Well Flash, in answer to your question there's obviously Villa, followed by Villa and errr well Villa!!
And why would any one hate QPR
But if you insist on three different teams:
Liverpool - just a normal club pre Shankly, who at the peak of the fame used to hoover all the emerging top talent from the rest of the league and who's fan base suddenly rose exponentially from Truro to Trondhiem after a few European Cups and a shed load of Div 1 titles and then have the nerve to call other fans plastic.
Then there's Le Ar$e - since a kid as I hated the name. I grew to dislike them even more because of monsieur 'I didn't see it' and their smug overbearing fans with their false sense of entitlement!
Reply | Add Comment | Complain | Share
comment by White Wall (U1078)
posted 21 hours, 1 minute ago
comment by Mamba - The Master of Disaster, King
of Sting, Dancing Destroyer and Count of Monte
Fisto(U1282) (U13041)
posted 23 seconds ago
For me this changes with time. I never used to
mind Chelsea until I started interacting with
Chelsea fans on here for instance.
-----------------------------------------
-----------------------------
I dont think you can let WUM's on here form your
opinion of a clubs fans.
Reply | Add Comment | Complain | Share
comment by HenrysCat (U3608)
****
Why? People do it on here with Liverpool all the time.
Chelsea, just a normal club pre Roman... whose fan base rose exponentially from Accra to Lagos after the billions got poured in...
comment by SAF_The_Legend-FreePalestine (U5768)
posted 9 hours, 51 minutes ago
comment by Nickalopodis-BoomsObsession (U9257)
posted 6 hours, 53 minutes ago
comment by SAF_The_Legend-FreePalestine (U5768)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by Nickalopodis-BoomsObsession (U9257)
posted 8 minutes ago
Although the hatred drops dramatically as we go down the list. Chelsea is more of a mild dislike, probably more to do with all the favourable decisions they have had over the years.
-----------------------------
Oh the hypocrisy! that is classic.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hypocrisy.... I believe you meant to quote the Chelsea fan who mentioned favourable decisions my good sir.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You are deluded. it is universally known that utd have got decisions in the PL era. Stand out, remarkable decisions that people cannot fathom. pedro mendes goal. michael owen being allowed 55 minutes of extra time against city. penalties in dying seconds that werent. Howard webb pens against chelsea. Ferdinand shove of lampard in the back, going up to nod in for 5 yards out. So many more.
Chelsea have notoriously been done over by refereeing decisions. most notably in europe. Liverpool ghost goal. barcelona penalties. Even this year fabregas getting booked when clearly taken out. Hazard has had a couple stone walls turned down too.
What are you on about? have you started drinking this wekend early?
Chelsea does not go in a sentence with favourable decision.
Even last year when ramires got bundled over people were screaming and hollaring,saying it was a dive. Even though, he just got bundled over
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Deluded till the end...
MOTD even counted the time added for that Owen goal and the minimum the referee should have added was when the ball had already left Owen's foot and heading for the net.
You keep up your deluded fantasies if it makes you feel better. Sound like a damn Liverpool fan, we only lost because the refs favour you
----------------------------------------------------------------------
erm...you said it first...your not very good at this whole talking business are you?
comment by Nickalopodis-BoomsObsession (U9257)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by SAF_The_Legend-FreePalestine (U5768)
posted 9 hours, 51 minutes ago
comment by Nickalopodis-BoomsObsession (U9257)
posted 6 hours, 53 minutes ago
comment by SAF_The_Legend-FreePalestine (U5768)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by Nickalopodis-BoomsObsession (U9257)
posted 8 minutes ago
Although the hatred drops dramatically as we go down the list. Chelsea is more of a mild dislike, probably more to do with all the favourable decisions they have had over the years.
-----------------------------
Oh the hypocrisy! that is classic.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hypocrisy.... I believe you meant to quote the Chelsea fan who mentioned favourable decisions my good sir.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You are deluded. it is universally known that utd have got decisions in the PL era. Stand out, remarkable decisions that people cannot fathom. pedro mendes goal. michael owen being allowed 55 minutes of extra time against city. penalties in dying seconds that werent. Howard webb pens against chelsea. Ferdinand shove of lampard in the back, going up to nod in for 5 yards out. So many more.
Chelsea have notoriously been done over by refereeing decisions. most notably in europe. Liverpool ghost goal. barcelona penalties. Even this year fabregas getting booked when clearly taken out. Hazard has had a couple stone walls turned down too.
What are you on about? have you started drinking this wekend early?
Chelsea does not go in a sentence with favourable decision.
