He is.
His name alone makes him better.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Agreed. But Cahill would be a fantastic backup defender, for when injuries come again
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Kos may not be the "household name" that Cahill is, but he fits brilliantly into our team.
Cahill has never played for Arsenal, therefore he cannot be better than Kos. Logic!
Yes!
If koscielny was english, everyone would bum him!
The media are unfair on koscielny, they never highlight how good he is. This is because 1 he is not english and 2 because he dosent fit their ideal of a CB. As he isnt a 6'4 english brute like a shawcross type.
Agreed. But Cahill would be a fantastic backup defender, for when injuries come again
=======
He would
But to sign him and push Kossy out would be madness after his performances last season.
Especially as him and Vermaelen look so bloody good together!
I think they should get married
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
how can there be any debate here? kos is awesome
Cahill won't want to to be back for us. Why don't we use that money to get Dann instead.
*sorry should read "back up for us".
"I read this and just keep shaking my head - obviously people have been watching a very different Koscielny to me"
Yea we have.
We tell him he's first choice, and then issue him with the number 34. That way, we don't need to tell him outright, and he knows the score.
Comparing Koscielny to Cahill is an insult. To Kossy.
Cahill is the best out of the English Cbs we've been linked with but he's nowhere near as good as Kossy or even Vermaelen.
Plus Koscielny has PUNDIT STEALTH.
A super-power in which all of your tabloid reading opponents severely under-estimate your ability.
I really hope Cahill only moves to whoever, if he is guranteed first team football.
It would be a waste to England if he didn't play
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Do arsenal fans just ignore all of koscielny's mistakes? he is good for 80% of the time but he is way too error prone. What is the point of defending well for 70 minutes and then giving your opponent a present of a goal?
This is like the time when Song was better than Essien and Toure
Or like the time when deluded people actualy thought Denilson was vital to our midfield
Or like the time when Almunia was good
Or like the time we didnt need a striker cause we had Bendtner
Or like the time Clichy was better than Cole
Some of you are so bias its unreal.
Sign in if you want to comment
Koscielny > Cahill
Page 1 of 4
posted on 26/8/11
No. just no.
posted on 26/8/11
Yes. just yes.
posted on 26/8/11
He is.
His name alone makes him better.
posted on 26/8/11
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 26/8/11
Agreed. But Cahill would be a fantastic backup defender, for when injuries come again
posted on 26/8/11
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 26/8/11
^No he wasn't.
posted on 26/8/11
Up arrow thingy phayle
posted on 26/8/11
Kos may not be the "household name" that Cahill is, but he fits brilliantly into our team.
Cahill has never played for Arsenal, therefore he cannot be better than Kos. Logic!
posted on 26/8/11
Yes!
If koscielny was english, everyone would bum him!
The media are unfair on koscielny, they never highlight how good he is. This is because 1 he is not english and 2 because he dosent fit their ideal of a CB. As he isnt a 6'4 english brute like a shawcross type.
posted on 26/8/11
Eboue made Fabregas
posted on 26/8/11
Agreed. But Cahill would be a fantastic backup defender, for when injuries come again
=======
He would
But to sign him and push Kossy out would be madness after his performances last season.
posted on 26/8/11
Especially as him and Vermaelen look so bloody good together!
I think they should get married
posted on 26/8/11
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 26/8/11
how can there be any debate here? kos is awesome
posted on 26/8/11
Cahill won't want to to be back for us. Why don't we use that money to get Dann instead.
posted on 26/8/11
*sorry should read "back up for us".
posted on 26/8/11
"I read this and just keep shaking my head - obviously people have been watching a very different Koscielny to me"
Yea we have.
posted on 26/8/11
We tell him he's first choice, and then issue him with the number 34. That way, we don't need to tell him outright, and he knows the score.
posted on 26/8/11
Comparing Koscielny to Cahill is an insult. To Kossy.
Cahill is the best out of the English Cbs we've been linked with but he's nowhere near as good as Kossy or even Vermaelen.
posted on 26/8/11
Plus Koscielny has PUNDIT STEALTH.
A super-power in which all of your tabloid reading opponents severely under-estimate your ability.
posted on 26/8/11
I really hope Cahill only moves to whoever, if he is guranteed first team football.
It would be a waste to England if he didn't play
posted on 26/8/11
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 26/8/11
Do arsenal fans just ignore all of koscielny's mistakes? he is good for 80% of the time but he is way too error prone. What is the point of defending well for 70 minutes and then giving your opponent a present of a goal?
posted on 26/8/11
This is like the time when Song was better than Essien and Toure
Or like the time when deluded people actualy thought Denilson was vital to our midfield
Or like the time when Almunia was good
Or like the time we didnt need a striker cause we had Bendtner
Or like the time Clichy was better than Cole
Some of you are so bias its unreal.
Page 1 of 4