comment by SAF_The_Legend-FreePalestine(7) (U5768)
posted 11 minutes ago
Your persistence in something that apparently means nothing to you is what puzzles me not your choice of subject.
...........................................................

Using your logic though, and based on the fact you have now 2 wrote 2 posts on it, you find me and my views a very important subject...

I am sorry to tell you JDFI I am not interesting in an online relationship with you. Remember now, we are using your logic. To me you have just made 2 posts on a subject you may have only the mildest interest in....

But using your logic, you obviously find me very important

So which is it JFDI?

Am I very important to you?

Or.... is there a chance that posters on an online forum might discuss things they don't see as vitally important?

The latter seems the obvious answer to most....
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Answering any post is important to me, don't worry, you are important to me other wise I'd take the time to trawl through your old posts.

You are just the only person bothered to respond to a generic post from me, I thank you had simply engaged in an exchange with you.

I truly hope you don't think everyone finds you important or seeking a relationship every time that happens, your ego must know no bounds.

comment by SAF_The_Legend-FreePalestine(7) (U5768)
posted 30 seconds ago
Im sure the world was abuzz with talk of the Chelsea Hull game....
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you do know that chelsea game was more balanced than to your one sided boring game

JFDI again I will point out that was using your logic of posting about it means very important to the person.

To me a forum post is very little commitment, very little importance required to make one. You disagree though, apparently me posting on it means the subject must be very important to me...

So, using your logic I am very important to you.

Using my logic I am just some random person you are having a fairly unimportant exchange with...

I now which logic sounds more likely, it isn't yours...

comment by ★★JustAnotherPoster★★ (U10557)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by SAF_The_Legend-FreePalestine(7) (U5768)
posted 30 seconds ago
Im sure the world was abuzz with talk of the Chelsea Hull game....
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you do know that chelsea game was more balanced than to your one sided boring game
----------------------------------------------------------------------

you do know that United play in red usually...

Sorry I just thought I would copy you and post something that had very little relation to the post I replied too...

comment by SAF_The_Legend-FreePalestine(7) (U5768)
posted 43 seconds ago
JFDI again I will point out that was using your logic of posting about it means very important to the person.

To me a forum post is very little commitment, very little importance required to make one. You disagree though, apparently me posting on it means the subject must be very important to me...

So, using your logic I am very important to you.

Using my logic I am just some random person you are having a fairly unimportant exchange with...

I now which logic sounds more likely, it isn't yours...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sounds a legit bent to me

comment by SAF_The_Legend-FreePalestine(7) (U5768)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by ★★JustAnotherPoster★★ (U10557)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by SAF_The_Legend-FreePalestine(7) (U5768)
posted 30 seconds ago
Im sure the world was abuzz with talk of the Chelsea Hull game....
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you do know that chelsea game was more balanced than to your one sided boring game
----------------------------------------------------------------------

you do know that United play in red usually...

Sorry I just thought I would copy you and post something that had very little relation to the post I replied too...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Makes no sense ..try again

comment by ★★JustAnotherPoster★★ (U10557)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by SAF_The_Legend-FreePalestine(7) (U5768)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by ★★JustAnotherPoster★★ (U10557)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by SAF_The_Legend-FreePalestine(7) (U5768)
posted 30 seconds ago
Im sure the world was abuzz with talk of the Chelsea Hull game....
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you do know that chelsea game was more balanced than to your one sided boring game
----------------------------------------------------------------------

you do know that United play in red usually...

Sorry I just thought I would copy you and post something that had very little relation to the post I replied too...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Makes no sense ..try again
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Neither did yours in reference to what I wrote... so you try again first

comment by SAF_The_Legend-FreePalestine(7) (U5768)
posted 42 seconds ago
comment by ★★JustAnotherPoster★★ (U10557)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by SAF_The_Legend-FreePalestine(7) (U5768)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by ★★JustAnotherPoster★★ (U10557)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by SAF_The_Legend-FreePalestine(7) (U5768)
posted 30 seconds ago
Im sure the world was abuzz with talk of the Chelsea Hull game....
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you do know that chelsea game was more balanced than to your one sided boring game
----------------------------------------------------------------------

you do know that United play in red usually...