Even last year when ramires got bundled over people were screaming and hollaring,saying it was a dive. Even though, he just got bundled over
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Deluded till the end...
MOTD even counted the time added for that Owen goal and the minimum the referee should have added was when the ball had already left Owen's foot and heading for the net.
You keep up your deluded fantasies if it makes you feel better. Sound like a damn Liverpool fan, we only lost because the refs favour you
----------------------------------------------------------------------
erm...you said it first...your not very good at this whole talking business are you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I said I had a mild dislike because they had some favourable decisions over the years, I didn't go on a tear filled few hundred word rant
comment by Mamba - The Master of Disaster, King of Sting, Dancing Destroyer and Count of Monte Fisto(U1282) (U13041)
posted 1 hour, 18 minutes ago
Chelsea, just a normal club pre Roman... whose fan base rose exponentially from Accra to Lagos after the billions got poured in..
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Obviously not educated enough to produce his own argument.
Don't take Member on Brummie.
He's a Feckin Limpet
He's a feckin limpet that doesn't know about 'Istory'!
That should bring him outta his shell
Chelsea was a no mark club before Roman came along and the financial doping commenced. Now their arrogant fans go around shooting off their big mouths and forgetting where they came from while truth is they have been spoonfed and success has been thrust upon them rather than earned.
and I didn't even touch his mum !
Liverpool were a mid table division 2 club with an ageing squad and ailing stadium, then the doping came along
Arrogant fans, let me tell you about arrogant fans Mamba.
Fans, possibly like you, from Torquay, Luton, Bangkok, Cornwall and New Delhi who wouldn't give a fat rats tail about Liverpool if it hadn't been for the fact that you'd won a load of titles and European cups.
Your average couldn't even match your stadiums capacity in the 70's by a long way. pre 70s your averages were not dissimilar to that of Chelsea or many other 1st division clubs of the time.
Yet you have the tummerity to call other fans 'Arrogant' - your lack of knowledge and ignorance is breathtaking!
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
What a weasel this Mamby Pamby is. You know full well he would act all friendly to your face and stab you in the back when you go to the loo
Anyhow,
Apart from the usual I'll throw Inter Milan in there. Whilst I was only a young kid who knew little to nothing about our semi-final exit to them at the time, they bought their success in a different manner, by bribing the officials!
Cost Shankly a European Cup final.
Yes, he changed everything but we were a sleeping giant so to speak in my opinion.
-------------------------------------------------
The same could be said of dozens of clubs in the 50's Galloping, apart form ourselves, Spurs, West Ham, Villa, B'ham City, Everton, Sheff Wed, Newcastle, Sunderland, Leeds and more.
Liverpool fans, specifically the stero typical ones on boards like these have no idea about the history of Liverpool or other clubs and seem to live in a fantasy world that they have always been superior to the rest of us, when in truth the average Liverpool fan is the same glory hunting plastic they try and make everyone else out to be!
You might understand why Liverpool fans are looked on with some distain in some quarters!
comment by BrummieBlue! (U3487)
posted 2 minutes ago
Yes, he changed everything but we were a sleeping giant so to speak in my opinion.
-------------------------------------------------
The same could be said of dozens of clubs in the 50's Galloping, apart form ourselves, Spurs, West Ham, Villa, B'ham City, Everton, Sheff Wed, Newcastle, Sunderland, Leeds and more.
Liverpool fans, specifically the stero typical ones on boards like these have no idea about the history of Liverpool or other clubs and seem to live in a fantasy world that they have always been superior to the rest of us, when in truth the average Liverpool fan is the same glory hunting plastic they try and make everyone else out to be!
You might understand why Liverpool fans are looked on with some distain in some quarters!
.....................................................................
Of course, reading through this thread we've been listed by nearly every poster!
I accept what you're saying.
At the same time though, regarding history, some fans see a club that had a glorious 30 year period & forget we were successful before then.
You won the league in the 50s Brummie so you weren't a sleeping giant at that time ;
The bluenoses were the leading club in this city till the 60s. In fact I'd go as far to say at that time all things considered they were probably the biggest club in the land. Arguably anyhow.
Sign in if you want to comment
3 Teams you dislike with a passion?
Page 4 of 5
posted on 24/1/15
Well Flash, in answer to your question there's obviously Villa, followed by Villa and errr well Villa!!
And why would any one hate QPR
posted on 24/1/15
But if you insist on three different teams:
Liverpool - just a normal club pre Shankly, who at the peak of the fame used to hoover all the emerging top talent from the rest of the league and who's fan base suddenly rose exponentially from Truro to Trondhiem after a few European Cups and a shed load of Div 1 titles and then have the nerve to call other fans plastic.
