comment by The Post Nearly Man. It's like having Dave bloody Sexton back. (U1270)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by Kung Fu Cantona *JeSuisPalestinian* (U18082)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Robb - My good man. (U19350)
posted 2 minutes ago
This is also a country with a history of genocide, why would they care about destroying another race, a perfect opportunity to test a weapon on live subjects.
---------------------------------------------------------
One of the most odious things you've ever said on these pages and that's saying something.
Oh, you do realise that the war between them and the US started because Japan bombed them without warning?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So are you saying that Native Americans just committed mass suicide?
How many black slaves murdered? How many murdered as "free men"?
Just as a side note, Japan did attack without warning but America knew about it....
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/8932197/Pearl-Harbour-memo-shows-US-warned-of-Japanese-attack.html
Make of that what you will.
Regardless they were military targets not civilians, I see no difference between ISIS's actions and Americas in this instance. Both destroying innocent lives to gain advantage, only the nukes are worse.
People only did just die, but infrastructure destroyed and then entire generations of children born with deformities due to nuclear fall out.
Nuking two entire cities is entirely different.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do the sailors killed at Pearl Harbour not count because they were American, or because they were in the navy they should have realised someone could bomb the fúck out of them in peacetime without warning?
You're stretching your well documented politics a bit thin applying them to wwii.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Na
This is how it works.
If you are involved in a war, you target the military NOT women and children or in this case ENTIRE cities.
They day somebody strikes America with nukes, I will stick up for them.
The day somebody attacks America for resources I will stick up for the.
etc etc
I stick up for the down trodden.
When China attack America for resources etc I promise to be the first on here with an article.
When China attack America for resources etc I promise to be the first on here with an article.
-
If that ever happens i'm pretty sure there won't be time to log into ja606 and write an article before the bombs start dropping. Furthermore, the internet would be the first thing to go down if such a large scale war between 2 superpowers kicked off.
^ I've come in late, so it may have been said but... China are actually, surprisingly, one of the 'better' holders of NWs, in that they keep the two major components separate. This stops them using them in a snap decision, takes (dangerous) emotion out the equation
comment by MC P. (U13708)
posted 38 seconds ago
^ I've come in late, so it may have been said but... China are actually, surprisingly, one of the 'better' holders of NWs, in that they keep the two major components separate. This stops them using them in a snap decision, takes (dangerous) emotion out the equation
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They're probably in the next room
It's not really documented much but in 1969 China and Russia very nearly reached nuclear war with each other. Mao forced the building of loads of nuclear shelters in readiness for it.
comment by 🔥💩He's French, He's Flash... I'm sorreh teh say it's Moyseh... (U9335)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by MC P. (U13708)
posted 38 seconds ago
^ I've come in late, so it may have been said but... China are actually, surprisingly, one of the 'better' holders of NWs, in that they keep the two major components separate. This stops them using them in a snap decision, takes (dangerous) emotion out the equation
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They're probably in the next room
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As an international actor China are relatively normal to their credit. But I'm saying nothing about their internal quagmire
comment by Robb - My good man. (U19350)
posted 1 minute ago
It's not really documented much but in 1969 China and Russia very nearly reached nuclear war with each other. Mao forced the building of loads of nuclear shelters in readiness for it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's also not very well documented that in the 70's Sino-Vietnamese War, China felt that any potential Russian retaliation to war with Vietnam (then the USSR's ally) would be of little consequence - They didn't necessarily fear the Russian nuclear arsenal. It lacked credibility.
We'd all be dead anyhow, unless we lived in some of the most remote parts of the planet, where the modern day UK citizen wouldn't have the skills required to survive anyway.
comment by MC P. (U13708)
posted 30 minutes ago
The counter point being we could just avoid getting into these wars and save both lives and money.
===========
Preach brother, preach
"modern day UK citizen wouldn't have the skills required to survive anyway. "
Bóllocks Busby.
You can find out how to do *literally anything* on Google. You'd be fine
comment by Robben #20 (U1145)
posted 44 seconds ago
"modern day UK citizen wouldn't have the skills required to survive anyway. "
Bóllocks Busby.
You can find out how to do *literally anything* on Google. You'd be fine
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Should have realised this would have been a french vs kung fu thread before commenting.
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 3 minutes ago
We'd all be dead anyhow, unless we lived in some of the most remote parts of the planet, where the modern day UK citizen wouldn't have the skills required to survive anyway.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There's a site where you can run simulations of nuclear weapons and their fallout (I'm an IR student, not a mad man... Promise). Anyhow, if you dropped the largest nuclear weapon ever made on Manchester, the fallout would reach well into Norway Puts it in some perspective doesn't it
comment by MC P. (U13708)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 3 minutes ago
We'd all be dead anyhow, unless we lived in some of the most remote parts of the planet, where the modern day UK citizen wouldn't have the skills required to survive anyway.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There's a site where you can run simulations of nuclear weapons and their fallout (I'm an IR student, not a mad man... Promise). Anyhow, if you dropped the largest nuclear weapon ever made on Manchester, the fallout would reach well into NorwayPuts it in some perspective doesn't it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Then maybe Easter Island is the place to be.
