comment by Robbing_Hoody - Sometimes I choose my words ca... (U6374)
posted 15 minutes ago
I have a highly successful job with a blue chip company and the only thing you have left is that you think people shouldn't have a few beers during a CL match against Real Madrid. Good God.
Bore off you sad no-mark.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Justifying your whole existence to a stranger on an anonymous forum
TheWhiteWall (U17633)
Sigh. No not really but you sanctimoniously saying people should raise their standards when I highly suspect you're some feckless no-mark doesn't really hold much weight does it. Perhaps raise your own standards rather than trolling LFC? Didn't you write about 6 articles in 15 hours about Liverpool Football Club?
I reckon you're quite lonely in all truth.
comment by Robbing_Hoody - Sometimes I choose my words ca... (U6374)
posted 3 seconds ago
TheWhiteWall (U17633)
Sigh. No not really but you sanctimoniously saying people should raise their standards when I highly suspect you're some feckless no-mark doesn't really hold much weight does it. Perhaps raise your own standards rather than trolling LFC? Didn't you write about 6 articles in 15 hours about Liverpool Football Club?
I reckon you're quite lonely in all truth.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Calm down
It wasn't a comeback I was genuinely wanting to thank you for being so stupid.
Taking text from some no mark Liverpool blogger and trying to pass it off as a genuine quote takes more stupidity than I can comprehend
===========================================================
Oh, that’s strange. When you were quoting from it, it was an extract from a book you didn’t know the name of, but if I quote from the exact same article, it’s suddenly a “no mark Liverpool blogger”.....bright boy, aren’t you?
Even if it is a “no mark Liverpool blogger”, you quoted from it first, and in any case it was accompanied by a quote from a Premier League source in the Guardian saying exactly the same thing.....yer eejit.
comment by Robbing_Hoody - Sometimes I choose my words carefully during a debate to suit my argument (U6374)
posted 7 minutes ago
TheWhiteWall (U17633)
Sigh. No not really but you sanctimoniously saying people should raise their standards when I highly suspect you're some feckless no-mark doesn't really hold much weight does it. Perhaps raise your own standards rather than trolling LFC? Didn't you write about 6 articles in 15 hours about Liverpool Football Club?
I reckon you're quite lonely in all truth.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Says the dipper on the Chelsea board 24/7
Mind you I am sure when you saw the article title you knew it was about Liverpool.
comment by Wessie Road (U10652)
posted 17 seconds ago
It wasn't a comeback I was genuinely wanting to thank you for being so stupid.
Taking text from some no mark Liverpool blogger and trying to pass it off as a genuine quote takes more stupidity than I can comprehend
===========================================================
Oh, that’s strange. When you were quoting from it, it was an extract from a book you didn’t know the name of, but if I quote from the exact same article, it’s suddenly a “no mark Liverpool blogger”.....bright boy, aren’t you?
Even if it is a “no mark Liverpool blogger”, you quoted from it first, and in any case it was accompanied by a quote from a Premier League source in the Guardian saying exactly the same thing.....yer eejit.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But I actually quoted Broughton who is quoted in the article you dipsh.t
You just lied about everything.
Never get a board ban though, because we aren't great big cissy tell tales who can't take it.
comment by Wessie Road (U10652)
posted 5 minutes ago
It wasn't a comeback I was genuinely wanting to thank you for being so stupid.
Taking text from some no mark Liverpool blogger and trying to pass it off as a genuine quote takes more stupidity than I can comprehend
===========================================================
Oh, that’s strange. When you were quoting from it, it was an extract from a book you didn’t know the name of, but if I quote from the exact same article, it’s suddenly a “no mark Liverpool blogger”.....bright boy, aren’t you?
Even if it is a “no mark Liverpool blogger”, you quoted from it first, and in any case it was accompanied by a quote from a Premier League source in the Guardian saying exactly the same thing.....yer eejit.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You have surpassed yourself again.
The only quote in the Guardian article is from an anonymous premier league source.
You are truly the dumbest poster on here. Not once but twice you've done it now.
Funny as fc.uk
But I actually quoted Broughton who is quoted in the article you dipsh.t
=======================================================
So you took a quote provided to you by a "no mark Liverpool blogger", then?
Wessie an anonymous premier league source just told me. Liverpool are classless.
Must be true.
The only quote in the Guardian article is from an anonymous premier league source.