Sorry I just thought I would copy you and post something that had very little relation to the post I replied too...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Makes no sense ..try again
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Neither did yours in reference to what I wrote... so you try again first
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As i wrote earlier your views are bent. .stick to your discussion

Not at all SAF, I have not said you posting on a subject makes it important to you, your persistence with the subject gives that impression.

It's an opinion based on what I can see.

Responding to you is what I regard as basic manners. Like I said my comment was generic, you replied to me and we have had an exchange, like you said this is a forum.

You made your point that this is an unimportant discussion to you, I guess the only way to prove that is to male this my last post on this particular matter, I have nothing to add or any further agenda anyhow,

comment by Superb (U6486) 
posted 1 minute ago
SAF surely your view that Sky didn't mention the Skrtel stamp at all after the game simply because he doesn't have as high a profile as Costa is a conspiracy theory in itself.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Why would that be a conspiracy theory?

It is widely known and accepted that news companies want to sell/attract viewers and to do so they pick the bigger stories.

Obviously I can't talk for all news companies ever but the vast majority are all about sales/viewers...

TBH to state otherwise would probably be the conspiracy theory!

------------------------------------------------

But to suggest that Sky neglected to even mention Skrtel once after he had committed exactly the same offence that they had so thoroughly castigated Costa for just because Skrtel is a slightly lesser name is by definition a conspiracy theory.

You are putting forward a theory that involves individuals supposedly conspiring in some way so therefore what you are proposing is a conspiracy theory.

You might not like the fact that it's a conspiracy theory but it is by definition exactly that.

comment by ★★JustAnotherPoster★★ (U10557)
posted 45 seconds ago
comment by SAF_The_Legend-FreePalestine(7) (U5768)
posted 42 seconds ago
comment by ★★JustAnotherPoster★★ (U10557)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by SAF_The_Legend-FreePalestine(7) (U5768)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by ★★JustAnotherPoster★★ (U10557)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by SAF_The_Legend-FreePalestine(7) (U5768)
posted 30 seconds ago
Im sure the world was abuzz with talk of the Chelsea Hull game....
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you do know that chelsea game was more balanced than to your one sided boring game
----------------------------------------------------------------------

you do know that United play in red usually...

Sorry I just thought I would copy you and post something that had very little relation to the post I replied too...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Makes no sense ..try again
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Neither did yours in reference to what I wrote... so you try again first
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As i wrote earlier your views are bent. .stick to your discussion
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well that is sweet of you but if you don't want to converse with me I would suggest that not replying to my posts would be an excellent start

comment by SAF_The_Legend-FreePalestine(7) (U5768)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by ★★JustAnotherPoster★★ (U10557)
posted 45 seconds ago
comment by SAF_The_Legend-FreePalestine(7) (U5768)
posted 42 seconds ago
comment by ★★JustAnotherPoster★★ (U10557)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by SAF_The_Legend-FreePalestine(7) (U5768)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by ★★JustAnotherPoster★★ (U10557)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by SAF_The_Legend-FreePalestine(7) (U5768)
posted 30 seconds ago
Im sure the world was abuzz with talk of the Chelsea Hull game....
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you do know that chelsea game was more balanced than to your one sided boring game
----------------------------------------------------------------------

you do know that United play in red usually...

Sorry I just thought I would copy you and post something that had very little relation to the post I replied too...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Makes no sense ..try again
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Neither did yours in reference to what I wrote... so you try again first
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As i wrote earlier your views are bent. .stick to your discussion
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well that is sweet of you but if you don't want to converse with me I would suggest that not replying to my posts would be an excellent start
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sorry but i cant change that

But to suggest that Sky neglected to even mention Skrtel once after he had committed exactly the same offence that they had so thoroughly castigated Costa for just because Skrtel is a slightly lesser name is by definition a conspiracy theory.
....................................................