POPULAR TODAY
Nuclear War
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by MC P. (U13708)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 3 minutes ago
We'd all be dead anyhow, unless we lived in some of the most remote parts of the planet, where the modern day UK citizen wouldn't have the skills required to survive anyway.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There's a site where you can run simulations of nuclear weapons and their fallout (I'm an IR student, not a mad man... Promise). Anyhow, if you dropped the largest nuclear weapon ever made on Manchester, the fallout would reach well into NorwayPuts it in some perspective doesn't it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Then maybe Easter Island is the place to be.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Or the space station... What a view that'd be haha
comment by newWAYNEorder (U20092)
posted 9 minutes ago
POPULAR TODAY
Nuclear War
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To the bunkers ye oiks.
Anyhow, if you dropped the largest nuclear weapon ever made on Manchester,
---
They did that in Liverpool as an experiment. The locals already bear some kind of strange resistance to the radiation, almost like they'd been exposed before. The bomb is also rumoured to have caused £8.7b worth of improvements.
Dem pink shellsuits were more dan dey seemed, soft lad
FACT - Shell suits offer more protection than a full radiation suit & in the event of a nuclear holocaust, all survivors will be required to wear one.
Rumours that the bomb was launched from a British sub have never been proved.
I've played fallout 3 so if there's a nuclear war id know what to do
The best place to be in case of nuclear war in in the past. Perhaps thirty years.
To the Delorean!
#nuclearwarisbad
#imnotkidding
#reallyreallybad
#IDontThinkYouKnowHowHashTagsWork
Nuclear War
Page 7 of 8
6 | 7 | 8
posted on 3/2/15
comment by The Post Nearly Man. It's like having Dave bloody Sexton back. (U1270)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by Kung Fu Cantona *JeSuisPalestinian* (U18082)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Robb - My good man. (U19350)
posted 2 minutes ago
This is also a country with a history of genocide, why would they care about destroying another race, a perfect opportunity to test a weapon on live subjects.
---------------------------------------------------------
One of the most odious things you've ever said on these pages and that's saying something.
Oh, you do realise that the war between them and the US started because Japan bombed them without warning?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So are you saying that Native Americans just committed mass suicide?
How many black slaves murdered? How many murdered as "free men"?
Just as a side note, Japan did attack without warning but America knew about it....
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/8932197/Pearl-Harbour-memo-shows-US-warned-of-Japanese-attack.html
Make of that what you will.
Regardless they were military targets not civilians, I see no difference between ISIS's actions and Americas in this instance. Both destroying innocent lives to gain advantage, only the nukes are worse.
People only did just die, but infrastructure destroyed and then entire generations of children born with deformities due to nuclear fall out.
Nuking two entire cities is entirely different.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do the sailors killed at Pearl Harbour not count because they were American, or because they were in the navy they should have realised someone could bomb the fúck out of them in peacetime without warning?
You're stretching your well documented politics a bit thin applying them to wwii.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Na
This is how it works.
If you are involved in a war, you target the military NOT women and children or in this case ENTIRE cities.
They day somebody strikes America with nukes, I will stick up for them.
The day somebody attacks America for resources I will stick up for the.
etc etc
I stick up for the down trodden.
When China attack America for resources etc I promise to be the first on here with an article.
posted on 3/2/15
When China attack America for resources etc I promise to be the first on here with an article.
-
If that ever happens i'm pretty sure there won't be time to log into ja606 and write an article before the bombs start dropping. Furthermore, the internet would be the first thing to go down if such a large scale war between 2 superpowers kicked off.
posted on 3/2/15
^ I've come in late, so it may have been said but... China are actually, surprisingly, one of the 'better' holders of NWs, in that they keep the two major components separate. This stops them using them in a snap decision, takes (dangerous) emotion out the equation
posted on 3/2/15
comment by MC P. (U13708)
posted 38 seconds ago
^ I've come in late, so it may have been said but... China are actually, surprisingly, one of the 'better' holders of NWs, in that they keep the two major components separate. This stops them using them in a snap decision, takes (dangerous) emotion out the equation
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They're probably in the next room
posted on 3/2/15
It's not really documented much but in 1969 China and Russia very nearly reached nuclear war with each other. Mao forced the building of loads of nuclear shelters in readiness for it.