Then there's Le Ar$e - since a kid as I hated the name. I grew to dislike them even more because of monsieur 'I didn't see it' and their smug overbearing fans with their false sense of entitlement!
posted on 24/1/15
Reply | Add Comment | Complain | Share
comment by White Wall (U1078)
posted 21 hours, 1 minute ago
comment by Mamba - The Master of Disaster, King
of Sting, Dancing Destroyer and Count of Monte
Fisto(U1282) (U13041)
posted 23 seconds ago
For me this changes with time. I never used to
mind Chelsea until I started interacting with
Chelsea fans on here for instance.
-----------------------------------------
-----------------------------
I dont think you can let WUM's on here form your
opinion of a clubs fans.
Reply | Add Comment | Complain | Share
comment by HenrysCat (U3608)
****
Why? People do it on here with Liverpool all the time.
posted on 24/1/15
Chelsea, just a normal club pre Roman... whose fan base rose exponentially from Accra to Lagos after the billions got poured in...
posted on 24/1/15
Another Bite
posted on 24/1/15
comment by SAF_The_Legend-FreePalestine (U5768)
posted 9 hours, 51 minutes ago
comment by Nickalopodis-BoomsObsession (U9257)
posted 6 hours, 53 minutes ago
comment by SAF_The_Legend-FreePalestine (U5768)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by Nickalopodis-BoomsObsession (U9257)
posted 8 minutes ago
Although the hatred drops dramatically as we go down the list. Chelsea is more of a mild dislike, probably more to do with all the favourable decisions they have had over the years.
-----------------------------
Oh the hypocrisy! that is classic.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hypocrisy.... I believe you meant to quote the Chelsea fan who mentioned favourable decisions my good sir.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You are deluded. it is universally known that utd have got decisions in the PL era. Stand out, remarkable decisions that people cannot fathom. pedro mendes goal. michael owen being allowed 55 minutes of extra time against city. penalties in dying seconds that werent. Howard webb pens against chelsea. Ferdinand shove of lampard in the back, going up to nod in for 5 yards out. So many more.
Chelsea have notoriously been done over by refereeing decisions. most notably in europe. Liverpool ghost goal. barcelona penalties. Even this year fabregas getting booked when clearly taken out. Hazard has had a couple stone walls turned down too.
What are you on about? have you started drinking this wekend early?
Chelsea does not go in a sentence with favourable decision.
Even last year when ramires got bundled over people were screaming and hollaring,saying it was a dive. Even though, he just got bundled over
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Deluded till the end...
MOTD even counted the time added for that Owen goal and the minimum the referee should have added was when the ball had already left Owen's foot and heading for the net.
You keep up your deluded fantasies if it makes you feel better. Sound like a damn Liverpool fan, we only lost because the refs favour you
----------------------------------------------------------------------
erm...you said it first...your not very good at this whole talking business are you?
posted on 24/1/15
comment by Nickalopodis-BoomsObsession (U9257)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by SAF_The_Legend-FreePalestine (U5768)
posted 9 hours, 51 minutes ago
comment by Nickalopodis-BoomsObsession (U9257)
posted 6 hours, 53 minutes ago
comment by SAF_The_Legend-FreePalestine (U5768)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by Nickalopodis-BoomsObsession (U9257)
posted 8 minutes ago
Although the hatred drops dramatically as we go down the list. Chelsea is more of a mild dislike, probably more to do with all the favourable decisions they have had over the years.
-----------------------------
Oh the hypocrisy! that is classic.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hypocrisy.... I believe you meant to quote the Chelsea fan who mentioned favourable decisions my good sir.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You are deluded. it is universally known that utd have got decisions in the PL era. Stand out, remarkable decisions that people cannot fathom. pedro mendes goal. michael owen being allowed 55 minutes of extra time against city. penalties in dying seconds that werent. Howard webb pens against chelsea. Ferdinand shove of lampard in the back, going up to nod in for 5 yards out. So many more.
Chelsea have notoriously been done over by refereeing decisions. most notably in europe. Liverpool ghost goal. barcelona penalties. Even this year fabregas getting booked when clearly taken out. Hazard has had a couple stone walls turned down too.
What are you on about? have you started drinking this wekend early?
Chelsea does not go in a sentence with favourable decision.
Even last year when ramires got bundled over people were screaming and hollaring,saying it was a dive. Even though, he just got bundled over
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Deluded till the end...