======================================================
Whereas a quote provided by you, which you got from a "no mark Liverpool blogger", and purporting to be from a book that you still don't know the name of, is obviously solid gold, compared to a quote taken from a national newspaper.
comment by Wessie Road (U10652)
posted 2 minutes ago
But I actually quoted Broughton who is quoted in the article you dipsh.t
=======================================================
So you took a quote provided to you by a "no mark Liverpool blogger", then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What source do you want to see it from?
As it's a recorded interview he gave and was carried in all the nationals,bbc and echo you tell me which one you want to see it in.
A no mark blogger can read and copy a quote even if he is scouse.
As it's a recorded interview he gave and was carried in all the nationals,bbc and echo you tell me which one you want to see it in.
========================================================
Perhaps you should have quoted it from there, then, rather than takling it from a "no mark Liverpool blogger", before questioning my source when I quoted from the exact same article.
If it's an unreliable source, why would the bits he puts in quotation marks be any more reliable than the rest of it?
It wouldn't have made any difference to the argument anyway, but it would have made you look a bit less of a d.ickwad.
comment by Wessie Road (U10652)
posted 2 minutes ago
The only quote in the Guardian article is from an anonymous premier league source.
======================================================
Whereas a quote provided by you, which you got from a "no mark Liverpool blogger", and purporting to be from a book that you still don't know the name of, is obviously solid gold, compared to a quote taken from a national newspaper.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What ya going to say now?
http://www.theguardian.com/football/2010/oct/09/liverpool-john-w-henry
comment by Wessie Road (U10652)
posted 15 seconds ago
As it's a recorded interview he gave and was carried in all the nationals,bbc and echo you tell me which one you want to see it in.
========================================================
Perhaps you should have quoted it from there, then, rather than takling it from a "no mark Liverpool blogger", before questioning my source when I quoted from the exact same article.
If it's an unreliable source, why would the bits he puts in quotation marks be any more reliable than the rest of it?
It wouldn't have made any difference to the argument anyway, but it would have made you look a bit less of a d.ickwad.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A quote is a quote. thats why they have quotation marks. Unlike you who puts them round some no mark blogger and tries to pass it off as if it means something.
You have been made to look a complete dish.te 3 times now and still you come back. I have to ask if you are mentally stable.
Wessie
Thanks for totally proving my article correct.
You have behaved with zero class despite being a proved a liar and despite trying to hoodwink people with nonexistent quotes.
You and your classless club are a laughing stock.
A quote is a quote. thats why they have quotation marks
==========================================================
Not when it comes from a source which you believe to be unreliable, it isn't.
"I think Say My Name is a bit thick, to be honest"
Martin Broughton.
You believe that quote, because I put quotation marks around it?
You have behaved with zero class despite being a proved a liar and despite trying to hoodwink people with nonexistent quotes.
You and your classless club are a laughing stock.
========================================================
Whereas that post exemplified all the qualities of 'class'
im glad we get under your plastic skin
I can't stand them, most people I have met that support Liverpool turn out to be general pratts. They're easily the most bitter and twisted fans in the world of football.
The way they behave aswel, which will be shown on the 8th Nov when we play them will sum them up perfectly.
Horrible disgusting sccummy football team and the only football club I can honestly say I hate. I dislike United, Leeds and QPR but that bunch are an appalling scrutty sccummy council estates lazy chavy bunch human beings.
now...mulitply that by 1000 and thats what we think of ye..
How can one clubs board contain, SMN, TCP and whitewall? It breaks all normal demographics.
the chelsea board has the biggest ratio of simpeltons with the smallest amount of board users...
worst fans on ja606 ......
by a mile
comment by THE MISSILE (U13008)
posted 1 hour, 52 minutes ago
How can one clubs board contain, SMN, TCP and whitewall? It breaks all normal demographics.
the chelsea board has the biggest ratio of simpeltons with the smallest amount of board users...
worst fans on ja606 ......
by a mile
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yet here you are
The is a wum snowball thrown at liverpool
im a liverpool fan...
Therefore...1 and 1 = 2
the chelsea board has the biggest ratio of simpeltons with the smallest amount of board users...
worst fans on ja606 ......
by a mile
-------
Statistically you are correct. Every clubs board has a f'ktarded element, but percentage wise the flammable flag wavers are easily out in front.
Worst fans on ja606
Not sure you can even those three fans can you seeing as they "follow" Liverpool.
Sign in if you want to comment
Worlds most classless club at it again.
Page 4 of 5
posted on 29/10/14
comment by Robbing_Hoody - Sometimes I choose my words ca... (U6374)
posted 15 minutes ago
I have a highly successful job with a blue chip company and the only thing you have left is that you think people shouldn't have a few beers during a CL match against Real Madrid. Good God.
