Comment deleted by Site Moderator
You know we don't do receipts after your last two purchases from us.
its fun watching Brendan eat his own Lies
Knotty
Do we need him? No, we don't need another overhyped english player that thinks he's already gods gift for scoring 10 goals in a season. Willian is fine, Does the job.
Plus Cuadrado hasnt even been given a real go yet.
The thing is ,do Liverpool want him now !
No No No,
If he was a few years older and had proven he can do it year in year out then yes.
But what £60m, £70m for a 20yr old who although talented isnt exactly Messi
you wouldn't die without him, but he'd improve your first XI
slightly larger than average fish in a small pond
Don't need him
comment by The Kaiser's Trainers (U5676)
posted 59 seconds ago
you wouldn't die without him, but he'd improve your first XI
----------------------------------------------------------------------
agreed, but for that money we can make better improvements in more needed positions
fair comment
age is another consideration
he's still in nappies and good enough to be a starter in a top club
you'd get at least 8 years of quality assuming he doesn't regress
if he improves it would look like the deal of the century
It's a hell of a lot for a 20 year old. He could turn into a world beater but then again he might be the next Shaun Wright Phillips.
With a hundred grand a week ( or more ) I think that I might regress a bit !
If I was on £100+k a week I'd be dead or 20 stone
probably both
is he work horse though?
Will he run up and down the wing all day covering the right back.
comment by White Wall (U1078)
posted 1 minute ago
is he work horse though?
Will he run up and down the wing all day covering the right back.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No chance.
Not gonna get into Jose's 1st 11 then.
Even Hazard has to put in a defensive shift.
Right price and right wages then maybe, but not certain what he brings over the likes of Willian and Quadrado, even has a striking resemblance to Salah so how well he would do in our squad i have no idea. Anything over 30million is too much and can be spent in other areas. Honestly if we are talking 60+ million i would rather have a punt at Bale.
You want tracking back.
Forget Bale FFS
Remember Lampard was overpriced way back in the way back.
I'd take Sterling instantly
sterling's played wingback a fair few times for us and no one has ever accused him of shirking defensive responsibility
can't see that being something used against him
At stupid money TCP i would rather have Bale, Sterling is barely worth 30million
Tell me. How much is Bale being paid weekly
Just looked. 300 smackers a week apparently
Sign in if you want to comment
Sterling ...............
Page 1 of 5
posted on 1/4/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 1/4/15
You know we don't do receipts after your last two purchases from us.
posted on 1/4/15
Knotty ...
posted on 1/4/15
its fun watching Brendan eat his own Lies
posted on 1/4/15
Knotty
Do we need him? No, we don't need another overhyped english player that thinks he's already gods gift for scoring 10 goals in a season. Willian is fine, Does the job.
posted on 1/4/15
Plus Cuadrado hasnt even been given a real go yet.
posted on 1/4/15
The thing is ,do Liverpool want him now !
posted on 1/4/15
No No No,
If he was a few years older and had proven he can do it year in year out then yes.
But what £60m, £70m for a 20yr old who although talented isnt exactly Messi
posted on 1/4/15
you wouldn't die without him, but he'd improve your first XI
posted on 1/4/15
slightly larger than average fish in a small pond
Don't need him
posted on 1/4/15
comment by The Kaiser's Trainers (U5676)
posted 59 seconds ago
you wouldn't die without him, but he'd improve your first XI
----------------------------------------------------------------------
agreed, but for that money we can make better improvements in more needed positions
posted on 1/4/15
fair comment
age is another consideration
he's still in nappies and good enough to be a starter in a top club
you'd get at least 8 years of quality assuming he doesn't regress
if he improves it would look like the deal of the century
posted on 1/4/15
It's a hell of a lot for a 20 year old. He could turn into a world beater but then again he might be the next Shaun Wright Phillips.
posted on 1/4/15
With a hundred grand a week ( or more ) I think that I might regress a bit !
posted on 1/4/15
If I was on £100+k a week I'd be dead or 20 stone
probably both
posted on 1/4/15
is he work horse though?
Will he run up and down the wing all day covering the right back.
posted on 1/4/15
comment by White Wall (U1078)
posted 1 minute ago
is he work horse though?
Will he run up and down the wing all day covering the right back.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No chance.
posted on 1/4/15
Not gonna get into Jose's 1st 11 then.
Even Hazard has to put in a defensive shift.
posted on 1/4/15
Right price and right wages then maybe, but not certain what he brings over the likes of Willian and Quadrado, even has a striking resemblance to Salah so how well he would do in our squad i have no idea. Anything over 30million is too much and can be spent in other areas. Honestly if we are talking 60+ million i would rather have a punt at Bale.
posted on 1/4/15
You want tracking back.
Forget Bale FFS
posted on 1/4/15
Remember Lampard was overpriced way back in the way back.
I'd take Sterling instantly
posted on 1/4/15
sterling's played wingback a fair few times for us and no one has ever accused him of shirking defensive responsibility
can't see that being something used against him
posted on 1/4/15
At stupid money TCP i would rather have Bale, Sterling is barely worth 30million
posted on 1/4/15
Tell me. How much is Bale being paid weekly
posted on 1/4/15
Just looked. 300 smackers a week apparently
Page 1 of 5