MOTD even counted the time added for that Owen goal and the minimum the referee should have added was when the ball had already left Owen's foot and heading for the net.
You keep up your deluded fantasies if it makes you feel better. Sound like a damn Liverpool fan, we only lost because the refs favour you
----------------------------------------------------------------------
erm...you said it first...your not very good at this whole talking business are you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I said I had a mild dislike because they had some favourable decisions over the years, I didn't go on a tear filled few hundred word rant
posted on 24/1/15
comment by Mamba - The Master of Disaster, King of Sting, Dancing Destroyer and Count of Monte Fisto(U1282) (U13041)
posted 1 hour, 18 minutes ago
Chelsea, just a normal club pre Roman... whose fan base rose exponentially from Accra to Lagos after the billions got poured in..
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Obviously not educated enough to produce his own argument.
posted on 24/1/15
Don't take Member on Brummie.
He's a Feckin Limpet
posted on 24/1/15
He's a feckin limpet that doesn't know about 'Istory'!
posted on 24/1/15
That should bring him outta his shell
posted on 24/1/15
posted on 24/1/15
Chelsea was a no mark club before Roman came along and the financial doping commenced. Now their arrogant fans go around shooting off their big mouths and forgetting where they came from while truth is they have been spoonfed and success has been thrust upon them rather than earned.
posted on 24/1/15
Out of his shell TCP!!
posted on 24/1/15
and I didn't even touch his mum !
posted on 24/1/15
Liverpool were a mid table division 2 club with an ageing squad and ailing stadium, then the doping came along
posted on 24/1/15
Arrogant fans, let me tell you about arrogant fans Mamba.
Fans, possibly like you, from Torquay, Luton, Bangkok, Cornwall and New Delhi who wouldn't give a fat rats tail about Liverpool if it hadn't been for the fact that you'd won a load of titles and European cups.
Your average couldn't even match your stadiums capacity in the 70's by a long way. pre 70s your averages were not dissimilar to that of Chelsea or many other 1st division clubs of the time.
Yet you have the tummerity to call other fans 'Arrogant' - your lack of knowledge and ignorance is breathtaking!
posted on 24/1/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 24/1/15
* quarter
posted on 24/1/15
What a weasel this Mamby Pamby is. You know full well he would act all friendly to your face and stab you in the back when you go to the loo
posted on 24/1/15
A bit extreme Wilson
posted on 24/1/15
Anyhow,
Apart from the usual I'll throw Inter Milan in there. Whilst I was only a young kid who knew little to nothing about our semi-final exit to them at the time, they bought their success in a different manner, by bribing the officials!
Cost Shankly a European Cup final.
posted on 24/1/15
Yes, he changed everything but we were a sleeping giant so to speak in my opinion.
-------------------------------------------------
The same could be said of dozens of clubs in the 50's Galloping, apart form ourselves, Spurs, West Ham, Villa, B'ham City, Everton, Sheff Wed, Newcastle, Sunderland, Leeds and more.
Liverpool fans, specifically the stero typical ones on boards like these have no idea about the history of Liverpool or other clubs and seem to live in a fantasy world that they have always been superior to the rest of us, when in truth the average Liverpool fan is the same glory hunting plastic they try and make everyone else out to be!
You might understand why Liverpool fans are looked on with some distain in some quarters!
posted on 24/1/15
Mamba springs to mind
posted on 24/1/15
comment by BrummieBlue! (U3487)
posted 2 minutes ago
Yes, he changed everything but we were a sleeping giant so to speak in my opinion.
-------------------------------------------------
The same could be said of dozens of clubs in the 50's Galloping, apart form ourselves, Spurs, West Ham, Villa, B'ham City, Everton, Sheff Wed, Newcastle, Sunderland, Leeds and more.
Liverpool fans, specifically the stero typical ones on boards like these have no idea about the history of Liverpool or other clubs and seem to live in a fantasy world that they have always been superior to the rest of us, when in truth the average Liverpool fan is the same glory hunting plastic they try and make everyone else out to be!
You might understand why Liverpool fans are looked on with some distain in some quarters!
.....................................................................
Of course, reading through this thread we've been listed by nearly every poster!
I accept what you're saying.
At the same time though, regarding history, some fans see a club that had a glorious 30 year period & forget we were successful before then.
You won the league in the 50s Brummie so you weren't a sleeping giant at that time ;
The bluenoses were the leading club in this city till the 60s. In fact I'd go as far to say at that time all things considered they were probably the biggest club in the land. Arguably anyhow.
Page 4 of 5