U10652)
posted 9 minutes ago
The one that quotes Broughton as saying administration was a real possibility. Something I posted a link to and you still haven't had the good grace to say you were wrong about.
=========================================================
You mean that link to an article on 'ThisisAnfield'? But you said you've been reading excerpts from a book, and what I was asking you was which book it was.
Is that article taken from a book? If so, which book is it? .....that's all I'm asking.
As for the article....you see the bit where it says:
“ the club would not enter administration as it is a profitable and solvent company”?
They were after Kop Holdings, the holding company and H & G vehicle...not the club.
There is speculation in that article that it would have amounted to the same thing, and that Liverpool would have been deducted points (and Broughton understandably played that up when he was arguing his case), but it turned out that wouldn’t have happened, and Broughton later said he was clear about that:
"The aim of the regulations is primarily to capture clubs who have gone into insolvency. This is manifestly not the case with Liverpool Football Club."
http://www.theguardian.com/football/2010/oct/06/liverpool-fc-sale-tom-hicks
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Trying hard but see zero relevance to this pile of horse sh.te. You have the quote that shows you lied. Actually you have 2 quotes that show you lied.
posted on 29/10/14
"It's a terrific club, it's a fantastic group of people, fantastic fans, the atmosphere will be electric again now and I'll look forward to coming back to Liverpool on a frequent basis and, after Chelsea's result, it will always be the result I look out for"
Martin Broughton
What a fine specimen of a Chelsea fan that man is, hats off to him, he did us proud. I think he'd be horrified by the Beavis & Butthead tone of this article, but he's probably a bit more cheerful than some of the posters on here
posted on 29/10/14
comment by Robbing_Hoody - Sometimes I choose my words carefully during a debate to suit my argument (U6374)
posted 7 minutes ago
Say My Name (U18558)
I don't think you are reading extracts from Tomkins at all. I think you're posting links from a terrible paper like the Mail.
To be honest it's clear to me you don't know what you're talking about but I do find it amusing that Purslow is an LFC fan and his dad is a scouser considering the tone and context of your thread.
Say My Name having his usual shocker!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Honest to god you are the most class bunch of liars.
You get shown up to be a complete bell because you couldn't even remember what i said and then babble some sh.te about Purslows dad which has zero to do with Purslow saving your sorry as.s club from administration.
I was completely right.
Classless club Classless fans and you have reinforced that 10 fold.
posted on 29/10/14
comment by Wessie Road (U10652)
posted 38 seconds ago
"It's a terrific club, it's a fantastic group of people, fantastic fans, the atmosphere will be electric again now and I'll look forward to coming back to Liverpool on a frequent basis and, after Chelsea's result, it will always be the result I look out for"
Martin Broughton
What a fine specimen of a Chelsea fan that man is, hats off to him, he did us proud. I think he'd be horrified by the Beavis & Butthead tone of this article, but he's probably a bit more cheerful than some of the posters on here
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly, class from him horseshte from you.
posted on 29/10/14
Exactly, class from him horseshte from you
========================================================
More cheerful class from the man who quotes as his evidence an article in which it says:
“the club would not enter administration as it is a profitable and solvent company"
posted on 29/10/14
A Chelsea season ticket holder and Chelsea employee saved Liverpool from administration so we could have moments like StevieMe's slip,"We go again" and those embarrassing flag waving victory parades.
You can trash them all you like,we thank them for these great times.
posted on 29/10/14
“It [administration] could happen, yes,”
posted on 29/10/14
comment by Wessie Road (U10652)
posted 3 minutes ago
Exactly, class from him horseshte from you
========================================================
More cheerful class from the man who quotes as his evidence an article in which it says:
“the club would not enter administration as it is a profitable and solvent company"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thats not even a quote from Broughton just text from the writer
Here's a tip for future reference quotes are highlighted with "quote" these.
You idiot.
Page 2 of 5