Bore off you sad no-mark.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Justifying your whole existence to a stranger on an anonymous forum
posted on 29/10/14
TheWhiteWall (U17633)
Sigh. No not really but you sanctimoniously saying people should raise their standards when I highly suspect you're some feckless no-mark doesn't really hold much weight does it. Perhaps raise your own standards rather than trolling LFC? Didn't you write about 6 articles in 15 hours about Liverpool Football Club?
I reckon you're quite lonely in all truth.
posted on 29/10/14
comment by Robbing_Hoody - Sometimes I choose my words ca... (U6374)
posted 3 seconds ago
TheWhiteWall (U17633)
Sigh. No not really but you sanctimoniously saying people should raise their standards when I highly suspect you're some feckless no-mark doesn't really hold much weight does it. Perhaps raise your own standards rather than trolling LFC? Didn't you write about 6 articles in 15 hours about Liverpool Football Club?
I reckon you're quite lonely in all truth.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Calm down
posted on 29/10/14
It wasn't a comeback I was genuinely wanting to thank you for being so stupid.
Taking text from some no mark Liverpool blogger and trying to pass it off as a genuine quote takes more stupidity than I can comprehend
===========================================================
Oh, that’s strange. When you were quoting from it, it was an extract from a book you didn’t know the name of, but if I quote from the exact same article, it’s suddenly a “no mark Liverpool blogger”.....bright boy, aren’t you?
Even if it is a “no mark Liverpool blogger”, you quoted from it first, and in any case it was accompanied by a quote from a Premier League source in the Guardian saying exactly the same thing.....yer eejit.
posted on 29/10/14
comment by Robbing_Hoody - Sometimes I choose my words carefully during a debate to suit my argument (U6374)
posted 7 minutes ago
TheWhiteWall (U17633)
Sigh. No not really but you sanctimoniously saying people should raise their standards when I highly suspect you're some feckless no-mark doesn't really hold much weight does it. Perhaps raise your own standards rather than trolling LFC? Didn't you write about 6 articles in 15 hours about Liverpool Football Club?
I reckon you're quite lonely in all truth.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Says the dipper on the Chelsea board 24/7
Mind you I am sure when you saw the article title you knew it was about Liverpool.
posted on 29/10/14
comment by Wessie Road (U10652)
posted 17 seconds ago
It wasn't a comeback I was genuinely wanting to thank you for being so stupid.
Taking text from some no mark Liverpool blogger and trying to pass it off as a genuine quote takes more stupidity than I can comprehend
===========================================================
Oh, that’s strange. When you were quoting from it, it was an extract from a book you didn’t know the name of, but if I quote from the exact same article, it’s suddenly a “no mark Liverpool blogger”.....bright boy, aren’t you?
Even if it is a “no mark Liverpool blogger”, you quoted from it first, and in any case it was accompanied by a quote from a Premier League source in the Guardian saying exactly the same thing.....yer eejit.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But I actually quoted Broughton who is quoted in the article you dipsh.t
You just lied about everything.
posted on 29/10/14
Never get a board ban though, because we aren't great big cissy tell tales who can't take it.
posted on 29/10/14
comment by Wessie Road (U10652)
posted 5 minutes ago
It wasn't a comeback I was genuinely wanting to thank you for being so stupid.
Taking text from some no mark Liverpool blogger and trying to pass it off as a genuine quote takes more stupidity than I can comprehend
===========================================================
Oh, that’s strange. When you were quoting from it, it was an extract from a book you didn’t know the name of, but if I quote from the exact same article, it’s suddenly a “no mark Liverpool blogger”.....bright boy, aren’t you?
Even if it is a “no mark Liverpool blogger”, you quoted from it first, and in any case it was accompanied by a quote from a Premier League source in the Guardian saying exactly the same thing.....yer eejit.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You have surpassed yourself again.
The only quote in the Guardian article is from an anonymous premier league source.
You are truly the dumbest poster on here. Not once but twice you've done it now.
Funny as fc.uk
posted on 29/10/14
But I actually quoted Broughton who is quoted in the article you dipsh.t
=======================================================
So you took a quote provided to you by a "no mark Liverpool blogger", then?
posted on 29/10/14
Wessie an anonymous premier league source just told me. Liverpool are classless.
Must be true.
posted on 29/10/14
The only quote in the Guardian article is from an anonymous premier league source.