posted on 3/2/15
comment by 🔥💩He's French, He's Flash... I'm sorreh teh say it's Moyseh... (U9335)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by MC P. (U13708)
posted 38 seconds ago
^ I've come in late, so it may have been said but... China are actually, surprisingly, one of the 'better' holders of NWs, in that they keep the two major components separate. This stops them using them in a snap decision, takes (dangerous) emotion out the equation
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They're probably in the next room
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As an international actor China are relatively normal to their credit. But I'm saying nothing about their internal quagmire
posted on 3/2/15
comment by Robb - My good man. (U19350)
posted 1 minute ago
It's not really documented much but in 1969 China and Russia very nearly reached nuclear war with each other. Mao forced the building of loads of nuclear shelters in readiness for it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's also not very well documented that in the 70's Sino-Vietnamese War, China felt that any potential Russian retaliation to war with Vietnam (then the USSR's ally) would be of little consequence - They didn't necessarily fear the Russian nuclear arsenal. It lacked credibility.
posted on 3/2/15
We'd all be dead anyhow, unless we lived in some of the most remote parts of the planet, where the modern day UK citizen wouldn't have the skills required to survive anyway.
posted on 3/2/15
comment by MC P. (U13708)
posted 30 minutes ago
The counter point being we could just avoid getting into these wars and save both lives and money.
===========
Preach brother, preach
posted on 3/2/15
"modern day UK citizen wouldn't have the skills required to survive anyway. "
Bóllocks Busby.
You can find out how to do *literally anything* on Google. You'd be fine
posted on 3/2/15
comment by Robben #20 (U1145)
posted 44 seconds ago
"modern day UK citizen wouldn't have the skills required to survive anyway. "
Bóllocks Busby.
You can find out how to do *literally anything* on Google. You'd be fine
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 3/2/15
Should have realised this would have been a french vs kung fu thread before commenting.
posted on 3/2/15
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 3 minutes ago
We'd all be dead anyhow, unless we lived in some of the most remote parts of the planet, where the modern day UK citizen wouldn't have the skills required to survive anyway.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There's a site where you can run simulations of nuclear weapons and their fallout (I'm an IR student, not a mad man... Promise). Anyhow, if you dropped the largest nuclear weapon ever made on Manchester, the fallout would reach well into Norway Puts it in some perspective doesn't it
posted on 3/2/15
comment by MC P. (U13708)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 3 minutes ago
We'd all be dead anyhow, unless we lived in some of the most remote parts of the planet, where the modern day UK citizen wouldn't have the skills required to survive anyway.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There's a site where you can run simulations of nuclear weapons and their fallout (I'm an IR student, not a mad man... Promise). Anyhow, if you dropped the largest nuclear weapon ever made on Manchester, the fallout would reach well into NorwayPuts it in some perspective doesn't it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Then maybe Easter Island is the place to be.
posted on 3/2/15
POPULAR TODAY
Nuclear War
posted on 3/2/15
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by MC P. (U13708)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 3 minutes ago
We'd all be dead anyhow, unless we lived in some of the most remote parts of the planet, where the modern day UK citizen wouldn't have the skills required to survive anyway.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There's a site where you can run simulations of nuclear weapons and their fallout (I'm an IR student, not a mad man... Promise). Anyhow, if you dropped the largest nuclear weapon ever made on Manchester, the fallout would reach well into NorwayPuts it in some perspective doesn't it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Then maybe Easter Island is the place to be.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Or the space station... What a view that'd be haha
posted on 3/2/15
comment by newWAYNEorder (U20092)
posted 9 minutes ago
POPULAR TODAY
Nuclear War
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To the bunkers ye oiks.
posted on 3/2/15
Anyhow, if you dropped the largest nuclear weapon ever made on Manchester,
---
They did that in Liverpool as an experiment. The locals already bear some kind of strange resistance to the radiation, almost like they'd been exposed before. The bomb is also rumoured to have caused £8.7b worth of improvements.
posted on 3/2/15
Dem pink shellsuits were more dan dey seemed, soft lad
posted on 3/2/15
FACT - Shell suits offer more protection than a full radiation suit & in the event of a nuclear holocaust, all survivors will be required to wear one.
posted on 3/2/15
Rumours that the bomb was launched from a British sub have never been proved.
posted on 3/2/15
I've played fallout 3 so if there's a nuclear war id know what to do
posted on 3/2/15
The best place to be in case of nuclear war in in the past. Perhaps thirty years.
To the Delorean!
posted on 3/2/15
#nuclearwarisbad
#imnotkidding
#reallyreallybad
posted on 3/2/15
#IDontThinkYouKnowHowHashTagsWork
Page 7 of 8
6 | 7 | 8