Actually wouldn't that be a fact rather than a conspiracy theory?

If they didn't mention Skrtel's stamp, then them not mentioning Skrtel's stamp is a fact, not a conspiracy.

Saying they didn't mention Skrtel's stamp because Sky is secretly in cahoots with Liverpool would be a conspiracy theory.

...................................................
You are putting forward a theory that involves individuals supposedly conspiring in some way so therefore what you are proposing is a conspiracy theory.
................................................

No conspiring or secrecy required really, papers and news stations just put up what sells...

To make it a conspiracy you would need various editors say or various owners of these media to meet up together and decide that they were going to put extra focus on Costa's stamp and none at all on Skrtel's even though the public want to see it...

Attracting as many viewers as possible isn't a conspiracy, its their whole aim, every year they will tell their shareholders how they hope to attract even more viewers, it isn't really a conspiracy when its your reason for being and is public knowledge...

Next you'll be telling me its a conspiracy to say companies want to make money, it's their reason for being...

comment by ★★JustAnotherPoster★★ (U10557)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by SAF_The_Legend-FreePalestine(7) (U5768)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by ★★JustAnotherPoster★★ (U10557)
posted 45 seconds ago
comment by SAF_The_Legend-FreePalestine(7) (U5768)
posted 42 seconds ago
comment by ★★JustAnotherPoster★★ (U10557)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by SAF_The_Legend-FreePalestine(7) (U5768)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by ★★JustAnotherPoster★★ (U10557)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by SAF_The_Legend-FreePalestine(7) (U5768)
posted 30 seconds ago
Im sure the world was abuzz with talk of the Chelsea Hull game....
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you do know that chelsea game was more balanced than to your one sided boring game
----------------------------------------------------------------------

you do know that United play in red usually...

Sorry I just thought I would copy you and post something that had very little relation to the post I replied too...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Makes no sense ..try again
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Neither did yours in reference to what I wrote... so you try again first
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As i wrote earlier your views are bent. .stick to your discussion
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well that is sweet of you but if you don't want to converse with me I would suggest that not replying to my posts would be an excellent start
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sorry but i cant change that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you find yourself unable to not hit the reply button then you have my sympathy.... maybe try looking at a different site for a second and see if the problem has gone when you come back....

comment by SAF_The_Legend-FreePalestine(7) (U5768)
posted 6 seconds ago
But to suggest that Sky neglected to even mention Skrtel once after he had committed exactly the same offence that they had so thoroughly castigated Costa for just because Skrtel is a slightly lesser name is by definition a conspiracy theory.
....................................................

Actually wouldn't that be a fact rather than a conspiracy theory?

If they didn't mention Skrtel's stamp, then them not mentioning Skrtel's stamp is a fact, not a conspiracy.

Saying they didn't mention Skrtel's stamp because Sky is secretly in cahoots with Liverpool would be a conspiracy theory.

...................................................
You are putting forward a theory that involves individuals supposedly conspiring in some way so therefore what you are proposing is a conspiracy theory.
................................................

No conspiring or secrecy required really, papers and news stations just put up what sells...

To make it a conspiracy you would need various editors say or various owners of these media to meet up together and decide that they were going to put extra focus on Costa's stamp and none at all on Skrtel's even though the public want to see it...

Attracting as many viewers as possible isn't a conspiracy, its their whole aim, every year they will tell their shareholders how they hope to attract even more viewers, it isn't really a conspiracy when its your reason for being and is public knowledge...

Next you'll be telling me its a conspiracy to say companies want to make money, it's their reason for being...