======================================================
Whereas a quote provided by you, which you got from a "no mark Liverpool blogger", and purporting to be from a book that you still don't know the name of, is obviously solid gold, compared to a quote taken from a national newspaper.
posted on 29/10/14
comment by Wessie Road (U10652)
posted 2 minutes ago
But I actually quoted Broughton who is quoted in the article you dipsh.t
=======================================================
So you took a quote provided to you by a "no mark Liverpool blogger", then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What source do you want to see it from?
As it's a recorded interview he gave and was carried in all the nationals,bbc and echo you tell me which one you want to see it in.
A no mark blogger can read and copy a quote even if he is scouse.
posted on 29/10/14
As it's a recorded interview he gave and was carried in all the nationals,bbc and echo you tell me which one you want to see it in.
========================================================
Perhaps you should have quoted it from there, then, rather than takling it from a "no mark Liverpool blogger", before questioning my source when I quoted from the exact same article.
If it's an unreliable source, why would the bits he puts in quotation marks be any more reliable than the rest of it?
It wouldn't have made any difference to the argument anyway, but it would have made you look a bit less of a d.ickwad.
posted on 29/10/14
comment by Wessie Road (U10652)
posted 2 minutes ago
The only quote in the Guardian article is from an anonymous premier league source.
======================================================
Whereas a quote provided by you, which you got from a "no mark Liverpool blogger", and purporting to be from a book that you still don't know the name of, is obviously solid gold, compared to a quote taken from a national newspaper.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What ya going to say now?
http://www.theguardian.com/football/2010/oct/09/liverpool-john-w-henry
posted on 29/10/14
comment by Wessie Road (U10652)
posted 15 seconds ago
As it's a recorded interview he gave and was carried in all the nationals,bbc and echo you tell me which one you want to see it in.
========================================================
Perhaps you should have quoted it from there, then, rather than takling it from a "no mark Liverpool blogger", before questioning my source when I quoted from the exact same article.
If it's an unreliable source, why would the bits he puts in quotation marks be any more reliable than the rest of it?
It wouldn't have made any difference to the argument anyway, but it would have made you look a bit less of a d.ickwad.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A quote is a quote. thats why they have quotation marks. Unlike you who puts them round some no mark blogger and tries to pass it off as if it means something.
You have been made to look a complete dish.te 3 times now and still you come back. I have to ask if you are mentally stable.
posted on 29/10/14
Wessie
Thanks for totally proving my article correct.
You have behaved with zero class despite being a proved a liar and despite trying to hoodwink people with nonexistent quotes.
You and your classless club are a laughing stock.
posted on 29/10/14
A quote is a quote. thats why they have quotation marks
==========================================================
Not when it comes from a source which you believe to be unreliable, it isn't.
"I think Say My Name is a bit thick, to be honest"
Martin Broughton.
You believe that quote, because I put quotation marks around it?
posted on 29/10/14
You have behaved with zero class despite being a proved a liar and despite trying to hoodwink people with nonexistent quotes.
You and your classless club are a laughing stock.
========================================================
Whereas that post exemplified all the qualities of 'class'
posted on 29/10/14
im glad we get under your plastic skin
posted on 30/10/14
I can't stand them, most people I have met that support Liverpool turn out to be general pratts. They're easily the most bitter and twisted fans in the world of football.
The way they behave aswel, which will be shown on the 8th Nov when we play them will sum them up perfectly.
Horrible disgusting sccummy football team and the only football club I can honestly say I hate. I dislike United, Leeds and QPR but that bunch are an appalling scrutty sccummy council estates lazy chavy bunch human beings.
now...mulitply that by 1000 and thats what we think of ye..
posted on 30/10/14
How can one clubs board contain, SMN, TCP and whitewall? It breaks all normal demographics.
the chelsea board has the biggest ratio of simpeltons with the smallest amount of board users...
worst fans on ja606 ......
by a mile
posted on 30/10/14
comment by THE MISSILE (U13008)
posted 1 hour, 52 minutes ago
How can one clubs board contain, SMN, TCP and whitewall? It breaks all normal demographics.
the chelsea board has the biggest ratio of simpeltons with the smallest amount of board users...
worst fans on ja606 ......
by a mile
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yet here you are
posted on 30/10/14
The is a wum snowball thrown at liverpool
im a liverpool fan...
Therefore...1 and 1 = 2
posted on 30/10/14
the chelsea board has the biggest ratio of simpeltons with the smallest amount of board users...
worst fans on ja606 ......
by a mile
-------
Statistically you are correct. Every clubs board has a f'ktarded element, but percentage wise the flammable flag wavers are easily out in front.
Worst fans on ja606
posted on 30/10/14
Not sure you can even those three fans can you seeing as they "follow" Liverpool.
Page 4 of 5