----------------------------------------------------------------------
What a load of bollarky it is ..cant even work it out what point you are trying to make.

http://www.anorak.co.uk/416110/sports/compare-and-contrast-liverpools-sorry-gerrard-to-chelseas-filthy-foreigner-diego-costa.html/?

comment by SAF_The_Legend-FreePalestine(7) (U5768)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by ★★JustAnotherPoster★★ (U10557)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by SAF_The_Legend-FreePalestine(7) (U5768)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by ★★JustAnotherPoster★★ (U10557)
posted 45 seconds ago
comment by SAF_The_Legend-FreePalestine(7) (U5768)
posted 42 seconds ago
comment by ★★JustAnotherPoster★★ (U10557)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by SAF_The_Legend-FreePalestine(7) (U5768)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by ★★JustAnotherPoster★★ (U10557)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by SAF_The_Legend-FreePalestine(7) (U5768)
posted 30 seconds ago
Im sure the world was abuzz with talk of the Chelsea Hull game....
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you do know that chelsea game was more balanced than to your one sided boring game
----------------------------------------------------------------------

you do know that United play in red usually...

Sorry I just thought I would copy you and post something that had very little relation to the post I replied too...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Makes no sense ..try again
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Neither did yours in reference to what I wrote... so you try again first
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As i wrote earlier your views are bent. .stick to your discussion
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well that is sweet of you but if you don't want to converse with me I would suggest that not replying to my posts would be an excellent start
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sorry but i cant change that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you find yourself unable to not hit the reply button then you have my sympathy.... maybe try looking at a different site for a second and see if the problem has gone when you come back....
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You make no sense to me with your philosophical approach

comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 10 minutes ago
Not at all SAF, I have not said you posting on a subject makes it important to you, your persistence with the subject gives that impression.

It's an opinion based on what I can see.

Responding to you is what I regard as basic manners. Like I said my comment was generic, you replied to me and we have had an exchange, like you said this is a forum.

You made your point that this is an unimportant discussion to you, I guess the only way to prove that is to male this my last post on this particular matter, I have nothing to add or any further agenda anyhow,
----------------------------------------------------------------------

JFDI well that completely contradicts your posts from earlier where you twice asked me why it is so important to me and then when I said it isn't you disagreed based on me posting about the subject...

Well either that or you think you were reading my brain, as that seems unlikely you can only have deemed the subject to be important to me, despite my denial, because I was posting on the subject.

I think you have come to the realisation that even you yourself can post on things which don't have a huge importance to you in much the same way almost every other forum member does.

What a load of bollarky it is ..cant even work it out what point you are trying to make.
........................................

Its hard to make it much more simple for you J A P....

Business like money.

TV news business viewers = money

So, more viewers = more money.

So, bigger story = more viewers.

Lastly, using the above equations we get....

bigger story = more money

and we remember that businesses like money.

So to say its a conspiracy theory that news media would focus on the bigger story is rubbish.

They are a business, a business aim is to make money.

Thus a business trying to make money isn't really conspiratorial, its the norm.

comment by SAF_The_Legend-FreePalestine(7) (U5768)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 10 minutes ago
Not at all SAF, I have not said you posting on a subject makes it important to you, your persistence with the subject gives that impression.

It's an opinion based on what I can see.

Responding to you is what I regard as basic manners. Like I said my comment was generic, you replied to me and we have had an exchange, like you said this is a forum.

You made your point that this is an unimportant discussion to you, I guess the only way to prove that is to male this my last post on this particular matter, I have nothing to add or any further agenda anyhow,
----------------------------------------------------------------------

JFDI well that completely contradicts your posts from earlier where you twice asked me why it is so important to me and then when I said it isn't you disagreed based on me posting about the subject...

Well either that or you think you were reading my brain, as that seems unlikely you can only have deemed the subject to be important to me, despite my denial, because I was posting on the subject.

I think you have come to the realisation that even you yourself can post on things which don't have a huge importance to you in much the same way almost every other forum member does.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh my farkin Lord this guy is either ret.rd or pretending to be one.

So you think you are the god send on this forum with the views which cant be contradicted and other members are just imbecile worms crowding here

marmite

comment by ★★JustAnotherPoster★★ (U10557)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by SAF_The_Legend-FreePalestine(7) (U5768)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 10 minutes ago
Not at all SAF, I have not said you posting on a subject makes it important to you, your persistence with the subject gives that impression.

It's an opinion based on what I can see.

Responding to you is what I regard as basic manners. Like I said my comment was generic, you replied to me and we have had an exchange, like you said this is a forum.

You made your point that this is an unimportant discussion to you, I guess the only way to prove that is to male this my last post on this particular matter, I have nothing to add or any further agenda anyhow,
----------------------------------------------------------------------

JFDI well that completely contradicts your posts from earlier where you twice asked me why it is so important to me and then when I said it isn't you disagreed based on me posting about the subject...

Well either that or you think you were reading my brain, as that seems unlikely you can only have deemed the subject to be important to me, despite my denial, because I was posting on the subject.

I think you have come to the realisation that even you yourself can post on things which don't have a huge importance to you in much the same way almost every other forum member does.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh my farkin Lord this guy is either ret.rd or pretending to be one.

So you think you are the god send on this forum with the views which cant be contradicted and other members are just imbecile worms crowding here

marmite
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And its a compliment

For me this place is like a pub where i can enjoy banter with other people so dont take any offence

JFDI you were the one trying to tell me how important a subject was to me, whilst I was trying to explain to you you were wrong.

If there is anyone with an ego it is you telling people what they are thinking when they are clearly telling you you are wrong. Its not difficult and its not hard, I know myself and what I am thinking far far better than you do.

Only someone with some kind of massive ego would suggest they can read someone better than they can read themselves based off a few forum posts.

To make it a conspiracy you would need various editors say or various owners of these media to meet up together and decide that they were going to put extra focus on Costa's stamp and none at all on Skrtel's even though the public want to see it...

--------------------------------

But you're saying that Sky have purposely avoided even mentioning the Skrtel incident precisely because he is a less interesting name than Costa.

If that's the case then it involves a conscious attempt for the producers and the pundits on Sky to do that. They are by definition conspiring not to mention Skrtel at all simply on the basis that he is a lesser name than Costa. According to you anyway.

What you are insinuating here is therefore by definition a conspiracy theory and you can try and run away from that all you like but that's what it is.

So while I understand the conspiracy theory that you're putting forward I don't agree with it at all.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Sideshow (U11809)
posted 7 minutes ago
I think you have come to the realisation that even you yourself can post on things which don't have a huge importance to you in much the same way almost every other forum member does.
-----
You can't prove that as you've just mentioned
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hence "I think" because unlike JFDI I do not have brain reading powers....

But you're saying that Sky have purposely avoided even mentioning the Skrtel incident precisely because he is a less interesting name than Costa.
...................................................

Not really, in the same way random groups of blokes talking about football won't conspire to talk about the bigger stories and not the smaller ones, it is just what naturally happens.

..............................................
If that's the case then it involves a conscious attempt for the producers and the pundits on Sky to do that. They are by definition conspiring not to mention Skrtel at all simply on the basis that he is a lesser name than Costa. According to you anyway.
..................................................

It doesn't require any kind of conspiracy, you talk about the biggest stories because they are the ones of interest...

The same reason the national news doesn't care about some local girl winning a swimming competition, they don't conspire to keep the small unimportant story out of the news.

........................................
What you are insinuating here is therefore by definition a conspiracy theory and you can try and run away from that all you like but that's what it is.
.......................................

Not at all, bigger stories will always get more coverage without any need for conspiring involved. What you are describing is just the normal workings of a business no matter how much you try to run away from it....

...............................................
So while I understand the conspiracy theory that you're putting forward I don't agree with it at all.
..............................................

Then might I suggest reading Adam Smith or some other economist, it's no conspiracy, companies just like making money....